bers brown and lyapunov
play

Bers, Brown and Lyapunov Romain Dujardin Ecole Polytechnique - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bers, Brown and Lyapunov Romain Dujardin Ecole Polytechnique April 14 th , 2012 Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov Plan 0. Prologue : bifurcation currents for rational maps. 1. Stability/bifurcation dichotomy for Kleinian groups.


  1. Bers, Brown and Lyapunov Romain Dujardin ´ Ecole Polytechnique April 14 th , 2012 Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  2. Plan 0. Prologue : bifurcation currents for rational maps. 1. Stability/bifurcation dichotomy for Kleinian groups. 2. Lyapunov exponent of a surface group representation 3. The degree of a projective structure. Joint work (in progress) with Bertrand Deroin (Orsay) Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  3. Prologue : bifurcation currents for rational maps. Let ( f λ ) λ ∈ Λ be a holomorphic family of rational mappings of degree d on P 1 . Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  4. Prologue : bifurcation currents for rational maps. Let ( f λ ) λ ∈ Λ be a holomorphic family of rational mappings of degree d on P 1 . For every λ , f λ admits a natural invariant probability measure µ λ (Brolin-Lyubich measure). We can consider the Lyapunov exponent function. � � � � ( f λ ) ′ ( z ) � d µ λ ( z ) λ �− → χ ( f λ ) = log Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  5. Prologue : bifurcation currents for rational maps. Let ( f λ ) λ ∈ Λ be a holomorphic family of rational mappings of degree d on P 1 . For every λ , f λ admits a natural invariant probability measure µ λ (Brolin-Lyubich measure). We can consider the Lyapunov exponent function. � � � � ( f λ ) ′ ( z ) � d µ λ ( z ) λ �− → χ ( f λ ) = log It is continuous and plurisubharmonic ∗ (psh) on Λ. Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  6. Prologue : bifurcation currents for rational maps. Let ( f λ ) λ ∈ Λ be a holomorphic family of rational mappings of degree d on P 1 . For every λ , f λ admits a natural invariant probability measure µ λ (Brolin-Lyubich measure). We can consider the Lyapunov exponent function. � � � � ( f λ ) ′ ( z ) � d µ λ ( z ) λ �− → χ ( f λ ) = log It is continuous and plurisubharmonic ∗ (psh) on Λ. Definition (DeMarco) The bifurcation current is T bif = dd c λ ( χ ( f λ )) Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  7. Prologue : bifurcation currents for rational maps. Results. Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  8. Prologue : bifurcation currents for rational maps. Results. ◮ Support theorem (DeMarco) Supp ( T bif ) is the bifurcation locus of the family. Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  9. Prologue : bifurcation currents for rational maps. Results. ◮ Support theorem (DeMarco) Supp ( T bif ) is the bifurcation locus of the family. ◮ Equidistribution of special subvarieties. (D.-Favre, Bassanelli-Berteloot) Natural sequences of hypersurfaces associated with bifurcations equidistribute towards T bif . Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  10. Prologue : bifurcation currents for rational maps. Results. ◮ Support theorem (DeMarco) Supp ( T bif ) is the bifurcation locus of the family. ◮ Equidistribution of special subvarieties. (D.-Favre, Bassanelli-Berteloot) Natural sequences of hypersurfaces associated with bifurcations equidistribute towards T bif . ◮ Formulas for Lyapunov exponent. Example : the Manning-Przytycki formula : if f λ is a monic polynomial of degree d then � χ ( f λ ) = log d + G f λ ( c ) . c critical Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  11. Sullivan’s dictionary Aim : translate these concepts into the context of families of subgroups of Aut ( P 1 ) = PSL (2 , C ). Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  12. 1. Stability/bifurcation dichotomy for Kleinian groups � a b � ◮ Aut ( P 1 ) ≃ PSL (2 , C ) via az + b cz + d ↔ . Fix �·� on SL (2 , C ). c d Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  13. 1. Stability/bifurcation dichotomy for Kleinian groups � a b � ◮ Aut ( P 1 ) ≃ PSL (2 , C ) via az + b cz + d ↔ . Fix �·� on SL (2 , C ). c d obius transformation γ ( z ) = az + b ◮ A M¨ cz + d � = id has a type model : z �→ e i θ z tr 2 ( γ ) ∈ [0 , 4) elliptic tr 2 ( γ ) = 4 parabolic model : z �→ z + 1 tr 2 ( γ ) / loxodromic model : z �→ kz ∈ [0 , 4] Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  14. 1. Stability/bifurcation dichotomy for Kleinian groups Let G be a finitely generated group, Λ a complex manifold, and ρ = ( ρ λ ) λ ∈ Λ : Λ × G → PSL (2 , C ) be a holomorphic family of representations of G (i.e. it is holomorphic in λ and a homomorphism in g ). Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  15. 1. Stability/bifurcation dichotomy for Kleinian groups Let G be a finitely generated group, Λ a complex manifold, and ρ = ( ρ λ ) λ ∈ Λ : Λ × G → PSL (2 , C ) be a holomorphic family of representations of G (i.e. it is holomorphic in λ and a homomorphism in g ). Standing assumptions : (R1) the family is non-trivial (R2) ρ λ 0 is faithful for some λ 0 (R3) for every λ , ρ λ is non-elementary (i.e. does not have a finite orbit on H 3 ∪ P 1 ). Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  16. 1. Stability/bifurcation dichotomy for Kleinian groups Let G be a finitely generated group, Λ a complex manifold, and ρ = ( ρ λ ) λ ∈ Λ : Λ × G → PSL (2 , C ) be a holomorphic family of representations of G (i.e. it is holomorphic in λ and a homomorphism in g ). Standing assumptions : (R1) the family is non-trivial (R2) ρ λ 0 is faithful for some λ 0 (R3) for every λ , ρ λ is non-elementary (i.e. does not have a finite orbit on H 3 ∪ P 1 ). (or sometimes (R3’) there is λ 0 , s.t. ρ λ 0 is non-elementary. ) Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  17. 1. Stability/bifurcation dichotomy for Kleinian groups Theorem (Sullivan, and also Bers, Marden, etc.) Let ( ρ λ ) λ ∈ Λ be as above, and Ω ⊂ Λ be a connected open subset. The following are equivalent : 1. ∀ λ ∈ Ω , ρ λ is discrete ; 2. ∀ λ ∈ Ω , ρ λ is faithful ; 3. for every g ∈ G, ρ λ ( g ) does not change type as λ ranges in Ω ; 4. for all λ , λ ′ ∈ Ω , ρ λ and ρ λ ′ are quasiconformally conjugate on P 1 , i.e. there exists a qc homeo φ : P 1 → P 1 s.t. ∀ g ∈ G, ρ λ 0 ( g ) ◦ φ = φ ◦ ρ λ 1 ( g ) . Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  18. 1. Stability/bifurcation dichotomy for Kleinian groups Theorem (Sullivan, and also Bers, Marden, etc.) Let ( ρ λ ) λ ∈ Λ be as above, and Ω ⊂ Λ be a connected open subset. The following are equivalent : 1. ∀ λ ∈ Ω , ρ λ is discrete ; 2. ∀ λ ∈ Ω , ρ λ is faithful ; 3. for every g ∈ G, ρ λ ( g ) does not change type as λ ranges in Ω ; 4. for all λ , λ ′ ∈ Ω , ρ λ and ρ λ ′ are quasiconformally conjugate on P 1 , i.e. there exists a qc homeo φ : P 1 → P 1 s.t. ∀ g ∈ G, ρ λ 0 ( g ) ◦ φ = φ ◦ ρ λ 1 ( g ) . Such a family is said to be stable on Ω. Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  19. 1. Stability/bifurcation dichotomy for Kleinian groups So we get a decomposition Λ = Stab ∪ Bif as a maximal domain of local stability and its complement. Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  20. 1. Stability/bifurcation dichotomy for Kleinian groups So we get a decomposition Λ = Stab ∪ Bif as a maximal domain of local stability and its complement. We also have identified a dense codimension 1 phenomenon responsible for bifurcations : Corollary For every t ∈ [0 , 4], � { λ, tr 2 ( ρ λ ( g )) = t } ⊃ Bif . g ∈ G Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  21. 1. Stability/bifurcation dichotomy for Kleinian groups So we get a decomposition Λ = Stab ∪ Bif as a maximal domain of local stability and its complement. We also have identified a dense codimension 1 phenomenon responsible for bifurcations : Corollary For every t ∈ [0 , 4], � { λ, tr 2 ( ρ λ ( g )) = t } ⊃ Bif . g ∈ G Note : Bif has non-empty interior (Margulis-Zassenhaus lemma) so Stab is not dense in this setting. Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  22. 2. Lyapunov exponent of a surface group representation For the remainder of the talk G = π 1 ( X , ⋆ ) is the fundamental group of a compact connected surface of genus ≥ 2, endowed with Riemann surface structure. Endow X with its Poincar´ e metric. Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  23. 2. Lyapunov exponent of a surface group representation For the remainder of the talk G = π 1 ( X , ⋆ ) is the fundamental group of a compact connected surface of genus ≥ 2, endowed with Riemann surface structure. Endow X with its Poincar´ e metric. Note : everything should work for (hyperbolic) surfaces of finite type (technically much more difficult) Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  24. 2. Lyapunov exponent of a surface group representation Let ρ : G → PSL (2 , C ) be a non-elementary representation. For v a unit tangent vector at ⋆ , let γ ⋆, v the corresponding unit speed half geodesic. For t > 0 close the path γ ⋆, v | [0 , t ] by a path of length ≤ diam( X ) returning to ⋆ . We get a loop � γ t . Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

  25. 2. Lyapunov exponent of a surface group representation Let ρ : G → PSL (2 , C ) be a non-elementary representation. For v a unit tangent vector at ⋆ , let γ ⋆, v the corresponding unit speed half geodesic. For t > 0 close the path γ ⋆, v | [0 , t ] by a path of length ≤ diam( X ) returning to ⋆ . We get a loop � γ t . Definition-Proposition For a.e. v ∈ T 1 ⋆ X , the limit 1 χ geodesic ( ρ ) = lim t log � ρ ([ � γ t ]) � t →∞ exists and does not depend on v . Romain Dujardin Bers, Brown and Lyapunov

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend