Combining and particle spectroscopy The decay behaviour of the PDR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

combining and particle spectroscopy the decay behaviour
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Combining and particle spectroscopy The decay behaviour of the PDR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Combining and particle spectroscopy The decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo S.G. P ICKSTONE *, V. D ERYA , A. H ENNIG , M. S PIEKER *, M.W EINERT , J. W ILHELMY *, AND A. Z ILGES I NSTITUTE FOR N UCLEAR P HYSICS U NIVERSITY OF C OLOGNE


slide-1
SLIDE 1

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

Combining γ and particle spectroscopy

S.G. PICKSTONE*, V. DERYA, A. HENNIG, M. SPIEKER*, M.WEINERT, J. WILHELMY*, AND A. ZILGES INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR PHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE

supported by DFG ZI 510/7-1 and BMBF 06KY9136

* Bonn-Cologne Graduate School of Physics and Astronomy

September 15th, 2015 COMEX5 Kraków

The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

slide-2
SLIDE 2

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

 Usually Γ0/Γ=1 assumed for B(E1) values from (γ,γ')

– Possible explanation of B(E1)-value discrepancy

 Branching ratios probe wave functions  Selective excitation needed to determine weak branchings

Pygmy Dipole Resonance – decay properties

1PDR

21

+

0gs

+

Bremsstrahlung Inelastic scattering

  • D. Savran, T. Aumann,

and A. Zilges, PPNP 70 (2013) 210

slide-3
SLIDE 3

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

 Usually Γ0/Γ=1 assumed for B(E1) values from (γ,γ')

– Possible explanation of B(E1)-value discrepancy

 Branching ratios probe wave functions  Selective excitation needed to determine weak branchings

Pygmy Dipole Resonance – decay properties

1PDR

21

+

0gs

+

Monoenergetic photons 𝐹𝑌 = 𝐹𝛿

Particle-γ-coincidences 𝐹𝑌 ≈ 𝐹𝑞 − 𝐹𝑞′

  • D. Savran, T. Aumann,

and A. Zilges, PPNP 70 (2013) 210

slide-4
SLIDE 4

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

Setup for p-γ coincidence experiments

SONIC HORUS Detectors 8 ΔE-E or single PIPS 14 HPGe Angles θ = 60°, 90°, 120°, 130° θ = 35°, 45°, 90°, 135°, 145° Efficiency 4% solid angle coverage ~ 2% @ 1.3 MeV Resolution typically 70 keV in-beam ~ 2 keV @ 1.3 MeV HORUS HORUS SONIC

slide-5
SLIDE 5

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

 Diagonal gates can be set to select decays to specific levels

– Ground state decays

p-γ coincidence matrix of 92Mo

Eγ [keV] EX [keV]

92Mo(p,p'γ)

@ Ep=10.5 MeV

slide-6
SLIDE 6

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

 Diagonal gates can be set to select decays to specific levels

– Ground state decays

p-γ coincidence matrix of 92Mo

Eγ [keV] EX [keV]

92Mo(p,p'γ)

@ Ep=10.5 MeV

slide-7
SLIDE 7

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

 Upper panel:

experimental results from (p,p'γ)

– Counts corrected by preliminary efficiency – Isotropic distribution assumed

 Lower panel:

experimental results from (γ,γ')

– ∝ B(E1) without branching

Ground state decays – comparison to (γ,γ')

92Mo(p,p'γ)

@10.5 MeV preliminary

92Mo(γ,γ')

  • G. Rusev, PhD Thesis,

TU Dresden (2006)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

 Upper panel:

experimental results from (p,p'γ)

– Counts corrected by preliminary efficiency – Isotropic distribution assumed

 Lower panel:

experimental results from (γ,γ')

– ∝ B(E1) without branching

Ground state decays – comparison to (γ,γ')

92Mo(p,p'γ)

@10.5 MeV preliminary

92Mo(γ,γ')

  • G. Rusev, PhD Thesis,

TU Dresden (2006)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

 Diagonal gates can be set to select decays to specific levels

– Ground state decays – Decays to 21

+, to 41 +, …

p-γ coincidence matrix of 92Mo

Eγ [keV] EX [keV]

92Mo(p,p'γ)

@ Ep=10.5 MeV

slide-10
SLIDE 10

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

 Diagonal gates can be set to select decays to specific levels

– Ground state decays – Decays to 21

+, to 41 +, …

p-γ coincidence matrix of 92Mo

Eγ [keV] EX [keV]

92Mo(p,p'γ)

@ Ep=10.5 MeV

slide-11
SLIDE 11

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

Decay branching ratio vs. energy

≈ Γ

1

Γ0 + Γ

1

  • No trend with energy

Branching to 21

+

  • observed
  • not observed

92Mo

slide-12
SLIDE 12

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

Branching ratio: experiment vs. theory

experiment theory

  • Experiment and

theory show similar picture

  • Smaller error bars

needed for higher significance

QPM calculations by N. Tsoneva

92Mo

slide-13
SLIDE 13

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

Branching ratio: experiment vs. theory

experiment

  • No trend of branching

ratio with strength

  • bserved
  • Different theoretical

prediction

  • Discrepancy for strong

transitions

theory QPM calculations by N. Tsoneva

92Mo

slide-14
SLIDE 14

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

 Goals of experiment:

– Study decay behaviour in non-magic nucleus – Individual and mean branching already observed in (α,α'γ) and (γ,γ') – With our setup:

  • More states (if similar to 92Mo)
  • Individual branching

– Higher beam energy to excite states at higher energies

94Mo(p,p'γ) @ Ep = 13.5 MeV

Adopted from C. Romig et al., PRC 88 (2013) 044331

  • V. Derya et al., NPA 906 (2013) 94

transitions to 21

+

transitions to g.s.

94Mo(α,α'γ)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

Excitation pattern vs. (γ,γ') and (α,α'γ)

 Observed less states than in (γ,γ'), but more states than in (α,α'γ)

  • V. Derya et al.,

NPA 906 (2013) 94

  • C. Romig et al.,

PRC 88 (2013) 044331

2+⨯3-

slide-16
SLIDE 16

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

 Only statistical

errors are shown

 No clear trend,

again state to state difference

 Needs to be

compared to theoretical predictions

Decay branching ratios for 94Mo

preliminary

94Mo 94Mo

slide-17
SLIDE 17

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

 Very good agreement with b1 values and upper limits from 94Mo(α,α'γ) performed at KVI with Eα=136MeV

Validation of setup and method

94Mo

preliminary

  • V. Derya et al., NPA 906 (2013) 94
  • C. Romig et al., PRC 88 (2013) 044331
slide-18
SLIDE 18

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

 2.2% for E  1.6% for ΔE-E 

3.9% for E

Up to 2.8% for ΔE-E

8.9% for E

7.8% for ΔE-E

Improvement of setup – solid angle coverage

ʘ

Beam

ʘ

E

Old Current New ʘ

slide-19
SLIDE 19

S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94Mo

 Many decays of PDR states to several final

states observed in 92Mo and 94Mo

– 21

+, 02 +, 22 +  Preliminary branching ratios for PDR states

could be determined for both nuclei

– Thorough analysis ongoing

 Setup and method was validated by com-

parison to 94Mo(α,α'γ) experiment at KVI

– Comparison to mean branching ratios

 Theoretical calculations needed for both cases!  Future experiments for PDR

– Inelastic scattering – Transfer reactions with p, d, α beams ≤ 30 MeV

Summary & Outlook

119Sn(d,pγ)120Sn

@Ed=8.5MeV

92Mo 94Mo