Center for Teaching Excellences Course Design Institute & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Center for Teaching Excellences Course Design Institute & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Center for Teaching Excellences Course Design Institute & Ignite Programs Michael Palmer, Director, Center for Teaching Excellence 2 3 4 5 6 7 Course Design Institute 8 In n thr hree to o five years, what hat will will your
2
3
4
5
6
7
Course Design Institute
8
9
In n thr hree to
- five years, what
hat will will your r stu tude dents ts still till know, be be able ble to do do, or r va value e …
10
Why is the United States such a religious country?
Do we see things as they are? Or do we see things as we are?
Could we, should we, make a bridge
- ut of glass?
Is global warming real? How can lobsters escape aging?
How does food get from your mouth to your derrière? Can’t we all just get along?
11
“This is by far the e best teaching g workshop I have ve ever er atten ended ed. The content was interesting and the instructors really practiced what they preached with respect to learning techniques.” “The institute gave me life! And it total ally chang anged my approac
- ach
h to
- cour
- urse design and
and teac aching.” “In two words: [th the CDI DI expe perience was] s] lif life-alte lteri
- ring. This may
seem overblown, but it is 100% true. I came in thinking I had a handle on my course, but realized very soon I needed to go back to the drawing board. The result is exponentially improved.”
- Overall, 389 participants have rated the 2008-2017
Institutes 4.76/5.00.
- 100% of participants have said they would recommend
CDI to a colleague.
12
Participation by Year
13
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 2008 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 UVa Faculty UVa Post-docs UVa Graduate Students Non-UVa Faculty Ed Developers
N=398
c3Design
14
Ignite
15
16
20 40 60 80 100 FY '15 FY '16 FY '17 FY '18 FY '19 FY '20 FY '21 FY 22
Actual hires Actual Departures Actual Net Cumulative
PLANNED NET FACULTY GROWTH (CUMULATIVE) PLANNED HIRES PLANNED DEPARTURES
These numbers represent the “undergraduate” schools only.
Faculty Renewal
Scholars by Cohort
- 2015-16: 32
- 2016-17: 38
Scholars by Rank
- 77% assistant professors
17
18
Participant perceptions
- ns a
and satis isfact ctio ion with intervention Stud udent nt perceptions
- ns
about the participant’s teaching practices Stud udent nt learni ning ng Participant bel elief efs about teaching & learning Participant teaching pract ctice ces perception survey self-efficacy/ confidence syllabi perceptions study syllabus toolbox syllabus rubric classroom observation
Syllabus Analysis
19
Syllabus Analysis
20
Classroom Observation
21
- 382 observations completed (+230)
– 203 classrooms – 20 departments – 2 schools
- 13 instructor behaviors: asking questions
- 13 student behaviors: small group work
Classroom Observation
22
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Instructor Writing on Board Students Working in Groups
% of Total Time non-CDI (n=197) CDI only (n=41) CDI w CoP (n=144)
Additional Instructor Support
- Undergraduate Learning Assistants (AAU mini-grant)
- TA Training Course (Jefferson Trust Grant)
- Undergraduate Consultants (Cornerstone Funds)
- Curriculum Design
23