CG Configuration = + C C C Assumption: r o is large. 1 1 D - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

cg configuration
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CG Configuration = + C C C Assumption: r o is large. 1 1 D - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

4 CG Configuration = + C C C Assumption: r o is large. 1 1 D DG DB isolation between input and output nodes 1 ( ) = + || RC C C R + 1 1 in GS SB s g g 1 1 m mb ( )( )


slide-1
SLIDE 1

4

IIT-Bombay Lecture 24 M. Shojaei Baghini

CG Configuration

( ) ( )( )

D DB DG

  • ut

mb m s SB GS in

R C C RC g g R C C RC

1 1 1 1 1 1

1 || + =         + + =

Assumption: ro is large. ⇒ isolation between input and

  • utput nodes

1 1 DB DG D

C C C + =

( )( )

  • ut

in mb m S D in

  • ut

sRC sRC g g R R s v s v s H + + + + = = ⇒ 1 1 1 1 ) ( ) ( ) (

slide-2
SLIDE 2

5

IIT-Bombay Lecture 24 M. Shojaei Baghini

Precise H(s): CG Configuration (If ro is not negligible but RL is negligible)

( ) ( ) ( )

[ ]

1 1 ) ( ) (

2

+ + + + + + + + = s R C C R r g g R r s C C r R r g g s v s v

s in L s

  • mb

m s

  • in

L

  • s
  • mb

m in

  • ut
slide-3
SLIDE 3

6

IIT-Bombay Lecture 24 M. Shojaei Baghini

CG Configuration (If ro is not negligible)

( ) ( )

        + + + ≈ + + + =

  • mb

m L mb m in

  • mb

m

  • L

in in

r g g Z g g sC r g g r Z sC Z 1 || 1 1 || 1

in in s in M s

v Z R Z v + =

1

,

RL

Pole estimation at the input

slide-4
SLIDE 4

7

IIT-Bombay Lecture 24 M. Shojaei Baghini

Interesting Approximation for the Second Pole

  • f CG Configuration

( ) ( ) ( )

[ ]

( ) ( )

mb m in L s

  • mb

m in L

  • s

L s

  • mb

m s in L s

  • mb

m s

  • in

L

  • s
  • mb

m in

  • ut

g g C C R r g g C C r R C R r g g If s R C C R r g g R r s C C r R r g g s v s v + = + ≈ ⇒ + ≈ + + + + + + + + =

2 1 2

: 1 1 ) ( ) ( τ τ

Simple isolated time constant at the input (pole assigned to the input node) and τ1 >> τ2

slide-5
SLIDE 5

8

IIT-Bombay Lecture 24 M. Shojaei Baghini

Very difficult to use direct calculation! We use property of CG configuration, given in the previous slide.

Frequency Response of Cascode Amplifier

slide-6
SLIDE 6

9

IIT-Bombay Lecture 24 M. Shojaei Baghini

Approximation in the Frequency Response of Cascode Amplifier ( )

eq in s in GD mb m m GS eq in mb m m A X L GD BD eq

  • ut

eq

  • ut

D

  • ut
  • ut

C R C g g g C C A g g g s v s v C C C C C R R

, 1 2 2 1 1 , 2 2 1 2 2 , ,

1 ) ( ) ( || ≈ ⇒         + + + = ⇒ − = + − ≈ + + = ≈ τ τ

  • What about the pole

at node X?

  • Worst case estimation
slide-7
SLIDE 7

4

IIT-Bombay Lecture 25 M. Shojaei Baghini

Related to the assignment (approximations and validity of time constant method)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

5

IIT-Bombay Lecture 25 M. Shojaei Baghini

DM Frequency Response of Differential Amplifier Differential-mode half circuit

slide-9
SLIDE 9

6

IIT-Bombay Lecture 25 M. Shojaei Baghini

CM Frequency Response of Differential Amplifier

  • Impact of mismatch
  • Tradeoff between

voltage headroom and CM frequency response

1 2 1 2