community science in the
play

Community Science in the Rondout Creek Watershed Jen Epstein, Water - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Community Science in the Rondout Creek Watershed Jen Epstein, Water Quality Program Scientist Dan Shapley, Water Quality Program Director October 16, 2019 We started with the community of river users (2008-2014) Water Quality Program


  1. Community Science in the Rondout Creek Watershed Jen Epstein, Water Quality Program Scientist Dan Shapley, Water Quality Program Director October 16, 2019

  2. We started with the community of river users

  3. (2008-2014)

  4. Water Quality Program Community Science Data Collection 16 rivers, creeks & waterfront project areas 400 sites 5,000+ samples

  5. Water Quality Program Theory of change Community science data collection is the foundation on which we build and support active data-based communities that are empowered to highlight issues of public concern, advocate for local solutions and lobby effectively in order to engage governments to improve water quality .

  6. Define Set Policy Policy & Budget Needs Active Data Based Community Apply policy Identify & budget to local issues local issues

  7. Rondout Creek Enterococcus Monitoring WHAT DO THE DATA SHOW?

  8. Rondout Creek Sampling Locations 18 non-tidal Rondout sites 0 sites above Rondout Reservoir 1 tidal site at Eddyville 1 Hudson River site at Kingston Point Beach 24 Wallkill River sites

  9. Rondout Creek Sampling Results

  10. Rondout Creek Sampling Results

  11. Rondout Creek Sampling Results

  12. Sources of Enterococcus Combined sewer overflows Separate sewer overflows Septic system failures Street runoff Illicit connections Agricultural runoff Livestock Wildlife Contaminated sediment

  13. “Toolbox Approach” to Water Quality • Enterococcus (& E.coli) • Nutrients • Detergents • Macroinvertebrate communities • Infrastructure data • Land use • Microbial source tracking

  14. Rondout Creek

  15. ? ? ? ?

  16. ? ? ? ?

  17. MST Study Site Selection

  18. MST Study Site Selection

  19. MST Study Site Selection

  20. Rondout MST Results: All Groups

  21. Wild Birds Were Most Commonly Observed Group

  22. Human Contamination Was Also Significant

  23. Cow and Horse Were Uncommon

  24. Human Contamination: Two Patterns

  25. Human Marker Results by Site

  26. Human Contamination Was Frequent At One Site

  27. Human Contamination Was Widely Present

  28. Rondout Creek MST Results: Human

  29. Human Contamination at Foordemore Road

  30. Sampling Sites Near Foordemore Road 4 1 1 2

  31. Napanoch & Ellenville WWTPs & Collection Areas 4 1 1 2

  32. Napanoch WWTP: Lines of Evidence • High Entero downstream of WWTP • E. coli also above EPA threshold • Human marker detected 4 of 6 times sampled • NYS DEC macroinvertebrate data shows WWTP impact • WWTP is at ~80% capacity, built in 1920/1980 • “Significant Noncompliance” with permit (last reviewed 1991) • Nutrients above EPA criteria at Port Ben Rd (not Fordemoore Rd)  Municipality is working hard to get grants, we plan to help them

  33. Napanoch WWTP: Lines of Evidence • High Entero downstream of WWTP • E. coli also above EPA threshold • Human marker detected 4 of 6 times sampled • NYS DEC macroinvertebrate data shows WWTP impact • WWTP is at ~80% capacity, built in 1920/1980 • “Significant Noncompliance” with permit (last reviewed 1991) • Nutrients above EPA criteria at Port Ben Rd (not Fordemoore Rd)  Municipality is working hard to get grants, we plan to help them

  34. Napanoch WWTP: Lines of Evidence • High Entero downstream of WWTP • E. coli also above EPA threshold • Human marker detected 4 of 6 times sampled • NYS DEC macroinvertebrate data shows WWTP impact • WWTP is at ~80% capacity, built in 1920/1980 • “Significant Noncompliance” with permit (last reviewed 1991) • Nutrients above EPA criteria at Port Ben Rd (not Fordemoore Rd)  Municipality is working hard to get grants, we plan to help them

  35. Napanoch WWTP: Lines of Evidence • High Entero downstream of WWTP • E. coli also above EPA threshold • Human marker detected 4 of 6 times sampled • NYS DEC macroinvertebrate data shows WWTP impact • WWTP is at ~80% capacity, built in 1920/1980 • “Significant Noncompliance” with permit (last reviewed 1991) • Nutrients above EPA criteria at Port Ben Rd (not Fordemoore Rd)  Municipality is working hard to get grants, we plan to help them

  36. Napanoch WWTP: Lines of Evidence • High Entero downstream of WWTP • E. coli also above EPA threshold • Human marker detected 4 of 6 times sampled • NYS DEC macroinvertebrate data shows WWTP impact • WWTP is at ~80% capacity, built in 1920/1980 • “Significant Noncompliance” with permit (last reviewed 1991) • Nutrients above EPA criteria at Port Ben Rd (not Fordemoore Rd)  Municipality is working hard to get grants, we plan to help them

  37. Napanoch WWTP: Lines of Evidence • High Entero downstream of WWTP • E. coli also above EPA threshold • Human marker detected 4 of 6 times sampled • NYS DEC macroinvertebrate data shows WWTP impact • WWTP is at ~80% capacity, built in 1920/1980 • “Significant Noncompliance” with permit (last reviewed 1991) • Nutrients above EPA criteria at Port Ben Rd (not sampled at Foordemore Rd)

  38. Centralized Wastewater System Is An Important Source Here Combined sewer overflows Separate sewer overflows Septic system failures Street runoff Illicit connections Agricultural runoff Livestock Wildlife Contaminated sediment

  39. Centralized Wastewater System Is An Important Source Here Combined sewer overflows Separate sewer overflows Septic system failures Street runoff Illicit connections Agricultural runoff Livestock Wildlife Contaminated sediment

  40. Centralized Wastewater System Is An Important Source Here Combined sewer overflows Separate sewer overflows Septic system failures Street runoff Illicit connections Agricultural runoff Livestock Wildlife Contaminated sediment

  41. Rondout Creek MST Results: Human

  42. Rondout Creek MST Results: Human • • • •

  43. Land Use, Land Cover & Soil Analysis

  44. Land Use, Land Cover & Soil Analysis

  45. Land Use, Land Cover & Soil Analysis • Wastewater treatment plant locations • Septic system locations (private & institutional) • Soil suitability for septic field use • Soil suitability for manure spreading • Wildlife influence

  46. Land Use, Land Cover & Soil Analysis • Wastewater treatment plant locations • Septic system locations (private & institutional) • Soil suitability for septic field use • Soil suitability for manure spreading  • Wildlife influence

  47. Rondout Soils Are Poorly Suited for Septic Systems

  48. Rondout Soils Are Poorly Suited for Septic Systems • Majority of soils are very limited or somewhat limited • Septic construction requirements have improved over time • Watershed has a significant number of institutional septic systems

  49. Rondout Soils Are Poorly Suited for Septic Systems • Majority of soils are very limited or somewhat limited • Septic construction requirements have improved over time • Watershed has a significant number of institutional septic systems 

  50. Rondout Soils Are Poorly Suited for Septic Systems • Majority of soils are very limited or somewhat limited • Septic construction requirements have improved over time • Watershed has a significant number of institutional septic systems 

  51. Define Set Policy Policy & Budget Needs Active Data Based Community Apply policy Identify & budget to local issues local issues

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend