SLIDE 1
EFFECT OF NEUROFEEDBACK: CASE STUDY ON CHILDREN WIT ITH DYSLEXIA
Presenter: Eva Wong
CASE STUDY ON CHILDREN WIT ITH DYSLEXIA OBJEC OBJECTIVES OF TH - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
CASE STUDY ON CHILDREN WIT ITH DYSLEXIA OBJEC OBJECTIVES OF TH - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Presenter: Eva Wong EFFECT OF NEUROFEEDBACK: CASE STUDY ON CHILDREN WIT ITH DYSLEXIA OBJEC OBJECTIVES OF TH TIVES OF THE P E PAPER APER Seeks to present the effectiveness of Neurofeedback as strategy to improve children with Dyslexia in
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
WHY?
- PREVALENCE RATE OF ASD
- IMPLICATIONS OF THE
CONDITION: PSYCHOLOGY SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR
- CONDITION IN MALAYSIA
7% Standard 2 Malays students (Gomez, 2000)
SLIDE 4
METHODOLOGY Embedded experimental design QUAL + quan
Creswell, 2003
SLIDE 5
Research Design
- n= 10, DDT (Dysphoneidesia)
- Age (mean): 8.4
- Sampling: Purposive
- Design: Pre-post
- Group: Intervention (A-E),
Control (F-J)
- Duration: 30 sessions
qual
Dyslexia Determination Test Post-positivism
Quan
Burt Reading Test positivism
SLIDE 6
WHAT?
- Intervention group
Educational Therapy Neurofeedback
- Intervention group
Educational Therapy
Educational Therapy
Phonetic Task Writing Task
SLIDE 7
IN INTERVENTION GROUP
Block
Duration Instruction
1
0 - 5 minutes Toy play
2
5 - 25 minutes Phonic Task
3
25 - 55 minutes Games + Neurofeedback
4
55 – 75 minutes Writing tasks
Neurofeedback Protocol T6 Delta F7 – C3 Alpha Marinus, et al (2009)
SLIDE 8
CONTROL GROUP
Block
Duration Instruction
1
0 - 5 minutes Toy play
2
5 - 25 minutes Phonic Task
3
25 - 55 minutes Games
4
55 – 75 minutes Writing tasks
SLIDE 9
FIN INDINGS: In Intervention Group
- Quantitative Data
- Pre: Avg 3.67
- Post: Avg 4.08
- 11.36% (Improvement)
Subjects Chro. Age Burt Pre Post A
7;4
3;9 4;3 B
7;7
4;1 4;5 C
7;6
3;3 3;9 D
7;3
3;8 4;2 E
7;8
3;7 4;2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E
Reading Age Pre and Post Intervention (Intervention Group)
Pre Post
SLIDE 10
FIN INDINGS: Control Group
- Quantitative Data
- Pre: Avg 3.58
- Post: Avg 3.83
- 7.00% (Improvement)
Subjects Burt Burt Before After F 3;1 3;3 G 3;6 3;9 H 4;1 4;4 I 3;3 3;3 J 4;0 4;7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 F G H I J
Reading Age Pre and Post Intervention (Control Group)
Pre Post
SLIDE 11
Fin indings: : Qualitative Data (In (Intervention Group) Dysle lexia Determination Test
Subjects Pre – Intervention Post - Intervention
Basal Level Ceiling Level Basal Level Ceiling Level
A
Pre-Primer Pre-Primer Primer Primer
B
Pre-Primer Pre-Primer Pre-Primer Primer
C
- Pre-Primer
Pre-Primer
D
- Pre-Primer
Pre-Primer
E
Pre-Primer Pre-Primer Primer Grade 1
SLIDE 12
Fin indings: : Qualitative Data (C (Control Group) Dysle lexia Determination Test
Subjects Pre – Intervention Post - Intervention
Basal Level Ceiling Level Basal Level Ceiling Level
A
- B
Primer Primer
C
Pre-Primer Pre-Primer
D
Pre-Primer Grade 1
E
Pre-Primer Pre-Primer
SLIDE 13
DIS ISCUSSION
- Result (intervention and control group)
- Quantitative and Qualitative
- Literature (Vanessa, 2014; Edelson, 2014)
SLIDE 14
Limitation
- Limited number of subjects
- Short intervention duration
- Long term effect?
SLIDE 15