ccNSO Mem bers Meeting .au Registry Transform ation Project - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ccnso mem bers meeting
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ccNSO Mem bers Meeting .au Registry Transform ation Project - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ccNSO Mem bers Meeting .au Registry Transform ation Project Barcelona, Spain 23 October 2018 23/10/2018 1 Contents Background Expression of Interest outcomes Request for Tender outcomes Contracting Outcomes


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ccNSO Mem bers Meeting

.au Registry Transform ation Project Barcelona, Spain 23 October 2018

23/10/2018 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Contents

  • Background
  • Expression of Interest outcomes
  • Request for Tender outcomes
  • Contracting
  • Outcomes
  • Transition

23/10/2018 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

23/10/2018 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Background - Timeline

23/10/2018 4

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Competition Model Advisory Panel June 2001 Ausregistry agreement 2002 -2006 (signed Dec 01) Registry Competition Review Panel Nov 2004 Ausregistry agreement 2006-2010 (signed Nov 05)

Tender Tender

Industry Competition Advisory Panel Oct 2008

Negotiation

Ausregistry agreement 2010-2014 (signed Feb 09) Industry Advisory Panel Dec 2012

Negotiation

Ausregistry agreement 2014-2018 (signed Oct 13)

EOI

Afilias agreement 2018-2022 (signed Dec 17) Registry Transition 1 July 2018

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Background – Registry Fee changes

5

All fees for two years and ex GST

$0.00 $5.00 $10.00 $15.00 $20.00 $25.00 $30.00 $35.00 $40.00 Dec-02 Sep-03 Jun-04 Mar-05 Dec-05 Sep-06 Jun-07 Mar-08 Dec-08 Sep-09 Jun-10 Mar-11 Dec-11 Sep-12 Jun-13 Mar-14 Dec-14 Sep-15 Jun-16 Mar-17

.com.au/.net.au per domain Registry Operator Fee

500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 Dec-02 Aug-03 Apr-04 Dec-04 Aug-05 Apr-06 Dec-06 Aug-07 Apr-08 Dec-08 Aug-09 Apr-10 Dec-10 Aug-11 Apr-12 Dec-12 Aug-13 Apr-14 Dec-14 Aug-15 Apr-16 Dec-16

.com.au/.net.au Cumulative Domain Name Volume

References: https: / / www.ausregistry.com.au/ domain-reports

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Background

  • Competition model was reviewed by the 2012 Industry Advisory Panel
  • 2001 Competition model retained
  • Initiate renegotiations w ith Ausregistry
  • At that time most potential responders to a tender were focussed on ICANN’s new gTLD

program

  • Expected that new gTLD program would result in additional potential registry operators and it

would take 2-3 years for the market to evolve and for new registry operators to establish market experience and track-record

  • Resulted in current agreem ent w ith Ausregistry – 2 0 1 4 – 2 0 1 8 ( 4 th term )
  • auDA should undertake a form al RFT process once the renegotiated

registry agreem ent expires.

  • The recommendations from the Advisory Panel relating to the registry were

approved by the auDA Board in Feb 2013

23/10/2018 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Background 2016/ 2017

  • .au registry had not been through a market exercise since 2005, and

AusRegistry/ Neustar had been the registry operator since 2002

  • The AusRegistry/ Neustar agreement had an expiry date of 30 June 2018
  • auDA Board resolved to undertake a restricted tender exercise starting with a

scoping exercise, sourcing expert advice

  • Consistent with the 2012 Advisory Panel recommendations approved by the auDA Board

in Feb 2013

  • Registry Transform ation Project commenced in May 2017

23/10/2018 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Registry Transformation Project Goals

a) Clear and effective separation between policy and operations b) Maintain and further enhance trust with the Australian Government and the Australian community c) Maintain operational stability and utility of the .au ccTLD d) Becoming a world leader in managing security, confidentiality, integrity and availability of .au registry data e) Supporting longer term goal to be an Emergency Back-end Registry Operator (EBERO) for other gTLDs or ccTLDs f) Supporting a data science and data analytics capability in relation to the registry data

23/10/2018 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Committees

  • Registrar Liaison Committee
  • All registrars invited to participate
  • Focus on registrar and technical requirements
  • Tender Process Committee
  • Dr Stephen Arnott (Aust Gov’t), Dr Liz Williams (ISG), Jay Daley (.nz), Nigel Phair (Uni. Canberra)
  • Advice on the tender process – EOI and RFT approach, and evaluation criteria
  • Tender Evaluation Committee
  • Teams led by partners: Jeff Schmidt (JAS Global), Charlie Offer (Ernst & Young), Colin Egan (PPB

Advisory), Cameron Whittfield (PwC Legal)

  • Carried out evaluations of EOI respondents and RFT respondents
  • Probity Advisor
  • Adrian Gibby (KPMG)

23/10/2018 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Request for Expression of I nterest

23/10/2018 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Expression of Interest process

  • The Request for Expressions of Interest (REOI ) was the initial scoping exercise

to:

  • define parameters of the subsequent restricted tender process
  • assess potential suppliers and options
  • Call for Expression of Interest – 29 May 2017
  • Expression of Interest closed – 26 June 2017

23/10/2018 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

EOI Evaluation Criteria

  • Financial
  • Value for money – financial and non-financial
  • Whole-of-life costs
  • Technical and Operational
  • Ability to meet technical specs
  • Flexibility – ability to update software and continue to innovate
  • Similar experience and performance history
  • Security
  • ability to support security, confidentiality, integrity and availability capabilities
  • Ability to meet and deliver on the registry transformation project goals

23/10/2018 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

EOI Respondents

  • 15 responses
  • 2 DNS offers
  • 1 business analytics offer
  • 5 large and experienced gTLD and ccTLD operators (> 10m names each)
  • Well resourced with significant migration experience
  • 3 experienced gTLD and ccTLD operators (> 1 m names each)
  • Very flexible, smaller and more complex gTLDs and ccTLDs
  • 2 new gTLD market entrants
  • Modern, high quality software but limited experience
  • 2 small software development teams
  • Local Staff with 15 years experience in domain names – build using open source software, public cloud

services and recruit staff to operate

23/10/2018 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Request for Tender

23/10/2018 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Request for Tender process

  • Draft Technical Specification published for comment – 26 August 2017
  • Summary of changes to Technical Specification published 21 September 2017
  • Request for Tender (RFT) issued – 1 September 2017
  • RFT closed – 3 October 2017

23/10/2018 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Value for Money

  • Achieving value for m oney is the core rule
  • f the Australian Government Procurement

Rules

  • Requires consideration of the financial and

non-financial costs and benefits

  • Non-Financial – 65% weighting
  • Financial – 35% weighting

23/10/2018 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Non-Financial criteria

  • Technical and Operation Capability (35% )
  • Project Goals (10% )
  • Risk management (10% )
  • Financial Capability (10% )

23/10/2018 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

RFT Respondents

  • 9 Respondents
  • All strong technically and operating at significant

scale

  • All proposing to set up primary and secondary

platforms in Australia that are geographically separated

  • All proposing to set up a team in Australia
  • Operate 9 of the top 20 TLDs representing over 43

million names

23/10/2018 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Afilias selected

  • Highest score for non-financial criteria

around technical and operational capability

  • Close to average price for financial criteria
  • Overall best value for money

23/10/2018 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Transition betw een Registry Operators

23/10/2018 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Transition progress

  • Largest ever migration of a TLD – 3.1 million

names

  • 6 month process
  • Test environments for registrars delivered in

March (phase 1) and April (Phase 2) 2018

  • Went live with services using data from

Neustar Asia Pacific – DNS name services and WHOIS services in May 2018

  • Transition completed 1 July 2018 on schedule

23/10/2018 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Transition Approach

  • Focussed on International and Australian best

practice standards with respect to the transition of a major IT service provider

  • Particular focus on risk management and

security

  • Extensive testing from Feb 2018 to June 2018
  • auDA testing team
  • Registrar testing
  • Independent security penetration testing of each

system

  • test and production

23/10/2018 22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Relevant international standards

  • ISO 31000 – Risk management
  • ISO 27000 – Information Security

Management Systems

  • ISO 22301 – Business Continuity

Management Systems

  • ISO 20000 – Service Management
  • ITIL Service Operation – 2011 edition

23/10/2018 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Relevant Australian Security standards

  • Australian Signals Directorate – Essential Eight
  • Application Whitelisting
  • Patch applications
  • Configure Microsoft Office macro stings
  • User application hardening
  • Restrict Administrative privileges
  • Patch Operating Systems
  • Multi-factor authentication
  • Daily backups
  • Australian Gov’t Information Security Manual (ISM) – Protected level

23/10/2018 24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Independent audits

  • Multiple independent reviews of security prior to

transition

  • Ernst & Young - risk assurance – weekly review
  • Pivot Point Security – appointed by Afilias for penetration

testing

  • Foresight IT Consulting – appointed by the Aust. Government

to do an independent review of security processes for transition

  • Australian Government security agencies (ASD, ASIO, ACSC)

did their own separate review of security

  • Regular meetings with the auDA Board’s Security and Risk

Committee

23/10/2018 25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Crisis Management

  • Crisis management plan developed with

input from Afilias, auDA, and Australian Government security agencies

  • Multiple crisis scenario exercises run with

the participation of Afilias, auDA, and Australian Government security agencies, with auDA Board observers

23/10/2018 26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Smooth transition

  • Transition completed within a 24 hour period starting

Saturday 30 June and completing early in the morning

  • n Sunday 1 July
  • DNS services progressively transitioned over a 3 month

period with zero downtime

  • Ausregistry/ Neustar completed all transition tasks

ahead of schedule on 30 June 2018

  • auDA and Afilias team worked together in Melbourne on

testing production systems before go-live

  • Afilias technical team worked from Toronto
  • Registrars immediately resumed operations on 1 July

2018

23/10/2018 27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Outcom es

23/10/2018 28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Key outcomes

  • Lower registry fee – 10% drop in wholesale prices for

registrars

  • Registry Data to remain in Australia
  • DNS services in all Australian capital cities
  • Perth, Adelaide, Melbourne, Hobart, Canberra, Sydney,

Brisbane, Darwin

  • Pro-active security monitoring – daily inspection of new

names

  • Extensive data collection for advanced data analytics to

move to proactive compliance management and development of business information for registrars

  • Focus on improved security and performance

23/10/2018 29