Characterisation of Individual Defects in Multicrystalline Silicon
David Tweddle, Phillip Hamer, Zhao Shen, Vladimir Markevich, Michael Moody, Peter Wilshaw.
Characterisation of Individual Defects in Multicrystalline Silicon - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Characterisation of Individual Defects in Multicrystalline Silicon David Tweddle, Phillip Hamer, Zhao Shen, Vladimir Markevich, Michael Moody, Peter Wilshaw. Multicrystalline Silicon (mc-Si) Solar Cells The solar industry is rapidly
David Tweddle, Phillip Hamer, Zhao Shen, Vladimir Markevich, Michael Moody, Peter Wilshaw.
2
increasing its production capacity
capacity increased to 40,000 new solar panels being installed every hour [2]
(6% decrease in 2017 to $0.39)
the dominant industrial technology, over 60% of global module production [1]
[1] J. Jin 2015, Top Solar Power and Industry Trends [2] Renewables 2017, Global Status Report
3
approximately 1% abs efficiency lower than monocrystalline
recombination active regions in the wafer, which limit the cell performance
extremely difficult, since recombination can be enhanced by small levels of impurities concentrated at atomic scale defects Requires advanced microscopy
Recombination via defect levels Photovoltaic cell with losses labelled
4
consist of regions with a high concentration of crystallographic defects
(EBIC) map shows recombination
Dislocations Grain boundary
Large quantities of recombination active grain boundaries and intragrain dislocations
transition metals) decorate these defects and cause recombination
EBIC image of mc-Si wafer
Low EBIC current High EBIC current
5
Industry uses two key treatments to improve the electrical properties of mc-Si:
(some) crystallographic defects and impurities, reducing their recombination activity
high temperature firing
regions
process and results in impurities being collected immediately adjacent to the cell surface
Image Courtesy of Institute for Solar Energy Research Hamelin (ISFH)
6
effective? Need – a multiscale method which can provide a detailed characterisation of a mc-Si wafer at various stages of processing
PL counts x105 s-1
harmful to cell efficiencies?
PL image of a p-type wafer post Phosphorus Diffusion Gettering + H passivation
7
8
EBIC (A) Distance (x)
[1] S. Maximenko 2010, J. Appl. Phys.
9
flat surfaces prior to microscopy such as EBIC and APT
ensure a ‘mirror finish’
(photoconductance) crashed, as confirmed in PL
room temperature diffusion of impurities has
10
Colloidal Silica Contamination - EBIC
Before Polishing After Polishing
11
APT is an established technique it allows:
50 nm
12
Grain boundary (GB) marked by E-beam deposited W and undercut using FIB methods End-on liftout upon a FIB TEM half grid with end flattened using FIB APT needle (d ≈ 100nm) produced with grain boundary running along the tip
13
Colloidal Silica Contamination - APT
50 nm 50 nm
Oxygen Carbon Before Polishing
14
Colloidal Silica Contamination - APT
50 nm 50 nm 50 nm 50 nm
Before Polishing After Polishing Oxygen Carbon Oxygen Carbon
15
Colloidal Silica Contamination - APT
Before Polishing After Polishing
50 nm 50 nm 50 nm 50 nm
Ni Cu Ni Cu
16
50 nm
Ni Cu
defects
17
1. As-Cast 2. Phosphorus Diffusion Gettered 3. Hydrogen Passivated 4. Phosphorus Diffusion Gettered + Hydrogen Passivation
18 H passivated Gettered + H
Photoluminescence
PL Counts s-1 PL Counts s-1
19 H passivated Gettered + H
Photoluminescence
PL Counts s-1 PL Counts s-1
20
Electron Back Scatter Diffraction (EBSD)
Extremely low grain misorientation Require the use of grain reference
mapping to observe the low angle grain boundaries
21
Electron Back Scatter Diffraction (EBSD)
Area of a large concentration of small angle grain boundaries misorientation < 5°
Area of Interest
22 3.8% 11.4% As - Cast Gettered
Electron Beam Induced Current (EBIC)
23
50 nm
Small angle tilt grain boundary: Array of edge dislocations Misorientation of 3.8° coincides with a dislocation spacing of 5.8 nm Matches TEM
Carbon
24
20 nm Carbon
25
both before and after gettering
expected in both TEM and APT
Possible Explanations: Transition metal impurity levels below detection limit for APT (2-10 ppm)
26 H passivated Gettered + H
Photoluminescence
PL Counts s-1 PL Counts s-1
27
50 nm
Preliminary Study
(misorientation 49.62°)
active after PDG
PDG – fast cool (internal gettering?)
boundary
concentration of impurities large enough to see Cu 9000 5000 1000
PL Counts s-1
28
29
unprocessed multicrystalline silicon wafer
LBIC map for ungettered HP mc-Si wafer
Adamczyk et al., 2018, J Appl Phys 12(5)
30
gettering, intragranular regions are seen to improve
become more recombination active – indicates internal gettering to GBs
LBIC map for ungettered and gettered mc-Si wafers
Adamczyk et al., 2018, J Appl Phys 12(5)
31
passivation grain boundaries become generally inactive, however performance is still limited by regions that remain electrically active
(gbs) are still electrically active
LBIC map for ungettered, gettered and gettered + H passivation mc-Si wafers
Adamczyk et al., 2018, J Appl Phys 12(5)
32
(GBs) which are still electrically active can be correlated to grain boundary type
LBIC map for ungettered, gettered and gettered + H passivation and EBSD map for mc-Si wafers
Σ3 {111} gbs are electrically inactive Σ9, Σ27 and SA GBs are generally electrically active RA grain boundaries tend to respond to H passivation and become inactive
Adamczyk et al., 2018, J Appl Phys 12(5)
Why?
33
EBSD (Gettered and H Passivated)
Area of Interest
34
EBIC (Gettered and H Passivated)
10.9% RA GB 42.4° RA GB 41.0° SA GB 7.6°
35
Active Grain Boundary Inactive Grain Boundary
CARBON
36
Active Grain Boundary Inactive Grain Boundary
NITROGEN
37
inactive grain boundary Possible Explanations: Nitrogen passivation of grain boundary Transition metal impurity levels in active grain boundary below detection limit for APT (2-10 ppm)
We are not evaluating the whole picture
38
Hydrogen repelled by the local field at the boundary? Does hydrogen stay there? (lack of traps or the formation of molecular hydrogen) Role of grain boundary type – not all boundaries of the same type respond equally NEED: A method that allows for the unambiguous detection of hydrogen at specific defects
Adamczyk et al., 2018, J Appl Phys 12(5)
39
2H Passivation – Using Atomic Hydrogen
exposed to harmful UV radiation)
hydrogen is introduced industrially
40
hydrogen passivation [Chen 2005]
techniques – grain boundary running along the length of the needle
41
the GB in the needle and following APT, transmission Kikuchi diffraction was used determine its misorientation and rotation axis
Grain Boundary
42
+
20 nm
GB
43
Deconvolution required using relative peak heights and Si natural abundance
1 2 3 4 28 29 30 31 32 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Counts (arb) Mass-to-Charge-State (Da)
Deuterated Random Angle
2H2 + 28Si2H+ 29Si2H+ 30Si2H+ 30Si
44
low GB energy and lack of introduction of new deep levels in the band gap
present, but also we have confirmed that no enrichment of 2H is observed
(Forward scattered image prior to APT confirming GB in the tip) 20 nm
45
Si2H+
46
2H present
the peaks 30-32 Da- adjacent peaks and Si natural abundancy
Comparison of mass spectra from a non-passivated and 2H passivated GB
47
2H present
the peaks 30-32 Da- adjacent peaks and Si natural abundancy
Comparison of mass spectra from a non-passivated and 2H passivated GB
29Si2H+ 30Si2H+
48
Comparison of mass spectra from a non-passivated and 2H passivated GB
29 29 30 30 Majority of 2H detected
28Si2H+ 30Si+ 29Si+ 30Si+ 29Si+ 28Si1H+ 28Si1H+
49
the 2H quantity per defect can be determined
dislocations
50
the 2H quantity per defect can be determined
dislocations
Lower detection limit ≈2 x 1012 counts cm-2
51
multicrystalline silicon that has the potential to underpin future development
Si2H+ peaks Next Steps:
with 2H distribution
respond and some don’t
52
The authors would like to thank: Prof Tony Peaker (University of Manchester) Dr John Murphy and Dr Nick Grant (University of Warwick) Daniel Chen and Moonyong Kim (UNSW) EPSRC (Supersilicon grant, EP/M024911/1)
53
54
multicrystalline silicon that has the potential to underpin future development
Si2H+ peaks Next Steps:
with 2H distribution
respond and some don’t
55
Deuterium only introduced effectively atomically 7 orders of magnitude difference in diffusivity