comet implementation of muon calorimeter using lyso
play

COMET:Implementation of Muon Calorimeter using LYSO Crystal Array - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

COMET:Implementation of Muon Calorimeter using LYSO Crystal Array Shobhna Misra, Hrishikesh Iyer,Prathamesh Joshi and Vedant Basu Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay May 30, 2017 Outline Importance LYSO


  1. COMET:Implementation of Muon Calorimeter using LYSO Crystal Array Shobhna Misra, Hrishikesh Iyer,Prathamesh Joshi and Vedant Basu Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay May 30, 2017

  2. Outline ◮ Importance ◮ LYSO Calorimeter Overview ◮ Experimental Setup ◮ Procedure ◮ Data Collection ◮ Results

  3. Charged Lepton Flavour Violation ◮ In the minimal Standard Model Framework with massless neutrinos, lepton flavour conservation is a consequence of gauge invariance. However, the phenomenon of neutrino mixing demonstrates flavour violation in leptons ◮ Observation of flavour violation in charged leptons would provide definitive evidence of new physics, being highly suppressed by the Standard Model. ◮ Coherent neutrino-less conversion of a negative muon to an electron ( µ − N → e − N ) in a muonic atom is a prominent and experimentally favourable process,due to a monoenergetic signal electron at energies far from the normal muon decay spectrum

  4. LYSO Calorimeter ◮ Crystal Calorimetry is especially advantageous due to total absorption. This provides accurate energy and position resolution, along with efficient reconstructions ◮ The LYSO (Lithium-Yttrium Oxyorthosilicate) crystal is suitable as a scintillator due to its high density and fast scintillation ◮ An array of Avalanche Photodiodes(Hamamatsu S8664-55). converts this scintillation into a voltage signal, which is then fed into a pre-amplifier. This data is then digitized by EROS boards and fed into the Data Acquisition Unit. ◮ A slow control board is implemented to control calibration LEDs, and monitor Temperature.

  5. Experimental Setup- Trigger ◮ The Level 1 trigger has been implemented using two plastic scintillation detectors ◮ These are separated by an optimal distance to reduce the solid angle, improving trigger efficiency. ◮ The scintillation is converted into a voltage pulse via a Photomultiplier Tube ◮ The two PMT signals are then passed through a threshold discriminator module, followed by a coincidence trigger. This is converted to ECL outputs, which serve as the overall trigger for the EROS board.

  6. Figure 1: Trigger Setup

  7. EROS Board ◮ Upon receiving the trigger, the analog input to the EROS board is passed through the DRS4 IC, which is a high speed Domino Ring Sampler. ◮ The main processing is done by a Xilinx Artix-7 FPGA chip. ◮ To reduce dead time on the electronics, a daisy chain system has been designed to network multiple EROS boards,using the high speed SiTCP protocol.

  8. Figure 2: capacitor offset values

  9. Data Processing ◮ Data Processing was performed on ROOT ◮ We initially calculated capacitor offset voltages using a baseline sample ◮ After compensating for the offset we averaged the baseline over 10000 entries, and subtracted it from the raw signal data.

  10. Results:Linearity The linearity of the output characteristics of the EROS board were tested using an RC Differentiator and a Function Generator Figure 3: Output amplitude v/s input amplitude

  11. Results:Temperature The stability of the output was studied across the operational range of 22 ◦ C − 28 ◦ C Figure 4: Signal maxima vs Temperature

  12. Results: Cosmic Muon Signals Finally, the entire assembly was tuned for detection of Cosmic Ray Muons Figure 5: Signal after processing

  13. Figure 6: Contaminated signal

  14. Figure 7: rectified signals

  15. Issues faced ◮ Initially, we had problems due to inefficient triggering off a single scintillator detector, which we attempted to correct by limiting the solid angle ◮ In the baseline calibration file, we were observing consistent kinks. This was troubling as the capacitor readings were restricted to a narrow almost Gaussian range. ◮ To calculate the baseline noise, we averaged capacitor values over all entries, which should give us a band near zero after removing the inherent offset. Yet we observed this kink across all channels. ◮ We also had abnormal noise in the channels off one board corresponding to a clean signal on the other 16 channels.

  16. Figure 8: Baseline Kink

  17. Acknowledgements We would like to express our gratitude to ◮ Kou Oishi, Kyushu University ◮ Kazuki Ueno, KEK ◮ Yuki Fujii, KEK.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend