Tax Fraud: W hen is Tax Avoidance a Crim inal Offence? By Craig - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Tax Fraud: W hen is Tax Avoidance a Crim inal Offence? By Craig - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Tax Fraud: W hen is Tax Avoidance a Crim inal Offence? By Craig Elliffe 2 July 2 0 1 0 Tax Avoidance and Crim inal Acts The difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion is the thickness of a prison wall. Denis Healey, former
Tax Avoidance and Crim inal Acts
“The difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion is the thickness of a prison wall.” Denis Healey, former UK Chancellor of the Exchequer
Observations
Unfamiliar Area of law Recent Changes Cases
- Tax Advisors
- Tax Payers
- Crown/ SFO
- Hayes (2008)
- Changes to
statutes
- Misdirected
Focus on investors
Tax Avoidance and Crim inal Acts
- Com pany director jailed for tax evasion
Thursday, 01 July 2010 13: 55
- Evading tax of more than $700,000 has led to four years jail for
a Bay of Plenty labour hire company director.
- Harbhajan Singh Kahlon had been found guilty on 23 charges of
GST-related tax fraud and later admitted a further 46 charges of tax evasion involving PAYE. He was sentenced last Friday in the Tauranga District Court.
- Inland Revenue Assurance manager investigations Jonathan
Matthews says this sentence makes it crystal clear to others considering tax fraud and evasion, that they'd better think again.
- "We will catch them and there will be very serious
consequences," he says.
Clever Schem es and Crim inality
Criminal Offences
Section 143B Tax Administration Act “Knowingly providing false, incomplete or misleading information” Intending to evade the assessment of tax Obtaining a refund in the knowledge of no lawful entitlement
Section 228 Crimes Act “intent to obtain any... pecuniary advantage.. Dishonestly and without claim of right uses any document
Section 2 2 8 Crim es Act 1 9 6 1
Use of a document (tax return)
- To obtain a pecuniary advantage
With the intention to obtain property
- Through the dishonest use of the document
That the accused had no claim of right
Dishonestly, w ithout claim of right
Hayes v R (Supreme Court 2008) “belief” assessed without reference to reasonableness (Robin Hood) or honesty
Reasonableness
If belief was qualified by the word “honestly”- two problems
- Reasonableness: Genuine belief in
lawfulness even if unreasonable is not caught by section 228
Overcomes the problem of someone framing their own moral code
- Will impact on the evidentiary
credibility
Application of section 2 2 8
Tax return used To obtain a refund (pecuniary advantage) Did not believe entitled to a refund
Assessment of the facts to see if the taxpayer genuinely believed they were entitled to the claim (reasonable doubt that they had a mistaken belief)
Features of tax avoidance
Non- commerciality Concealment Artificiality Difference between legal and economic effects
Australian decision R v Pearce
Investors $10000 Servcom
$39000 (deducted)
MAGICA/ Allied Securities
$29000 Loan (NR)