Challenge 31- MOuse Smart HoppERS (MOSHERS) Sponsors: MRC Harwell - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

challenge 31 mouse smart hoppers moshers
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Challenge 31- MOuse Smart HoppERS (MOSHERS) Sponsors: MRC Harwell - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

An International Centre for Mouse Genetics Challenge 31- MOuse Smart HoppERS (MOSHERS) Sponsors: MRC Harwell Institute Launch Meeting 6 September 2018 The Challenge To monitor and accurately measure food intake in a home cage - directly or


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Challenge 31- MOuse Smart HoppERS (MOSHERS)

Sponsors: MRC Harwell Institute

Launch Meeting 6 September 2018

An International Centre for Mouse Genetics

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Challenge

To monitor and accurately measure food intake in a home cage - directly or indirectly Deliver individual data on three to five mice housed together

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Problem

Monitoring food intake needs specialist equipment and space

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Problem 2

Behaviour changes when singly housed

F e m ale s M ale s 1 2 3 4

*** ***

F o o d In ta k e (g)

Food intake using two separate metabolic cage-type monitoring systems (mutants in red)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Problem 3

Monitoring food intake in home cages is labour- intensive and requires disturbing the animals every day

4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 5 0 5 5

*** ***

A g e (W e e k s) F o o d In ta k e /W e e k (g )

*** ** * *** *

Home cage food intake monitoring

slide-6
SLIDE 6

4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 5 0 5 5

*** ***

A g e (W e e k s) F o o d In ta k e /W e e k (g )

*** ** * *** *

F e m ale s M ale s 1 2 3 4

*** ***

F o o d In ta k e (g)

In this example, we expect that confounding factors such as neophobia and anxiety may be affecting the animal’s feeding behaviour

Otp- metabolic mutant

(Mol Metab 2017 6(11) 1419)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The Problem 4

Existing multiple housed systems are: a) too expensive for wide-spread use b) data-heavy requiring expertise and IT infrastructure c) require a modification inside/outside the cage

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Current state of the art- Summary

Weighing home cage hoppers Limited accuracy and sensitivity Averaged over mice in cage No account of hierarchy Specialised metabolic caging “Accurate” Single novel housing = stress = altered FI Home cage monitoring “Accurate” Not scalable for many cages

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Why was this Challenge developed?

Scientific

  • Food Intake (FI) in energy balance
  • Feeding behaviour
  • Obesity, diabetes, metabolic disease

Business

  • Existing systems confounded by stress
  • Loss of metadata (when/how much/how long)
  • Lack of larger datasets
slide-10
SLIDE 10

3Rs drivers

Monitoring Welfare:

  • Weight loss is one of the most common welfare indicators used with mice
  • Mice are likely to reduce activity and feeding before weight loss
  • Opportunities for EARLY welfare indicators

Early and accurate intervention:

  • Adjustment of analgesia routines
  • Detection of early onset indicators (e.g. neurodegenerative models)

Innovations in Welfare:

  • NEW information on animal behaviour and feeding which may lead to refinements

procedures such as fasting, post-surgical care and maintaining genetically altered mouse lines

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Deliverables

A DEVICE for everyone delivering a time series of data representing food intake.

  • Compatibility with all existing cages
  • Mouse friendly (no training or intervention)
  • Affordability
  • Accessibility – easy data analysis and Cloud potential
  • Portable and easy service
  • Collect data on individual cages (1)
  • Collect data on individual animals (2)
slide-12
SLIDE 12

What we don’t want

  • Disruption of the home environment
  • Single housing
  • Difficult data analysis
  • Expensive to buy, run and maintain
  • Hard for technicians to operate in high throughput settings (set

up/take down/clean)

  • Low-level adoption and non-standardisation of food-intake

measurement.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Sponsor in-kind

  • In-house validation with wild type and mutant lines including a

comparison of data from paired-feeding, metabolic and calorimetry caging data.

  • Advice and ideas in device design
  • In-house testing of a prototype device
  • Data critique and validation
  • Access to a wide network of mouse genetic researchers (inside and
  • utside of Harwell) for advice/analysis and critique.
  • House 55k mice
  • 2017:

197k regulated procedures 229k mice bred 133 new GA lines

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Contacts

Dr Sara Wells: S.wells@har.mrc.ac.uk Dr Roger Cox: R.Cox@har.mrc.ac.uk