Conejo Valley Unified School District Dr. Jennifer Boone Demograph - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
conejo valley unified school district dr jennifer boone
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Conejo Valley Unified School District Dr. Jennifer Boone Demograph - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nov 08, 2023 142 likes •366 views

Conejo Valley Unified School District Dr. Jennifer Boone Demograph raphics ics Other her Asian As African A n Amer erica can Hispani nic o c or Whit ite Latin ino Two o or More Enhance the Culture and Conditions that Optimize

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Conejo Valley Unified School District

  • Dr. Jennifer Boone
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Whit ite Two o

  • r More

Hispani nic o c or Latin ino African A n Amer erica can As Asian Other her

Demograph raphics ics

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Enhance the Culture and Conditions that Optimize Learning for all Students

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Maximize all students’ achievement through highly effective instruction that includes opportunities for academic acceleration and intervention

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Develop High Quality Activities That Engage Students With Their Schools

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Increase passing rates:
  • CAASPP
  • AP Exams
  • A-G requirements
  • 2.5 GPA or Higher
  • Maintain:
  • Fully credentialed and Highly Qualified Teachers
  • Staffing ratios
  • Maintain or exceed facilities standards on Facilities

Inspection Tool process

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Students scoring standard met or higher per the SMARTER Balanced Assessment in English Language Arts

Stu tudent G t Grou

  • up

2014-15 2015-16 Distric rict-Wid ide 64% 67% Low Incom

  • me

36% 39% Specia ial E l Educatio ion 18% 21% Englis lish L Learn rners 10% 13%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Students scoring standard met or higher per the Smarter Balanced Assessment in Mathematics

Stu tudent G t Grou

  • up

2014-15 2015-16 Distric rict-Wid ide 57% 58% Low Incom

  • me

26% 28% Specia ial E l Educatio ion 13% 14% Englis lish L Learn rners 12% 14%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Percentage of AP exams with a score of 3 or higher

Stu tudent G t Grou

  • up

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Distric rict-Wid ide 80.2% 78.5% 78.9% 78.1% Low Incom

  • me

71.8% 66.5% 71.9% 68.8% Specia ial E l Educatio ion 85.0% 66.7% 58.3% 70.0% Englis lish L Learn rners 73.3% 57.1% 75.0% 100.0%

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Students completing A-G requirements

Stu tudent G t Grou

  • up

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 District-Wide 50.3% 53.2% 57.2% 55.7% Low Income 14.5% 26.3% 27.0% 28.8% Special Education 4.0% 2.8% 6.1% 3.3% English Learners 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Students in grades 7-8 with a cumulative GPA of 2.5 or higher Students in grades 9-12 with a cumulative GPA of 2.5 or higher

Stud tudent G Group

  • up

201 2012-13 201 2013-14 201 2014-15 201 2015-16 District-Wide 79.9% 82.1% 82.3% 83.8% Low Income 55.6% 58.9% 62.9% 59.3% Special Education 70.5% 72.0% 69.0% 70.7% English Learners 47.1% 46.2% 26.3% 31.8% Stud tudent G Group

  • up

201 2012-13 201 2013-14 201 2014-15 201 2015-16 District-Wide 74.5% 78.1% 77.4% 77.9% Low Income 47.0% 51.5% 58.4% 58.6% Special Education 58.6% 62.7% 57.9% 67.3% English Learners 26.7% 32.4% 18.6% 31.3%

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Increase:
  • Enrollment in CP and H
  • 2.5 GPA or Higher
  • Pass rate on AP exams
  • EL growth and proficiency per the CELDT
  • EL reclassification
  • Grades 3-5 math benchmarks
  • Grades 3-5 SRI Lexile
  • HS graduation rate
  • Decrease HS dropout rate
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Students in grades 7-8 that were enrolled in CP or Honors courses Students in grades 9-12 that were enrolled in CP or Honors courses

CP o

  • r

r Hig igher Hon

  • nor
  • rs

St Stude dent Grou

  • up

2013 2013-14 2014 2014-15 2015 2015-16 2013 2013-14 2014 2014-15 2015 2015-16 District-Wide 90.2% 93.6% 94.5% 38.3% 42.8% 38.8% Low Income 73.1% 92.1% 92.9% 9.2% 12.0% 12.6% Special Education 38.9% 43.9% 50.2% 3.0% 2.1% 2.5% English Learners 60.8% 55.5% 73.0% 2.2% 2.4% 0.7%

CP P or H r Hig igher Honors rs/AP/ P/IB Stude udent G Group up 2013 2013-14 14 2014 2014-15 15 2015 2015-16 16 2013 2013-14 14 2014 2014-15 15 2015 2015-16 16 District-Wide 92.3% 93.8% 92.2% 43.0% 44.1% 44.8% Low Income 83.6% 96.3% 86.0% 17.4% 18.8% 18.2% Special Education 50.3% 54.5% 54.8% 5.3% 4.4% 6.1% English Learners 72.3% 49.1% 69.0% 3.9% 1.4% 6.2%

slide-15
SLIDE 15

EL S Stud udent nts 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Achieving one or more levels

  • f growth per the annual

CELDT 41.4% 48.7% 40.7% 45.9% Scoring proficient or higher per the CELDT 40.4% 38.9% 41.5% 43.7% Reclassified to Fluent English Proficient 13.3% 18.5% 17.3% 18.5%

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Graduation Rate (Grade 12) Annual Dropout Rate (Grades 9-12)

Stud tudent G Group

  • up

201 2012-13 201 2013-14 201 2014-15 201 2015-16 District-Wide 99.3% 99.0% 97.5% 98.1% Low Income 96.6% 97.1% 94.0% 95.0% Special Education 98.8% 97.5% 87.2% 94.1% English Learners 100% 84.6% 60.7% 70.6% Stud tudent G Group

  • up

201 2012-13 201 2013-14 201 2014-15 201 2015-16 District-Wide 0.55% 0.65% 0.63% 0.35% Low Income 0.88% 1.86% 1.56% 0.89% Special Education 0.45% 1.03% 1.19% 0.15% English Learners 0.0% 6.31% 1.81% 4.04%

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Increase:
  • Student Connectedness Rate
  • HS graduation rate
  • Decrease:
  • HS dropout rate
  • Suspension rate
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Student Connectedness Rate

Stu tudent G t Grou

  • up

2011-12 2013-14 2015-16 7th

th Grade

93% 94% 96% 11th

th Grade

91% 92% 94%

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Student Suspension Rate

Stu tudent G t Grou

  • up

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Distric rict-Wid ide 2.60% 2.59% 2.00% 1.72% Low Incom

  • me

5.80% 4.29% 4.34% 3.88% Specia ial E l Educatio ion 6.37% 7.02% 6.40% 5.62% Englis lish L Learn rners 5.68% 3.99% 2.05% 2.03%

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Students Suspended Multiple Times

Stu tudent G t Grou

  • up

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Distric rict-Wid ide 0.64% 0.54% 0.68% 0.37% Low Incom

  • me

1.59% 0.93% 1.64% 0.95% Specia ial E l Educatio ion 1.87% 2.49% 2.68% 1.91% Englis lish L Learn rners 1.30% 0.73% 0.76% 2.03%

slide-21
SLIDE 21