Command and Control Command and Control Warfare Demonstrator - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Magdalena Hammervik Jenny Lindoff Martin Castor Lars Tydén

Command and Control Warfare Demonstrator (C2WS) Command and Control Warfare Demonstrator (C2WS)

2005-2007 2005-2007

Magdalena Hammervik

Purpose of this presentation Purpose of this presentation

Description of technology and method development for C2W demonstrator phase 1, 2005-2007. Description of technology and method development for C2W demonstrator phase 1, 2005-2007.

Magdalena Hammervik

Definitions Definitions

Purpose: Demonstrate effects of C2W on C2 ability C2W in this project

EW CNO

Purpose: Demonstrate effects of C2W on C2 ability C2W in this project

EW CNO Situation Map

EW CNO

? ? ?

Magdalena Hammervik

Radar sensor ESM sensor IRST sensor HQ Sensor reports Order Human

• perator

Rules and regulations

C2

Action

Magdalena Hammervik

Dynamical simulation toolbox Dynamical simulation toolbox

IRST Optics surveillance UV warner Laser warner Flares Smoke DIRCM Optics IRST Optics surveillance UV warner Laser warner Flares Smoke DIRCM Optics Surveillance radar TAR Radar jammer Chaff Radar warner

Radio system Digital communication Radio jamming Direction finding

Magdalena Hammervik

Radar Jamming Process

Radar Radar Warner Radar Jammer

False targets False targets generated by generated by radar radar jammer jammer

Magdalena Hammervik

Network with CNO Network with CNO

Socket Socket

Rx/Tx

Data link layer

Id 1A

R

Network layer Application layer

Nod C C2 Nod A Nod B

Rx/Tx Id 1A

R C2

Rx/Tx Id 1A

R C2

Simulated network

Socket

Transport layer Physical layer

Radio Net

(EWRadioSystem)

Cable Net

C A B

Magdalena Hammervik

”Network map” ”Network map”

Magdalena Hammervik

”Situation map” ”Situation map”

Based on reports APP-6a Icons and bearings identified as depending on the sensor’s abilities friendly, hostile, unknown

Magdalena Hammervik

Windows Windows

Lars Tydén, FOI

Magdalena Hammervik

Data fusion Data fusion

Magdalena Hammervik

Analysis Analysis

0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1 1 4 . 4 2 1 4 . 4 5 1 4 . 4 8 1 4 . 5 1 1 4 . 5 4 1 4 . 5 7 1 5 . 1 5 . 3 1 5 . 6 1 5 . 9 1 5 . 1 2 Time Com-Jam LLA Perceived Jam LLA ESM LLA IRST LLA Fire 1 4 . 4 2 1 4 . 4 5 1 4 . 4 8 1 4 . 5 1 1 4 . 5 4 1 4 . 5 7 1 5 . 1 5 . 3 1 5 . 6 1 5 . 9 1 5 . 1 2 Time Frigate Radar jam LLA Perceived Jam LLA radar

Replay Export of data to Matlab and Excel XML

Magdalena Hammervik

What is the problem? What is the problem?

How can we measure command and control ability? How can we analyse one or several working processes where a group of people solve a complex task in a complex situation? How can we measure command and control ability? How can we analyse one or several working processes where a group of people solve a complex task in a complex situation?

Magdalena Hammervik

Experiments in C2WS Experiments in C2WS

Three experiments have so far been conducted:

July 2006 November 2006 February 2007

Planned experiments

November 2007 2008-2009

Three experiments have so far been conducted:

July 2006 November 2006 February 2007

Planned experiments

November 2007 2008-2009

Magdalena Hammervik

Basic assumptions for experiments in C2WS Basic assumptions for experiments in C2WS

Command and control warfare (C2W) affects an opponent’s ability to practice command and control (C2) There are prerequisites for C2 affecting C2 ability. C2WS can simulate some aspects of C2W, and therefore, some aspects of C2 ability can be measured. Command and control warfare (C2W) affects an opponent’s ability to practice command and control (C2) There are prerequisites for C2 affecting C2 ability. C2WS can simulate some aspects of C2W, and therefore, some aspects of C2 ability can be measured.

Magdalena Hammervik Consists of

What is C2 ability? What is C2 ability?

Consists

• f

affects

C2W C2 Ability

EW CNO Prerequisites for C2

Examples:

• Radio jam
• Radar jam
• Signal

intelligence Examples:

• Passive

scan

• Active

scan

• CNA

Examples:

• Logs from games
• Observers protocol
• Subjective

estimations

• Performance

estimations

• Communication

analysis Is measured by

• 1. Knowledge and experience
• 2. Operational picture
• 3. Confidence/trust
• 4. Information flow
• 5. Situation awareness
• 6. Objectives
• 7. Feedback
• 8. Flexibility
• 9. Decision making

Magdalena Hammervik

Participants and materials Participants and materials

Swedish military officers Two opposite teams (HQ’s) A platform operator Observers on each side keep log of events Data collection partly built-in, partly external from the demonstrator Swedish military officers Two opposite teams (HQ’s) A platform operator Observers on each side keep log of events Data collection partly built-in, partly external from the demonstrator

Magdalena Hammervik

Scenario Scenario

Magdalena Hammervik

Procedure Procedure

Instructions and introductory training Order + intelligence

Realism Experiment control (eg. ROE)

Planning phase (each HQ)

Game After Action Review Concluding discussion

Instructions and introductory training Order + intelligence

Realism Experiment control (eg. ROE)

Planning phase (each HQ)

Game After Action Review Concluding discussion

Magdalena Hammervik

Data collection Data collection

Subjective ratings from participants during and after games (PDA + Questionnaires) Observers – ratings and

• bservations

Demonstrator Logs Concluding discussion Communication analysis Psychophysiology - pulse Subjective ratings from participants during and after games (PDA + Questionnaires) Observers – ratings and

• bservations

Demonstrator Logs Concluding discussion Communication analysis Psychophysiology - pulse

Magdalena Hammervik

Example from a game (1) Example from a game (1)

Deployment force BLA

Magdalena Hammervik

Example from a game (2) Example from a game (2)

Deployment force BLA

Magdalena Hammervik

Use of results Use of results

Feedback to and from participants Development of functionality Important that technology and method development goes hand in hand Feedback to and from participants Development of functionality Important that technology and method development goes hand in hand

Magdalena Hammervik Jenny Lindoff Martin Castor Lars Tydén

Questions? Questions?