conditional quantiles with functional covariates an
play

Conditional quantiles with functional covariates: an application to - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Conditional quantiles with functional covariates: an application to Ozone pollution forecasting Herv Cardot, Christophe Crambes & Pascal Sarda Compstat - Prague August 2004 Compstat 2004 - Prague p.1/14 Presentation of the data (1)


  1. Conditional quantiles with functional covariates: an application to Ozone pollution forecasting Hervé Cardot, Christophe Crambes & Pascal Sarda Compstat - Prague August 2004 Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.1/14

  2. Presentation of the data (1) Data (ORAMIP) : Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.2/14

  3. Presentation of the data (1) Data (ORAMIP) : � 9 variables : NO, N 2 , O 3 , WD, WS, . . . (hourly measurements) Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.2/14

  4. Presentation of the data (1) Data (ORAMIP) : � 9 variables : NO, N 2 , O 3 , WD, WS, . . . (hourly measurements) � 6 stations Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.2/14

  5. Presentation of the data (1) Data (ORAMIP) : � 9 variables : NO, N 2 , O 3 , WD, WS, . . . (hourly measurements) � 6 stations � 4 years : 1997 − 2000 ( 15 th May - 15 th Sept) Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.2/14

  6. Presentation of the data (2) 120 100 80 Ozone 60 40 20 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 hours Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.3/14

  7. Presentation of the data (3) Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.4/14

  8. Presentation of the data (3) � variable of interest : max of O 3 every day: Y = t ( Y 1 , . . . , Y n ) Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.4/14

  9. Presentation of the data (3) � variable of interest : max of O 3 every day: Y = t ( Y 1 , . . . , Y n ) � covariates : NO, N 2 , O 3 , DV or V V : 18h . . . 24h 1h . . . 17h day 0/day 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . X 1 , 1 X 1 , 24 . . . . . . . . . day n − 1 /day n X n, 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . X n, 24 Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.4/14

  10. Presentation of the data (3) � variable of interest : max of O 3 every day: Y = t ( Y 1 , . . . , Y n ) � covariates : NO, N 2 , O 3 , DV or V V : 18h . . . 24h 1h . . . 17h day 0/day 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . X 1 , 1 X 1 , 24 . . . . . . . . . day n − 1 /day n X n, 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . X n, 24 � ( X i , Y i ) i =1 ,...,n couples of random variables with Y i ∈ R and X i ∈ L 2 ( I ) Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.4/14

  11. Presentation of the data (3) � variable of interest : max of O 3 every day: Y = t ( Y 1 , . . . , Y n ) � covariates : NO, N 2 , O 3 , DV or V V : 18h . . . 24h 1h . . . 17h day 0/day 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . X 1 , 1 X 1 , 24 . . . . . . . . . day n − 1 /day n X n, 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . X n, 24 � ( X i , Y i ) i =1 ,...,n couples of random variables with Y i ∈ R and X i ∈ L 2 ( I ) � X i is known in t 1 , . . . , t p ∈ I (equispaced) Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.4/14

  12. Definition of the conditional quantiles Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.5/14

  13. Definition of the conditional quantiles � α ∈ ]0 , 1[ , x ∈ L 2 ( I ) Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.5/14

  14. Definition of the conditional quantiles � α ∈ ]0 , 1[ , x ∈ L 2 ( I ) � α conditional quantile : P ( Y ≤ g α ( X ) | X = x ) = α Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.5/14

  15. Definition of the conditional quantiles � α ∈ ]0 , 1[ , x ∈ L 2 ( I ) � α conditional quantile : P ( Y ≤ g α ( X ) | X = x ) = α � property : g α ( x ) = arg min a ∈ R E ( l α ( Y − a ) | X = x ) with l α ( u ) = | u | + (2 α − 1) u Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.5/14

  16. Presentation of the model Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.6/14

  17. Presentation of the model � model (cf. Koenker and Bassett, 1978) : � g α ( X ) = c + � Ψ α , X � = c + Ψ α ( t ) X ( t ) dt I Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.6/14

  18. Presentation of the model � model (cf. Koenker and Bassett, 1978) : � g α ( X ) = c + � Ψ α , X � = c + Ψ α ( t ) X ( t ) dt I � we want to estimate the function Ψ α ∈ L 2 ( I ) : spline estimation Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.6/14

  19. Spline estimation of Ψ α Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.7/14

  20. Spline estimation of Ψ α k ∈ N ⋆ , q ∈ N Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.7/14

  21. Spline estimation of Ψ α k ∈ N ⋆ , q ∈ N interval I I j I 1 I k k sub−intervals Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.7/14

  22. Spline estimation of Ψ α k ∈ N ⋆ , q ∈ N t ( B 1 , . . . , B k + q ) B -splines basis B k , q = Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.7/14

  23. Spline estimation of Ψ α k ∈ N ⋆ , q ∈ N t ( B 1 , . . . , B k + q ) B -splines basis B k , q = k + q � t B k , q � � estimator : � Ψ α = θ = θ j B j j =1 Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.7/14

  24. Spline estimation of Ψ α k ∈ N ⋆ , q ∈ N t ( B 1 , . . . , B k + q ) B -splines basis B k , q = k + q � t B k , q � � estimator : � Ψ α = θ = θ j B j j =1 Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.7/14

  25. c and � Determination of � θ Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.8/14

  26. c and � Determination of � θ � � θ and � c solution of the minimisation problem : � 1 n � l α ( Y i − c − � t B k , q θ , X i � ) + ρ � ( t B k , q θ ) ( m ) � 2 � min n θ ∈ R k + q i =1 Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.8/14

  27. c and � Determination of � θ � � θ and � c solution of the minimisation problem : � 1 n � l α ( Y i − c − � t B k , q θ , X i � ) + ρ � ( t B k , q θ ) ( m ) � 2 � min n θ ∈ R k + q i =1 empirical version of E ( l α ( Y − c − � s, X � )) Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.8/14

  28. c and � Determination of � θ � � θ and � c solution of the minimisation problem : � 1 n � l α ( Y i − c − � t B k , q θ , X i � ) + ρ � ( t B k , q θ ) ( m ) � 2 � min n θ ∈ R k + q i =1 penalization Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.8/14

  29. c and � Determination of � θ � � θ and � c solution of the minimisation problem : � 1 n � l α ( Y i − c − � t B k , q θ , X i � ) + ρ � ( t B k , q θ ) ( m ) � 2 � min n θ ∈ R k + q i =1 � no explicit solution Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.8/14

  30. c and � Determination of � θ � � θ and � c solution of the minimisation problem : � 1 n � l α ( Y i − c − � t B k , q θ , X i � ) + ρ � ( t B k , q θ ) ( m ) � 2 � min n θ ∈ R k + q i =1 � no explicit solution � algorithm : Iterative Reweighted Least Squares Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.8/14

  31. Multiple conditional quantiles Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.9/14

  32. Multiple conditional quantiles � v covariates X 1 , . . . , X v Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.9/14

  33. Multiple conditional quantiles � v covariates X 1 , . . . , X v � model : g α ( X 1 , . . . , X v ) � � Ψ 1 α ( t ) X 1 ( t ) dt + . . . + Ψ v α ( t ) X v ( t ) dt = c + I I Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.9/14

  34. Multiple conditional quantiles � v covariates X 1 , . . . , X v � model : g α ( X 1 , . . . , X v ) � � Ψ 1 α ( t ) X 1 ( t ) dt + . . . + Ψ v α ( t ) X v ( t ) dt = c + I I � algorithm : backfitting + Iterative Reweighted Least Squares Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.9/14

  35. Application to the pollution data Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.10/14

  36. Application to the pollution data � learning sample : ( X l i , Y l i ) i =1 ,...,n learn � test sample : ( X t i , Y t i ) i =1 ,...,n test Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.10/14

  37. Application to the pollution data � learning sample : ( X l i , Y l i ) i =1 ,...,n learn � test sample : ( X t i , Y t i ) i =1 ,...,n test � number of knots : k = 8 (equispaced) � degree of splines functions : q = 3 � order of derivation in the penalization : m = 2 Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.10/14

  38. Application to the pollution data � learning sample : ( X l i , Y l i ) i =1 ,...,n learn � test sample : ( X t i , Y t i ) i =1 ,...,n test � number of knots : k = 8 (equispaced) � degree of splines functions : q = 3 � order of derivation in the penalization : m = 2 � choice of ρ : Generalized Cross Validation Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.10/14

  39. Quality criteria of the models Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.11/14

  40. Quality criteria of the models � n t i =1 ( Y t i − � 1 Y t i ) 2 n t C 1 = � n t 1 i =1 ( Y t i − Y l ) 2 n t Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.11/14

  41. Quality criteria of the models � n t i =1 ( Y t i − � 1 Y t i ) 2 n t C 1 = � n t 1 i =1 ( Y t i − Y l ) 2 n t n t � C 2 = 1 | Y t i − � Y t i | n t i =1 Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.11/14

  42. Quality criteria of the models � n t i =1 ( Y t i − � 1 Y t i ) 2 n t C 1 = � n t 1 i =1 ( Y t i − Y l ) 2 n t n t � C 2 = 1 | Y t i − � Y t i | n t i =1 � n t i =1 l α ( Y t i − � 1 Y t i ) n t C 3 = � n t 1 i =1 l α ( Y t i − q α ( Y l )) n t Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.11/14

  43. Results (conditional median) Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.12/14

  44. Results (conditional median) Models Variables C 1 C 2 C 3 N2 0 . 814 16 . 916 0 . 906 1 covariate O3 0.414 12.246 0.656 WS 0 . 802 16 . 836 0 . 902 O3, NO 0 . 413 11 . 997 0 . 643 2 covariates 0 . 413 11 . 880 0 . 637 O3, N2 O3, WS 0 . 414 12 . 004 0 . 635 O3, NO, N2 0 . 412 12 . 127 0 . 644 3 covariates O3, N2, WD 0 . 409 12 . 004 0 . 645 O3, N2, WS 0 . 410 11 . 997 0 . 642 4 covariates O3, NO, N2, WS 0.400 11.718 0.634 5 covariates O3, NO, N2, WD, WS 0 . 401 11 . 750 0 . 639 Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.12/14

  45. Forecasting (conditional median) Compstat 2004 - Prague – p.13/14

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend