co mpa ny pre se nta tio n se pte mb e r 2016 sa fe ha rb
play

Co mpa ny Pre se nta tio n Se pte mb e r 2016 Sa fe Ha rb o r I - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Co mpa ny Pre se nta tio n Se pte mb e r 2016 Sa fe Ha rb o r I n ke e ping with the SE C's "Sa fe Ha rb o r" g uide line s, c e rta in sta te me nts ma de during this pre se nta tio n c o uld b e c o nside re d fo rwa rd-lo


  1. Co mpa ny Pre se nta tio n – Se pte mb e r 2016

  2. Sa fe Ha rb o r I n ke e ping with the SE C's "Sa fe Ha rb o r" g uide line s, c e rta in sta te me nts ma de during this pre se nta tio n c o uld b e c o nside re d fo rwa rd-lo o king a nd sub je c t to c e rta in risks a nd unc e rta intie s tha t c o uld c a use re sults to diffe r ma te ria lly fro m tho se pro je c te d. Whe n we use the wo rds "will like ly re sult," "ma y," "a ntic ipa te ," "e stima te ," "sho uld," "e xpe c t," "b e lie ve ," "inte nd," o r simila r e xpre ssio ns, we inte nd to ide ntify fo rwa rd-lo o king sta te me nts. Suc h fo rwa rd-lo o king sta te me nts inc lude , b ut a re no t limite d to , o ur b usine ss a nd inve stme nt stra te g y, o ur unde rsta nding o f o ur c o mpe titio n, c urre nt ma rke t tre nds a nd o ppo rtunitie s, pro je c te d o pe ra ting re sults, a nd pro je c te d c a pita l e xpe nditure s. T he se fo rwa rd-lo o king sta te me nts a re sub je c t to kno wn a nd unkno wn risks a nd unc e rta intie s, whic h c o uld c a use a c tua l re sults to diffe r ma te ria lly fro m tho se a ntic ipa te d inc luding , witho ut limita tio n: g e ne ra l vo la tility o f the c a pita l ma rke ts a nd the ma rke t pric e o f o ur c o mmo n sto c k; c ha ng e s in o ur b usine ss o r inve stme nt stra te g y; a va ila b ility, te rms a nd de plo yme nt o f c a pita l; a va ila b ility o f q ua lifie d pe rso nne l; c ha ng e s in o ur industry a nd the ma rke t in whic h we o pe ra te , inte re st ra te s o r the g e ne ra l e c o no my, a nd the de g re e a nd na ture o f o ur c o mpe titio n. T he se a nd o the r risk fa c to rs a re mo re fully disc usse d in the Co mpa ny's filing s with the Se c uritie s a nd E xc ha ng e Co mmissio n. E BI T DA is de fine d a s ne t inc o me b e fo re inte re st, ta xe s, de pre c ia tio n a nd a mo rtiza tio n. E BI T DA yie ld is de fine d a s tra iling twe lve mo nth E BI T DA divide d b y the purc ha se pric e . A c a pita liza tio n ra te is de te rmine d b y dividing the pro pe rty's ne t o pe ra ting inc o me b y the purc ha se pric e . Ne t o pe ra ting inc o me is the pro pe rty's funds fro m o pe ra tio ns minus a c a pita l e xpe nse re se rve o f e ithe r 4% o r 5% o f g ro ss re ve nue s. Ho te l E BI T DA flo w-thro ug h is the c ha ng e in Ho te l E BI T DA divide d b y the c ha ng e in to ta l re ve nue s. E BI T DA, F F O, AF F O, CAD a nd o the r te rms a re no n-GAAP me a sure s, re c o nc ilia tio ns o f whic h ha ve b e e n pro vide d in prio r e a rning s re le a se s a nd filing s with the SE C. T his o ve rvie w is fo r info rma tio na l purpo se s o nly a nd is no t a n o ffe r to se ll, o r a so lic ita tio n o f a n o ffe r to b uy o r se ll, a ny se c uritie s o f Ashfo rd Ho spita lity T rust, I nc . o r a ny o f its re spe c tive a ffilia te s, a nd ma y no t b e re lie d upo n in c o nne c tio n with the purc ha se o r sa le o f a ny suc h se c urity. 2

  3. Ashfo rd Ho spita lity T rust Visio n  Announc e d str ate gy r e fine me nts to impr ove shar e holde r value  Manage me nt te am mor e highly- aligne d with shar e holde r s than our pe e r s  Supe r ior long- te r m total shar e holde r r e tur n pe r for manc e  Be st in c lass hote l manage r s  Appr opr iate use of financ ial le ve r age  Oppor tunistic platfor m foc use d on full- se r vic e hote ls 3

  4. Re c e nt De ve lo pme nts  Q2 2016 Re vPAR g ro wth o f 4.9%  Q2 2016 AF F O pe r sha re g ro wth o f 17.6%  Q2 2016 Ad juste d E BIT DA g ro wth o f 10.7%  In June 2016, c o mple te d the pla nne d sa le o f the 5-ho te l se le c t-se rvic e po rtfo lio fo r $142 millio n with e xpe c te d ne t pro c e e d s o f a ppro xima te ly $37 millio n  In Aug ust 2016, c o mple te d the re d e mptio n o f a ll o utsta nd ing sha re s o f 9.0% Se rie s E pre fe rre d sto c k fund e d b y the re c e ntly-c o mple te d o ffe ring o f 7.375% Se rie s F pre fe rre d sto c k  Anno unc e d e nha nc e me nts to c o rpo ra te g o ve rna nc e po lic ie s  Anno unc e d pla nne d sa le o f the 151-ro o m Co urtya rd Pa lm De se rt a nd 130-ro o m Re sid e nc e Inn Pa lm De se rt fo r $36 millio n  In Se pte mb e r, c o mple te d the sa le o f the 124-ro o m Ha mpto n Inn & Suite s Ga ine sville fo r a ppro xima te ly $27 millio n 4

  5. Be st I n Cla ss Ho te l Ma na g e rs  86 pro pe rtie s ma na g e d b y Re ming to n re pre se nting 59% o f po rtfo lio ho te l E BI T DA  29 pro pe rtie s ma na g e d b y Ma rrio tt re pre se nting 29% o f po rtfo lio ho te l E BI T DA  Re ma ining 11 pro pe rtie s ma na g e d b y Hilto n, Sta rwo o d, Hya tt, a nd I nte rsta te  Be st in c la ss ho te l pro pe rty ma na g e rs a nd a sse t ma na g e rs tha t drive stro ng pe rfo rma nc e thro ug h ROI initia tive s, re ve nue o ptimiza tio n, a nd c o st c utting me a sure s Base d o n T T M Ho te l E BI T DA as o f June 30, 2016 fo r 126 o wne d ho te ls as o f S e pte mb e r 1, 2016 5

  6. Re ming to n Outpe rfo rma nc e - Pro fita b ility Hote l E BIT DA F low- T hr ough 334% 100% 300% 70% 68% 75% 60% 59% 59% 58% 57% 53% 52% 47% 43% 41% 42% 50% 22% 25% 0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 - 25% - 50%  Re mington has outpe r for me d in E BIT DA flow- thr ough 7 out of the - 75% last 8 ye ar s - 100% - 125%  Supe r ior manage me nt of downside r isk and c ash flow loss - 150% - 175% -808% - 800% - 200% Non- Re mington Re mington 6 NOT E : Re ming to n manag e d ho te ls o wne d b y Ashfo rd T rust and Ashfo rd Prime as c o mpare d to No n-Re ming to n manag e d ho te ls

  7. De mo nstra te d L o ng -T e rm T ra c k Re c o rd T otal Shar e holde r Re tur n 450% L ong - te rm pe rforma nc e 420% sig nific a ntly outpe rforms 400% pe e rs 350% 300% 249% 250% 200% 154% 150% 129% 124% 107% 90% 100% 75% 72% 70% 66% 59% 47% 50% 26% 25% 20% 0% -3% -7% -9% -19% -24% -24% - 50% (1) Inc e ption 10- Yr 9- Yr 8- Yr 7- Yr 6- Yr 5- Yr 4- Yr 3- Yr 2- Yr 1- Yr Pe e r Avg AHT (1) S inc e I PO o n Aug ust 26, 2003 Pe e r ave rag e inc lude s: CHS P, CL DT , DRH, F CH, HS T , HT , I NN, L HO, RL J, SHO 7 Re turns as o f 9/ 1/ 16 S o urc e : S NL

  8. Hig he st I nside r Owne rship Inside r Owne r ship 20.0% 18%* 18.0% 16.0% Most highly aligne d manage me nt te am among our pe e r s 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6% 6.0% 3% 4.0% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2.0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0.0% AHT HT RL J CL DT F CH Pe e r Avg CHSP INN HST PE B DRH SHO L HO Pub lic L o dg ing RE I T s inc lude : CHS P, CL DT , DRH, F CH, HS T , HT , I NN, L HO, PE B, RL J, S HO S o urc e : Co mpany filing s. 8 * I nside r o wne rship fo r Ashfo rd T rust inc lude s dire c t & indire c t inte re sts & inte re sts o f re late d partie s

  9. Attra c tive Divide nd Yie ld Divide nd Yie ld (as of 9/ 1/ 16) 8.0% Highe st divide nd yie ld in the industr y and with attr ac tive c ove r age r atio of 3.2x 7.1% 7.0% 6.7% 6.4% 6.3% 6.2% 6.1% 5.9% 6.0% 5.7% 5.0% 4.9% 5.0% 4.7% 4.6% 4.0% 3.5% 3.2% 3.0% 2.7% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.0% AHT L HO CHSP APL E CL DT XHR HT RL J Pe e r DRH PE B HST INN F CH AHP SHO Avg S o urc e : Co mpany filing s and marke t data 9

  10. Hig h Qua lity, Ge o g ra phic a lly Dive rse Po rtfo lio E mbassy Suite s Por tland Hilton Bac k Bay We stin Pr inc e ton Po r tland, OR Bo sto n, MA Pr inc e to n, NJ L e Me r idie n Minne apolis Minne apo lis, MN Chic ago Silve r smith Mar r iott Gate way Chic ago , IL Ar lingto n, VA Mar r iott F r e mont T he Chur c hill F r e mo nt, CA Washingto n, D.C. Re naissanc e Nashville Mar r iott Be ve r ly Hills Nashville , T N Be ve r ly Hills, CA W Atlanta Downtown Hilton Santa F e Atlanta, GA Santa F e , NM Cr owne Plaza Ke y We st L ake way Re sor t & Spa Ke y We st, F L L e Pavillon Hote l Hilton Costa Me sa Austin, T X Ne w Or le ans, L A Co sta Me sa, CA Mar r iott Sugar L and Sugar L and, T X ust Ho te ls 10 Ashfo r d T r

  11. Po rtfo lio Ove rvie w Hote l E BIT DA by Br and Hote l E BIT DA by Manage r Inde pe nde nt Sta rwood Inte rsta te 6.0% Sta rwood 2.5% 0.5% 8.0% IHG 5.1% Ma rriott Hya tt 29.2% 4.1% Ma rriott 49.6% Re ming ton 59.0% Hilton Hilton 27.2% 5.4% Hya tt 3.4% Hote l E BIT DA by Chainsc ale Hote l E BIT DA by MSA Uppe r- Midsc a le Inde pe nde nt T op T e n Ma r ke ts 3.3% 3.9% Othe r T T M Hotel % of L uxury 9.1% EBIT DA T otal 4.8% Wa shing to n DC Area $47,325 9.9% Sa n F ra n/ Oa kla nd , C A $33,567 7.1% T op 50 L o s Ang eles Metro Area $33,107 7.0% Upsc a le 17.9% Atla nta , GA $30,288 6.4% 33.7% NY/ NJ Metro Area $29,932 6.3% DF W, T X $26,575 5.6% Uppe r- Upsc a le B o sto n, MA $25,422 5.3% T op 25 54.3% Na shville, T N $23,557 5.0% 73.0% MN/ St. Pa ul Area $16,071 3.4% Ho usto n, T X $13,465 2.8% T ota l Portfolio $475,880 100.0% T T M Ho te l E BI T DA as o f June 30, 2016 fo r 126 o wne d ho te ls as o f S e pte mb e r 1, 2016 11 Ho te l E BI T DA in tho usands

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend