Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 2016-2017 Preliminary End-of-Year - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
charlotte mecklenburg schools
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 2016-2017 Preliminary End-of-Year - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 19, 2022 150 likes •580 views

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 2016-2017 Preliminary End-of-Year Results Media Briefing September 7, 2017 CMS is Continuing to Make Strides Forward For the 4 th year in a row, College and Career Ready (CCR) rates improved in Mathematics and

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 2016-2017 Preliminary End-of-Year Results Media Briefing

September 7, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

  • For the 4th year in a row, College and Career Ready (CCR) rates improved in

Mathematics and Math I.

  • Compared to 2015-16, College and Career Ready (CCR) rates improved in

English II, but declined in Reading, Science, and Biology.

  • Similarly, Grade Level Proficiency (GLP) rates improved in Mathematics, English

II, and Math I, but declined in Reading, Science, and Biology compared to 2015-16.

  • CMS outperformed the state average and most large districts in the state in

College and Career Ready (CCR) rates.

  • Seventy-three percent (73%) of schools in CMS met or exceeded growth

expectations.

CMS is Continuing to Make Strides Forward

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

  • Student performance on the ACT WorkKeys exam, a national measure of

workplace readiness, improved and outpaced the state for the 5th year in a row.

  • CMS graduated 89.4% of the 2017 cohort of seniors in four years.
  • CMS has a higher four-year cohort graduation rate than the state and most
  • ther large school districts in North Carolina.
  • The number of schools in CMS receiving a school performance grade of A or

A+ held steady at 25 schools.

  • The number of schools in CMS receiving a school performance grade of F held

steady at 5 schools.

  • Nearly 74% of schools in CMS earned a school performance grade of A, B or C.

CMS is Continuing to Make Strides Forward

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

2017 Cohort Graduation Rate (4-Year)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5 69.9 73.5 76.4 81.0 85.1 88.3 89.6 89.4 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2014

CMS 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate

NC:

86.5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Graduation Rates for All Racial Subgroups

84.9 86.6 86.5 91.1 93.0 93.8 94.6 94.8 76.4 84.4 83.2 86.5 87.3 92.3 94.3 93.0 61.6 66.8 71.3 76.6 82.6 86.8 89.5 89.7 54.6 58.0 65.5 71.1 74.3 79.6 79.8 78.5

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

White Asian Black Hispanic

2010 to 2017 Change 2016 to 2017 Change White + 9.9 points + 0.2 points Asian + 16.6 points

  • 1.3 points

Black + 28.1 points + 0.2 points Hispanic + 23.9 points

  • 1.3 points

Source: NCDPI Cohort Graduation Rate: http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/reporting/cohortgradrate Graduation Rate Calculation Method: http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/reporting/cohortgradrate

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Graduation Gaps Have Narrowed Dramatically Since 2010

43.3 41.6 44.8 53.5 61.8 65.4 68.8 68.2 43.9 42.7 46.1 46.0 51.9 64.0 57.9 59.9 59.8 64.6 69.7 74.5 79.5 83.1 85.2 85.0

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

SWD LEP EDS

2010 to 2017 Change 2016 to 2017 Change EDS + 25.2 points

  • 0.2 points

SWD + 24.9 points

  • 0.6 points

LEP + 16.0 points + 2.0 points

SWD: Students with Disabilities; LEP: Limited English Proficient; EDS: Economically Disadvantaged Students

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

86.5 89.4 81.4 86.5 89.8 88.5

NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake

CMS’s Graduation Rate Exceeds Most Other Large Districts in North Carolina

4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate - 2017

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Math and Reading Grades 3-8 Science Grades 5 & 8 Math I, English II & Biology

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

In 2013-14, the State Board of Education adopted a new methodology for determining achievement levels of students.

The State Redefined Its Definition of Grade Level Proficiency (GLP) and College and Career Readiness (CCR)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Grade Level Proficiency

  • College and

Career Ready

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

67.1 63.8 58.7 64.4 64.4 58.4 60.9 66.0 60.4 63.8 68.9 56.3

English II Math I Biology

56.8 55.7 70.3 56.4 56.9 71.4 58.0 59.4 73.8 57.2 60.0 73.1

3-8 Reading 3-8 Math 5 & 8 Science

CMS Proficiency Rates Are Rising in Nearly All Tested Subjects

Percentage of students At or Above Grade Level Proficiency has increased from 2014 to 2017 in all subjects except English II and Biology

Change: 2014 to 2017

+0.4 points

Change: 2014 to 2017

+4.3 points

Change: 2014 to 2017

+2.8 points

2014 2015 2016 2017 Levels 3, 4, & 5

Change: 2014 to 2017

  • 3.3 points

Change: 2014 to 2017

+5.1 points

Change: 2014 to 2017

  • 2.4 points

2014 2015 2016 2017 Levels 3, 4, & 5 2014 2015 2016 2017 Levels 3, 4, & 5

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

College and Career Readiness Rates in End-of-Grade (EOG) Tested Subjects

45.4 48.3 59.7 45.3 49.4 62.4 47.6 52.7 65.4 45.9 53.3 63.9

3-8 Reading 3-8 Math 5 & 8 Science

2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017

Change: 2014 to 2017

+0.5 points

Change: 2014 to 2017

+5.0 points

Change: 2014 to 2017

+4.2 points

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

College and Career Readiness Rates in End-of-Course (EOC) Tested Subjects

56.6 52.8 49.5 54.2 56.0 50.2 52.7 58.1 52.4 54.3 60.2 48.6

English II Math I Biology

2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017

Change: 2014 to 2017

  • 2.3 points

Change: 2014 to 2017

+7.4 points

Change: 2014 to 2017

  • 0.9 points
slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Percentage of Students Proficient in Reading

Test CMS 2015-16 Percent Proficient CMS 2016-17 Percent Proficient Change from 2015-16 to 2016-17

Reading 3 58.5% 58.4%

  • 0.1 points

Reading 4 57.9% 57.3%

  • 0.6 points

Reading 5 55.5% 56.5%

+1.0 points

Reading 6 59.7% 60.2%

+0.5 points

Reading 7 60.4% 57.3%

  • 3.1 points

Reading 8 56.2% 53.2%

  • 3.0 points

Reading 3-8 58.0% 57.2%

  • 0.8 points

Percentage of Students Grade Level Proficient (Achievement Levels 3, 4, and 5) from 2015-16 to 2016-17

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Percentage of Students CCR In Reading Declined

Test CMS 2015-16 Percent C & C Ready CMS 2016-17 Percent C & C Ready Change from 2015-16 to 2016-17

Reading 3 49.6% 46.5%

  • 3.1 points

Reading 4 46.6% 44.3%

  • 2.3 points

Reading 5 44.3% 43.7%

  • 0.6 points

Reading 6 51.2% 50.4%

  • 0.8 points

Reading 7 49.1% 48.8%

  • 0.3 points

Reading 8 44.8% 42.2%

  • 2.6 points

Reading 3-8 47.6% 45.9%

  • 1.7 points

Percentage of Students College and Career Ready (Achievement Levels 4 and 5) from 2015-16 to 2016-17

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Percentage of Students Proficient in Math is Rising

Test CMS 2015-16 Percent Proficient CMS 2016-17 Percent Proficient Change from 2015-16 to 2016-17

Science 5 74.5% 72.2%

  • 2.3pts.

Science 8 73.0% 74.0%

+1.0 pts.

Science 5 & 8 73.8% 73.1%

  • 0.7 pts.

Test CMS 2015-16 Percent Proficient CMS 2016-17 Percent Proficient Change from 2015-16 to 2016-17

Math 3 68.5% 68.2%

  • 0.3 pts.

Math 4 62.1% 62.7%

+0.6 pts.

Math 5 65.8% 65.6%

  • 0.2 pts.

Math 6 55.4% 56.8%

+1.4 pts.

Math 7 53.4% 54.7%

+1.3 pts.

Math 8 49.5% 50.4%

+0.9 pts.

Math 3-8 59.4% 60.0%

+0.6 pts.

Percentage of Students Grade Level Proficient (Achievement Levels 3, 4, and 5) from 2015-16 to 2016-17

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Percentage of Students CCR in Math is Rising

Test CMS 2015-16 Percent C & C Ready CMS 2016-17 Percent C & C Ready Change from 2015-16 to 2016-17

Science 5 66.1% 62.6%

  • 3.5 pts.

Science 8 64.6% 65.2%

+0.6 pts.

Science 5 & 8 65.4% 63.9%

  • 1.5 pts.

Test CMS 2015-16 Percent C & C Ready CMS 2016-17 Percent C & C Ready Change from 2015-16 to 2016-17

Math 3 57.0 % 58.2 %

+1.2 pts.

Math 4 56.7% 55.6%

  • 1.1 pts.

Math 5 60.4% 60.1%

  • 0.3 pts.

Math 6 49.0% 50.3%

+1.3 pts.

Math 7 47.3% 48.8%

+1.5 pts.

Math 8 44.2% 45.1%

+0.9 pts.

Math 3-8 52.7% 53.3%

+0.6 pts.

Percentage of Students College and Career Ready (Achievement Levels 4 and 5) from 2015-16 to 2016-17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Percentage of Students Proficient in English II and Math I is Rising

Test CMS 2015-16 Percent Proficient CMS 2016-17 Percent Proficient Change from 2015-16 to 2016-17

English II 60.9% 63.8%

+2.9 points

Math I 66.0% 68.9%

+2.9 points

Biology 60.4% 56.3%

  • 4.1 points

EOC Composite 62.8% 63.6%

+0.8 points

Percentage of Students Grade Level Proficient (Achievement Levels 3, 4, and 5) from 2015-16 to 2016-17

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Percentage of Students CCR in English II and Math I is Rising

Percentage of Students College and Career Ready (Achievement Levels 4 and 5) from 2015-16 to 2016-17

Test CMS 2015-16 Percent C & C Ready CMS 2016-17 Percent C & C Ready Change from 2015-16 to 2016-17

English II 52.7% 54.3%

+1.6 points

Math I 58.1% 60.2%

+2.1 points

Biology 52.4% 48.6%

  • 3.8 points

EOC Composite 54.8% 54.9%

+0.1 points

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

59.2 61.2 46.4 53.6 55.6 67.2

NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake

CMS Outperformed Most Other Large Districts in North Carolina

GLP Performance Composite

Overall Performance Composite – Percent Grade Level Proficient (Levels 3, 4 and 5) by District and NC

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

49.2 52.2 37.4 44.8 46.5 58.8

NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake

CMS Outperformed Most Other Large Districts in North Carolina

CCR Performance Composite Overall Performance Composite – Percent College and Career Ready (Levels 4 and 5) by District and NC

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

CMS Outperformed Most Other Large Districts in North Carolina

3-8 Math GLP 3-8 Reading GLP Percent of Students Grade Level Proficient in Reading, Math and Science by District and NC

57.5 57.2 44.7 50.8 52.5 66.5 55.4 60.0 42.2 48.9 51.2 63.6 72.8 73.1 60.5 65.4 67.6 76.5

NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake

5 & 8 Science GLP

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

CMS Outperformed Most Other Large Districts in North Carolina

3-8 Math CCR 3-8 Reading CCR Percent of Students College & Career Ready on the Reading, Math and Science EOG Tests by District and NC

45.5 45.9 34.2 40.4 41.7 56.1 47.6 53.3 35.1 42.5 44.1 57.3 62.6 63.9 49.4 55.9 57.8 67.7

NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake

5 & 8 Science CCR

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

CMS Outperformed Most Other Large Districts in North Carolina

Math I GLP

60.7 63.8 52.6 58.2 61.1 70.0 64.3 68.9 46.7 62.6 66.9 74.4 56.1 56.3 46.5 58.0 54.0 61.4

NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake

English II GLP

Percent of Students Grade Level Proficient on the English II, Math I, and Biology Exams by District and NC

Biology GLP

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

CMS Outperformed Most Other Large Districts in North Carolina

Math I CCR

50.1 54.3 42.9 48.2 50.9 60.5 54.1 60.2 37.9 51.1 57.3 65.5 47.5 48.6 39.4 50.0 45.9 53.7

NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake

English II CCR

Percent of Students College & Career Ready on the EOC Tests by District and NC

Biology CCR

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Schools Meeting or Exceeding Expected Growth: 2012-13 to 2016-17

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

  • School Growth is an indication of the average rate at which students in a

school learned over the past year.

  • The standard is roughly equivalent to a year’s worth of expected

growth for a year of instruction.

  • The growth measure is defined in one of three ways:
  • did not meet expected growth;
  • met expected growth; or
  • exceeded expected growth.

School Growth

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Nearly Three Quarters of CMS Schools Met or Exceeded Growth Expectations

Year District/ State Total Number

  • f

Schools # Meeting

  • r

Exceeding Growth % Meeting

  • r

Exceeding Growth

2012-13 CMS 156 127 81.4% 2013-14 CMS 157 130 82.8% 2014-15 CMS 160 131 81.9% 2015-16 CMS 165 141 85.5% 2016-17 CMS 164 119 72.6% 2016-17 NC 2,531 1,866 73.7%

Note: In 2016-17, six schools did not have growth data, as provided by EVAAS/NC (Cato Middle College High, Harper Middle College High, Levine Middle College High, Metro School, Lincoln Heights and Turning Point Academy) and are not included in the denominator.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

School Performance Grades: 2013-14 to 2016-17

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Effective in the 2013-14 school year, North Carolina assigned School Performance Grades to all public schools. The School Performance Grades are based on student achievement (80%) and growth (20%). The indicators and the proficiency standard or benchmark used for achievement include: 1. Annual End-of-Grade (EOG) mathematics and reading assessments in grades 3–8 and science assessments in grades 5 and 8 (Level 3 and above) 2. Annual End-of-Course (EOC) assessments in Math I, Biology, and English II (Level 3 and above) 3. The percentage of graduates who complete Math III, Algebra II, or Integrated Math III with a passing grade 4. The percentage of grade 11 students who achieve the minimum score required for admission into a constituent institution of The University of North Carolina on the ACT (composite score of 17) 5. The percentage of graduates identified as Career and Technical Education concentrators who meet the Silver Certificate or higher on the ACT WorkKeys assessment 6. The percentage of students who graduate within four years of entering high school (Standard [4-Year] Cohort Graduation Rate) The EVAAS model, which provides the growth measure, uses current and previous student test data to determine whether schools are maintaining or increasing student achievement from one year to the next. In the event that a school does not have a Growth Score, only the School Achievement Score is used to calculate the Performance Score. It is important to note that schools that have met or exceeded growth may still receive a low School Performance Grade since achievement accounts for 80% of the grade.

School Performance Grades

For 2013–14 through 2016-17, the grade designations are set on a 15-point scale:

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Number of Schools with an A/A+ at 25 (15%) for the 2nd Year

Schools Performance Grades

Year A+ N/(%) A N/(%) B N/(%) C N/(%) D N/(%) F N/(%) Total

2013-14

  • 17

(11%) 47 (30%) 46 (29%) 36 (23%) 11 (7%) 157 2014-15 8 (5%) 11 (7%) 50 (31%) 44 (28%) 37 (23%) 10 (6%) 160 2015-16 14 (8%) 11 (7%) 42 (25%) 61 (37%) 32 (19%) 5 (3%) 165 2016-17 15* (9%) 10 (6%) 40 (24%) 58 (35%) 39 (23%) 5 (3%) 167

*In 2014-15, the state introduced A+ grades. Schools that earn an “A” designation and do not have significant achievement and/or graduation gaps will be designated as an “A+” school. Significant achievement and graduation gaps are defined as in-school gaps that are above the three-year state average when averaging gaps in the previous year and at least one of the two prior years between the highest-achieving subgroup and lowest-achieving subgroup. In 2016-17, 15 schools were designated as A+ schools. These schools are Bain ES, Beverly Woods ES, Dilworth ES, Elon Park ES, Polo Ridge ES, Hawk Ridge ES, Huntersville ES, Ballantyne ES, McKee Road ES, Olde Providence ES, Piedmont IB MS, Providence Spring ES, Providence HS, South Charlotte MS, and Grand Oak ES.

25 schools received a SPG of an A or A+ in 2015-16 and 2016-17 compared to 19 schools in 2014-15 The number of schools receiving an F grade decreased from 10 in 2014-15 to 5 in 2015-16 and remained the same in 2016-17

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

School Performance Grade Changes

2 3 2 5 2 11 7 33 47 25 3 3 2 6 12 2

A+ A B C D F

SPG IMPROVEMENT FROM 2015-16 TO 2016-17

Improved since 2015-16 Maintained since 2015-16 Declined since 2015-16

Note: There are five schools that are not included in this chart because they did not have a School Performance Grade in one or both years because they use an alternate accountability model or because they were new schools in 2015-16 or 2016-17.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

ACT and WorkKeys Exam Performance 2016-17

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

ACT Performance Overview – Juniors

2017 English

Average Score (Change from 2016)

Math

Average Score (Change from 2016)

Reading

Average Score (Change from 2016)

Science

Average Score (Change from 2016)

Composite

Average Score (Change from 2016)

CMS

17.2

(-.2)

19.2

(-.2)

18.9

(-.5)

18.6

(-.3)

18.6

(-.3)

State

17.4

(+.3)

18.9

(0)

18.9

(-.1)

18.8

(-.1)

18.6

(0) North Carolina is one of over 20 states to require all 11th grade students to take the ACT.

2017 Grade 11 ACT results as reported by ACT.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

ACT Performance Overview – Graduating Seniors

2017 English

Average Score (Change from 2016)

Math

Average Score (Change from 2016)

Reading

Average Score (Change from 2016)

Science

Average Score (Change from 2016)

Composite

Average Score (Change from 2016)

CMS

17.8

(+.2)

19.6

(+.2)

19.7

(+.5)

19.2

(+.2)

19.2

(+.3)

State

17.8

(0)

19.3

(-.1)

19.6

(+.1)

19.3

(+.1)

19.1

(0)

2017 Graduating Seniors results as reported by ACT.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

CMS Improved Performance on ACT WorkKeys Exam for the 5th Straight Year

Percent of Senior CTE Concentrators with a Silver Certificate or Better

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

CMS 68.9% 73.7% 73.9% 76.1% 77.0% State 67.3% 67.6% 72.1% 73.5% 73.3%

Attainment of a Silver Certificate or Better is an Indicator of Career and Workplace Readiness ACT WorkKeys Performance – Senior CTE Concentrators

Sources: http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/act/

http://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/state34_North%20Carolina_Web_Secured.pdf

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

  • For the 4th year in a row, College and Career Ready (CCR) rates improved in

Mathematics and Math I.

  • Compared to 2015-16, College and Career Ready (CCR) rates improved in

English II, but declined in Reading, Science, and Biology.

  • Similarly, Grade Level Proficiency (GLP) rates improved in Mathematics, English

II, and Math I, but declined in Reading, Science, and Biology compared to 2015-16.

  • CMS outperformed the state average and most large districts in the state in

College and Career Ready (CCR) rates.

  • Seventy-three percent (73%) of schools in CMS met or exceeded growth

expectations.

CMS is Continuing to Make Strides Forward

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

  • Student performance on the ACT WorkKeys exam, a national measure of

workplace readiness, improved and outpaced the state for the 5th year in a row.

  • CMS graduated 89.4% of the 2017 cohort of seniors in four years.
  • CMS has a higher four-year cohort graduation rate than the state and most
  • ther large school districts in North Carolina.
  • The number of schools in CMS receiving a school performance grade of A or

A+ held steady at 25 schools.

  • The number of schools in CMS receiving a school performance grade of F held

steady at 5 schools.

  • Nearly 74% of schools in CMS earned a school performance grade of A, B or C.

CMS is Continuing to Make Strides Forward

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

  • School Improvement Plans
  • Build upon the strategies and successes of schools and staff within CMS
  • Secondary teacher-leader cadre
  • Focus on foundational literacy skills:

– Reading Foundations professional development/application expansion – NC Pre-K Expansion – North Star Reading Partners, starting at 2nd Grade – Cross subject/content integration – Partner Community Efforts

  • Integration of all content areas with literacy
  • Instructional Leadership Team process fidelity with a focus on writing

Moving Forward

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

  • Preparation of staff and students in response to K-8 English Language Arts and

Mathematics standards shifts for the 2018-19 school year

  • Embedding social-emotional learning and cultural proficiency

strategies/resources within the English Language Arts curriculum

  • Specially designed curriculum for English Learners.
  • Continued support for rigorous lesson planning through Instructional Planning

Approach

  • Instructional Coaching support by Learning Community staff

Moving Forward

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41