Ch Chester A A. Widom, m, FAI AIA A Sta tate Ar Architect - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
ch chester a a widom m fai aia a
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ch Chester A A. Widom, m, FAI AIA A Sta tate Ar Architect - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Oct 09, 2023 265 likes •703 views

Ch Chester A A. Widom, m, FAI AIA A Sta tate Ar Architect DSA: Serving California Since 1907 2 1906: San Francisco 1933: Long Beach 3 Field Act 4 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OVERSIGHT: STRUCTURAL, FIRE/LIFE SAFETY, ACCESS 72

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ch Chester A

  • A. Widom,

m, FAI AIA A

Sta tate Ar Architect

slide-2
SLIDE 2 2

DSA: Serving California Since 1907

slide-3
SLIDE 3 3

1906: San Francisco 1933: Long Beach

slide-4
SLIDE 4 4

Field Act

slide-5
SLIDE 5 5

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OVERSIGHT: STRUCTURAL, FIRE/LIFE SAFETY, ACCESS

 72 Community College Districts › 114 Campuses › 191 Projects (2015-2016)  1,084 K-12 School Districts › 9,292 Campuses › 2,137 Projects (2015-2016)  Essential Service Buildings › 5 Projects (2015-2016)

Incremental projects not included

slide-6
SLIDE 6 6

DESIGN OVERSIGHT: ACCESS COMPLIANCE ONLY

 Courts  UC Campuses  CSU Campuses  219 Projects (2014-15)

slide-7
SLIDE 7 7

ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES

 Prop 39 Review  Project Inspector Certification  Testing Laboratory Certification  DSA Academy  Construction Change Documents  CASp Certification  CASp Outreach (SB 1186)

slide-8
SLIDE 8 8

CODE DEVELOPMENT RESPONSIBILITIES

 Triennial Publication  Intervening Update  Emergency Regulations  Access*  Structural  Mechanical  Electrical  Plumbing  Landscape Irrigation 

slide-9
SLIDE 9 9

HEADQUARTERS OFFICE

 Standards and Procedures  Policy & Communication › Client Relations › Administration Relations › Legislative Relations  Code Development  Oversight Responsibilities  Ad Hoc Task Forces  Sustainability (MEPE)

slide-10
SLIDE 10 10

REGIONAL OFFICES

slide-11
SLIDE 11 11

Staff

 Headquarters:

54

 Sacramento Regional Office:

51

 Oakland Regional Office:

58

 Los Angeles Regional Office:

72

 San Diego Regional Office:

64

 Total DSA Staff:

299

slide-12
SLIDE 12 12

PROJECTS IN PROGRESS AS OF April 30, 2017

slide-13
SLIDE 13 13

PROJECTS IN PROGRESS AS OF April 30, 2017

slide-14
SLIDE 14 14

PERCEPTION OF DSA: 2011

 Bureaucratic  Long “Bin” time  Loses documents  Stumbling block to construction  Slow  Wasteful

slide-15
SLIDE 15 15

CHANGING CULTURE CHANGING PROCESSES

slide-16
SLIDE 16 16

CHANGING CULTURE

slide-17
SLIDE 17 17

STAKEHOLDER PERCEPTION

 Districts  Program Managers  Construction Managers  Architects & Engineers  Inspectors  Contractors  State Government

slide-18
SLIDE 18 18

LEADERSHIP & STAFFING

 Leadership › Headquarters › Regional Offices › Succession Plan  Staff Development › Collaboration › Change  Communication › Internal › Stakeholders

slide-19
SLIDE 19 19

CHANGING PROCESSES

slide-20
SLIDE 20 20

COMMUNICATION

 Cloud Based Connectivity and Transparency  Field Engineer Connectivity  eTracker  iTracker  Focused email system for stakeholders  Weekly internal newsletter

slide-21
SLIDE 21 21

TRANSPARENCY

 DSAbox for Projects › 13,193 Stakeholder Collaborators  Certification Box  Inspector Box  Landscape Irrigation Box

slide-22
SLIDE 22 22

CERTIFICATION

 Certified Projects  Projects under construction  Projects occupied without certification: › Legacy

1983 - 2010

› Transition:

2011 – May 31, 2013

 Inspection Card:

June 1, 2013 - Present

slide-23
SLIDE 23 23

LEGACY PROJECTS OCCUPIED W/O CERTIFICATION

as of April 30, 2017

16,386 7,297
  • 2,000
4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000

Oc c upie d without Ce r tific ation - L e gac y Pr

  • je c ts
slide-24
SLIDE 24 24

TRANSITION PROJECTS

as of April 30, 2017

 Total Transition Projects:

9,633

 Total Certified: 92.8%

8,905

 Total Occupied w/out Certification

695

 Total In-process (in construction pending 301-N)

33

* Base Transition project numbers change due to projects moving to Inspection Card projects
slide-25
SLIDE 25 25

INSPECTION CARD PROJECTS

as of April 30, 2017

 Total Projects Occupied:

9,372

 Total Certified: 93%

6,415

 Total Occupied w/out Certification

519

 Total In-process (in construction, pending 301-N)

2,438

slide-26
SLIDE 26 26

PROJECT SCHEDULES

TIME IS MONEY

 Construction Funding › State School Facilities Bonds

 2016 Bond (Prop 51): $9B

› Local School Facilities Bonds

 Prior Existing Bond Authority* $25.0B  Bonds Passed in 2014 – 2016 $37.5B

› Total Bonds:

$71.5B

 Escalation @ 8%/year

$5.72B

 Stakeholder Schedule Misconception

*Estimate

slide-27
SLIDE 27 27

TYPICAL MONTHLY SCORECARD POSTED ON DSA WEBSITE

slide-28
SLIDE 28 28

TYPICAL MONTHLY SCORECARD POS OSTE TED ON ON DSA W WEBSITE

slide-29
SLIDE 29 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30 30

TIME IS MONEY

 Eliminate Bin Time  Develop Appointment System  DSA Commitment › Scheduled Review Completion  Design Professional/ Client Commitment › Complete Submission

slide-31
SLIDE 31 31

CHALLENGES

 Culture › Collaborative › Succession  Processes › Bin Time > Scheduled Appointment System › eTracker > iTracker › Electronic Plan Review › Testing and Certification › Continuing Education › Design Build  Sustainability

slide-32
SLIDE 32

# DSA7x7x7 # De sig nE ne rg yWa te r

slide-33
SLIDE 33 33

DESIGN AWARD JURIES

slide-34
SLIDE 34 34

CHANGING THE CONVERSATION

 IMPACT OF DESIGN › Education › Energy & Water Conservation  REACHING ZERO NET ENERGY › Is it possible? › At what cost?  COST VS. INVESTMENT › Some benefits are hard to calculate/quantify › Must protect investment

slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36

$3k Per Bldg/Year

$1.5 BILLION

POTENTIAL SAVINGS

slide-37
SLIDE 37 37

WEB SITE: www.7x7x7DesignEnergyWater.com

 Video of Presentation at the Crest Theatre  Final Reports  Cost Estimates  Sustainability Articles

slide-38
SLIDE 38

DESIG DESIGN BUIL BUILD D

Public S School

  • l and C

Com

  • mmunity

Colleg ege Pr e Proces ess

Owner DB A/E Builder
slide-39
SLIDE 39 39

DSA’s DESIGN BUILD HISTORY

 Mixed Project Success › Lack of Design Build Team’s DSA Experience

 Similar to Municipal Agencies  Solve the Details in the Field  Excessive CCDs

› DSA’s Staff Skeptical of Delivery Method  DSA Alternate Delivery Task Force › Regulations › Processes  District Q.A. Programs

Owner DB A/E Builder
slide-40
SLIDE 40 40

SUCCESSFUL DESIGN BUILD/DSA COLLABORATION CRITERIA

 Mutual Trust and Respect  Team Experience: › Design Professionals › Construction Leadership › Major Sub-Contractors › Project Inspector(s) › DSA Plan Reviewers › DSA Field Engineer  Professional Responsibilities

Owner DB A/E Builder
slide-41
SLIDE 41 41

DSA’s DESIGN BUILD CONCERNS & RECOMENDATIONS

 Builder’s Influence: › Architect › Inspector  Builder’s Participation with DSA  Major Sub-Contractor’s Engaged Early  No Differed Submissions  Field Engineers Participation

Owner DB A/E Builder
slide-42
SLIDE 42 42

Partners in the Design and Construction

  • f Great Schools

“ ”