Collaboration for Collaboration for Regional Haze and Fine - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
collaboration for collaboration for regional haze and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Collaboration for Collaboration for Regional Haze and Fine - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nov 15, 2023 248 likes •518 views

Collaboration for Collaboration for Regional Haze and Fine Regional Haze and Fine Particle Pla Particle Plan ning nning NYSERDA Conference on Environmental Monitoring, Evaluation, and Protection in NY October 7, 2003 Susan S.G. Wierman

slide-1
SLIDE 1

MARAMA

Collaboration for Collaboration for Regional Haze Regional Haze and Fine and Fine Particle Pla Particle Plan nning ning

NYSERDA Conference on Environmental Monitoring, Evaluation, and Protection in NY

October 7, 2003

Susan S.G. Wierman

slide-2
SLIDE 2

MARAMA

Topics Topics

zKey Regional Haze SIP Requirements zTen Questions Visibility and PM2.5 Planners Wan t Answered zRegional Collaboration--Visibility SIPs zCurrent work & next steps

slide-3
SLIDE 3

MARAMA

Regional Haze Regional Haze SIP Goal SIP Goal

“…the prevention of any future, and the remedying of any existing, impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I Federal areas which impairment results from man-made air pollution.”

(CAA Sec. 169)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Class I areas near New York Class I areas near New York

Moosehorn Roosevelt Campobello Acadia Presidential Range Dry River Great Gulf Lye Brook Brigantine

slide-5
SLIDE 5

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaYVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA Fine particles = sulfates + organics + nitrates + ammonium + elemental carbon+ soil dust

View from Look Rock, Great Smoky Mtns., TN

slide-6
SLIDE 6

MARAMA

Key Regional Haze SIP Key Regional Haze SIP Requirements Requirements

zCalculation

  • f Baseline & Natural

Visibility Conditions zReasonable Progress Goals zBART (Best Available Retrofit Technology) zLong-term Strategy (includes control measures needed to achieve goals)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

MARAMA

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070

Baseline to Natural by 2064 Baseline to Natural by 2064

Shenandoah (VA) B rigantine (NJ) Lye Brook (VT) Acadia (ME) Moosehorn (ME)

0.362 dv/year 0.362 dv/year 0.348 dv/year 0.348 dv/year 0.262 dv/year 0.262 dv/year 0.270 dv/year 0.270 dv/year 0.233 dv/year 0.233 dv/year dv

slide-8
SLIDE 8

MARAMA

Sche Sched dule ule

z First SIP due ~ 2007 zFirst increment of progress by 2018 zFive year increments z2064 natural conditions

slide-9
SLIDE 9

MARAMA

slide-10
SLIDE 10

MARAMA

Regional Contribution Regional Contribution

zLarge for both sulfates and organic carbon –The principle components of PM2.5 in the eastern US

zAll Class I areas are affected by

  • ut-of-state sources
slide-11
SLIDE 11

MARAMA

Basic Basic Questions Questions

  • What kinds of sources are causing

visibility impairment and high PM levels?

  • Where

are those sources located?

  • What kinds of emissions controls in

my state will effectively reduce those emissions?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

MARAMA

Additional Questions Additional Questions

  • What help can I get from other

states and EPA?

  • How soon

can controls be adopted?

  • At what cost?
  • In the mean

time, how can I provide informati

  • n to the public?
slide-13
SLIDE 13

MARAMA

More Detaile More Detailed Questions d Questions

  • Do

we know enough to predict high PM levels and to estimate the results of controls?

  • Do w

e understand enough to identify and control carbon sources?

  • Should

we modify our monitoring network?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Lye Brook Great Gulf Acadia New York

New York Emissions Affect Class I New York Emissions Affect Class I Areas in Other States Areas in Other States

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Acadia New York Pennsylvania Vermont Rhode Island New Hampshire Virginia Maryland Connecticut New Jersey Massachusetts Delaware Maine

Other States Affect the Same Areas Other States Affect the Same Areas

slide-16
SLIDE 16

MARAMA

Collaboration among Collaboration among

zStates affecting the area zTribes zFederal land managers & EPA zAffected sources zThe public

slide-17
SLIDE 17

MARAMA

Pu Pur rp pos

  • ses of

es of Reg Regi io

  • nal Proce

nal Proces ss s

zIdentify sources contributing to haze zSet Goals for Class I areas zCoordinate BART determinations zAssess adequacy of control options zDevelop regional control measures zCoordinate among regions

slide-18
SLIDE 18

MARAMA

Regional Planning Orgs. Regional Planning Orgs.

zMANE-VU zVISTAS zMidwest RPO zCENRAP zWRAP

slide-19
SLIDE 19

MARAMA

MANE MANE-V

  • VU Members

U Members

z Maine z Pennsylvania z New Hampshire z Delaware z Vermont z Maryland z Massachusetts z District of Columbia z Connecticut z Penobscot Nation z Rhode Island z St. Regis Mohawk Tr. z New York z EPA, NPS, USFS, USF&WS z New Jersey

slide-20
SLIDE 20

MARAMA

MANE MANE-V

  • VU S

U St taff aff

zOTC

– Chris Recchia, Exec. Director

zNESCAUM

– Gary Kleiman, Technical lead

zMARAMA

– Serpil Kayin, Technical lead

slide-21
SLIDE 21

MARAMA

Some MANE-VU Products Some MANE-VU Products

zRegional Haze summary report zAdditional monitoring zCAMNET zSource apportionment study zInventory improvements zReports on potential BART sources

slide-22
SLIDE 22

MARAMA

Current MANE- Current MANE-V VU Projects U Projects

zAdditional data analysis zInventory improvements zModel sensitivity analysis zContribution assessment report zSIP Template zWeb-based tools for trajectory analyses & event tracking

slide-23
SLIDE 23

MARAMA

Next Steps Next Steps

zMust reduce SO2 emissions

–Will reduce both urban and rural sulfates –In-state and neighboring state SO2 reductions greatest impact –Transport rule/multi-p bill essential

slide-24
SLIDE 24

MARAMA

Other controls ne Other controls needed eded

zYear-round NOx reductions zReduce diesel emissions zControl various kinds of fires and combustion

slide-25
SLIDE 25

MARAMA

More information More information

zhttp://www.manevu.org/ zhttp://www.marama.org zhttp://www.nescaum.org zhttp://www.epa.gov/oar/visibility/ zhttp://www2.nature.nps.gov/ard/