Comit de programme du 1 ocobre 2014 Outline StG 2014 step 1 results - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Comité de programme du 1 ocobre 2014

│ 2

• StG 2014 step 1 results
• General Overview
• Gender
• Years past PhD
• Resubmissions
• HI country

Outline

│ 2

│ 3

Life Sciences Physical Sciences & Engineering Social Sciences & Humanities

1036 (32 %) 1490 (45 %) 746 (23 %) 305 (37 %) 373 (45 %) 149 (18 %) Submitted proposals Proposals retained to step2 Total = 3272 Total = 827

StG2014 Outcome Step1 evaluation

Success Rate 26%

│ 3

│ 4

StG 2014 – Overview by domain Step 1 results

│ 4 │ 4

30% 26% 20% 26% 40% 45% 41% 43% 30% 29% 39% 31%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% LS domain PE domain SH domain STG 2014 step 1

% "C" % "B" % "A"

│ 5

StG 2012 - 2014 – Overview by domain Submissions by gender

│ 5

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% LS PE SH Call Domain

% F 2012 % F 2013 % F 2014

│ 6

StG 2013 - 2014 – Overview by domain

Submissions vs passed to Step2 by gender

│ 6

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% PE domain LS domain SH domain Grand Total

STG 2013 (STG str) % submissions who are female STG 2013 (STG str) % "passed to step 2" who are female STG 2014 % submissions who are female STG 2014 % "passed to step 2" who are female

│ 7

StG 2014 – Overview by panel

Submissions vs passed to Step2 by gender

│ 7

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% PE1 PE2 PE3 PE4 PE5 PE6 PE7 PE8 PE9 PE10 LS1 LS2 LS3 LS4 LS5 LS6 LS7 LS8 LS9 SH1 SH2 SH3 SH4 SH5 SH6 % fraction who are F Allocated panel

% submissions from F % "passed to step 2" who are F

│ 8

StG 2014 – Overview by domain Step 1 success rate by gender

│ 8

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% LS domain PE domain SH domain STG 2014 Step 1 success rate Domain

SR M SR F

26%

│ 9

StG 2013 - 2014 Evaluated proposals by years past PhD

│ 9

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 % in category # years past PhD

% in category STG 2013 % in category STG 2014

│ 10

StG 2013 - 2014 Results of Step1 by years past PhD

│ 10

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Step 1 success rate

# interviews # Yrs past phd on call publication date

# passed to step 2 2013 # passed to step 2 2014 Step 1 SR 2013 Step 1 SR 2014

│ 11

StG 2014 : Resubmissions

Eligible Applicants resubmitting to StG2014 (673) 4 resubmissions 3 3 resubmissions 21 2 resubmissions 107 1 resubmission 542

│ 12

StG 2014 - Step 1 evaluation

Resubmissions from previous calls

7 3 10 29 54 2 198 5 3 18 32 84 1 234 2 11 24 33 1 48 50 100 150 200 250 Passed to Step 2 Satisfactory, beyond budget Step 1 Unsatisfactory Step 1

│ 13

StG 2014 – Step1 evaluation Resubmissions : success rates from previous calls

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Overall SR: 37,9%

│ 14

StG 2013 - 2014 Submissions by HI country

│ 14

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% UK DE IT ES FR NL SE FI BE IL DK AT PT NORO IE EL HU PL CZ CH % submissions in call Host institution country

Top 21 - incl Switzerland

% of submissions 2013 % of submissions 2014

│ 15

StG 2013 - 2014 Submissions by HI country

│ 15

100 200 300 400 500 600 UK DE IT ES FR NL SE FI BE IL DK AT PT NORO IE EL HU PL CZ CH # submissions HI country

Top 21 - incl Switzerland

STG 2013 STG 2014

│ 16

StG 2014 – results of Step 1 Success rate by HI country

│ 16 101 260 212 48 91 430 571 17 87 103 4 283 55 108 123 14 84 32 32 9 10 399 17 50 29 41 100 200 300 400 500 600

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% IL FR NL IE DK DE UK TR AT BE IS ES NO FI SE CY PT HU PL RS EE IT CH RO CZ EL Step 1 success rate HI country

SR by HI country # submissions

26%

│ 17

StG 2014 – results of Step 1 Success rate by HI country

│ 17

UK DE FR NL ES IL IT DK BE FI SE AT IE NO PT TR HU PL CY RO CH CZ EE EL IS RS 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 0% 1% 10% % "Passed to step 2" % submissions

│ 18

• 2 Grantees re-applying:
• LS1 from STG 2009
• PE6 from STG 2010
• Both have passed to step 2

StG 2014 – Resubmissions by grantees

│ 18

│ 19

ERC StG 2014 - Eligibility 62 Ineligible proposals (1.9%)

│ 19 3 2 1 5 3 2 4 2 4 2 4 1 1 5 4 9 1 1 3 2 1 1 1

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% LS1 LS2 LS3 LS4 LS5 LS6 LS7 LS8 LS9 PE1 PE2 PE3 PE4 PE5 PE6 PE7 PE8 PE9 PE10 SH1 SH2 SH3 SH4 SH5 SH6 % ineligible proposals in panel allocated panel

Ineligible proposals LS = 2.1 % PE = 2.1 % SH = 1%

% in panel ineligible # ineligible (62)

│ 20

Ineligible Evaluation PE 13 May 24 June LS 13 May 27 June SH 13 May 2 July days after panel

• 6 days

StG 2014 – Step1 results Communication to Applicants

│ 20

│ 21

• 870 Interviews from 22 September to 16 October
• PE2 and PE6 : 46- 52 interviews
• Results planned to be released in November
• Expected overall success rate : 10-11%

StG 2014 Step2 Panel meetings

│ 21

• Overview & Eligibility
• CoG Step 1 results
• Overview Scoring
• Cut-off ratio
• Gender
• Reapplying grantees
• Some conclusions

│ 22

Outline

Overview: CoG 2014

• Final number of submitted proposals - 2528
• Eligibility finished – 36 ineligible proposals (rate of

ineligibility 1.4%)

• Step 1 Panel Meetings just completed for all domains
• Communication to successful Step 1 applicants for

interview gone out, together with an informal notice to unsuccessful PIs

• Step 2 meetings November / December – 810 interviews

to be held

COG 2014 Ineligibility

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 # proposals

ERC COG 2014 Reasons for ineligibility 36 proposals = 1.4 % (1.6 % in 2013)

CoG 2014 – Outcome Step 1 evaluation

Life Sciences Physical Sciences & Engineering Social Sciences & Humanities 797 (31.5 %) 1205 (47.7 %) 526 (20.8 %) 291 (36 %) 365 (45 %) 154 (19 %) Submitted proposals Proposals retained to step2 Total = 2528 Step 1 success rate 32 %

26 49 42 38 29 39 32 44 31 35 31 81 59 52 59 51 30 51 43 50 29 38 31 21 39 41 33 36 31 15

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

PE1 PE2 PE3 PE4 PE5 PE6 PE7 PE8 PE9 PE10

allocated panel

ERC COG 2014 Step 1 results PE domain

Unsatisfactory 'C' (26 %) Satisfactory 'B' (43 %) Passed to Step 2 'A' (31 %)

CoG 2014 - Step 1 results PE domain: overview by panel

26 49 42 38 29 39 32 44 31 35 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 PE1 PE2 PE3 PE4 PE5 PE6 PE7 PE8 PE9 PE10 Step 1 budget cut-off ratio allocated panel

ERC COG 2014 Step 1 cut-off ratio - PE domain

COG 2014 step 1 # interviews

CoG 2014 - Step 1 results PE domain: panel budget multiplier

29 26 28 33 35 29 45 31 35 15 32 17 44 28 24 42 34 15 30 13 17 24 38 34 42 24 18

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% LS1 LS2 LS3 LS4 LS5 LS6 LS7 LS8 LS9 allocated panel ERC COG 2014 Step 1 results LS domain

Unsatisfactory 'C' (31%) Satisfactory 'B' (32%) Passed to Step 2 'A' (37 %)

CoG 2014 - Step 1 results LS domain: overview by panel

29 26 28 33 35 29 45 31 35

0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 LS1 LS2 LS3 LS4 LS5 LS6 LS7 LS8 LS9 Step 1 budget cut off ratio

allocated panel

ERC COG 2014 budget cut-off ratios LS domain

COG Step 1 cut-off ratio # interviews

CoG 2014 - Step 1 results LS domain: panel budget multiplier

CoG 2014 –Step 1 results Overview by panel

20 36 17 30 24 27 18 54 20 27 24 27 22 48 9 50 22 41 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% SH1 SH2 SH3 SH4 SH5 SH6 allocated pannel

ERC COG 2014 Step 1 results SH domain

Unsatisfactory 'C' (37 %) Satisfactory 'B' (33 %) Passed to Step 2 'A' (30 %)

CoG 2014 – Step 1 results SH domain: panel budget multiplier

20 36 17 30 24 27 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 SH1 SH2 SH3 SH4 SH5 SH6 Step 1 budget cut-off ratio Allocated panel

ERC COG 2014 Step 1 cut-off ratio SH domain

COG 2014 Step 1 # interviews

COG 2014 - Submissions by gender

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% LS1 LS2 LS3 LS4 LS5 LS6 LS7 LS8 LS9 PE1 PE2 PE3 PE4 PE5 PE6 PE7 PE8 PE9 PE10 SH1 SH2 SH3 SH4 SH5 SH6 % submissions from F Allocated panel

ERC COG 2013 - 2014 % submissions from females by panel

% F in panels 2013 (29.3 % = 1077) % F in panels 2014 (27.4 % = 694)

CoG 2014 - PE Step 1 results

Submissions vs passed to Step2 by gender

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%

PE1 PE2 PE3 PE4 PE5 PE6 PE7 PE8 PE9 PE10 domain

% who are F allocated panel

ERC COG 2014 Results of step 1 % females in evaluation

% in evaluation who are F % in step 2 who are F

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

PE1 PE2 PE3 PE4 PE5 PE6 PE7 PE8 PE9 PE10 domain F

success rate females allocated panel

ERC COG 2013-2014 Step 1 success rate PE domain = 31%

(SR M 2013 = 19 %, SR M 2014 = 31 %)

SR female 2013 (18 %) SR female 2014 (31 %)

CoG 2014 – PE Step 1 results Success rate by gender

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

LS1 LS2 LS3 LS4 LS5 LS6 LS7 LS8 LS9 domain

allocated panel

ERC COG 2014 Results of step 1 % of Females in evaluation

% in evaluation who are F % Step 2 who are F

CoG 2014 – LS Step 1 results

Submissions vs passed to Step2 by gender

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

LS1 LS2 LS3 LS4 LS5 LS6 LS7 LS8 LS9 domain F

female success rates Allocated panel

ERC COG 2013-2014: Step 1 success rates LS domain = 37% (SR M 2013 = 26 %, SR M 2014 = 40 %)

SR F 2013 (14 %) SR F 2014 (31 %)

CoG 2014 – LS Step 1 results Success rate by gender

CoG 2014 – SH Step 1 results

Submissions vs passed to Step2 by gender

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% SH1 SH2 SH3 SH4 SH5 SH6 domain % who are F allocated panel

ERC COG 2014 Results of step 1 % females in evaluation

% in evaluation who are F % in step 2 who are F

CoG 2014 – SH Step 1 results success rate by gender

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% SH1 SH2 SH3 SH4 SH5 SH6 Domain female success rates allocated panel

ERC COG 2013-2014: Step 1 success rates SH domain = 30% (SR M 2013 = 17 %, SR M 2014 = 32 %)

SR F 2013 SR F 2014

CoG 2014 – Resubmissions by grantees – update this slide

• 123 Grantees re-applying – overall step 1 SR: 65%
• 31 StG 2007, 57 StG 2009, 34 StG 2010, 1 StG 2011
• 4.9 % evaluated proposals
• Highest PE2 @ 9
• PE - 29 out of 52 passed to step 2 (SR = 56% vs PE

domain 31 %; 3 proposals with C score)

• LS - 36 out of 49 passed to step 2 (SR = 73% vs LS

domain 37 %)

• SH – 15 out of 22 passed to step 2 (SR = 68% vs SH

domain 29%)

ERC COG 2014: Results step 1

123 reapplying grantees

5 7 8 7 6 5 4 7 6 9 6 7 2 5 5 4 6 2 5 4 2 5 3 3 2 4 6 8 10 LS1 LS2 LS3 LS4 LS5 LS6 LS7 LS8 LS9 PE1 PE2 PE3 PE4 PE5 PE6 PE7 PE8 PE9 PE10 SH1 SH2 SH3 SH4 SH5 SH6 # proposals allocated panel

ERC COG 2014 Reapplying grantees step 1 results success rate 65 %

C B A

Summary

• Evaluation on track
• Step 1 meetings finished – 810 interviews (vs 694 in

2013)

• Step 1 success rate: 32% (vs 19% in 2013)
• Communication to PIs is ongoing

1.PoC 2014 Deadline 1- Results 2.Conclusions PoC 2014

Points to be covered

ERC PoC 2014-DL1 Overview

• Call published in December 2013.
• ERC received 182 proposals
• 3 proposals declared ineligible ( Not fully related to an

ERC grant).

• 79 proposals in LS (43 %)
• 75 proposals in PE (41 %)
• 28 proposals in SH (15%)
• 1 Synergy proposal
• Applicants were informed about the outcome of the

evaluation at the end of July 2014.

50 proposals retained for funding

• 91 proposals pass all thresholds
• 50 were retained for funding
• 11 were left on a reserve list
• 30 were not retained due to budget restrictions
• 7,471,098 M€ committed (+ 20%?)
• Success rate of 27%
• 27 Proposals from PE (37% success rate) + 3 in reserve
• 19 Proposals from LS (24,5% success rate) + 7 in reserve
• 3 Proposals from SH (11% success rate) + 1 in reserve
• 1 SyG (100% success rate)
• Gender: 9 Female applicant retained (28% sr)

ERC Proof of Concept Evolution of Success rates and Budget used

41% 33% 55% 45% 24% 24% 27% 88% 57% 96% 79% 97% 99% 99%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% DL1 DL2 DL1 DL2 DL1 DL2 DL1 2011 2012 2013 2014

Success rates Budget used 30 22 33 27 33 34 50

ERC Proof of Concept 2011-2012-2013- 2014 - Success rates by domain

67% 58% 30% 37% 23% 54% 18% 25% 10% 50% 5% 11% 77% 65% 32% 18% 30% 20% 5% 27% 9%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% PE PE PE PE LS LS LS LS SH SH SH SH 2011 2012 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014

DL1 DL2

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

LS1 LS2 LS3 LS4 LS5 LS6 LS7 LS8 LS9 PE1 PE10 PE2 PE3 PE4 PE5 PE6 PE7 PE8 SH1 SH2 SH3 SH4 SH5 SH6 SYG6

ERC Proof of Concept 2014- DL1 Results PoC funded proposals by related Panel (Black Main ; Red reserve)

2 + 1

2 2 1 2 4 4 5 1 1 1 1

2 + 1 4 + 1 6 + 3 1 + 1 5 + 2 6 + 1

1

ERC Proof of Concept 2014- DL1 Results Reserve List proposals by panel

1 2 3 LS1 LS2 LS5 LS7 LS8 PE7 PE8 SH3

ERC Proof of Concept 2014- DL1 Results HI country

2 4 6 8 10 12 IL UK ES DE FR NL CY FI IT SE BE IE DK IS TR Reserve Main List

WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE 4 THE CHANCELLOR, MASTERS AND SCHOLARS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD 3 THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM. 3 AGENCIA ESTATAL CONSEJO SUPERIOR DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS 2 BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY 2 KUNGLIGA TEKNISKA HOEGSKOLAN 2 TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 2 UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS 2

ERC Proof of Concept 2014- DL1 Host Institutions with 2 or more PoC

ERC Proof of Concept 2014- DL1 Success rate by HI country

100% 67% 67% 39% 35% 29% 27% 27% 25% 23% 18% 17% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% TR CY FI IL ES DE SE UK IE IT FR NL Overall S.R 27%

EPICUP- EPIgenetics of Cancer of Unknown Primary

Fundacion Instituti de Investigacion Biomedica de Bellvitge ( IDIBELL) ES. The objective: to develop a package demonstrating the feasibility of a high-throughput tool for epigenotyping Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) to identify tumor type based in the DNA methylation profile of non-coding RNA (ncRNA) loci.( a diagnostic kit) Relation with ERC grant: The goal of the ERC grant is to determining the contribution of DNA methylation alterations to the aberrant activity of ncRNA loci in human

• cancer. Proved to be commercially feasible

ChildCog:Novel digital solutions for assessing child cognitive function (SH4)

Tampere University (FI) The issue: Need to detect early child mental and cognitive functions. Relation with ERC grant: A central goal

• f the PIs ERC StG project

(EarlyDev) is to use electrophysiological and eye- tracking based methods to probe infants’ cognitive function

iPublic:Inkjet Printed Ultrafast Batteries and Large Integrated Capacitors

KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE) The issue: Present energy storage devices generally suffer from either low power density or low energy density. The PI proposes “graphene-buffered Li-ion batteries”. Relation with ERC grant: On the ERC grant the PI developed inkjet printing techniques, mainly relying on a solvent-exchange ink formulation technique, allow a reliable fabrication of uniform graphene patterns at a resolution of ~50 µm

General conclusions PoC call 2014

1.- Decision needed on Reserve List 2.- Deadline 2 - 1st October 2014 142 pre-registered proposals 15 days before the deadline ( In DL1 185) 3.- Use of new IT tools.

│ 55

│ 56

I – FP 7 challenges Update of the Budget situation (payment credits) in 2014

Strategy for payment shortage:

• Priority to pre-financing of the last remaining FP7

projects to be signed

• Priority to pay final or later reporting periods where the

PI needs more immediate reinforcement and usually the amounts are smaller

ITN 2013 call – budget 517.792.000 €

Call deadline 22 November 2012 Negotiation start 26 March 2013 Time to grant (75% signed) 260 days (9 August 2013) Signed 170 (incl. 20 B-list) (514.965.281 €) Not yet signed 1 (2.812.782 €)

People in FP7

IAPP 2013 call – budget 89.100.000 €

Call deadline 16 January 2013 Negotiation start 09 April 2013 Time to grant (75% signed) 239 days (12 September 2013) Signed 54 (incl. 7 B-list) (83.222.755 €) To be signed/launched 2/2 (5.877.245 €)

ITN IAPP

IRSES 2013 call – budget 32.946.000€

Call deadline 17 January 2013 Negotiation start 9 April 2013 Time to grant (75% signed) 273 days (16 October 2013) Signed 96 (incl. 13 B-list) (32.944.700 €) Not yet signed

• People in FP7

IRSES

IIF 2013 call – budget 48.950.000€

Call deadline 14 August 2013 Negotiation start 29 November 2013 Time to grant (75% signed) 198 days (27 February 2014) Signed 220 (incl. 29 B-list) (48.502.870 €) Not yet signed 1 (IIFR) in negotiation

IOF 2013 call – budget 48.950.000€

Call deadline 14 August 2013 Negotiation start 29 November 2013 Time to grant (75% signed) 202 days (3 March 2014) Signed 174 (incl. 26 B-list) (48.601.585 €) Not yet signed 2 in negotiation

People in FP7

IOF IIF

Call deadline 14 August 2013 Negotiation start 29 November 2013 Time to grant (75% signed) 215 days (17 March 2014) Signed 676 (incl. 72 B-list) (145.538.336 €) Not yet signed 10 (1.861.664 €)

IEF 2013 call - budget 147.400.000 €

People in FP7

IEF

CIG Deadline 13 – budget 22.000.000 €

Call cut off date 07 March 2013 Negotiation start 29 May 2013 Time to grant (75% signed) 187 days (10 September 2013) Signed 222 (incl. 23 B-list) (21.4m €) Not yet signed 6 (0.6m €)

People in FP7

CIG Deadline 14 – budget 22.000.000 €

Call deadline 18 September 2013 Negotiation start 02 December 2013 Time to grant (75% signed) 196 days (02 April 2014) Signed 215 (incl. 22 B-list) (21.0 m €) Not yet signed 10 (1.0m €)

CIG CIG

COFUND 2013 call - budget 126.500.000 €

Call deadline 05 December 2012 Negotiation start 19 March 2013 Time to grant (75% signed) 440 days (18 February 2014) Signed 31 (incl. 2 B-list) (126.48 m €) Not yet signed

People in FP7

COFUND

H2020 MSCA

ITN

Innovative Training Networks

IF

Individual Fellowships

RISE

Research and Innovation Staff Exchange

NIGHT

European Researchers Night

Programme Committee Meeting 1 October 2014 Kaisa HELLEVUO, REA Unit A1

ETN EID EJD European Training Networks

350.18 M€ 25.5 M€ 30 M€

European Industrial Doctorates European Joint Doctorates

Participants implement a joint research training programme Doctoral training with the non-academic sector Universities cooperating to deliver joint degrees

ITN 2014 Modes & Budget

• Call Deadline:

9 April 2014

• Evaluation week:

23 – 27 June 2014

• Launch Grant preparation:

4 Sept. 2014

• Starting dates:

1 Nov 2014 – 1 Jan 2015

ITN 2014: Submitted & A-list proposals

selection

ETN EID EJD 8,6% 15,3% 13,1% Success rate

ITN 2014: Eligible and A-list proposals by panel

Note: ETN, EJD and EID 2014

ITN 2014: Number of beneficiaries in A-list & Role

ITN 2014: Number of beneficiaries in A-list & Mode

ETN EID EJD Total 869 76 47 992

ITN 2014: Number of partner organisations A-list & Mode

ETN EID EJD Total 560 35 74 669

ITN 2014 - Number of EID beneficiaries & Role 19 EID A-List projects

6 6 9 36 – 108 (1-3 fellows) 144 – 216 (4-6 fellows) 252 – 324 (7-9 fellows) 360 – 432 (10-12 fellows) 504 - 540 (11-12 fellows) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of participants Total person months 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 3 4 6 2

ITN 2014: Number of EID Submissions, participants & person months requested

14 10 14 2 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

<=180

1 3

Number of EID submissions

Physics Physics Chemistry Chemistry Life Environment Engineering Engineering

ITN 2014: European Joint Doctorate Programme s in Europe

H2020 MSCA

ITN

Innovative Training Networks

IF

Individual Fellowships

RISE

Research and Innovation Staff Exchange

NIGHT

European Researchers Night

Programme Committee Meeting 1 October 2014 Klaus-Günther BARTHEL, REA Unit A2

• Call opened

12 Mar. 2014

• Call closed

11 Sept. 2014, 17:00h Brussels time

• Call budget

240.5 M€

(EF – 211.5 M€; GF – 29 M€)

• Evaluation
• Oct. – Nov. 2014
• Ethical screening

1- 5 Dec. 2014

• Results to be sent to applicants by 11 Feb. 2015
• First Grant Agreements expected for Apr. 2015

IF 2014: Call data

IF 2014: Overview

IF 2014: Country participation EU – 28 MS

IF 2014: Country participation EU – 28 MS

IF 2014: Country participation AC

IF 2014: Country participation TC as Partner Organisation for Global Fellowships

H2020 MSCA

ITN

Innovative Training Networks

IF

Individual Fellowships

RISE

Research and Innovation Staff Exchange

NIGHT

European Researchers Night

Programme Committee Meeting 1 October 2014 Francois WILLEKENS, REA Unit A3

• Call Deadline:

24 April 2014

• Evaluation week:

2 – 6 June 2014

• Launch Grant preparation: 4 Sept. 2014

Budget 70 M€

RISE 2014: Call data

Academic 70% Non-Academic 30%

Academic 1026 -> 438 Non Academic 437 -> 187

1463 participants 625 A-List RISE 2014: Submitted & A-list participants

The success rate

• f Academic and

non-Academic is the same !

Rise 2014: Submitted and A-list participants by panel

Rise 2014: Number of participants in A-list

Member States, Associated Countries & International Organisations

Country Acad NonAcad Total AT 8 2 10 BE 5 3 8 BG CY 1 2 3 CZ 2 2 4 DE 34 17 51 DK 8 2 10 EE 1 1 EL 15 11 26 ES 39 22 61 FI 6 4 10 FR 25 11 36 HR 2 2 HU 4 1 5 IE 5 3 8 IT 34 22 56 LT 1 1 2 LU 1 1 LV 1 1 MT 1 1 NL 16 7 23 PL 9 1 10 PT 13 7 20 RO 1 3 4 SE 9 5 14 SI 1 3 4 SK UK 43 14 57 Grand Total 282 146 428 Member States

Country Academic P. Non -Academic P. Total AL 1 2 3 IL 4 2 6 NO 1 1 TR 4 4 8 4 1 5 14 9 23

• No. Participants

Associated Countries and IEIO Grand Total

RISE 2014: Number of participants in A-list Third Countries

Country Acad. Non-Acad. Total Country Acad. Non-Acad. Total AM 3 3 MA 6 6 AR 18 18 MX 3 1 4 AU 6 1 7 MY 1 1 BF 1 1 NA 1 1 BO 1 1 NG 1 1 BR 6 1 7 NP 1 1 BY 5 5 NZ 3 3 CA 3 3 PE 2 2 CH 1 2 3 PK 1 1 CL 9 1 10 RS 1 1 CN 9 9 RU 1 1 2 CO 2 2 4 SA 1 1 EC 1 1 TH 1 1 EG 3 3 TN 1 1 ET 2 2 TW 2 2 IN 2 2 UA 10 10 JO 1 1 US 21 6 27 JP 8 2 10 UY 1 1 KR 1 1 2 XK 1 1 LB 1 1 ZA 8 5 13 LI 1 1 Grand Total 142 32 174 Third Countries

• No. Participants
• No. Participants

RISE 2014: Success rates by participants and country (MS, AC, IEIO)

H2020 MSCA

ITN

Innovative Training Networks

IF

Individual Fellowships

RISE

Research and Innovation Staff Exchange

NIGHT

European Researchers Night

Programme Committee Meeting 1 October 2014 Sandro Ricci, REA Unit A4

European Researchers´ Night 2014: Facts

Grant Agreement Preparation timeline Final evaluation report: 30/04/2014 Information to Programme Committee/applicants: 13/05/2014 Time to Grant Target: 240 days including 90 days of Grant Preparation First Grant agreement signed: 01/07/2014  TTG 119 days; 49 days of Grant Preparation Final Grant agreement signed:  TTG 182 days; 112 days of Grant Preparation Average TTG: 152 days Average Grant Preparation: 82 days

Night 2014: Funded projects

• 47 Grant agreements signed

(48 on A list, 2 proposals merged into 1 project)

• 210 beneficiaries; largest consortium 14 beneficiaries
• 25 countries; 300 cities
• EU contribution: €8 million

 total cost: €12.6 million  smallest project: EU €71.765; total €79.737  largest project: EU €421.200; total €1.045.075

Night 2014: Geographical Coverage

Member State Countries Austria; Bulgaria; Croatia; Estonia; France; Germany; Greece; Hungary; Ireland; Italy; Malta; Netherlands; Poland; Portugal; Romania; Slovakia; Slovenia; Spain; United Kingdom Associated Countries Bosnia and Herzegovina; Israel; Montenegro; Serbia; Turkey Other Countries Switzerland (CERN)