Chapter 5: Short Run Price Competition Price competition (Bertrand - - PDF document

chapter 5 short run price competition
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Chapter 5: Short Run Price Competition Price competition (Bertrand - - PDF document

Chapter 5: Short Run Price Competition Price competition (Bertrand competition) A1. Firms meet only once in the market. A2. Homogenous goods. A3. No capacity constraints. Bertrand paradox: same outcome as competitive market...


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Chapter 5: Short Run Price Competition

  • Price competition (Bertrand competition)
  • A1. Firms meet only once in the market.
  • A2. Homogenous goods.
  • A3. No capacity constraints.
  • Bertrand paradox: same outcome as competitive

market...

  • Solution: relax the assumptions....

– Repeated interaction (Chapter 6) – Product Differentiation (Chapter 7) – There exist capacity constraints;

∗ Cournot Equilibrium

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

1 The Bertrand Paradox

  • Duopoly, n = 2
  • Because identical goods, consumers buy from the

supplier that charges the lowest price.

  • Market demand: q = D(p)
  • Marginal cost: c
  • Firm i’s demand is

Di(pi, pj) =        D(pi) if pi < pj

1 2D(pi) if pi = pj

if pi > pj

  • Firm i’s profit is

Πi(pi, pj) = (pi − c)Di(pi, pj)

Definition A Nash equilibrium in price (Bertrand equilibrium) is a pair of prices (p∗

1, p∗ 2) such that each

firm i’s price maximizes the profit of i, given the other firm’s price.

Πi(p∗

i, p∗ j) ≥ Πi(pi, p∗ j) for i = 1, 2 and for any pi.

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • The Bertrand Paradox (1883):

The unique equilibrium is p∗

1 = p∗ 2 = c.

  • Firms price at MC and make no profit.
  • If asymmetric marginal costs c1 < c2, it is no longer

an equilibrium. – p = c2 (firm 1 sets price lower than c2 to get the whole market) – firm 1 makes Π1 = (c2 − c1)D(c2) and firm 2 has no profit. 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2 Solutions to Bertrand Paradox

2.1 Repeated Interaction (relax A1)

  • Chapter 6
  • If firms meet more than once, (p∗

1, p∗ 2) = (c, c) is not

the only equilibrium.

  • Collusive behavior can be sustain by the threat of

future losses in a price war.

2.2 Product Differentiation (relax A2)

  • Chapter 7
  • With homogenous product: at equal price, con-

sumers are just indifferent between goods.

  • If goods are differentiated: (p∗

1, p∗ 2) = (c, c) is no

longer an equilibrium.

  • Example: spacial differentiation

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2.3 Capacity Constraints (relax A3)

  • Edgeworth solution (1887).
  • If firms cannot sell more than they are capable
  • f producing: (p∗

1, p∗ 2) = (c, c) is no longer an

equilibrium.

  • Why? If firm 1 has a production capacity smaller

than D(c), firm 2 can increase his price and get a positive profit.

  • Example: 2 hotels in a small town, number of beds

are fixed in SR.

  • The existence of a rigid capacity constraint is

a special case of a decreasing returns-to-scale technology.

  • Why? Firm 1 has a marginal cost of c up to the

capacity constraint and then MC = ∞. 5