Conflict Competency: Moving From Avoidance to Opportunity May 22, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

conflict competency moving from avoidance to opportunity
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Conflict Competency: Moving From Avoidance to Opportunity May 22, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Conflict Competency: Moving From Avoidance to Opportunity May 22, 2018 Hope is Not a Strategy Conflict is commonly perceived as unpleasant and unwelcome. As a result, we avoid or ignore it. Unfortunately, unaddressed conflict


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Conflict Competency: Moving From Avoidance to Opportunity

May 22, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Hope is Not a Strategy

  • Conflict is commonly perceived as

unpleasant and unwelcome.

  • As a result, we avoid or ignore it.
  • Unfortunately, unaddressed conflict

rarely disappears.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Conflict Can Be Costly

Research shows that even low levels of disruptive behavior in the workplace impact performance:

  • 38% intentionally decreased work quality
  • 47% intentionally decreased time at work
  • 48% intentionally decreased work effort
  • 66% said their performance declined
  • 78% said that their commitment to the organization declined
  • 80% lost time worrying about the issue.
  • Managing Difficult Employees and Disruptive Behaviors, Teresa A. Daniel, SHRM

Online (April 2012).

slide-4
SLIDE 4

What Causes Conflict

  • In a word, DIFFERENCES.
  • But not necessarily substantive differences.

Differences in values, interests, perception, and communication style can all contribute to

  • conflict. Layer on differences in lived

experience, social identities, cultural affinities, and personal abilities, and we have an environment in which conflict is inescapable.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

And Then There’s Email…

  • Use of communication technologies is

associated with reduced adherence to social norms.

– Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 321–

  • 326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
  • Emails or texts also provide fewer

nonverbal cues and no instant feedback to assist the reader.

– Byron, K. (2008). Carrying too heavy a load? The communication and miscommunication of emotion by e-mail. The Academy of Management Review, 33, 309–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.31193163

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Reframing Conflict

  • The tension of difference is a necessary part
  • f human interaction. Accepting conflict as a

functional part of our relationships allows us to better see our differences as an

  • pportunity for growth and learning, rather

than the source of discomfort and awkwardness.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Common Sources of Workplace Conflict

  • Stress
  • Excessive Workload
  • Differences in VIPS
  • Scarce Resources
  • Personality Clashes
  • Hurtful Humor/Sarcasm
  • Poor Communication
  • Fear of Change
  • Disrespectful Behavior
  • Gossip
  • Poor Performance
  • Passive Aggression
  • Ingrained Behaviors
  • Lack of Recognition
  • Inadequate Training
  • Cultural Differences
  • Ineffective Leadership
  • Inconsistency
  • Non-Constructive

Criticism

slide-8
SLIDE 8

What stops us from addressing conflict effectively?

  • Discomfort with difficult conversations
  • Lack of training/preparation
  • Role modeling/workplace norms
  • Our own needs/motivations/self-confidence
  • The perception that it is not “our”

responsibility

  • Fear

– Not being taken seriously – Being blamed for “making trouble” – Hurting someone’s feelings – Retaliation

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Deconstructing Conflict

Adapted from Patterson, K., Grenny, J., Maxfield, D., McMillan R., & Switzler, A. (2013). Crucial Accountability. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

See & Hear Narrative Feeling Action

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Effective Responses to Conflict

  • Active Listening/Perspective Taking
  • Reflective Thinking
  • Delayed Response
  • Respectful Language
  • Expressing and Recognizing Emotions
  • Assertive/Non-Reactive Statements
slide-11
SLIDE 11

A Practical Approach to Addressing Conflict

  • Ask yourself:
  • 1. What really happened? Am I seeing the

situation objectively?

  • 2. What was my role in what happened?
  • 3. Is it worth my attention?
  • 4. What is the impact on my work/our work?
  • 5. What is my goal in the conversation?
  • 6. Am I prepared? When would be the best

time and place? What is my attitude?

  • 7. Should I seek assistance before addressing?
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Assertive, Non-Reactive Statements

  • I see, I feel, I hope & expect, I will….
  • When you…I feel…because….

In the future, it would be great if…. I wish that…. I will/will not….

  • I notice that…and I assume that…. Is that

true?

  • Why v. What, But v. And

You should v. I would like you to….

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Reading List

  • Patterson, K., Grenny, J., Maxfield, D., McMillan

R., & Switzler, A. (2013). Crucial Accountability. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

  • Sutton, Robert I. (2007). The No Asshole Rule.

New York, NY: Business Plus.

  • Mayer, Bernard. (2015). The Conflict Paradox.

San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Scenario 1

  • You’re working at your desk when Pat, a staff member who

reports to you, comes in visibly upset. Pat sits down and tells you that, during a team meeting, a fellow staff member spoke very disrespectfully, questioning Pat’s competence. Pat was embarrassed in front of coworkers and didn’t know what to say. Pat also emphasizes that this is not the first time this has happened, and that “everyone” knows that Morgan is a bully but nobody does anything about it. Pat wants this behavior to stop, but doesn’t want you to tell Morgan that Pat has complained. How would you respond to Pat? What next steps might you take? Would it make a difference if Morgan reported to someone other than you?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Scenario 2

  • There are two staff members that are constantly at odds. Mary

is extremely outgoing and occasionally fails to observe personal

  • boundaries. For example, she talks loudly, asks personal

questions and injects herself into conversations between others without an invitation. Susan is quiet and prefers to simply focus

  • n the work to be done. Each does very good substantive work,

and the unit wants to retain both. One day, Susan comes in and says that she’s had it – that unless Mary will shut up and leave her alone, she will quit. When you approach Mary, she says that she is just “being who she is,” and that she hasn’t done anything wrong – Susan just needs to not take things so

  • seriously. What might you as the supervisor do in this situation?
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Scenario 3

  • You have a colleague who, while quite competent, is not known

for tact and diplomacy. This person consistently sends “reply all” emails that include derogatory comments about colleagues, and behaves in ways others experience as disrespectful. When Jody has been approached about her behavior, she just says she doesn’t have time for whining. Jody emphasizes that she is not from Minnesota, and can’t stand the passive aggressive culture here. Multiple people have talked to the area director about Jody’s behavior, but she just says that people have to be able to get along. Recently, Jody’s wrath was targeted at an employee that you feel does very good work. This person has now told you he is considering leaving. You are not Jody’s

  • supervisor. Is there anything that you could/would do to try to

intervene?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Thank You

  • Julie Hagen Showers
  • Associate Vice President, Office for Equity and

Diversity

  • 432 Morrill Hall
  • 612-625-4068
  • showers@umn.edu