Present Status and Future Prospects of COMET to Search for μ-e Conversion at J-PARC
- Y. Fujii
KEK
- n behalf of the COMET Collaboration
CLFV2016, Charlottesville, 21st June 2016
Present Status and Future Prospects of COMET to Search for -e - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Present Status and Future Prospects of COMET to Search for -e Conversion at J-PARC Y. Fujii KEK on behalf of the COMET Collaboration CLFV2016, Charlottesville, 21st June 2016 Outline Physics COMET Experiment Overview R&D and
KEK
CLFV2016, Charlottesville, 21st June 2016
2
3
Flavors are mixed through CKM matrix in the Standard Model, Already confirmed Flavors are mixed through PMNS matrix, Already confirmed (extension of SM) Charged Lepton Flavor Violation Forbidden in the Standard Model, B(μ→eγ)~O(10-54) for SM+ν oscillation, Not observed so far
Quarks Leptons
? ? ?
w/o neutrino emission
are complementary
4
10 3 10 4 10
10
1 10 10
2
! " (TeV) EXCLUDED (90% CL) B(µ # e$)=10-13 B(µ # e$)=10-14 B(µ # e conv in 27Al)=10-16 B(µ # e conv in 27Al)=10-18
Andre de Gouvea (2013) photonic dominant four-fermion dominant
nucleus
μ- e-
1.17μs proton bunch Beam BG DIO BG Signal Measurement time window
17 of stopping muons are required
decay in flight, Antiproton, Proton leakage, etc.
5
Extinction = Number of protons between 2 bunches Number of protons in a bunch
composed of 175+ researchers of 33 institutes from 15 countries
7
8
MR Synchrotron *design value
*
9
Muon Stopping Target 8GeV Proton Beam
Detector Solenoid Electron Spectrometer Pion Capture Solenoid Muon Transport Solenoid
10
StrECAL
Straw Tube Tracker ECAL
CyDet
Cylindrical Drift Chamber Trigger Hodoscope Muon Stopping Target
Facility
even in the worst case
12
filled fi l l e dh=9' 4'filled'and'5'empty
filledRCS' h=2'
Bucket'B Bucket'A A BOverview of Hadron Beam Facility
last year
Engineering design ongoing
13
April 2015
R=13mm, L=700mm
14
Target prototype
Geometry of proton monitor Diamond prototype detector
Scintillator signal inside beam pipe
Abort line @J-PARC MR
completed
are ongoing
preparation
15
Al stabilized SC wire Coil winding Transport Solenoid Detector Solenoid
secondaries
16
h05 Entries 51033 Mean 5933 RMS 242.8 z position (mm) 5500 5600 5700 5800 5900 6000 6100 6200 6300 6400 + count/p 5 10 15 20 25 30 35Longitudinal Distribution
Collimators
…
Saddle type coil is put
coil to generate dipole field
μ- stopping distribution projected on the target plane μ- stopping distribution along the beam axis
Keep the vertical position
wires
@p=105MeV/c, is achievable
18
Position resolutions of CDC prototype obtained in the beam test @Spring-8 RECBE Board Mass Test @IHEP
this month
19
June 2016 June 2016
radiator and a plastic scintillator
sides
accidental trigger due to γ rays
the prototype detector for 100MeV/c electrons
to be done
20
TOP: Plastic Scint. Bottom: Acryl Fine mesh PMT Analog FE prototype To digitizer
4 coincidence trigger
physics measurement
22
1st straw plane (x1) 2nd straw plane (x2) 3rd straw plane (y1) 4th straw plane (y2) gas manifold gas manifold front-end boards front-end boardsBeam
390 1950 1560 signal lines HV lines front-end boards gas inlet gas outlet gas manifold23
Vacuum Straw Tube × 16 × 2
Position mm 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Sigma um 50 100 150 200 250 300 Sigma vs Position for Ar/C2H6=50/50, 2000V
0.1Pa achieved !
Less than 200um σx everywhere
24
NaI(Tl) GSO LYSO Density, g/cm3 3.67 6.71 7.1
2.6 1.38 1.12 Decay const., ns 230 30-60 41 Max emission, nm 415 430 420 Relative LY 100 20 70-80
Comparisons of scintillator characteristics
20mm 20mm 120mm
2 → 10×10mm 2, ×3 photon yield
25
ECAL Prototype overview
May 19, 2016 19th COMET CM : ECAL Prototype Status 4
ECAL modules Vacuum gauge Vacuum Pump
Time [ns]
100 200 300 400 500
[ns] σ
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
26
DAQ PC ROESTI ROESTI EROS EROS
We measured data transfers speed by DAQ PC. Trigger Case of 5 boards
Only 1 optical cable in between chained ROESTI/EROS and PC!
σT < 1ns in common chip
27
Straw Prototype Beam Define Counter (BDC) ECAL Prototype
e- beam
ECAL Preamp
28
2×2 analog sum from ECAL ECAL waveforms in EROS *COTTRI is a front-end trigger system for CyDet and backup solution for StrawECAL
EROS successfully done
for same chip, same board and diff. board, respectively (preliminary)
length uncertainty
29
2 4 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
hPosRes_0
Entries 49257 Mean 0.03641 RMS 0.3424
Very Preliminary
Before calibration pattern 2 (same board) After calibration
σx=200um
Rtrack-Rhit [mm] Entries t1-t2 [ns] t1-t2 [ns] Straw Position Resolution
31
Common for CyDet and StrawECAL
MIDAS base
intermediating board, FCT
32
data
connector
33
19/05/16 9 Leonid Epshteyn, Novosibirsk group 9
Prototype v.2 of the Pre-trigger board and digitizing board
Connectors to FE 8-ch 10bit ADC Connectors digitizing– pretrigger Power for pre-trigger and digitizing boards FPGA Altera, Cyclone IV Connector to FCT
signals
StrECAL beam test succeeded
35
36
M
e n t u m ( Me V / c ) M
e n t u m ( Me V / c )
C z a r n e c k i e t a l . 2 1 1 G e a n t 4 C z a r n e c k i e t a l . 2 1 1 G e a n t 4
K i n e t i c E n e r g y ( M e V ) K i n e t i c E n e r g y ( M e V )
G e a n t 4 A l C a p d a t a G e a n t 4 A l C a p d a t a
Event display w/ merged particles
37
Yellow: MC 105MeV e- Red: Reconstructed Track
Signal track with BG Blue: signal Red: BG After apply track finding based on
16
39
Number of muons stopped inside targets Fraction of muons to be captured by Al target = 0.61 Fraction of μ-e conversion to the ground state = 0.9
103.6 < pe < 106.0 MeV/c 700 < te < 1170 ns
40
Due to incident protons arriving between the main proton bunches Due to particles delayed inside capture/transport solenoids
Electron spectrometer
high enough
42
Torus1 T
u s 2
Forthcoming PhD Thesis (Ben Krikler)
43
S t
p i n g T a r g e t E l e c t r
S p e c t r
e t e r D e t e c t
E l e c t r
S p e c t r
e t e r S t
p i n g T a r g e t S e c t i
D e t e c t
S
e n
d 1 5 M e V / c 5 M e V / c
DIO blocker around here
0T
included yet
44
DAQ days 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 S.E.S.
17 −10
16 −10
2.6×10-17
S.E.S. Curve as a function
45
47
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Phase-I (3.2kW) Beamline SC ¡magnet Detector Data-‑taking Phase-II (56kW) High ¡Power ¡ Facility Detector High-‑p/COMET ¡beamline
Beam ¡Cond.
Physics
World ¡best ¡sensitivity ¡ measurement ¡ ¡<10−14
Physics ¡Detector
Beam ¡measurement ¡Detector
Capture, ¡Transport ¡& ¡Cryogenics Phase-‑II ¡Detector Shield, ¡Dump ¡& ¡Magnet ¡ extension
Start ¡measurement ¡toward ¡ the ¡target ¡sensitivity ¡<10−16
COMET searches for μ-e conversion with S.E.S of 3×10
Phase-I (Phase-II) @J-PARC Phase-II S.E.S. with 1 year DAQ is comparable to that of Mu2e A lot of studies are intensively ongoing Recent Highlights Completion of CDC construction StrawECAL combined test Daisy chain for EROS/ROESTI Beam test for Diamond detector Large scale MC production Revisited Phase-II study with updated magnetic fields / geometry / software Data taking will start in 2018/2019 for Phase-I Phase-II can be a few years after Phase-I depending on the budget Almost all R&Ds for Phase-II will be completed in Phase-I
48