Characterization of sub-cloud vertical velocity distributions and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

characterization of sub cloud vertical velocity
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Characterization of sub-cloud vertical velocity distributions and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Characterization of sub-cloud vertical velocity distributions and precipitation-driven outflow dynamics using a ship- based, scanning Doppler lidar during VOCALS-Rex. Alan Brewer 1 , Graham Feingold 1 , Sara Tucker 2 , and Mike Hardesty 1 1 NOAA


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Characterization of sub-cloud vertical velocity distributions and precipitation-driven outflow dynamics using a ship- based, scanning Doppler lidar during VOCALS-Rex.

Alan Brewer1, Graham Feingold1, Sara Tucker2, and Mike Hardesty1

1NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 2Ball Aerospace, Boulder, Colorado

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Characterization of sub-cloud vertical velocity distributions and precipitation-driven outflow dynamics using a ship- based, scanning Doppler lidar during VOCALS-Rex. Acknowledge:

  • Chris Fairall, Bob Banta, Dan Wolfe, Ludovic Bariteau

(NOAA ESRL PSD, CSD & CIRES Univ of Colorado)

  • Sandra Yuter &, Casey Burleson, Northern Carolina State University
  • Simon de Szoeke, Oregon State Univ
  • David Mechem, Univ of Kansas
  • Paquita Zuidema, Univ of Miami
  • Dave Covert, Univ of Washington

Alan Brewer1, Graham Feingold1, Sara Tucker2, and Mike Hardesty1

1NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 2Ball Aerospace, Boulder, Colorado

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Using ship-based Doppler Lidar observations to compare with LES models

Two approaches :

  • Continuous observations, build statistics of turbulence

profiles, and composite the results.

  • Combine high temporal and spatial resolution remote

sensing data to study evolution specific examples.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

This talk :

Preparing Lidar data for comparison

  • Combine vertical and horizontal velocity

measurements to create turbulence profiles.

  • Strength of the turbulence
  • Driving mechanism
  • Compositing turbulence profiles to investigate
  • Diurnal cycles
  • Impact of decoupling and drizzle occurrence
  • Anatomy of an outflow
  • Summary
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Turbulence profiles

  • Vertical variance
  • Skewness
  • Horizontal variance
  • TKE
  • Isotropy Ratio (vertical vs horizontal variance)
  • Eddy Dissipation Rate
  • Mean wind speed and direction
  • Aerosol backscatter strength
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Vertical velocities : form statistics from repeating 10

minute collection periods

Strongest vertical motion at cloud base, negative skewness consistent with top-down mixing driven by cloud-top cooling

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Horizontal velocities : Spatial variability

Scanning measurements along two orthogonal axes combined to create total horizontal variance.

Pl 1 Pl 2 Ship

slide-9
SLIDE 9

One minute to form horizontal variance profiles, cover from the sea surface though cloud base. Samples scales of 30m – 6km.

Horizontal velocities : Spatial variability

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The Isotropy ratio is one for isotropic turbulence

) ( 2 1

2 2 hor vert

TKE    

) ( 2 2

2 2 2 2 2 v u w hor vert

      

Vertical Horizontal Dominates

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Eddy Dissipation Rate

Time (10 Minutes typical) Vertical Velocity (m/s)

Height (km) 1.5

log (k)

height 625m slope -5/3

Epsilon (m2s-2)

10-4 10-3 Spectrum Height (km) 1.5

3 / 5 3 / 2

) (

 k k S 

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Composite Turbulence Profiles

  • Form cloud base normalized profiles
  • Combine data from entire experiment
  • Investigate

– Diurnal cycle – Connection to decoupling and drizzle occurrence

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Vert Var (m2s-2) Skewness Local Solar Time ( 24 Hrs) Local Solar Time ( 24 Hrs) 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0

  • 1.0

0.0 0.0 1.0 Cloud Base Norm Height 0.0 1.0 Cloud Base Norm Height

Vertical Velocity Variance and Skewness

Cloud Boundaries Solar Insolation

Vertical variance is max at night, skewness consistent with top-down mixing driven by cloud top cooling.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

1.0 0.0 0.5

  • 2
  • 5
  • 4

1.0 Cloud Base Norm Height 0.0 1.0 Cloud Base Norm Height Cloud Boundaries Solar Insolation Vert Var (m2s-2) log10(Epsilon)

Epsilon has a diurnal pattern with a maximum at cloud base and at the surface

  • 3

Local Solar Time ( 24 Hrs) Local Solar Time ( 24 Hrs) 0.0

Eddy Dissipation Rate

slide-15
SLIDE 15

1.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 1.0 Cloud Base Norm Height 0.0 1.0 Cloud Base Norm Height Cloud Boundaries Solar Insolation TKE (m2s-2) Isotropy Ratio

TKE and Isotropy Ratio

TKE has diurnal pattern with max at cloud base. Isotropy ratio indicates vertical motion most important near center of BL at night. Horizontal motion dominates during day.

Local Solar Time ( 24 Hrs) Local Solar Time ( 24 Hrs) 0.0 0.0

  • 1.0
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Decoupling

Base Cloud LCL Base Cloud Index Decoupling  

Cloud Base (m) Lifting Condensation Level (m)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Decoupling and Drizzle Occurrence

Drizzle Proxy

High Low

Occurrence

Well mixed

Decoupling Index

Decoupled

Entire Experiment

Drizzly Proxy derived from C-Band Radar

Periods of stronger decoupling are associated with higher drizzle rates Eastern portion relatively well mixed, western portion had more decoupling

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Vertical Skewness Vertical Variance Horizontal Variance Well mixed

Decoupling Index

Decoupled

0.0 1.0

Cloud Base Norm Height

0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0

  • 1.0

0.0 0.5 2.0 0.0 1.0

Turbulence Profiles as a function of Decoupling Index

Vertical variance strongest for well mixed BL. Horizontal variance maximum at surface and cloud base.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

TKE (m2s-2) Isotropy Ratio Well mixed

Decoupling Index

Decoupled Cloud Base Norm Height

0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0

Turbulence Profiles as a function of Decoupling Index

Strongest TKE associated with well mixed BL near cloud base. Ratio: vertical motion important at mid BL with horizontal variance being more important at surface.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Anatomy of an Open Cell

  • Combine scanning remote sensor data

– Lidar residual velocity – C-Band reflectivity

  • Temporal resolution : 0.5 - 3 minutes to

complete a scan

slide-21
SLIDE 21

16:41 16:48 + 7 minutes 17:01 + 13 minutes

A B C

slide-22
SLIDE 22

16:41 A - B 16:48 + 2 minutes 16:44 16:45 16:46

A B

0 Range (km) 4 1 1 1 km km km

slide-23
SLIDE 23

17:01 + 13 minutes

C

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Summary

  • Lidar observational data used to create

statistical accumulations of turbulence quantities

  • Scanning remote sensing data used to

study structure and time evolution of open cell boundaries.

  • Results from both approaches are being

be used to compare to LES models.

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27

10 20

Shallow PPI High PPI Shallow RHI Zenith

minutes

Repeating 20 minute scan sequence

20 40 60

1 Hour

5 10 15 20 UTC time (hours)

24 Hours

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Continuous operation 21 Oct – 30 Nov 2008

5 10 15 20 21-Oct 24-Oct 27-Oct 30-Oct 02-Nov 05-Nov 08-Nov 11-Nov 14-Nov 17-Nov 20-Nov 23-Nov 26-Nov 29-Nov UTC time (hours) HRDL RV Brown -VOCALS 2008: Scan Type vs. Date and Time stare PPI RHI VStare in port

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Average profiles from entire experiment: day vs night

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Combining vertical and horizontal velocity data to form turbulence profiles.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

16:41 A 16:48 B + 7 minutes 17:01 C + 13 minutes

slide-32
SLIDE 32

12:45 14:15 16:45

15 minute time steps Advection removed

GOES Imagery: VOCALS

October 27 2008

25 km Ship location

slide-33
SLIDE 33