ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC.
Environmental Consulting & Management
CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE
June 7, 2017
Green and Sustainable Remediation
Presented by:
CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE Presented by: Amanda Ludlow, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Green and Sustainable Remediation CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE Presented by: Amanda Ludlow, Principal Scientist ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Consulting Roux Associates, Inc. & Management June 7, 2017 Green and Sustainable
ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC.
Environmental Consulting & Management
Presented by:
Definitions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency “The practice of considering all environmental
effects of remedy implementation and incorporating
cleanup actions.”
Interstate Technology Regulatory Council (ITRC) “The site-specific employment of products, processes,
technologies, and procedures that mitigate contaminant risk to receptors while making decisions that are cognizant of balancing community goals, economic impacts, and net environmental effects.
New York State “The practice of considering all environmental
effects of remedy implementation and incorporating
cleanup actions.”
Improved stakeholder engagement
Community benefits Educational opportunities Collaboration
Simplified, reproducible results
Quantify desired metrics
Reduced impacts
Emissions / greenhouse gases Energy/Water/Waste Ecosystems
2006 – Sustainable Remediation Forum (SURF) formed; SURF formally
integrates sustainable principles, practices, and metrics into remediation projects and works to foster GSR on a national and international basis
2007 – Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management
Officials (ASTSWMO) creates Green Cleanups Task Force which advocates for what are referred to as “greener cleanups”
2008 – EPA develops The Green Remediation Technical Primer and forms the
EPA/State Greener Cleanup Working Groups
2010 – NYSDEC issues DER-31 which establishes a preference for
remediating sites in the most sustainable manner while still meeting all legal, regulatory and program requirements
2011 – Interstate Technology Regulatory Council (ITRC) publishes Green and
Sustainable Remediation Technology Overview (GSR-1) and GSR Technical/Regulatory Guidance (GSR-2)
2013 – American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) publishes two
standard guides: Greener Cleanups (E2893), Integrating Sustainable Objectives into Cleanup (E2876), Best Management Table in Excel format
Minimize energy use Increase renewable energy Minimize emissions Minimize water use Preserve water quality Conserve material resources Minimize waste Protect land and ecosystem services
Investigation Remedy Selection Remedial Design Construction O&M Closure
Level 3 BMPs + Advanced Evaluation Level 2 BMPs + Simple Evaluation Level 1 Best Management Practices
Increasing Tool Complexity and Data Needs
EPA
BMP Fact Sheets (13)
in Decision-Making
ASTM
Integrating Sustainable Objectives into Cleanup
Greener Cleanups
ITRC
Sustainable Remediation: A Practical Framework
SuRF
Integrating Sustainability into Remediation Projects
BMPs
Project Planning Sampling & Analysis Site Preparation & Restoration Water Quality Residual Management Materials Vehicles and Equipment Power and Fuel Buildings
EPA fact sheets
Introduction to BMPs Site investigation Excavation Pump and treat Bioremediation SVE & Air Sparging Clean fuel and emission
Renewable energy
Minimize impacts to natural resources Engage stakeholders Identify recycling/ reuse options Maximize renewable energy use Use local labor and resources Reuse unimpacted soil
California Department of Toxic Substances Control
Metrics Option 1 - SVE Option 2 - MNA Relative Importance Yes/No Score* Yes/No Score* Air emissions Yes 2 Yes 1 1 Solid waste Yes 2 Yes 1 1 Wastewater Yes 1 Yes 1 1 Noise/odor/vibration Yes 3 Yes 1 1 Land stagnation Yes 1 Yes 3 2 TOTAL 9 7 WEIGHTED TOTAL 10 10 http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/omf/grn_remediation.cfm
*Scale of 1 to 3 where 1 is favorable (more green or sustainable) in this example
Carbon footprint calculators Remedy footprint tools
Air Force Sustainable Remediation
Navy and Army Corps of Engineers SiteWiseTM Other tools
Net environmental benefits analysis tools Life-cycle assessment (LCA) tools
Emissions Water Consumption Energy Used
Material Production Transportation Equipment Use Residual Handling Resource Consumption
Materials Production
Well Construction Treatment Chemical Treatment Media Construction Materials Well Decommissioning Silt Curtains Bulk Materials
MATERIAL PRODUCTION WELL MATERIALS
Well Type 1 Input number of wells Input depth of wells (ft) Choose specific casing material schedule from drop down menu Sch 40 PVC Choose well diameter (in) from drop down menu 1/8 Input total quantity of Sand (kg) Input total quantity of Gravel (kg) Input total quantity of Bentonite (kg) Input total quantity of Typical Cement (kg) Input total quantity of General Concrete (kg) Input total quantity of Steel (kg)
TREATMENT CHEMICALS & MATERIALS
Treatment 1 Input number of injection points Choose material type from drop down menu Hydrogen Peroxide Input amount of material injected at each point (pounds dry mass) Input number of injections per injection point
TREATMENT MEDIA
Treatment 1 Input weight of media used (lbs) Choose media type from drop down menu Virgin GAC
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Material 1 Choose material type from drop down menu HDPE Liner Input area of material (ft2) Input depth of material (ft)
WELL DECOMMISSIONING
Well Type 1 Input number of wells Input depth of wells (ft) Input well diameter (in) Choose material from drop down menu Soil
SILT CURTAIN MATERIALS
Curtain 1 Input length or perimeter of silt curtain (ft) Input depth of silt curtain (ft)
BULK MATERIAL QUANTITIES
Material 1 Choose material from drop down menu Acetic Acid Choose units of material quantity from drop down menu pounds Input material quantity
www.navfac.navy.mil/navfac_worldwide/sp ecialty_centers/exwc/products_and_services /ev/erb/gsr.html
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 1,000.00 10,000.00 100,000.00 1,000,000.00 10,000,000.00
MMBTU MWH gallons metric ton metric ton metric ton metric ton metric ton metric ton metric ton Total Energy Used Electricity Usage Water Consumption GHG Emissions Onsite NOx Emissions Onsite SOx Emissions Onsite PM10 Emissions Total NOx Emissions Total SOx Emissions Total PM10 Emissions
Excavation Hot Spot Excavation & Capping
Phase Activities Total Energy Used Electricity Usage Water Consumpt ion GHG Emissions Onsite NOx Emissions Onsite SOx Emissions Onsite PM10 Emissions Total NOx Emissions Total SOx Emissions Total PM10 Emissions MMBTU MWH gallons metric ton metric ton metric ton metric ton metric ton metric ton metric ton Excavation Consumables 121,878.74 NA NA 5,364.03 NA NA NA 18.90 26.69 8.27 NA NA Transportation-Personnel 239.66 NA NA 19.03 NA NA NA 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 Transportation-Equipment 5.45 NA NA 0.42 NA NA NA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Equipment Use and Misc 2,572.60 1.23 4,500,826 166.97 0.45 0.11 0.03 0.96 0.48 0.08 0.00 1.21 Residual Handling 51,475.74 NA NA 3,037.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.73 5.56 29.59 0.00 0.34 176,172.19 1.23 4,500,826 8,588.41 0.45 0.11 0.03 30.60 32.73 37.94 0.01 1.60 Consumables 0.00 NA NA 0.00 NA NA NA 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 Transportation-Personnel 0.00 NA NA 0.00 NA NA NA 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 Transportation-Equipment 0.00 NA NA 0.00 NA NA NA 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 Equipment Use and Misc 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 Residual Handling 0.00 NA NA 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 176,172.19 1.23 4,500,826 8,588.41 0.45 0.11 0.03 30.60 32.73 37.94 0.01 1.60 Hot Spot Excavation & Capping Consumables 2,814.36 NA NA 122.21 NA NA NA 0.26 0.49 0.11 0.00 0.00 Transportation-Personnel 15.33 NA NA 1.20 NA NA NA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transportation-Equipment 5.44 NA NA 0.42 NA NA NA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Equipment Use and Misc 703.62 0.09 81,641.64 52.26 0.13 0.02 0.01 0.31 0.16 0.03 0.00 0.48 Residual Handling 746.25 NA NA 45.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.08 0.41 0.00 0.01 4,285.00 0.09 81,641.64 221.33 0.13 0.02 0.01 0.73 0.73 0.55 0.00 0.49 Consumables 6,818.19 NA NA 413.45 NA NA NA 0.96 1.70 0.40 NA NA Transportation-Personnel 13.42 NA NA 1.06 NA NA NA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transportation-Equipment 0.00 NA NA 0.00 NA NA NA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Equipment Use and Misc 864.89 0.00 0.00 64.24 0.16 0.03 0.01 0.39 0.20 0.03 0.00 0.02 Residual Handling 850.49 NA NA 57.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.05 0.26 0.00 0.01 8,546.99 0.00 0.00 536.55 0.16 0.03 0.01 1.46 1.95 0.69 0.00 0.04 12,832.00 0.09 81,641.64 757.88 0.30 0.06 0.02 2.18 2.67 1.24 0.00 0.52 Long Term Total Construc tion Short Term Total O&M O&M Total Long Term Total Accident Risk Fatality Accident Risk Injury Construc tion Short Term Total O&M O&M Total
Power and Fuel
Use biodiesel produced from waste or
cellulose-based products to power equipment
Use on‐site generated renewable
energy to fully or partially provide power
Vehicle and Equipment
Implement an idle reduction plan Use biodegradable hydraulic fluids on
hydraulic equipment
Use electric, hybrid, ethanol, or
compressed natural gas vehicles instead of conventional vehicles
Site Preparation and Land Restoration
Reuse on-site or local clean materials
(e.g., crushed concrete)
Use reclaimed asphalt pavement as a
granular base for new roads
Project Planning and Team Management
Choose equipment and product
vendors with production and distribution centers near the site to minimize fuel consumption associated with delivery
Select local waste disposal and
recycling facilities to minimize transportation impacts
Use a local laboratory to minimize
transportation impacts
Use local staff (including
subcontractors) when possible to minimize transportation impacts
Residual Solid and Liquid Waste
Reuse or recycle recovered product
(such as resale of captured petroleum products, precipitated metals) and materials (for example, cardboard, plastics, asphalt, concrete)
Investigation Remedy Selection Remedial Design Construction O&M Closure
Level 3 BMPs + Advanced Evaluation Level 2 BMPs + Simple Evaluation Level 1 Best Management Practices
Increasing Tool Complexity and Data Needs