coastal circulation in the Caribbean and the Virgin Islands using - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

coastal circulation in the caribbean and the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

coastal circulation in the Caribbean and the Virgin Islands using - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Numerical simulation on estuarine and coastal circulation in the Caribbean and the Virgin Islands using ROMS M. Solano 1 , J. Capella 3 , M. Canals 2 , J. Morell 3 , S. Leonardi 1 1 University of Puerto Rico Mayagez Campus, Mechanical


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Numerical simulation on estuarine and coastal circulation in the Caribbean and the Virgin Islands using ROMS

  • M. Solano1 , J. Capella3, M. Canals2, J. Morell3, S. Leonardi1

1 University of Puerto Rico Mayagüez Campus, Mechanical Engineering Department 2 University of Puerto Rico Mayagüez Campus, General Engineering Department 3Caribbean Coastal Ocean Observing System

Sponsored by: Caribbean Coastal Ocean Observing System University of Puerto Rico

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • Background
  • Motivation
  • Objectives
  • Setting
  • Numerical Setup

– Numerical model description – Grid generation – Initial/Boundary conditions – Forcing

  • Regional Model Results

– San Juan Bay – Charlotte Amalie

  • Conclusions
  • Future Work

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

  • Our initiative consist of a team of mechanical engineers graduates from the CFD

UPRM lab to create an operational high resolution coastal observing system for Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, sponsored by CariCOOS and the UPR.

  • CariCOOS, the United States Caribbean Coastal Ocean Observing System, with

CaRA guidance, operates a network of observing assets including data buoys, coastal meteorological stations, vessels, instruments and radars. CaRA is one of eleven regional associations (RAs) devoted to coastal ocean observing throughout the United States coastal oceans and the Great Lakes.

  • Efforts to create this high resolution observing system consist in downscaling

existing operational models in the Caribbean to provide reliable high resolution information for various coastal and estuarine applications.

  • Past studies of the department of marine sciences at UPRM include surf-zone

hydrodynamics (wave induced currents) of “Tres Palmas” marine reserve, sediment transport and sand composition in the near-shore of Rincon and the Mona passage using a non-linear shallow water wave model (BOUSS2D).

  • Our efforts began just after the last Miami coordination workshop and since then

we have successfully implemented ROMS in the San Juan bay, testing its diverse range of applications such as online and offline nesting capabilities, river discharge and particle tracking in hindcast mode.

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Motivation

  • Puerto Rico and St. Thomas have some of the busiest ports in the Caribbean,

including touristic cruise and cargo ships.

  • Several estuarine regions with national reservoirs filled with diverse wildlife and

unique bio luminescent microorganisms make coastal regions rare and special.

  • Particle tracking algorithms have a lot of potential in ocean related applications

such as spill containment, sediment transport and coastal security.

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Objectives

  • Implement ROMS numerical model in Puerto Rico and the US virgin

Islands to study coastal and estuarine ocean dynamics and validate results against hydro- graphic observed measurements.

  • Develop more efficient particle tracking algorithms and test it in

real life applications (Passive drifter)

  • Create a high resolution, operational ocean-atmosphere observing

system for any potential application in Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands.

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Setting

  • Puerto Rico is the smallest of the greater Antilles, located between the

Caribbean sea and the Atlantic Ocean. The U.S. Virgin Islands are located east of Puerto Rico, these include: St. John, St. Thomas and St. Croix.

  • The region is characterized by numerous islands on the continental shelf

extending all throughout the Antilles, with the Puerto Rico trench in the North and the Caribbean sea in the south.

  • Several estuarine and coastal regions.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Numerical Set Up

  • Regional Ocean Modeling System

(ROMS) – Free Surface, terrain following, primitive equations

  • cean model.

– Hydrostatic – Boussinesq – Mixing schemes (horizontal and vertical)

  • Grid: Arakawa C-grid

– Horizontal: Arakawa C-grid – Vertical: Sigma terrain following

  • Time stepping:

– Barotropic – Baroclinic

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Initial and Boundary Conditions

  • Sea state variables used to generate initial and boundary conditions are interpolated

from the AmSeas NCOM model.

  • The Naval Oceanographic Office (NAVOCEANO) operational ocean prediction system for

the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean is based on the NRL-developed Navy Coastal Ocean Model (NCOM).

  • The AmSeas model has a 3km resolution with 40 vertical levels. The model assimilates

SST, altimetry (SSH) as well as profile temperature and salinity nested into the 1/8 degree global NCOM model.

  • The nonlocal closure scheme is based on the K-profile, boundary layer formulation

by Large et al. (1994). The K-profile scheme has been expanded to include both surface and bottom oceanic boundary layers.

  • Open lateral boundary conditions.

– Flather condition: Barotropic variables (2D). – Orlansky condition: Baroclinic variables (3D).

  • Forcing:

– Tides – Winds – Rivers

8

http://www.northerngulfinstitute.org/edac/NCOM_AmSeas.php

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Input parameters

  • Grid

– Horizontal resolution:

  • (SJU) 90 m [496 x 446] || (STT) 110 m [299 x 202]

– Vertical: 24 sigma layers – Stretching parameters: theta_s=5, theta_b=0.1, t_cline=1 m

  • Time stepping

– Simulation time: SJU (5 months ) | STT ( 1 month)

– Time stepping: SJU (1 sec) | STT (2 sec)

  • Boundary Conditions

– Free surface: Chapman – Open lateral conditions at open sea: Flather (2D), Radiation (3D) – Closed boundary condition for land areas

  • Forcing:

– Tides (OTIS) – River

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

San Juan Bay, Puerto Rico

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Velocity Vectors at the Surface Superimposed to Velocity Magnitude Contours

Area of interest

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Time Series of Sea Surface Height and the U-comp. of the Velocity (Jan- Feb 2011)

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Tidal Components and River Discharge

  • Tidal components were extracted using

the Oregon Tidal Inversion Software .

  • Point source of fresh water from the

National Water Information System from USGS

– Simulation 1

  • Amseas NCOM
  • Tidal Forcing
  • Wind Forcing

– Simulation 2

  • AmSeas NCOM
  • Tidal Forcing
  • Wind Forcing
  • River Forcing

Point of Fresh Water At the site of river ‘Rio Piedras’

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Velocity Vectors Superimposed to Color Contours of Velocity Magnitude Velocity Vectors at Sea Surface Superimposed to Color Contours of Salinity w/o river w/o river w/ river w/ river

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Currents Direction Rose - Simulation with River

Depth of 7.3 meters -> Depth of 2.3 meters ->

Experimental Data Simulation

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Vertical Section of Salinity Contour Inside the San Juan Bay - Simulation with River

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

San Juan Bay Velocity Vectors Superimposed to Color Contours of Barotropic Velocity Magnitude (25-Jan-2011)

w/ river w/o river

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • St. Thomas Time Series of Sea Surface Height

and Depth Integrated U and V

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Velocity Contours with Superimposed Vectors Scale: -0.5 m/s to 1.3 m/s

Errors in bathymetry High velocity tidal currents

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Temperature and Salinity Contours

Scale: 27.5 C to 30.5 C Scale: 34.4 g/kg to 35.9 g/kg

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Conclusions and Future Work

  • In just under a year the hindcast models developed for the San Juan

Bay and the Virgin Islands show promising results.

  • In the San Juan Bay, computed velocity agree well with the data

collected with the ADCP at mid levels. Current velocity and characteristic tidal current directions are well reproduced by de model.

  • In Charlotte Amalie modelled results agreed reasonably well

with sea surface height and velocity direction measured by CariCOOS buoy VI102 located south of St. John. The velocity magnitude presents discrepancies from experimental observation. Errors are probably due the approximation in bathymetry.

  • Future work includes coupling of (real time) atmospheric and wave

models to validate results and move towards the goal of establishing a high resolution operational model.

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Comments and Questions

23