CMS Studies An Update CIBMTR Data Managers Meeting February 21, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

cms studies an update
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CMS Studies An Update CIBMTR Data Managers Meeting February 21, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CMS Studies An Update CIBMTR Data Managers Meeting February 21, 2018 Sue Logan Clinical Research Coordinator CIBMTR Data Operations Conflict of interest There are no conflicts of interest to disclose TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 2 . 2


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CMS Studies – An Update

CIBMTR Data Managers Meeting February 21, 2018

Sue Logan Clinical Research Coordinator CIBMTR Data Operations

slide-2
SLIDE 2

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 2 .

Conflict of interest

  • There are no conflicts of interest to disclose

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 3 .

Agenda

  • What are CMS CED studies?
  • Current status of CIBMTR’s CMS

CED studies

  • Medicare reimbursement for CED

studies

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Background

slide-5
SLIDE 5

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 5 .

What is CMS?

  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

(CMS) is a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

  • Administers many programs including

Medicare.

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 6 .

Objective of all CMS studies

  • To provide a mechanism to Medicare

beneficiaries for claims coverage for allogeneic HCT.

  • To provide data requested by Medicare under its

CED to make payment on claims for HCT using the existing research observational database of the CIBMTR

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 7 .

What is CED?

  • Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) is

the means by which CMS can provide coverage and encourage clinical studies that will lead to solid evidence for future decision making.

  • National Coverage Determination (NCD)
  • Relatively rare mechanism used when:

– Safety has been assured – Service has high potential of benefit – Significant barriers to conduct of trials exist

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 8 .

Why is CED needed?

  • Transplants in the older population continues

to increase for a variety of diseases

  • BMT community continued to work with CMS

to consider other CED/NCD

  • Decisions have been made for:

– MDS (Active Dec 2010) – Myelofibrosis (Active Nov 2016) – Multiple Myeloma (Active July 2017) – Sickle Cell (Active Oct 2017)

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 9 .

Requirements

  • Centers must designate willingness to

participate in CRF submission for CED

  • A separate participation agreement is

required for each study

  • Participating recipients must sign CMS

consent form

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 10 .

CMS Consent

  • CMS consent form – Feb 2017
  • Patients should be invited to participate in both

the CMS CED study and the Research Database protocol.

  • Patient participation in the CMS CED study is

not dependent on their participation in the Research Database Protocol.

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 11 .

CMS Consent ver 3.0

  • Revised consent form was approved by NMDP

IRB Jan 2018.

  • Language was added in Section IV regarding

the NIH Certificate of Confidentiality.

  • Language was added in Section IV regarding

submitting health information to scientific databases.

  • https://www.cibmtr.org/DataManagement/Protoc
  • lConsent/ObservationalData/pages/index.aspx

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 12 .

Instructions for Transplant Centers That Use the NMDP/Be The Match IRB

  • Transplant centers that have an IRB

Authorization Agreement with the NMDP IRB may begin using the new consent form immediately for enrolling patients on the CMS CED studies. No additional local review or approval is necessary.

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 13 .

Instructions for Transplant Centers That Use Their Own Local IRB

  • If transplant centers use their own local IRB to

enroll patients on the CMS CED studies, they should submit the revised protocol and new consent form to their IRB as soon as possible.

  • It may be submitted as an amendment so they

don’t have to wait until their local IRB continuing review

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 14 .

Instructions for Transplant Centers That Use Their Own Local IRB

  • Centers are allowed to continue using their

current consent form while they are obtaining IRB approval of the revised form.

  • Renewals must be approved before their local

IRB expiration date

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 15 .

Instructions for Transplant Centers That Use Their Own Local IRB

  • Once IRB approval is received, the IRB approval

letter and IRB-approved consent form must be sent to Sue Logan at slogan@nmdp.org.

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 16 .

Reporting Requirements for all CMS CED studies

  • CRID assignment form 2804/2814
  • Enrollment form 2554

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 17 .

Reporting Requirements for all CMS CED studies

  • Pre-TED form 2400

– Indicate CMS clinical trial

16-CMS-MF

  • Comprehensive report forms - necessary for

study objectives.

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Assessment of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Medicare Beneficiaries with Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Related disorders - Part I. (10-CMSMDS)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 19 .

10-CMSMDS

  • Primary Objective:

– To prospectively examine outcomes of allogeneic HCT in adults >= 65 years of age with MDS to determine whether their

  • utcomes are similar to those in younger patients.
  • Secondary Objectives:

– To prospectively determine whether there are disease- or patient-related factors that predict outcomes of HCT for MDS and related disorders in patients >= 65 years of age – To prospectively evaluate what transplant characteristics are associated with outcomes of HCT for MDS and related disorders in patients >= 65 years of age

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 20 .

10-CMSMDS

  • CMS decision in Summer of 2010
  • Opened for enrollment in December 2010
  • 134 participating centers
  • Current Enrollment 3466

– >= 65 y/o Arm = 2181 – <65 Arm = 1285

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 21 .

10-CMSMDS

  • Patients do not have to have Medicare to be

enrolled in the study.

– 25% of patients with MDS who gave consent to the research database are enrolled – 100% of patients over age 65 who gave consent to the research database are enrolled

  • CMS consent and F2554 only required if

CMS will be paying for the transplant

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 22 .

10-CMSMDS

  • As of the January 30th, 2018 release of

FormsNet3, centers will be required to complete Comprehensive Report Forms (CRF) for about half of the patients participating in the 10- CMSMDS-1 study.

  • Further study information is located on the

CIBMTR website at the following location:

https://www.cibmtr.org/Studies/ClinicalTrials/mct/HCT- MDS/Pages/index.aspx

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 23 .

BMT CTN 1102 Hypometh vs RIC for MDS

  • A Multi-Center Biologic Assignment Trial

Comparing Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant to Hypomethylating Therapy or Best Supportive Care in Patients Aged 50-75 with Intermediate-2 and High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome

  • CTN 1102 is also a CMS CED study
  • Co-enrollment in 10-CMSMDS and CTN 1102 is

not allowed

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Prospective Assessment of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with Myelofibrosis (16-CMS-MF)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 25 .

16-CMS-MF HLA-Matched Donor HCT Study

  • Primary objective:

– Compare the five-year survival probabilities from DIPSS assessment between the two study arms: alloHCT recipients and non-HCT therapies (ruxolitinib / best supportive care) recipients.

  • Secondary objectives:

– Compare leukemia-free survival at five years from DIPSS assessment. – Identify patient-, disease-, and HCT-related factors associated with poor HCT outcomes in the alloHCT arm. – Estimate the cumulative incidences of acute and chronic graft- versus-host disease, transplant related mortality, and relapse starting at HCT in the alloHCT arm.

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 26 .

16-CMS-MF Haploidentical Donor Study

  • Primary objective:

– Estimate the five-year overall survival probabilities with haploidentical HCT from DIPSS assessment.

  • Secondary objectives:

– Estimate five-year leukemia-free survival with haploidentical HCT from DIPSS assessment. – Identify patient-, disease-, and HCT-related factors associated with poor outcomes post haploidentical HCT, starting at HCT. – Estimate the cumulative incidences of acute and chronic GVHD, relapse, and transplant related mortality, starting at HCT.

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 27 .

16-CMS-MF

  • CMS decision in October 2016
  • 104 participating centers
  • Opened for enrollment in December 2016

– Target Enrollment = 650 (225 MAC) – Current Enrollment = 52

  • Non-HCT Arm = 2400

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 28 .

16-CMS-MF

  • Eligibility Criteria

– Primary myelofibrosis, post- essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis, or post- polycythemia vera myelofibrosis. – Int-2 or high-risk disease as determined by the DIPSS. – Age ≥55 at the time of DIPSS. – For the patients receiving an allogeneic transplant:

  • 6/6 HLA-matched related donors
  • 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor
  • Haploidentical donor.

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 29 .

16-CMS-MF

  • Eligibility Criteria

– Both peripheral blood stem cells and bone marrow grafts are allowed. – All conditioning regimen intensities are allowed – All GVHD prophylaxis regimens are allowed

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 30 .

16-CMS-MF

  • Ineligible if

– AlloHCT using umbilical cord blood unit(s) – HLA-mismatched adult donors (< 6/6 HLA alleles for related and < 8/8 HLA alleles for unrelated) – Overlap syndromes (e.g., CMML, JMML) – Prior allo HCT

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 31 .

Secondary Myelofibrosis

  • If polycythemia vera or essential

thrombocythemia develops myelofibrosis

  • On the F2402

– Select polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia in Q167 “MDS/MPN subtype at diagnosis” – Q212 Did it transform to a different MDS/MPN subtype should be Yes – Select primary myelofibrosis in Q213 “MDS/MPN subtype after transformation”

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 32 .

Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS)

  • The Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring

System (DIPSS) for primary myelofibrosis (PMF) uses five risk factors to predict survival:

– age older than 65 years – hemoglobin lower than 10 g/dL – leukocytes higher than 25 × 10(9)/L – circulating blasts ≥ 1% – constitutional symptoms

  • weight loss, night sweats, fever

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 33 .

Additional Required Forms

  • F2555 CMS – MF Myelofibrosis Eligibility

Form

  • F2556 Myelofibrosis Supplemental Pre-

HCT Data

  • F2557 Myelofibrosis Supplemental Post-

HCT Data

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 34 .

Why is my patient on the CRF track when they are not enrolled in the study?

  • Comprehensive report forms, including the 2556 and

2557, are now required for all patients with myelofibrosis transplanted after 2/1/2017

  • This includes non-Medicare patients and Medicare

patients who are not eligible for the study.

  • Centers that are not participating in the CMS study will

be required to submit comprehensive report forms for their myelofibrosis patients.

  • The only exception to this is when the patient declines

consent for CIBMTR’s research database.

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Assessment of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Medicare Beneficiaries With Multiple Myeloma (17-CMS-MM)

slide-36
SLIDE 36

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 36 .

17-CMS-MM

  • Primary Objective:

– To compare five-year OS probabilities between the alloHCT cohort and an age and disease risk matched cohort of autoHCT patients.

  • Secondary Objectives:

– To compare five-year PFS probabilities between the alloHCT cohort and an age and disease risk matched cohort of autoHCT patients.

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 37 .

17-CMS-MM

  • CMS decision in June 2017
  • 71 participating centers
  • Opened for enrollment in July 2017

– HCT Arm

  • Target Enrollment = 500
  • Current Enrollment = 4
  • Control Arm = 500

– Auto HCT patients already in RDB on CRF track

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 38 .

17-CMS-MM

  • Eligibility Criteria

– Stage II or III multiple myeloma at diagnosis – MM Classifications:

MM-IgG, MM-IgA, MM-IgD, MM-IgE, MM-IgM (not Waldenstrom), MM-light chain only, MM-non secretory

– Are eligible to receive an alloHCT from any suitable allogeneic donor including umbilical cord blood

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 39 .

17-CMS-MM

  • Exclusion Criteria

– Stage 1 at diagnosis

  • But if they had a prior auto, relapsed within 18

months and then are stage II or III, they will be eligible.

39

slide-40
SLIDE 40

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 40 .

BMT CTN 1302 Allo Myeloma

  • Multicenter Phase II, Double-blind Placebo

Controlled Trial of Maintenance Ixazomib after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for High Risk Multiple Myeloma

  • Co-enrollment in 17-CMS-MM and CTN 1302

is allowed

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Prospective Assessment of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Adolescents and Young Adults with Severe Sickle Cell Disease

(17-CMS-SCD)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 42 .

17-CMS-SCD

  • Primary Objective:

– Compare the 5-year survival probabilities between patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) who received allogeneic HCT to those who received standard of care

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 43 .

17-CMS-SCD

  • Submitted to CMS in August 2017
  • 47 participating centers
  • Opened for enrollment in Oct 2017

– Target Enrollment = 200 – Current Enrollment = 0 – Non-HCT Arm = 1000

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 44 .

17-CMS-SCD

  • Eligibility Criteria

– Age 15 – 50 years. – Sickle cell disease (HB SS, HB S beta thalassemia or HB SC) with severe signs or symptoms indicating poor prognosis and warranting transplantation.

  • Stroke
  • Neurological deficit lasting > 24 hours
  • Recurrent acute chest syndrome (ACS)
  • Recurrent pain crises
  • Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions to prevent vaso-occlusive

clinical complications (i.e. pain, stroke, or ACS)

  • High tricuspid valve regurgitant jet velocity (TRJV)

44

slide-45
SLIDE 45

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 45 .

17-CMS-SCD

  • Eligibility Criteria

– Donors may be HLA-matched unrelated donors, HLA- matched siblings, or mismatched relatives – Donors with sickle cell trait are eligible to donate – Product may be bone marrow, peripheral blood or umbilical cord blood

  • Exclusion Criteria
  • Previous allogeneic HCT

45

slide-46
SLIDE 46

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 46 .

Additional Required Forms

  • F2558 CMS – SCD Sickle Cell Disease

Eligibility Form

46

slide-47
SLIDE 47

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 47 .

BMT CTN 1503 STRIDE2

  • A Study to Compare Bone Marrow

Transplantation to Standard Care in Adolescents and Young Adults with Severe Sickle Cell Disease

  • CTN 1503 is also a CMS CED study
  • Co-enrollment in 17-CMS-SCD and CTN

1503 is not allowed

47

slide-48
SLIDE 48

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 48 .

BMT CTN 1507 Haplo SCD

  • Reduced Intensity Conditioning for

Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation in Patients with Symptomatic Sickle Cell Disease

  • Co-enrollment in 17-CMS-SCD and CTN 1507 is

allowed

  • Enroll patients in both studies if they want

Medicare to pay for the transplant.

  • If the patient is not on Medicare, only enroll them

in 1507.

48

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Medicare

slide-50
SLIDE 50

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 50 .

Medicare

  • There is not a prior authorization process for

Medicare CED studies.

  • The patient must be clinically eligible for the

study and have their transplant at a participating center.

  • When the claim is filed, it must have an

approved ICD-10 Diagnosis code and National Clinical Trial number (NCT) listed on the claim.

50

slide-51
SLIDE 51

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 51 .

Medicare

  • If patients have secondary Medicare

coverage do they need to be registered for the CMS CED?

– Yes, if Medicare will be billed as primary or secondary they need to be enrolled.

51

slide-52
SLIDE 52

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 52 .

What about Medicaid?

  • Medicaid coverage is controlled by state

regulations, so the Medicare CED clinical trial policies do not apply.

  • Check with your state’s Medicaid office to find
  • ut if they will cover it

52

slide-53
SLIDE 53

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 53 .

Pediatric Patients on Medicare

  • Children can qualify for Medicare benefits if

– They qualify for Social Security Disability benefits as determined by the Social Security administration – Are disabled prior to the age of 22 years old. – Have received SSDI benefits for at least 24 months

53

slide-54
SLIDE 54

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 54 .

Need more information about Medicare?

  • For additional information regarding Medicare

billing and claims, contact the NMDP/Be The Match Payer Policy team

payerpolicy@nmdp.org https://payer.bethematchclinical.org https://network.bethematchclinical.org/transplant- centers/access-to-transplant/reimbursement- support/medicare/

54

slide-55
SLIDE 55

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT | 55 .

Questions?

55