Bunches (EFB): Maximized biogas production through full utilization - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

bunches efb
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Bunches (EFB): Maximized biogas production through full utilization - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Anaerobic Digestion of Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) and Empty Fruit Bunches (EFB): Maximized biogas production through full utilization of palm oil processing wastes and by-products Anders Ek, Chief Scientist 1 Asia Biogas Singapore PTE


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Anaerobic Digestion of Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) and Empty Fruit Bunches (EFB): Maximized biogas production through full utilization of palm oil processing wastes and by-products

Anders Ek, Chief Scientist Asia Biogas Singapore PTE Limited 03 June 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ASIA BIOGAS INTRODUCTION

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Company Introduction

  • Offices in Singapore, Bangkok and Jakarta
  • Design/Engineering, Turn-key supply , O&M Services and Project

Development

  • Industrial heat
  • Power generation
  • Compressed Biogas/Biomethane (CBG/bioCNG)
  • Over 80 projects in Thailand, Philippines and Vietnam
  • 6 operating projects in Thailand (BOOT)
  • Under construction:
  • Krabi 2.2 MW POME, Thailand
  • Greenfields Dairy Farm Biogas, Indonesia

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

LARGE PLANTS?

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Starch Wastewater Biogas Plant, KWTE

  • 10,000 m3

WW/day

  • 3 MW Power

Plant and

  • 22 MW(thermal)

1) Mixing Tank 2) Pump House 3) ABR 4) Control Room 5) Blower House 6) Power Plant 1 2 3 4 5 6

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Cassava Pulp (garg) Biogas Plant, SWE

1 2 3 3 7

  • 1,500 ton

garg/day

  • 8.4 MW Power

plant and

  • 15 MW(thermal)

1) Pulp Dilution 2) Mixing Tanks 3) ABRs 4) Blower/Pump House 5) Control Room 6) Power House 7) Flares 4 5 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Biogas plants at SWI, Thailand

1 2 3

1) Starch Factory 2) Starch Wastewater Biogas Plant 3) Cassava Pulp (garg) Biogas Plant

  • 11.4 MW Power

Plant and

  • 37 MW(thermal)
slide-8
SLIDE 8

WASTES FROM PALM OIL PRODUCTION – BIOGAS AND POWER POTENTIAL

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Wastes from Palm Oil Production

9

POME 0.5–0.6 m3/ton FFB COD: 50–100,000 mg/L EFB 22 – 24 % of FFB 35 % TS 90 % VS of TS Decanter cake 4 % of FFB 20 – 25 % TS 80 – 85 % VS of TS

slide-10
SLIDE 10

45 TPH POM Waste  5.3 (8.2)* MW

10

FFB 45 TPH POME 540 m3/day COD: 90,000 mg/L EFB 248 ton/day 35 % TS 90 % VS of TS Decanter cake 43 ton/day 23 % TS 83 % VS of TS Methane 602 m3/h Power 2.46 MW Methane 652 (1304)* m3/h Power 2.67 (5.33)* MW Methane 100 m3/h Power 0.4 MW

*) with pretreatment of EFB

slide-11
SLIDE 11

BIOGAS PRODUCTION FROM POME

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Biogas production from POME

  • Technology options?

12

IN-GROUND REACTOR TANK REACTOR Reactor type Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (ABR) Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) Area Large Medium Technology Simple Medium Automation Medium High Investment Lower Higher

slide-13
SLIDE 13

KrabiWTE POME 2.2 MW

  • Krabi Waste to Energy Co Ltd
  • Host: Krabi Oil-Palm Farmers Cooperatives

Federation Ltd

13

Parameter Unit Data POME flow m3/day 500 POME COD mg/L 100,000 Methane Nm3 CH4/day 14,875 Biogas Nm3/day 24,792 Power equivalent kWe 2,534

slide-14
SLIDE 14

KrabiWTE POME 2.2 MW (May)

15

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Biogas production from POME

  • Effluent treatment?
  • Zero-discharge?
  • Technology no issue – produce

drinking water if you want! (RO, Vibrating Membrane Filtration, etc)

  • Cost/profitability is the issue!

16

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Biogas production from POME

17

  • Aerobic lagoons/irrigation – low cost
  • Aerated treatment OK – but consider OPEX!
  • Solids capture with geo-membranes

Parameter Before After % Removal COD (mg/L) 44,000 221 99.5 % TSS (mg/L) 44,500 400 99.1 %

No polymer added!

slide-17
SLIDE 17

BIOGAS PRODUCTION FROM EFB

18

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Energy production from EFB

  • Sustainable?

19

Energy Nutrients Structure material to soil Return to plantation No Yes Yes Composting No Yes Yes Incineration Yes No? No Pellet production Yes, indirect No No Biogas Yes Yes Yes

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Empty Fruit Bunches

  • 35 % TS
  • 90 % VS of TS
  • Cellulose: 29–39 % (d.b.)

(cassava pulp: 13%)

  • Hemicellulose: 22 %

(d.b)

  • Lignin 23% (d.b.)

(cassava pulp: < 2% !)

20

slide-20
SLIDE 20

EFB – Structure?

22

(Doherty et al., 2010) (Mosier et al., 2004)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Biogas production from EFB

  • Challenges?
  • Low Nitrogen
  • Oil-recovery yes/no  Methane yields
  • High TS  High-solids digestion
  • Ligno-cellulosic  Pre-treatment economic?

23

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Extruded EFB?

24

5 mm

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Biogas production from EFB

26

PRETREATMENT (OPTIONAL) POWER CBG SOLID FERTILIZER LIQUID FOR IRRIGATION PRESS (OPTIONAL) EFB OIL-RECOVERY SIZE-REDUCTION DIGESTION GAS PROCESSING DIGESTATE DEWATERING OIL POME AFTER AD

slide-24
SLIDE 24

SYNERGIES / CONCLUSIONS

28

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Synergies POME/EFB

  • C/N ratio EFB not optimal

–N from POME AD effluent

  • Common gas train

–H2S scrubber –Dehumidifying –Gensets –CAPEX/OPEX reductions

29

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Biogas from POME & EFB

  • Conclusions?

– Energy + Nutrients + Structure material to soil

  • Power output POME & EFB to biogas @ 90,000 mg COD/L

30

Mill size Power @ Different pre-treatment ton FFB/hour Min Max 45 5.5 MW 8.2 MW 60 7.4 MW 11 MW 90 11 MW 16 MW 120 15 MW 22 MW

slide-27
SLIDE 27

31

Biogas Design Engineering Services EPC and Turnkey Project Construction Project Financing Solutions Biogas solutions for: Cassava Starch Palm Oil Manure Energy Crops Agro-industrial Wastes Food/Beverage Ethanol

Anders Ek, Chief Scientist asiaBIOGAS Bangkok – Singapore – Jakarta www.asiabiogas.com anders.ek@asiabiogas.com