Bulk viscosity, spectra, and flow in heavy ion collisions
Thomas Schaefer & Kevin Dusling, North Carolina State University
Bulk viscosity, spectra, and flow in heavy ion collisions Thomas - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Bulk viscosity, spectra, and flow in heavy ion collisions Thomas Schaefer & Kevin Dusling, North Carolina State University Why bulk viscosity? 0.4 0.35 Ideal Gas 0.3 2 c s 0.25 Lattice 0.2 0.15 0.1 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Thomas Schaefer & Kevin Dusling, North Carolina State University
0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 T [MeV] cs
2
Ideal Gas Lattice
Real QCD is not scale invariant, and ζ = 0. Usually, this is treated as a nuisancance – it leads to uncertainties in the extraction of η. Here, I want to estimate ζ from data and see what (if anything) we can learn.
Shear viscosity determines shear stress (“friction”) in fluid flow F = A η ∂vx ∂y Bulk viscosity controls non-equlibrium pressure P = P0 − ζ(∂ · v)
b
Ep dN d3p
= v0(p⊥) (1 + 2v2(p⊥) cos(2φ) + . . .) η suppresses v2, enhances v0 ζ suppresses v0, (typically) enhances v2 Note: v0 also sensitive to eos, freezeout, hadronic phase.
Spectra computed on freeze-out surface (“Cooper-Frye”) Ep dN d3p = 1 (2π)3
f(Ep)pµdσµ Write f = f 0 + δf and match to hydrodynamics δΠµν =
Only moments of δf fixed by η, ζ. Need kinetic models.
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 v2 (pT) pT [GeV] Ideal fo only fo + δf 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 v2 (pT) pT [GeV] Ideal Quadratic Linear
Approximate collision term by single relaxation time C[δfp] ≃ δfp τ(Ep) fp = n0
p + δfp
Bulk viscosity second order in conformal breaking parameter δc2
s
ζ = 15η
s − 1
3 2
Weinberg (1972)
Distribution function is first order in conformal breaking δf ∼ f 0
p
η sT p2 T 2
s − 1
3
Near conformal fluids: Bulk viscous correction dominated by δf
QCD: Elastic vs inelastic reactions
g ∼ g2T 2)
g + g → g + g + g Hadron gas: inelastic scattering, hadro-chemistry
p + ¯ p → 5π
elastic 2 ↔ 2 can be written as Fokker-Planck equation (diffusion equation in momentum space) (∂ · u) p2 3 − c2
sEp
∂ (βEp) ∂β
np ∂ ∂pi
∂ ∂pi δfp np
drag coefficient µA = g2CAm2
D
8π
log
mD
1
3 − c2 s
ζ = 0.44α2
sT 3
log(α−1
s )
ζ ∼ 47.9 1 3 − c2
s
2 η
Arnold, Dogan, Moore (2006)
Shear Bulk
5 10 15 20 pT 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Χp
Quarks Gluons
2 4 6 8 10 pT 0.2 0.4 0.6
Χp
Pure glue: shear vs bulk QGP: quarks vs gluons (bulk rescaled by δc2
s)
δfp = −np(1 ± np) [χS(p)ˆ piˆ pjσij + χB(p)(∂ · u)]
Pion gas: Bulk viscosity governed by chemical non-equilibration δfp = np(1 + np) δµ T + EpδT T 2
More formal: χ0 is a “quasi zero mode” which dominates C−1 Inelastic rate determines χ0, energy conservation fixes χ1 χ0 = ζ F ζ = βF2 4Γ2π→4π where we have defined F =
3 − c2 sEp ∂(βEp) ∂β
ζ ≃ 12285 f 8
π
m5
π
exp
T
Hadron gas: Assume bulk viscosity dominated by chemical relaxation δf a
p = −np(1 ± np) (χa 0 − χ1Ep) (∂ · u)
χa
0 determined by rates, χ1 fixed by energy conservation
Slowest rate determines ζ, other rates fix δµa/δµπ. Simple model χa
0 ≃ χπ
2 mesons 2.5 baryons inspired by µρ = 2µπ and 2µN = 5µπ. Find ζ/s = 0.05 ⇔ δµπ = 20 MeV
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 1 2 3 4 v2 (pT) pT [GeV] Ideal Shear only η/s=0.16 ζ/s=0.005 η/s=0.16 ζ/s=0.015
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 1/(2π pT) dN/(dy dpT) [GeV-2] pT [GeV] PHENIX Data (2030%) Pions Protons ζ/s ≈ 0.01, η/s=0.16 0.24 ζ/s=0, η/s=0.08
Data: PHENIX nucl-ex/0307022. Hydro fit: Kevin Dusling (2012). LHC: Bozek & Wyskiel arxiv:1203.6513. Also: afterburners (Vishnu etc).
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
STAR Data (2030%) Pions Protons
ζ/s ≈ 0.01, η/s=0.16 0.24 ζ/s=0, η/s=0.08
Data: STAR, nucl-ex/0409033. Hydro fit: Kevin Dusling (2012)
Bulk viscous corrections dominated by freezeout distributions QGP: ζ controlled by momentum rearrangement Hadron gas: ζ determined by chemical non-equilibration A new way to look at fugacity factors in thermal fits? RHIC spectra seem to require ζ/s ∼ < 0.05 Bulk viscosity not zero: Spectra prefer δµ, fine structure of v2 improves
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 2 4 6 8 10 12
τ [fm/c] ζ/s = 0.015
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 r [fm] 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 τ [fm/c]
gradient expansion (bulk stress) freeze out surface (w/o bulk viscosity)
10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 1 2 3 4 5 dN/(2 π pT dpT dy) [GeV-2] pT [GeV] Kaons Lambda
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 1 2 3 4 5 v2 (pT) pT [GeV] Kaons Lambda
η/s = 0.16 ζ/s = 0.04
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 1 2 3 v2 (pT) pT [GeV] Ideal η/s=0.16 ζ/s=0.00 η/s=0.24 ζ/s=0.008 η/s=0.32 ζ/s=0.010 η/s=0.40 ζ/s=0.012
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 v2 Npart Integrated v2 of Pions Ideal Shear only Shear + Bulk
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 v2 Npart Integrated v2 of Protons Ideal Shear only Shear + Bulk
Consider four-velocity uα with u2 = −1 (gαβ = (−1, 1, 1, 1)) δfp = −npχSpαpβ∂αuβ − npχB(∂ · u) Asymptotic behavior χS,B ∼ p2. Consider BJ flow: pαpβ∂αuβ ∼ − p2
T
τ and ∂ · u ∼ 1 τ .
δfp ∼ η s pT T 2 1 τT − ζ s pT T 2 1 τT Elliptic flow v2 =
≃ v0
2 + δv2 − v0 2δv0
Dissipative hydro with both η, ζ
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
[ms] ideal = 0 ζ = 0
Dissipative hydro with both η, ζ βη,ζ = (η, ζ)EF E 1 (3λN)1/3
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
βη βζ
η ≫ ζ
Dusling, Schaefer (2010)