Case Study: Bernard Legg-Calve-Perthes Age: 8 years to 10 years - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

case study bernard
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Case Study: Bernard Legg-Calve-Perthes Age: 8 years to 10 years - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Case Study: Bernard Legg-Calve-Perthes Age: 8 years to 10 years David S. Feldman, MD Chief of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery Professor of Orthopedic Surgery & Pediatrics NYU Langone Medical Center & NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Case Study: Bernard

Legg-Calve-Perthes Age: 8 years to 10 years

David S. Feldman, MD Chief of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery Professor of Orthopedic Surgery & Pediatrics NYU Langone Medical Center & NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases

slide-2
SLIDE 2

BACKGROUND

slide-3
SLIDE 3

At the age of 8 years and 2 months, Bernard’s pediatrician diagnosed him with Legg-Calve-Perthes disease of the right hip. He was placed on crutches and began physical therapy.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Bernard was then referred to two hip specialists, one recommended an osteotomy and therapy while the other thought an

  • steotomy was too aggressive when night

bracing and crutches could be sufficient.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Bernard visited me for a third opinion on possible treatment options when he was 8 years and 3 months old.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

DIAGNOSIS

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Bernard had pain in his right hip but felt no pain and had full range of motion in his left

  • hip. His knees and ankles were normal and

there was no family history of hip problems.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

I noticed that Bernard was limping to avoid standing on his right leg when he walked (antalgic gait). In addition, while a left hip’s normal range of motion is 45 degrees, Bernard’s was limited to 25 degrees (abduction) and he was unable to internally rotate his hip.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

X-rays provided by his parents showed Legg-Calve-Perthes in the right hip that had increased in severity over time.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

TREATMENT

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Intraoperative Arthrogram with Interpretation

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Bernard underwent an arthrogram shortly before surgery to determine if the best course of action would have been an

  • steotomy or joint distraction

(arthrodiastasis). His hip was injected with a dye to contrast the parts of his hip and then a series of X-rays were taken.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Bernard’s arthrogram showed a correction of more than twenty degrees was needed. In addition, treatment began later in the process than usual and his femoral head was severely deteriorated. As a result, it was decided that Bernard would undergo arthrodiastasis.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

An osteotomy is the best option if an arthrogram shows a correction of twenty degrees or less is needed. However, arthrodiastasis is the best option if a correction of over twenty degrees is needed because an osteotomy is insufficient in such cases.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Right Hip Arthrodiastasis with Multiplanar EBI Distraction External Fixator Applied

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Arthrodiastasis involves separating the parts

  • f the hip joint while keeping ligaments and

tendons intact. The procedure allows the components of the hip to be properly spaced and aligned. An EBI external fixator is a medical device that is used to hold / guide bones into the correct position and proper alignment.

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Post Op Treatment

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Daily antibiotics to avoid infection.
  • Physical therapy two times per week to improve

range of motion in knee and hip.

  • Monthly follow-up appointments to check pin

sites for signs of infection and progression of the right hip’s rehabilitation.

  • Bernard’s external fixator was removed six

months after surgery but he continued physical therapy to strengthen his hip and improve its range of motion.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Results

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Exams and radiographs during follow-up appointments revealed that Bernard’s hip was well positioned and there was an improvement in the hip’s range of motion. Over time his femoral head began to heal and take on a healthy rounded shape. However, he continued walking with a limp.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

CONCLUSION

slide-23
SLIDE 23

By the age of ten, Bernard had normal range

  • f motion and no pain in his hip. He is now

running and walking without limitations.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

David S. Feldman, MD

Pediatric Orthopedic Surgeon www.davidsfeldmanmd.com