Characterization of Water Management in PEM Fuel Cells with - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Characterization of Water Management in PEM Fuel Cells with - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Characterization of Water Management in PEM Fuel Cells with Microporous Layer Using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Dzmity Malevich, Ela Halliop, Kunal Karan, Brant A Peppley and Jon Pharoah WWW.FCRC.CA Water management in PEM fuel cell
Water management in PEM fuel cell
Hydrogen Oxygen Water Hydrogen + + + + Oxygen Water
membrane catalyst porous transport layer
e e + + + +
e e
+ + + +
e e
water content
Flooded Dry
Microporous Layer (MPL)
2
porous carbon backing microporous layer catalyst layer
200μm 200μm 1μm
Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Porous Transport Layer (PTL) (Gas Diffusion Layer) Catalyst Coated Membrane (CCM)
Effect of MPL on PEMFC performance
3 i / A/cm2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Ecell / V 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
PEMFC with MPL PEMFC without MPL
with MPL
Polarization curves for PEMFCs without MPL and with MPL on anode and cathode sides. Error bars represent standard deviation within batch of identically built cells.
without MPL
Positive effects of MPL:
reduces cathode flooding
- U. Pasaogullari, C.-Y. Wang,
- Electrochim. Acta 4 9 (2004) 4359
- L. R. Jordan, A. K. Shukla, T. Behrsing,
- N. R. Avery, B. C. Muddle, M.Forsyth,
- J. Power Sources 8 6 (2000) 250
im proves catalyst utilization
- Z. Qi, A. Kaufman, J. Power Sources,
1 0 9 (2002) 38
Reduces variability in cell perform ance
- Z. Qi, A. Kaufman, J. Power Sources,
1 0 9 (2002) 38
- D. Malevich, E. Halliop, B. Peppley, J. Pharoah, K. Karan,
- J. Electrochem. Soc., 156, B216 (2009)
Theories explaining MPL effect
Water
4
+ + Oxygen Oxygen Water membrane + + MPL cathode catalyst layer
Hydrophobic characteristic of the MPL forces w ater from cathode tow ards FFP reducing flooding
Porous transport layer (aka GDL)
- A. Z. Weber and J. Newman, J. Electrochem. Soc.,
152, A677 (2005) Proposed in:
Theories explaining MPL effect
Water
5
Hydrogen Hydrogen + + + + + + Oxygen Oxygen Water membrane
water drag with proton water back diffusion
MPL
- G. Lin and T. V. Nguyen, J. Electrochem. Soc., 152, A1942 (2005).
Proposed in:
MPL facilitates w ater back diffusion providing better hum idification of m em brane and catalyst layers
anode catalyst layer cathode catalyst layer
Theories explaining MPL effect
Water
6
+ + Oxygen Oxygen Water membrane + + MPL cathode catalyst layer
MPL m akes open pathw ays for gaseous
- xygen to be transported
to catalyst layer
Porous transport layer (aka GDL)
Proposed in: water water water
- J. T. Gostick, M. A. Ioannidis, M. W. Fowler, M. D.
Pritzker, Electrochem. Comm. 11, 576 (2009)
Approaches to examine proposed mechanisms Flow visualization
7
Neutron radiographs of water distribution in flow field channels – effect of PTL (J.P. Owejan, T.A. Trabold, D.L. Jacobson, M. Arif, S.G. Kandlikar, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 32, 4489 (2007)
Approaches to examine proposed mechanisms
8
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)
Setup 1
- r
Setup 2
resistance Rs I=V*Rs
- 1
EIS enabled potentiostat or potentistat+ impedance analyser impedance analyser V electronic load PEM fuel cell
High-current impedance Low-current impedance
EIS response of PEM fuel cell
9
Z' / Ω cm2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Z'' / Ω cm2
- 0.2
- 0.1
0.0
1 2 3 0.1 Hz 1 Hz 3 Hz 12 Hz 600 Hz 60000 Hz
High- frequency arc Low- frequency arc Mid-frequency arc High- frequency intercept
Z' / Ω cm
2
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
- Z'' / Ω cm
2
0.2 0.1 0.0
210 mA cm-2 300 mA cm-2 400 mA cm-2 500 mA cm-2
Mid-frequency arc: charge transfer resistance
10
R(i=500) R(i=210)
effect of current density on EIS response
- D. Malevich, E. Halliop, B. Peppley, J. Pharoah, K. Karan,
- J. Electrochem. Soc., 156, B216 (2009)
Low-frequency arc: mass-transport resistance
11
Z' / Ω cm2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Z'' / Ω cm2
- 0.2
- 0.1
0.0
0.1 Hz 1 Hz 3 Hz 12 Hz 600 Hz 60000 Hz H2/Air cell H2/(20%O2+He) cell
effect of cathode gas on EIS response
- D. Malevich, E. Halliop, B. Peppley, J. Pharoah, K. Karan,
- J. Electrochem. Soc., 156, B216 (2009)
- 30
- 25
- 20
- 15
- 10
- 5
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
- 300
- 250
- 200
- 150
- 100
- 50
H2 / H2 H2 / Air
Z' / Ω cm2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Z'' / Ω cm2
- 0.3
- 0.2
- 0.1
0.0
1.5 kHz 24 Hz 12 Hz 2 Hz 60 kHz 0.1Hz
H2/O2 cell H2/Air cell H2/H2 cell
High-frequency arc: membrane resistance
Ecell-Ecell(j=0) / mV Ecell-Ecell(j=0) / mV i / mA cm-2
R=0.1 Ω cm2 12 Diameter of high-frequency arc found to be consistent with the resistance calculated from the known geometry and conductivity
- f the Nafion membrane
- J. M. Le Canut, R. Latham, W. Mérida, D. A.
Harrington, J. Power Sources, 192, 457 (2009)
- D. Malevich, E. Halliop, B. Peppley, J. Pharoah, K. Karan,
ECS Transactions 156, 1763 (2008)
Z' / Ω cm2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Z'' / Ω cm2
- 0.2
- 0.1
0.0
1 2 3 0.1 Hz 3 Hz 12 Hz 600 Hz 60000 Hz
13
In-series resistance (FFP, endplates, cables etc.) Membrane resistance Cathode charge- transfer resistance Cathode mass- transport resistance
EIS response of PEM fuel cell: arc assignment
total cell resistance (Rcell)
polarization curve
Rcell
E / V
i = 0.21 A cm-2
Effect of MPL on PEMFC EIS response
14
Z' (Ω cm2) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Z'' (Ω cm2)
- 0.2
- 0.1
0.0
0.1 Hz 1 Hz 3 Hz 12 Hz 600 Hz 60000 Hz
Impedance diagrams for PEMFC with (2,3) and without (1) MPL fed with H2/ Air. Current density – 0.21 A cm -2.
without MPL with MPL
Effect of MPL: influence of current density
15
without MPL with MPL
0.3 A cm-2 0.7 A cm-2
Z' / Ω cm
2
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
- Z'' / Ω cm
2
0.2 0.1 0.0
Equivalent circuit fitting
16
W
Ro CPEm Rct CPEdl Zw Rm Randles circuit:
i / mA cm
- 2
300 400 500 600 700 800 900
R / Ω cm
2
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
6 5 i / mA cm
- 2
300 400 500 600 700 800 900
R / Ω cm
2
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Effect of current density on cathode charge-transfer and Warburg resistances
Rw Rct Rw Rct Rct+Rw Rct+Rw
17
with MPL without MPL
Time constants for oxygen transport process
18
Experimentally determined: Theoretically predicted:
MPL effect models
19
Model A: MPL promotes water back diffusion Model B: MPL forces water to FFP Expected effects:
- Increased amount of water in cathode
catalyst layer
- Reduced membrane resistance
- Reduced water content in cathode PTL
Expected effects:
- Reduced amount of water in cathode
catalyst layer
- Increased water content in cathode PTL
- bserved
not observed