Comparative Assessment of Steam Processed pellets produced from - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

comparative assessment of steam processed pellets
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Comparative Assessment of Steam Processed pellets produced from - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Comparative Assessment of Steam Processed pellets produced from wood, straw and switchgrass S M H ASSAN S HAHRUKH , A DETOYESE O YEDUN , A MIT K UMAR 1 , L INOJ K UMAR , B AHMAN G HIASI , S HAHAB S OKHANSANJ 2 1 Department of Mechanical


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Comparative Assessment of Steam Processed pellets produced from wood, straw and switchgrass

S M HASSAN SHAHRUKH, ADETOYESE OYEDUN, AMIT KUMAR1, LINOJ KUMAR, BAHMAN GHIASI, SHAHAB SOKHANSANJ2

1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta

Edmonton, AB, Canada

2Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering,

Vancouver, BC, Canada

ADVANCED BIOFUELS SYMPOSIUM July 22 - 24, 2015, Montreal, Canada

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Outline

 Background and Objective  Pellet Production Supply Chain  Model Development and Validation  Mass and Heat Balance of Steam

Pretreatment

 Techno-Economic Result  Summary of Result

Presentation at BFN, 2 2 -2 4 July, 2 0 1 5

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

  • Pretreatm ent helps

producing high quality pellets

  • Energy density of

regular pellets is 1 / 8 th of coal

  • High transportation

cost of regular biom ass and pellets

  • Need for higher

utilization of Biom ass Low Utilization Cost I ssues Pretreatm ent Low Bulk and Energy density of regular pellets

Presentation at BFN, 2 2 -2 4 July, 2 0 1 5

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Objectives

Conduct Techno-Economic Assessment

Cost curves Sensitivity & uncertainty

Conduct Energy Analysis

Net energy ratio (NER) Sensitivity & uncertainty

Develop process model for steam pretreatment of wood, straw and switchgrass

Heat and mass balance Data intensive modeling

Presentation at BFN, 2 2 -2 4 July, 2 0 1 5

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Pellet Supply Chain

Biomass ss collection Bale le for

  • rmation
  • n/

chi hippi pping ng Trans nspo portation n to p pelle llet pla lant Pelle llet prod

  • duction
  • n

Trans nspo portation n

  • f
  • f p

pellet t to

  • bi

biorefine nery Used i in n bi biorefine nery Suppl pply cha hain o n of pelle llet to a

  • a b

bior

  • refinery (Con
  • nvention
  • nal method
  • d)

Used i in n bi biorefine nery Biomass ss collection Trans nspo portation n to p pelle llet pla lant Pelle llet Prod

  • duction
  • n

Trans nspo portation n

  • f
  • f p

pellet t to

  • bi

biorefine nery Steam pretreatment Bale le for

  • rmation
  • n

/chi hippi pping ng Steam Pretreatment Supply chain o

  • f p

pellet ( (produced from pretreated biomass) t to a a b biorefinery Presentation at BFN, 2 2 -2 4 July, 2 0 1 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Experimental Material and Method

Material

W ood, Straw ,Sw itchgrass

Moisture content ~ 1 0 % -5 0 %

Method

Pretreatm ent carried in 2 .6 L StakeTech Steam gun w ith 4 0 0 g

  • f biom ass treated at

different tem perature and tim e Steam treated biom ass pelletized Presentation at BFN, 2 2 -2 4 July, 2 0 1 5

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Model Input and Validation

1 . Boiler unit: Supply of steam at different tim e and tem perature 2 . Tim e: 1 0 m in 3 . Tem perature: 1 8 0 -2 1 0 ⁰C 2 . Steam Pretreatm ent Unit: Biom ass is treated w ith high pressure steam in batch reactor ( Yield reactor considered)

logR = log exp(T − 100 14.75 )dt

Governing Equation:

Source: Lam et al. 2 0 1 3

Presentation at BFN, 2 2 -2 4 July, 2 0 1 5

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Model Input and Validation

3 . Pellet m ill: produces pellet of 2 0 -3 0 m m long, 6 m m in diam eter, has a heating elem ent

  • perating at 7 0 -1 0 0

C.

2 . Grinder: Kicks

energy constant 1 0 0 KJ/ kg, solid recovery 9 5 % 1 . Dryer: operating tem perature at 8 0 C. No grinder is required for pellet production of straw and sw itchgrass Presentation at ASABE, 2 6 -2 9 July,2 0 1 5

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Model Validation Result

Operation Experimental Energy Consumption (kJ) ASPEN model Predicted Energy Consumption (kJ) Wood Straw SG Wood Straw SG Steam Pretreatment 2097 749 678 2095 760 710 Drying 6162 6731 8979 6156 6951 9045 Size reduction 15 17 Pelletization 492 330 318 500 352 325

Presentation at BFN, 2 2 -2 4 July,2 0 1 5

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Comparative Heat and Mass Balance

W ood

  • A. Regular Pellet
  • B. Steam Pretreated Pellet

Dryer Hammer Mill Pellet Mill 2.4 kg 0.63 kg 0.58 kg 0.54 kg 19.6 MJ 1 kg 2.1 MJ 6.2 MJ 0.01 MJ 0.45 MJ Dryer Hammer Mill Pellet Mill 1 kg 0.7 kg 0.65 kg 0.61 kg 18 MJ 1.3 MJ 0.2 MJ 0.5 MJ

Presentation at BFN, 2 2 -2 4 July,2 0 1 5

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Comparative Heat and Mass Balance (Cont’d)

Dryer Hammer Mill Pellet Mill 1kg 0.95 kg 0.92kg 0.85 kg 17 MJ 0 MJ 0.3MJ 0.8 MJ Dryer Hammer Mill Pellet Mill 1kg 0.95 kg 0.92kg 0.88 kg 17 MJ 0 MJ 0.3MJ 0.8 MJ

Straw Sw itchgrass

  • A. Regular Pellet
  • A. Regular Pellet
  • B. Steam Pretreated Pellet
  • B. Steam Pretreated Pellet

Dryer Hammer Mill Pellet Mill 3.0 kg 0.8 kg 0.8kg 0.72 kg 19 MJ 1kg 0.8MJ 6.7 MJ 0 MJ 0.42 MJ Dryer Hammer Mill Pellet Mill 3.4 kg 0.8 kg 0.8kg 0.71 kg 19.1 MJ 1kg 0.7MJ 8.9 MJ 0 MJ 0.4 MJ

Presentation at BFN, 2 2 -2 4 July,2 0 1 5

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Variation of NER with Pretreatment Temperature and Level

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 140 160 180 NER Steam Pretreatment Temperature Straw Switchgrass

  • 1.00

2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 25% 50% 75% NER Pretreatment level Wood Straw SG

Presentation at BFN, 2 2 -2 4 July,2 0 1 5

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Uncertainty Analysis

Straw Sw itchgrass

000 005 010 015 020 025 030 035 040 045 050 055 Probability 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 NER Histogram Plot for NER .21) 49) 5% 90% 5% = 1.21) 95%฀(x = 1.49)

W ood

Presentation at BFN, 2 2 -2 4 July,2 0 1 5

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Techno-Economic Snapshot

Straw Forest residue Switchgrass Regular Steam pretreated Regular Steam pretreated Regular Steam pretreated Optimum size (t year-1) 190,000 250,000 190,000 290,000 190,000 230,000 Pellet cost ($ t-1) 122.04 188.34 116.01 183.14 116.20 192.41

  • Capital recovery

9.56 15.31 10.83 20.34 13.74 21.53

  • Maintenance cost

2.64 3.68 2.34 3.59 2.58 3.76

  • Field cost

52.34 58.75 28.19 32.08 25.57 29.39

  • Transportation cost

33.89 42.99 37.04 50.24 45.38 57.68

  • Premium

0.00 0.00 6.39 5.50 5.34 6.13

  • Employee cost

7.27 7.85 6.58 6.76 7.27 8.53

  • Energy cost

5.41 48.91 14.74 53.79 5.41 54.50

  • Consumable item cost

10.93 10.86 9.90 10.84 10.93 10.88 Pellet transportation 6.30 5.50 6.20 5.45 6.80 6.10 Total pellet delivery cost 128.34 193.84 122.21 188.59 123.00 198.51

Presentation at BFN 2 2 -2 4 July,2 0 1 5

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Variation of Transportation Cost

Presentation at BFN, 2 2 -2 4 July, 2 0 1 5

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Variation of Capital Cost

Presentation at BFN, 2 2 -2 4 July, 2 0 1 5

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Variation in Production Cost

Presentation at BFN, 2 2 -2 4 July,2 0 1 5

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Sensitivity Analysis - Wood

174.00 179.00 184.00 189.00 194.00 199.00

  • 20%
  • 10%

0% 10% 20% Production Cost, $ \ t % change

capital cost employee cost Energy cost Transportation cost Field cost consumable cost

180.00 182.00 184.00 186.00 188.00 190.00 192.00 194.00

  • 20%
  • 10%

0% 10% 20% Production Cost, $\t

Moisture content Feed stock material loss Inflation IRR % area

Presentation at BFN, 2 2 -2 4 July,2 0 1 5

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Sensitivity Analysis - Straw

180.00 185.00 190.00 195.00 200.00 205.00

  • 20%
  • 10%

0% 10% 20% Total cost of pellet ($(t)-1) % change

capital cost employee cost Energy cost Transportation cost Field cost consumable cost

188.00 190.00 192.00 194.00 196.00 198.00 200.00

  • 20%
  • 10%

0% 10% 20% Total cost of pellet production($(t)-1) % change

Moisture content Feed stock material loss Inflation IRR % area

Presentation at BFN, 2 2 -2 4 July,2 0 1 5

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Sensitivity Analysis - Switchgrass

186.00 191.00 196.00 201.00 206.00

  • 20%
  • 10%

0% 10% 20% Total cost of pellet ($(t)-1) % change

capital cost employee cost Energy cost Transportation cost Field cost consumable cost

193.00 194.00 195.00 196.00 197.00 198.00 199.00 200.00 201.00 202.00 203.00

  • 20%
  • 10%

0% 10% 20% Total cost of pellet production($(t)-1) % change

Moisture content Feed stock material loss Inflation IRR % area

Presentation at BFN, 2 2 -2 4 July,2 0 1 5

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Uncertainty Analysis

000 005 010 015 020 025 030 035 040 045 050 055 Probability 230 235 240 245 250 255 260 265 270 275 Pellet Cost ($/tonne) Histogram Plot for 236.846391740834 39) 1.8) 5% 90% 5% 236.39) 95%฀(x = 261.8)

Straw

0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 Probability 230 235 240 245 250 255 260 265 270 275 Pellet Cost ($/tonne) Histogram Plot for 236.862753087947 93) 5) 5% 90.005% 4.995% 237.93) 95.005%฀(x = 258.65)

Sw itchgrass

000 005 010 015 020 025 030 035 040 045 050 Probability 220 225 230 235 240 245 250 255 Pellet Cost ($/tonne)

Uncertainty Steam Pretreatment Base case-45000 tonne for Forest Residue

7) ) 4.995% 90.00999% 4.995% 28.37) 95.005%฀(x = 247.11)

W ood

Presentation at BFN, 2 2 -2 4 July,2 0 1 5

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Summary of Result

Energy

  • Energy ratio of regular pelletization process is higher than steam

pretreated pellet due to addition of steam as energy source

  • Calorific value of pellet increases by 21% due to steam pretreatment
  • Grinding energy input is zero for straw and switchgrass

Cost

  • $/ tonne cost of production for steam pretreated pellet is higher than

regular pellet due to increased capital cost

  • $/ GJ cost production of pellet for both steam treated pellet and

regular pellet is similar with approximately 30 cents difference

Scaling

  • Steam pretreatment is more effective over a plant size of 270,000

tonnes/ yr plant capacity due to economy of scale benefits based on $/ GJ

Presentation at BFN 2 2 -2 4 July, 2 0 1 5

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Acknowledgement

  • Bio Fuel Net
  • University of Alberta
  • Dr. Shahab Sokhansanj, Dr. Linoj Kum ar and

Bahm an Ghiasi, Departm ent of Chem ical Engineering, University of British Colum bia

Presentation at BFN 2 2 -2 4 July,2 0 1 5

slide-24
SLIDE 24

T

HANKS

Contact Information:

  • Dr. AMIT KUMAR

Professor NSERC/Cenovus/Alberta Innovates Associate Industrial Research Chair in Energy and Environmental Systems Engineering Cenovus Energy Endowed Chair in Environmental Engineering Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta Amit.kumar@ualberta.ca www.energysystems.ualberta.ca +1 780 492 7797

2015 CSBE | SCGAB Annual General Conference July 5 – 8, 2015, Edmonton, AB, Canada