Community Science in the Rondout Creek Watershed Jen Epstein, Water - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

community science in the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Community Science in the Rondout Creek Watershed Jen Epstein, Water - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Community Science in the Rondout Creek Watershed Jen Epstein, Water Quality Program Scientist Dan Shapley, Water Quality Program Director October 16, 2019 We started with the community of river users (2008-2014) Water Quality Program


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Community Science in the Rondout Creek Watershed

Jen Epstein, Water Quality Program Scientist Dan Shapley, Water Quality Program Director October 16, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

We started with the community of river users

slide-3
SLIDE 3

(2008-2014)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Water Quality Program

Community Science Data Collection

16 rivers, creeks & waterfront project areas 400 sites 5,000+ samples

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Water Quality Program

Theory of change Community science data collection is the foundation on which we build and support active data-based communities that are empowered to highlight issues of public concern, advocate for local solutions and lobby effectively in order to engage governments to improve water quality.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Set Policy & Budget Apply policy & budget to local issues Identify local issues Define Policy Needs

Active Data Based Community

slide-7
SLIDE 7

WHAT DO THE DATA SHOW?

Rondout Creek Enterococcus Monitoring

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Rondout Creek Sampling Locations

18 non-tidal Rondout sites 0 sites above Rondout Reservoir 1 tidal site at Eddyville 1 Hudson River site at Kingston Point Beach 24 Wallkill River sites

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Rondout Creek Sampling Results

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Rondout Creek Sampling Results

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Rondout Creek Sampling Results

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Combined sewer overflows Separate sewer overflows Septic system failures Street runoff Illicit connections Agricultural runoff Livestock Wildlife Contaminated sediment

Sources of Enterococcus

slide-13
SLIDE 13

“Toolbox Approach” to Water Quality

  • Enterococcus (& E.coli)
  • Nutrients
  • Detergents
  • Macroinvertebrate

communities

  • Infrastructure data
  • Land use
  • Microbial source

tracking

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Rondout Creek

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

? ? ? ?

slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30

slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33

? ? ? ?

slide-34
SLIDE 34

MST Study Site Selection

slide-35
SLIDE 35

MST Study Site Selection

slide-36
SLIDE 36

MST Study Site Selection

slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38
slide-39
SLIDE 39
slide-40
SLIDE 40
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Rondout MST Results: All Groups

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Wild Birds Were Most Commonly Observed Group

slide-43
SLIDE 43
slide-44
SLIDE 44

Human Contamination Was Also Significant

slide-45
SLIDE 45
slide-46
SLIDE 46

Cow and Horse Were Uncommon

slide-47
SLIDE 47
slide-48
SLIDE 48
slide-49
SLIDE 49

Human Contamination: Two Patterns

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Human Marker Results by Site

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Human Contamination Was Frequent At One Site

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Human Contamination Was Widely Present

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Rondout Creek MST Results: Human

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Human Contamination at Foordemore Road

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Sampling Sites Near Foordemore Road

4 2 1 1

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Napanoch & Ellenville WWTPs & Collection Areas

4 2 1 1

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Napanoch WWTP: Lines of Evidence

  • High Entero downstream of

WWTP

  • E. coli also above EPA threshold
  • Human marker detected 4 of 6

times sampled

  • NYS DEC macroinvertebrate data

shows WWTP impact

  • WWTP is at ~80% capacity, built

in 1920/1980

  • “Significant Noncompliance” with

permit (last reviewed 1991)

  • Nutrients above EPA criteria at

Port Ben Rd (not Fordemoore Rd)  Municipality is working hard to get grants, we plan to help them

slide-58
SLIDE 58
  • High Entero downstream of

WWTP

  • E. coli also above EPA threshold
  • Human marker detected 4 of 6

times sampled

  • NYS DEC macroinvertebrate data

shows WWTP impact

  • WWTP is at ~80% capacity, built

in 1920/1980

  • “Significant Noncompliance” with

permit (last reviewed 1991)

  • Nutrients above EPA criteria at

Port Ben Rd (not Fordemoore Rd)  Municipality is working hard to get grants, we plan to help them

Napanoch WWTP: Lines of Evidence

slide-59
SLIDE 59
  • High Entero downstream of

WWTP

  • E. coli also above EPA threshold
  • Human marker detected 4 of 6

times sampled

  • NYS DEC macroinvertebrate data

shows WWTP impact

  • WWTP is at ~80% capacity, built

in 1920/1980

  • “Significant Noncompliance” with

permit (last reviewed 1991)

  • Nutrients above EPA criteria at

Port Ben Rd (not Fordemoore Rd)  Municipality is working hard to get grants, we plan to help them

Napanoch WWTP: Lines of Evidence

slide-60
SLIDE 60
  • High Entero downstream of

WWTP

  • E. coli also above EPA threshold
  • Human marker detected 4 of 6

times sampled

  • NYS DEC macroinvertebrate data

shows WWTP impact

  • WWTP is at ~80% capacity, built

in 1920/1980

  • “Significant Noncompliance” with

permit (last reviewed 1991)

  • Nutrients above EPA criteria at

Port Ben Rd (not Fordemoore Rd)  Municipality is working hard to get grants, we plan to help them

Napanoch WWTP: Lines of Evidence

slide-61
SLIDE 61
  • High Entero downstream of

WWTP

  • E. coli also above EPA threshold
  • Human marker detected 4 of 6

times sampled

  • NYS DEC macroinvertebrate data

shows WWTP impact

  • WWTP is at ~80% capacity, built

in 1920/1980

  • “Significant Noncompliance” with

permit (last reviewed 1991)

  • Nutrients above EPA criteria at

Port Ben Rd (not Fordemoore Rd)  Municipality is working hard to get grants, we plan to help them

Napanoch WWTP: Lines of Evidence

slide-62
SLIDE 62
  • High Entero downstream of

WWTP

  • E. coli also above EPA threshold
  • Human marker detected 4 of 6

times sampled

  • NYS DEC macroinvertebrate data

shows WWTP impact

  • WWTP is at ~80% capacity, built

in 1920/1980

  • “Significant Noncompliance” with

permit (last reviewed 1991)

  • Nutrients above EPA criteria at

Port Ben Rd (not sampled at Foordemore Rd)

Napanoch WWTP: Lines of Evidence

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Combined sewer overflows Separate sewer overflows Septic system failures Street runoff Illicit connections Agricultural runoff Livestock Wildlife Contaminated sediment

Centralized Wastewater System Is An Important Source Here

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Combined sewer overflows Separate sewer overflows Septic system failures Street runoff Illicit connections Agricultural runoff Livestock Wildlife Contaminated sediment

Centralized Wastewater System Is An Important Source Here

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Combined sewer overflows Separate sewer overflows Septic system failures Street runoff Illicit connections Agricultural runoff Livestock Wildlife Contaminated sediment

Centralized Wastewater System Is An Important Source Here

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Rondout Creek MST Results: Human

slide-67
SLIDE 67
  • Rondout Creek MST Results: Human
slide-68
SLIDE 68

Land Use, Land Cover & Soil Analysis

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Land Use, Land Cover & Soil Analysis

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Land Use, Land Cover & Soil Analysis

  • Wastewater treatment plant

locations

  • Septic system locations

(private & institutional)

  • Soil suitability for septic field

use

  • Soil suitability for manure

spreading

  • Wildlife influence
slide-71
SLIDE 71

Land Use, Land Cover & Soil Analysis

  • Wastewater treatment plant

locations

  • Septic system locations

(private & institutional)

  • Soil suitability for septic field

use

  • Soil suitability for manure

spreading

  • Wildlife influence
slide-72
SLIDE 72

Rondout Soils Are Poorly Suited for Septic Systems

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Rondout Soils Are Poorly Suited for Septic Systems

  • Majority of soils are very

limited or somewhat limited

  • Septic construction

requirements have improved

  • ver time
  • Watershed has a significant

number of institutional septic systems

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Rondout Soils Are Poorly Suited for Septic Systems

  • Majority of soils are very

limited or somewhat limited

  • Septic construction

requirements have improved

  • ver time
  • Watershed has a significant

number of institutional septic systems

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Rondout Soils Are Poorly Suited for Septic Systems

  • Majority of soils are very

limited or somewhat limited

  • Septic construction

requirements have improved

  • ver time
  • Watershed has a significant

number of institutional septic systems

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Set Policy & Budget Apply policy & budget to local issues Identify local issues Define Policy Needs

Active Data Based Community