Factors Influencing Retention of Students in an RN-to-BSN Program - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

factors influencing retention of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Factors Influencing Retention of Students in an RN-to-BSN Program - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Factors Influencing Retention of Students in an RN-to-BSN Program BRELINDA K. KERN, PHD, RN APRIL 4, 2014 1 Problem 2 Justification Retention a benchmark for program success Schools must identify reasons RN-to-BSN program


slide-1
SLIDE 1

BRELINDA K. KERN, PHD, RN APRIL 4, 2014

1

Factors Influencing Retention of Students in an RN-to-BSN Program

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Problem

Bre Kern

2

 Justification

 Retention a benchmark for program success

 Schools must identify reasons RN-to-BSN program

students leave

 Little to no evidence of studies

 Significance

 RN-to-BSN enrollment up; attrition rates +50%

 Retention tracked; More data needed

 80% of nurses should have BSN by 2020 (ANA, 2008

& IOM, 2011)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Purpose

Bre Kern

3

 Describe factors that restricted or promoted

retention among RN-to-BSN students

 Examine any difference in the measure of these

factors between juniors and seniors  Ultimate goal to inform faculty

 Develop and guide interventions  Assist universities to meet nursing organization

suggestions

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Theoretical Basis

Bre Kern

4

 Philosophical underpinnings – Comte’s positivism

concept

 Goal of knowledge is only to describe the phenomena

 Conceptual framework

 Jeffreys (2004) Nursing Undergraduate Retention and Success

(NURS) model; Focus on retention

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Review of Literature

Bre Kern

5

 Few studies among RN-to-BSN students

 Persistence, minority retention, and online orientation  Direct interaction of faculty & students a constant theme  Faculty availability and timely feedback most important

 Jeffreys – extensive research

 Identified five factors that restrict/support student retention  Environmental factors  Institutional interaction and integration factors  Personal academic factors  College facilities factors  Friend support factors

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Methodology

Bre Kern

6

 Research design

 Non-experimental, descriptive, comparison study, using convenience

sample from RN-to-BSN students at one liberal arts university

 Instrumentation

 SPA-R and demographic questionnaire  Reliability and validity

 Protection of human subjects – IRB approval

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Study Setting

Bre Kern

7

 Midwest liberal arts university

 Two main campuses in separate states

 Learning environment

 Face-to-face and blended  Geographically separated sites

 Learning cohorts

 Community hospitals and community colleges

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Overview of Results

Bre Kern

8

 Invitation sent to 208 individuals

 84 (40.38%) entered survey site

 The sample

 White females, mid-30’s, married, full-time jobs  Continuously enrolled with average grade of A

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Research Questions

Bre Kern

9

 Question 1 – What are the descriptive values for five

identified factors among a sample of RN-to-BSN students?

 Question 2 – What is the rank order of the means of the

scores for the measures associated with each of the five factors among this sampling?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Descriptive Statistics for the Scores of the Research Variables (N = 77)

Bre Kern

10

________________________________________________________________________ Variable M SD range n ________________________________________________________________________ Environmental factors .23 .46

  • .80 to 1.40

77 College facilities factors .25 .27

  • .40 to .80

76 Personal academic factors .29 .72

  • 1.20 to 2.00

77 Institutional integration factors .33 .32

  • .40 to 1.20

77 Friend support factors 1.23 .61 .00 to 2.00 77 ________________________________________________________________________

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Integration of Findings with Literature

Bre Kern

11

 Environmental Factors

 Least supportive factor; Congruent with Jeffreys (2007)

 Institutional Interaction & Integration Factors

 Congruent with Jeffreys’ (2004, 2007) studies; Active mentoring by

faculty seen as most beneficial

 Personal Academic Factors

 Congruent with Jeffreys (2007)  Students challenged to balance responsibilities  Able to prioritize; Skill used daily in nursing practice

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Integration of Findings with Literature (Cont’d)

Bre Kern

12

 College Facilities Factors

 Not perceived as most restrictive or supportive 

Differences encountered in current study

 Friend Support Factors

 Perceived as most supportive  Support of family and friends linked to retention

 Differences encountered in current study

 None; Seen by juniors and seniors as key to staying in program

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Implication of Findings

Bre Kern

13

 Nursing Education

 Study focused on infrequently studied students; Sensitize faculty to

supportive and restrictive factors

 Nursing Practice

 More emphasis needed on strategies other than financial aid

 Nursing Research

 Low retention rates in degree completion programs (AACN, 2010)  Retention likely to lead to advanced nursing education

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Limitations

Bre Kern

14

 Testing and instrumentation

 Low inter-item reliability  Survey items not specific

 Generalizability

 One population  Small sample size

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Recommendations For Future Studies

Bre Kern

15

 Qualitative study  Mixed methods study  Revise tool to be specific to RN-to-BSN students  Increase sample size and/or calculate power analysis for a

large effect size

slide-16
SLIDE 16

?

Questions

Bre Kern

16