Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee Presented by: Parsons - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶

Dec 26, 2022 210 likes •480 views

Presented to: Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee Presented by: Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. Presentation Date: June 25, 2014 AGENDA Transit Development Plan Overview Miami-Dade Transit Overview Peer Analysis Outreach

SLIDE 1

Presented to:

Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee

Presented by:

Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc.

Presentation Date:

June 25, 2014

SLIDE 2

AGENDA

Transit Development Plan Overview
Miami-Dade Transit Overview
Peer Analysis
Outreach Activities
MDT10Ahead Survey Results
Next Steps

2

SLIDE 3

Purpose of the Transit Development Plan

Florida Statute requires that Miami-Dade Transit

prepare a Transit Development Plan (TDP) to qualify for the State Public Transit Grant Program.

A TDP Major Update is completed every five years

and updated annually.

– For 2014, Miami-Dade Transit’s TDP is a Major Update

Serves as MDT’s strategic development, and
perational guidance document for a 10-year planning

horizon.

The TDP is coordinated with other county plans and

stakeholder input is gathered for TDP development.

3

SLIDE 4

Transit Development Plan Sections

Overview of Miami-Dade Transit

–MDT’s Accomplishments

Capital Improvements
Service Operations
Customer Information/Convenience
Existing Conditions

–Peer Review –Trend Analysis (5-years)

Operating Environment

–Land Use –Socio-economic characteristics

4

SLIDE 5

Transit Development Plan Sections

Identify TDP Goals and Objectives
Situation Appraisal

–Transit propensity

Ten Year Implementation Program (2015 – 2024)

–Capital Improvements –Operating Service Improvements –Transit Needs

Financial Plan (2015 – 2024)

–Capital/Operating Budget –Funded (constrained) and Unfunded (unconstrained) projects –Funding Sources

5

SLIDE 6

Miami-Dade Transit Overview

15th Largest Transit System in the U.S.

– Service Area - 306 miles – Urbanized population of 2.5 million – Four Modes

Metrobus

– 93 routes; 8,828 stations/stops; 824 buses

» Busway: ~20 miles exclusive lanes

Metrorail – 24.8 miles; 23 stations; 136 vehicles
Metromov – 4.4 miles; 21 stations; 46 vehicles
Special T – 380 vehicles

6

SLIDE 7

Miami-Dade Transit Overview

FY 2013 111 Million Annual Total Boardings
353,000 Average Weekday Boardings
Multimodal Connections:

– Tri-Rail – Broward County Transit

Farebox Recovery Ratio 28%

7

SLIDE 8

Service Improvements
Capital Improvements

– Transit Hubs – Park-and-Rides

Transit Corridors

– Enhanced Bus Service

Passenger Convenience

– Transit Tracker

MDT’s Planned Capital and Service Improvements

8

SLIDE 9

MDT Performance Indicator Trends (2007 – 2012)

9

SLIDE 10

Peer Agencies

Agency Location Metrobus Metrorail Metromover Special Transportation Service (STS) Bus Heavy Rail Automated Guideway Paratransit/Demand Response Broward County Transit Division (BCT) Pompano Beach, FL PEER Jacksonville Transportation Authority (JTA) Jacksonville, FL PEER PEER King County Department of Transportation (King County Metro) Seattle, WA PEER Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) Boston, MA PEER PEER Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) Philadelphia, PA PEER PEER PEER Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) Washington, DC PEER PEER Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) Baltimore, MD PEER PEER PEER Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) Atlanta, GA PEER PEER The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (GCRTA) Cleveland, OH PEER PEER PEER Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) Chicago, IL PEER PEER Detroit Transportation Corporation (DTC) Detroit, MI PEER Metropolitan Transit Authority - Harris County (MTA Harris County) Houston, TX PEER

10

SLIDE 11

Bus Peer Comparison Route Miles and Passenger Trips

Mean Mean

11

SLIDE 12

Bus Peer Comparison Vehicle Revenue Hours and Operating Cost Per Trip

Mean Mean Mean

12

SLIDE 13

Bus Peer Comparison Operating Expense and Farebox Recovery

Mean Mean

13

SLIDE 14

Rail Peer Comparison Route Miles and Passenger Trips

Mean Mean

14

SLIDE 15

Rail Peer Comparison Vehicle Revenue Hours and Operating Cost Per Trip

Mean Mean Mean

15

SLIDE 16

Rail Peer Comparison Operating Expense and Farebox Recovery

Mean Mean

16

SLIDE 17

Automated Guideway Peer Comparison Route Miles and Passenger Trips

Mean Mean

17

SLIDE 18

Automated Guideway Peer Comparison Vehicle Revenue Hours and Operating Cost Per Trip

Mean Mean

18

SLIDE 19

Automated Guideway Peer Comparison Operating Expense

Mean

19

SLIDE 20

Stakeholder Involvement and Public Outreach

MDT10Ahead Survey

http://www.miamidade.gov/transit/mdt-10-ahead.asp

MDT10Ahead Mini Survey
Social Media Outlets
Special Outreach Events
County Public Meetings
Transportation and Aviation Committee (TAC)

Public Hearing

Board of County Commissioners (BCC)

20

SLIDE 21

MDT10Ahead Survey Results

Survey Type Number Completed Public – English 629 Public – Spanish 14 Employee 24 Mini-Survey 788 Total 1,455

The number of respondents per question may vary.

As of June 20, 2014

10

SLIDE 22

Ridership

45% 45% 22% 22% 16% 16% 3% 3% 10% 10% 12% 12% 6% 6% 1% 1% 12% 12% 28% 28% 9% 9% 2% 2%

32% 32% 38% 38% 69% 69% 94% 94%

0% 0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100 100% 120 120%

Metrorail Metrobus Busway Metrobus STS More than 4 times per week 1-3 times per week A few times per month Rarely or never 11

SLIDE 23

Ten-Year Priorities

81% 81% 69% 69% 65% 65% 51% 51% 51% 51% 48% 48% 37% 37% 14% 14% 21% 21% 19% 19% 30% 30% 29% 29% 28% 28% 28% 28% 4% 4% 8% 8% 13% 13% 15% 15% 16% 16% 19% 19% 25% 25%

0% 0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100 100% 120 120% Ver ery i impor portant ant Som

mewhat i

what impor portant ant Ne Neutr utral No Not t impor portant tant

On On-Time me Ear Early/ y/La Late e Ser Servi vice Fr Frequen equent Ser Servi vice Weeke eekend nd Ser Servi vice Ser Serve ve New New Ar Areas eas Si Simpl pler er Routes Routes Fewer Fewer Stops Stops

12

SLIDE 24

Why Ride Transit?

68% 68% 68% 68% 66% 66% 57% 57% 57% 57% 56% 56% 45% 45% 20% 20% 20% 20% 22% 22% 24% 24% 23% 23% 17% 17% 24% 24% 8% 8% 8% 8% 7% 7% 13% 13% 15% 15% 10% 10% 24% 24%

0% 0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100 100% 120 120% Str trongl

ngly agr

agree ee Som

mewhat agr

what agree ee Ne Neutr utral Di Disagr agree

Saves es Money ney Saves es Tim ime Conveni enient nt Tak Takes me e wher here I want ant to

go Good

d for
r

Environm

nment

nt Can an do do Other her Things ngs (Read) ad) Healthi hier er

13

SLIDE 25

MDT’s Service Rating

14 Excellent 6% Very good 23% Good 31% Average 24% Poor 16% Excellent Very good Good Average Poor

SLIDE 26

Stakeholder input, review, and comment period

(January - July 2014)

Public review and comment period

(February - July 2014)

Draft Transit Development Plan (July 2014)
Finalize Draft Transit Development Plan (August 2014)
Submit Transit Development Plan to FDOT for review

and approval by September 1st

Present to TAC on November 12th
Present to BCC on November 18th