Concepts to Assessment Centres ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

concepts to
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Concepts to Assessment Centres ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introducing Employee Experience (EX) Concepts to Assessment Centres ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa Aim of presentation To introduce concepts that are used in optimising the employee/candidate experience to ACs,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Introducing Employee Experience (EX) Concepts to Assessment Centres

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Aim of presentation

To introduce concepts that are used in optimising the employee/candidate experience to ACs, focusing on: Identifying moments that matter, personalisation, NPS and design thinking to create an

  • ptimal

experience

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Overview of presentation

  • Why the focus on the

employee/candidate experience?

  • Definition of EX and CX
  • Key concepts and its

application in assessment centres

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Why the focus on the employee/candidate experience?

https://www.digitalhrtech.com/wider-employee-experience/ ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-5
SLIDE 5

It started here

James L. Heskett, W. Earl Sasser, Jr. and Leonard A. Schlesinger “The Service Profit Chain” 1997

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-6
SLIDE 6

People First Strategies

As one forward-thinking retail executive noted, “We used to prioritize our stakeholders as shareholders first, customers second, and employees third. We now realize we had it

  • backward. If we put employees first, they in turn take care of
  • ur customers, and they in turn take care of our

shareholders.”

The employee experience: Culture, engagement, and beyond. By Josh Bersin, Jason Flynn, Art Mazor, Veronica Melian https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/focus/human-capital-trends/2017/improving-the-employee-experience- culture-engagement.html

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Candidate/ Participant experience

The drivers for a focus on candidate engagement within an AC fell into three broad categories:

  • Maximising the chances of successful

participants accepting job offers

  • Making participants (either internal or

external) advocates of the process or

  • rganisation
  • Role modelling customer service
  • rientation for organisations where this is a

key value

  • The focus on candidate experience was

defined as more important for certain groups such as younger candidates and in certain sectors where “experience” is more

  • f a factor, such as in retail

International Perspective – current practices and future challenges by Nigel Povah, Philippa Riley and Jordon Jones in Assessment Centres: Unlocking People Potential for Growth, edited by Sandra Schlebusch and Gert Roodt. 2019.

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-8
SLIDE 8

EX: Why now? Some reasons

  • Greater focus on experiences
  • The changing world of work
  • Consumerisation of employees
  • Technology
  • Personalisation
  • Consistently low engagement

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Why experience?

  • Let’s hear what Jacob Morgan says….

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

It gets written about!

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The Business Case

What’s the difference between Employee Experience and Employee Engagement? February 13, 2018 by Carolyn Nevitte. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/whats-difference-between-employee-experience-carolyn-nevitte

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The business Case

  • Aon Hewitt 2015 Trends in Global

Employee Engagement: a 5% increase in employee engagement is linked to a 3% increase in revenue growth in the subsequent year.

  • Dale Carnegie Training uncovered that

companies with engaged employees

  • utperform those without by up to

202%.

  • PwC cited: Based on stock

performance, Wharton professor Alex Edmans determined that companies

  • n the Fortune list of “best companies

to work for” outperformed their peers by 2–3 percent per year.

  • In a whitepaper by Rutgers, A New

Framework of Employee Engagement, they note that: a meta-analysis of the financial performance of 1,979 business units in ten companies found that business units that score above the database median on both employee and customer engagement metrics were, on average, 3.4 times more effective financially (in terms of total sales and revenue, performance to target, and year-over-year gain in sales and revenues) than units that rank in the bottom half on both measures.

  • CustomerThink shows that a 5 point

improvement in employee attitudes will drive a 1.3 point improvement in customer satisfaction, which in turn will drive a 0.5% improvement in revenue growth.

  • https://customerthink.com/the-business-case-

for-a-great-employee-experience/

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-14
SLIDE 14

How does candidate experience affect hiring?

According to a survey by CareerBuilder, faced with a bad candidate experience:

https://recruitingsocial.com/2016/03/what-is-candidate-experience/

42% of workers would never seek employment with a company again 22% would tell others not to work there 9% would tell others not to purchase products or services from the company

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-15
SLIDE 15

How does candidate experience affect hiring?

If they had a good candidate experience:

56% would consider seeking employment with the company again in the future 37% would tell others to seek employment there 23% would be more likely to purchase products or services from the company

https://recruitingsocial.com/2016/03/what-is-candidate-experience/

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Why the focus

  • n the

experience of assessments?

“Recent years have witnessed an emerging body of

research on candidate reactions to selection

  • processes. These reactions reflect how candidates

perceive and respond to selection tools (e.g., standardized tests, interviews, situational judgment tests) and include feelings of anxiety, levels of motivation, belief in tests, levels of self-efficacy, and perceptions of fairness and justice (Ryan & Ployhart, 2000). Consideration of candidate reactions is crucial, as reactions have been found to have notable implications for scores on selection procedures, as well as for candidates’ subsequent attitudes and

  • intentions. For example, candidates with positive

reactions are more likely to be motivated during the selection process, perceive the organization as an attractive place to work, and recommend the

  • rganization to others (Hausknecht, Day, &

Thomas, 2004)”.

McCarthy JM, Van Iddekinge CH, Lievens F, Kung MC, Sinar EF, Campion MA. Do candidate reactions relate to job performance

  • r affect criterion-related validity? A multistudy investigation of

relations among reactions, selection test scores, and job

  • performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2013 Sep;98(5):701-
  • 19. doi: 10.1037/a0034089. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Applicant Perspectives in selection

Applicant Perspectives During Selection: A Review Addressing “So What?,” “What’s New?,” and “Where to Next?” Julie M. McCarthy, Talya N. Bauer, Donald M. Truxillo, Neil R. Anderson, Ana Cristina Costa, Sara M. Ahmed Journal of Management, Vol 43, Issue 6, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316681846

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Is the EX

  • ptimal?

Gartner Quarterly Update on Global Workforce Trends, June 12, 2019. Mary Baker. https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/gartner-quarterly-update-on-global-workforce- trends/ ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Is the CX optimal?

  • Great Experience: Increase the relationship
  • Poor Candidate Experience: sever the Relationship – The resentment factor

2019 EMEA (Europe, the Middle East & Africa) Candidate Experience Research Report. Talent Board and the Candidate Experience Awards (CandEs)

2016 2017 2018 2019 21% 20% 22% 23% 2016 2017 2018 2019 8% 11% 8% 12%

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Reasons why candidates withdraw from recruitment process

2019 EMEA (Europe, the Middle East & Africa) Candidate Experience Research Report. Talent Board and the Candidate Experience Awards (CandEs) ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Definition of the Candidate Experience

  • The perception of a job

seeker about an employer, based on the interaction during the complete recruitment

  • process. This includes all

points of contact during recruitment – job search, the application process, interview process and onboarding.

https://www.hrtechnologist.com/articles/ recruitment-onboarding/what-is- candidate-experience-definition- components-technology/

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Definition of EX

“The intersection of employee expectations, needs, and wants and the

  • rganizational design of

those expectations, needs, and wants” Or “designing an organization where people want to show up by focusing on the cultural, technological, and physical environments”

Sources: Jacob Morgan. What’s the Difference Between Employee Engagement and Experience? August 10, 2017. https://thefutureorganization.com/whats-difference-employee-engagement-experience/ Source: Jacob Morgan. The Employee Experience Equation. February 25, 2016. https://thefutureorganization.com/the-employee-experience-equation/

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Definition of EX

The employee experience (EX) is the sum of the various perceptions employees have about their interactions with the

  • rganization in which they

work as expressed in the formula:

EX = Experiences + Expectations + Perceptions

The Employee Experience: How to Attract Talent, Retain Top Performers, and Drive

  • Results. 2017 by Tracy Maylett and Matthew Wride

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-24
SLIDE 24

The biggest expectation

  • Though candidate experience is influenced

by the recruitment process in many different ways, one factor stands out:

  • “The single strongest factor in a company’s

candidate experience rating is the extent to which a candidate leaves the recruiting process perceiving, feeling and knowing they were given a fair chance.

  • If you ask a candidate, ‘Were you able to fully

share your background, your knowledge, your competency, your skills, your experience with us so that you believe we got what we needed to fairly judge you?’

  • The candidates who say yes will absolutely

rate their experience higher.” —Gerry Crispin, Co-Founder, Candidate Experience Awards

https://recruitingsocial.com/2016/03/what-is-candidate-experience/

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-25
SLIDE 25

KEY CONCEPTS AND ITS APPLICATION IN ASSESSMENT CENTRES

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Paul Davies, employee experience leader at General Electric

"If I think about the language that I used as an HR professional, let's say 18 months ago, the term persona, the term user experience, the term user interface, the term moments that matter, storyboards, journey maps were simply not in my vocabulary.

https://searchhrsoftware.techtarget.com/feature/Five-steps-to-kick-start-your-employee- experience-strategy ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Design the EX

EX Design Process

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-28
SLIDE 28

The use of personas

“An informed summary of the mindset, needs, and goals typically held by key stakeholders.” “Not preconceived stereotypes; they are archetypes borne of careful study.” Archetypes generally describe goals and observed behavior patterns and are much more specific than users.” Each persona represents a significant portion of people in the real world and enables designers to focus on a manageable and memorable cast of characters, instead of thousands of individuals. Personas aid in creating different designs for different kinds of people—designing for a specific somebody, rather than a generic nobody.

https://www.td.org/insights/personas-designing-personalized-learner-centric-experiences https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/employee-relations/pages/personas-to-design-solutions-for-your-workforce.aspx ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Example

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Example

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Example

https://hrtrendinstitute.com/2017/05/11/personas/ ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Example

https://hrtrendinstitute.com/2017/05/11/personas/ ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Why personas?

  • Help to understand employees’ points of view, goals, needs, challenges and frustrations
  • With thoughtfully constructed personas, HR strengthens the foundation for design thinking by gaining the

perspective of the workers and bringing their voice to the table.

  • The result? Workforce solutions designed by HR are better adopted, more efficient and more successful.
  • Empathy. By creating personas, you can learn what it's like to walk in the shoes of various workforce

segments through a variety of "journeys," such as onboarding, open enrollment and performance evaluations.

  • Focus. Personas help HR avoid the "peanut butter spread" approach, which applies vague assumptions

about wants and needs across the entire workforce. Most workforces have more than one "user type." Developing a persona to represent each one helps you both define a solution's design and hone its intended targets.

  • Efficiency. By walking through processes persona by persona, HR can identify redundant touch points and

eliminate inefficiencies like re-entering a name multiple times or requiring three levels of approval when

  • nly two are needed.
  • Buy-in. A persona document helps HR communicate research findings to other stakeholders in the

business, mapping specific journeys that reflect an understanding of what different types of workers truly want and need. This makes building consensus faster and easier.

  • Guiding principles. Personas help illuminate what the majority of users want, allowing you to see what is

most commonly useful and what is a "one-off." When strategy or process design questions come up, personas are a practical tool for making better decisions. https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/employee-relations/pages/personas-to-design-solutions- for-your-workforce.aspx

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Typical AC Candidate personas?

  • Mary Manager
  • Diligent Dave
  • Suspicious Susan
  • Defensive Darcy
  • Nervous Nell

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-35
SLIDE 35

MOMENTS THAT MATTER AND EMPLOYEE JOURNEY MAPS

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Tool: Employee Journey map

A journey map visually describes an employee’s journey as he/she attempts to achieve a

  • goal. It depicts a timeline
  • f the employee

experience; key touchpoints; what the employee is feeling, thinking and doing; and pain points and

  • pportunities.

http://enterprisestrategies.com/2017/04/06/journey-mapping-for-intranets/ ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Jacob Morgan’s Moments that Matter

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Journey Mapping to identify touch points and moments that matter

experience.deloitte.com

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Example of Candidate Journey touchpoints

https://blog.recrutainment.de/2014/10/13/es-ist-in-der-anstand-im-umgang-stupid-ergebnisse-der-candidate-experience-studie-2014/

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Mapping the Development AC Journey

Receiving invitation to AC AC Orientation AC registration AC Introduction session Instructions for first simulation Completion of simulation 1 Debrief by Administrator Collaborative evaluation and coaching by AC coach Completion and debrief of rest of simulations Feedback and report Development plan

Touch Points: Communication by organisation, Service Provider, Line Manager, Simulation Material, Verbal Instructions, Observers, Feedback, Technology, etc.

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Examples of Candidate concerns

No clear guidance provided

  • n how assessments will be

marked Not being given sufficient feedback on your performance after an assessment Assessments which seemed poorly designed Being asked to participate in simulations which seem very unrealistic Not being provided with any opportunity to wind down and relax after the assessment centre The use of tests or exercises which appear to be of little or no relevance for the role applied for The assessment centre being located in a rough and intimidating part of town The impression that assessors have not been sufficiently trained A lack of 'human' contact - an impersonal experience - feeling like being in a sausage machine The relevance of certain assessments for the job you applied for not being explained Attending an inadequate or inappropriate de-briefing after the assessment centre Insufficient time given to complete exercises Role players with insufficient skill or training to perform at a good standard Not being given sufficient food or refreshment Before an assessment, not being provided with sufficient information about it Being given unclear instructions Not being assured that the results of the assessment centre will be confidential Assessors making what seem to be exaggerated or inappropriate inferences from the information

  • btained

Assessors appearing to have little knowledge of the assessment process Being assessed in a room which was not fit for this purpose After the assessment centre, being asked in front

  • f other candidates how

you feel and whether you are ok Being given pre-reading for assessments which imply that you will receive certain information, when that information is not provided Exercises in which the role- player was also the assessor Being asked to take part in a single assessment which took three hours or more Being distracted in an exercise by noise, conversations between assessors, people being assessed in adjoining rooms etc.

Dewberry, C., & Jackson, D.J.R. (2016). The Perceived Nature and Incidence of Dysfunctional Assessment Center Features and

  • Processes. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 24(2): 189-196.
slide-42
SLIDE 42

EX AND PERSONALISATION

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-43
SLIDE 43

What is personalisation?

  • Katie Sweet defines personalisation as "The act of tailoring an

experience or communication based on information a company has learned about an individual.“ (https://www.evergage.com/blog/personalization-definition- what-is-personalization/)

  • “Personalisation is different from customisation, but the

concepts are closely related. In personalisation a company modifies an experience, without any special effort of the customer (or employee). With customisation the customer (or the employee) can tailor the experience him/herself”. Tom Haak form the HR Trend Institute

  • "Hyper-personalization takes personalized marketing a step

further by leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) and real-time data to deliver more relevant content, product, and service information to each user."

  • (Todd Lebo: Hyper-personalisation - What it is and why you

need it in your 2019 marketing)

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-44
SLIDE 44

How can we personalise the AC experience?

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-45
SLIDE 45

NET PROMOTOR SCORE

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Calculating NPS

slide-47
SLIDE 47

DESIGN THINKING

slide-48
SLIDE 48

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-49
SLIDE 49

How is the CX being addressed?

  • Virtual assessments
  • Shortening the duration of the centres
  • Bespoke exercises and “Day –in-the Life” centres to ensure

candidate engagement, inform candidates about the organisation & role and increase the perceived relevance and associated fairness

  • The constructs assessed could also influence CX and therefore

move to strengths and values focus

  • Communication – detailed information on what to expect etc.
  • Feedback
  • International Perspective – current practices and future challenges

by Nigel Povah, Philippa Riley and Jordon Jones in Assessment Centres: Unlocking People Potential for Growth, (2nd Ed.) edited by Sandra Schlebusch and Gert Roodt, 2020.

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-50
SLIDE 50

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Presenter: Lydia Cillié-Schmidt lydiacs@yebo.co.za

ACSG Annual Conference, 12 March 2020, Sandton, South Africa