Changes to paper, with input from Peter, Jan and Fred Kees - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

changes to paper with input from peter jan and fred kees
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Changes to paper, with input from Peter, Jan and Fred Kees - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Changes to paper, with input from Peter, Jan and Fred Kees Ligtenberg, lepcol meeting 25-3-18 Section 1-2: References (1) [3] is now GridPix detectors introduction and applications [4] is CAST Leave [5] TIPP17 talk? (now with link)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Changes to paper, with input from Peter, Jan and Fred Kees Ligtenberg, lepcol meeting 25-3-18

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Section 1-2: References (1)

[3] is now “GridPix detectors – introduction and applications” [4] is CAST Leave [5] TIPP17 talk? (now with link) [6] is timepix3 reference “Timepix3: a 65k channel hybrid pixel readout chip with simultaneous toa/tot and sparse readout”

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Section 2 small changes

  • Inserted: diameter
  • Clock frequency 640 MHz
  • Changed to: “The box has length of 69

mm, a width (not shown) of 42 mm and a height of 28 mm with a maximum drift length of about 20 mm.“

  • Moved: for the readout SPIDR software
  • Removed: “The detector is cooled with

water”

  • Grid voltage → local drift voltage
  • Bigger text in figure
  • Beam line → beam
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Section 2: References (2) and other changes

  • [8] for FEI4 chip (inactive added)
  • [9] for TLU
  • 280 is value at which drift speed is max
  • Changed wording of threshold per pixel
  • Moved drift speed value in text and

changed explanation on used value

  • Pressure changed and checked (the
  • verpressure was already included)
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Drift speed

  • Using telescope fit & timepix hits, mean z residual can be calculated
  • Order 1% deviation from Magboltz drift speed, but data is very noisy

Mean z-residual [mm]

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Air pressure

Morning of Juli 13th, with 19 mbar over pressure

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Changed parameters and errors

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Section 4.1

  • Added “the positions …”
  • Added reference to figure 3
  • Changed legend entry and fit in

figure 3 to “Track fit”

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Section 4.2

  • Changed wording
  • Cutflow made (for small part of run), but not put in
  • Because some cuts are on hits not on events
  • Because not very informative
  • Mistake in percentage

Cut Rejected Timepix triggers 46105 100% less than 4 planes hit in telescope 2488 43617 95% All telescope clusters failed fit 2236 41381 90% More than one cluster in tpc 3204 38177 83% Telescope and tpc fits do not match 3378 34799 75% Less than 30 hits in tpc 1427 33372 72% tpc fit leaves or enters on the side 774 32598 71% Tpc entry already has a matching cluster 710 31888 69% At least 75% of hits in track 250 31638 69% Successful 31638 69%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Section 4.2

  • Added “position of”
  • “a magnitude corresponding with a time”
  • “pass the whole tpc”
  • “less than 1 mm away”
  • “the projection of”
  • “passed”-> “passes”
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Section 5.1

  • Changed wording for plateau sligthly.
  • Should it be changed more?
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Section 5.2

  • “depends on the magnitude”
  • Other small tekst corrections
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Section 5.3

  • Completely changed explenation on chi2
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Section 5.4

  • Hit resolution at zero drift is large?
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Section 5.6

  • “truncated sum of electrons”
  • Changed sentence and added “optimally” to

indicate that the rejected fraction was

  • ptimized.