Space-time picture and bulk observables in relativistic heavy ion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

space time picture and bulk observables in relativistic
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Space-time picture and bulk observables in relativistic heavy ion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Space-time picture and bulk observables in relativistic heavy ion collisions (HydroKinetic approach) Yu.M. Sinyukov (BI TP, Kiev) Seminar BLTP 6 June , 201 019 The stages of the matter evolution in A+A collisions The initial huge kinetic


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Yu.M. Sinyukov (BI TP, Kiev) Seminar BLTP

6 June , 201 019

Space-time picture and bulk observables in relativistic heavy ion collisions (HydroKinetic approach)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The initial huge kinetic energy of colliding nuclei converts into masses of the final observed particles (several tens of thousands) + the energy of collective flow

The stages of the matter evolution in A+A collisions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

I ntegrated HydroKinetic Model: HKM iHKM

3

HYDRO HADRONOZATI ON HADRON CASCADE (UrQMD) Pre-thermal stage

Tp ~ 156 - 165 MeV

r t

¿th = 1 fm

¿0 = 0:1 fm

¿p

Complete algorithm incorporates the stages:

  • generation of the initial states: (MC Glaub & CGC)
  • thermalization of initially non-thermal

matter;

  • viscous chemically equilibrated

hydrodynamic expansion;

  • particlization of expanding medium in the

hadronization area ;

  • a switch to UrQMD cascade with near

equilibrium hadron gas as input;

  • simulation of observables.

Yu.S., Akkelin, Hama: PRL 89 (2002) 052301; … + Karpenko: PRC 78 (2008) 034906; Karpenko, Yu.S. : PRC 81 (2010) 054903; … PLB 688 (2010) 50; Akkelin, Yu.S. : PRC 81 (2010) 064901; Karpenko, Yu.S., Werner: PRC 87 (2013) 024914; Naboka, Akkelin, Karpenko, Yu.S. : PRC 91 (2015) 014906; Naboka, Karpenko, Yu.S. PRC 93 (2016) 024902.

. The initial (non-equilibrium) state

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Bulk Observables, “Soft Physics” measurements

r

Z

t A A

π

p K

p= (p1+ p2)/2 q= p1- p2

QS correlation function

Tch and μch soon after hadronization (chemical f.o.)

Radial flow

Landau, 1953

Inverse of spectra slope Radii Ri , i= Long, Side, Out 3D geometrical system sizes

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

The is OK at but at different max initial energy densities when other parameters change: The two values of the shear viscosity to entropy is used for comparison: The basic result (selected by red) is compared with results at other parameters, including viscous and ideal pure thermodynamic scenarios (starting at without pre-thermal stage but with subsequent hadronic cascade).

The iHKM parameters (at Laine-Shroeder EoS example)

2 Slope of the pion spectra

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

The is OK at but at different max initial energy densities when other parameters change: The two values of the shear viscosity to entropy is used for comparison: The basic result (selected by red) is compared with results at other parameters, including viscous and ideal pure thermodynamic scenarios (starting at without pre-thermal stage but with subsequent hadronic cascade). No dramatic worsening of the results happens if simultaneously with changing

  • f parameters/scenarios renormalize maximal

initial energy density .

The iHKM parameters (at Laine-Shroeder EoS example)

2 Slope of the pion spectra

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The sensitivity of the results to the model parameters

7

The variation EoS (and the corresponding hadronization temperature) can be compensated to get the same bulk results by . I nitial time and are main param.

+

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Interferometry microscope (Kopylov, Podgoretcky: 1971-1973 )

The idea of the correlation femtoscopy is based on an impossibility to

distinguish between registered particles emitted from different points because

  • f particle identity.

R

a b detector

1 2 p1 p2 r1 r2 r3 x1 x2 x3 x a

xb

2 1

|qi| D

Momentum representation Probabilities:

q

1/Ri

The model of independent particle emission for bosons

slide-9
SLIDE 9

THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FEMTOSCOPY (Yu.S.1986 – 1995)

To provide calculations analytically one should use the saddle point method and Boltzmann

approximation to Bose-Einstein distribution function. Then the single particle spectra are proportional to homogeneity volume: and just these homogeneity lengths forms exponent in Bose-Einstein correlation function

p1 p2

q= p1-p2= (qout, qside, qlong)

L RT

lL lT

Interferomerty radii: QGP RHIC HBT PUZZLE

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Correlation femtoscopy of nucleus-nucleus collisions

The theory, method and interpretation of the correlation femtoscopy measurements that are utilized by all the collaborations dealing with such kind of analysis in A+ A and p+ p collisions at the SPS, RHIC та LHC, are developed. It allows to study the homogeneity lengths in extremely inhomogeneous fast expanding hadron and quark-gluon systems, with accuracy 10–15 m and 10–23 s.

1987 Femto “homogeneity

lengths”. The general interpretation of the

femtoscopy scales as the spatio- temporal homogeneity length has been formulated

“Bowler–Sinyukov treatment”

The method that allow to sepa- rate the quantum-statistical (QS) correlations from Coulomb ones and long-lived (l-l) resonance contributions is proposed

«Sinyukov-Makhlin formula”

that allow to measure the life- time of the hot matter at “Little bang”

) , ) , (

2

(

p f p x f

x

i

x i

′ ′ = λ

2015

  • fraction of l-l resonances
  • Coulomb wave function.
  • QS-кореляційна ф.
  • mean transv. velocity
slide-11
SLIDE 11

HKM iHKM

Evolution of ideas and main femtoscopy results

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Initial flows and Ro/Rs ratio (t0= 1-2 fm/c)

Yu.S. Act.Phys. Polon. B 37 (2006) 3343 Freeze-out hypersurfaces in transverse 1D projection)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Emission functions in HKM for top SPS, RHIC and LHC energies

slide-14
SLIDE 14

HKM prediction: solution of the HBT Puzzle

Quotations: HKM

slide-15
SLIDE 15

HKM iHKM

Femtoscopy scales vs multiplicity and initial system size

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Interferometry volume Vint in LHC p-p and central Au-Au, Pb-Pb collisions

without post-hydro hadron cascade

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Interferometry volume Vint in LHC p-p and central Au-Au, Pb-Pb collisions

iHKM

Vint(A; dN=dy)

iHKM

Akkelin, Yu.S. : PRC 70 064901 (2004); PRC 73 034908 (2006)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Interferometry volume Vint in LHC p-p and central Au-Au, Pb-Pb collisions

iHKM

Vint(A; dN=dy)

iHKM iHKM with uncertainty principle

Akkelin, Yu.S. : PRC 70 064901 (2004); PRC 73 034908 (2006) Yu.S., Shapoval: PRD 87, 094024 (2013)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

  • M. Adzhimambetov, Yu.S. , 2019

in preparation Interferometry volume vs initial overlapping area at the fixed multiplicity

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

The femtoscopy radii at different energies and the same multiplicity

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Femtoscopy volume vs initial transverse overlapping area of creating systems

Initial transverse size ST = effective transverse aria of overlapping nuclei at the initial stage of collision process

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Rside

Data from ALICE, 2015 Pions Naboka, Karpenko, Yu.S. PHYS REV C 93, 024902 (2016)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Rout

Data from ALICE, 2015 Pions Naboka, Karpenko, Yu.S. PHYS REV C 93, 024902 (2016)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Rlong

Data from ALICE, 2015 Pions Naboka, Karpenko, Yu.S. PHYS REV C 93, 024902 (2016)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

iHKM

Femtoscopy scales: pions vs kaons

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • Sep. 2015 , L.V

. Malinina QM2015, Kobe, Japan

K±K± and K0 K0

s s

in Pb-Pb: HKM model

New results from ArXiv.org:1506.07884 R and λ for π±π±, K±K±, K0 K0 , pp

s s

for 0-5% centrality Radii for kaons show good agreement with HKM predictions for K±K±

(V. Shapoval, P. Braun-Munzinger, I. Karprenko

  • Yu. Sinyukov Nucl.Phys.A929 (2014))

λ decrease with k , both data and HKM

T

HKM prediction for λ slightly

  • verpredicts the data

Λπ are lower λK due to the stronger

influence of resonances

L.V . Malinina

Quark Matter, Japan ALI CE Coll. Phys. Rev. C 96 … (2017)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Comparison with HKM for 0-5% centrality

HKM model slightly underestimates R

side

  • verestimates R_side /R_out

HKM model with re-scatterings

(M. Shapoval, P . Braun-Munzinger, Iu.A. Karpenko, Yu.M. Sinyukov , Nucl.Phys. A 929 (2014) 1.) describes well ALICE

π & K data. HKM model w/o re-scatterings demonstrates approximate mT scaling for π & K, but does not describe ALICE π & K data The observed deviation

L.V . Malinina

from mT scaling is explained in ( M. Shapoval, P

. Braun-Munzinger, Iu.A. Karpenko, Yu.M. Sinyukov , Nucl.Phys. A 929 (2014) by

essential transverse flow & re-scattering phase. ALI CE Coll. Phys. Rev. C 96 … (2017) Quark Matter, Japan

slide-28
SLIDE 28

3D K±K± & ππ radii versus k

T

Pion results from ArXiv .org:1507.06842

Radii scale better with kT than mT according to HKM

(V . Shapoval, P . Braun-Munzinger, Iu.A. Karpenko, Yu.M. Sinyukov , Nucl.Phys. A 929 (2014) 1);

Similar observations were reported by PHENIX at RHIC (arxiv:1504.05168). R R

  • ut

side

R

long

L.V . Malinina

ALI CE Coll. Phys. Rev. C 96 … (2017) Quark Matter, Japan

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Predictions for the pion and kaon femtoscopy scales for LHC energy per nucleon pair 5.02 TeV The iHKM prediction of the charged pion and kaon interferometry radii k_T dependence for the centrality c= 0-5 % . The calculations were performed at the two hadronization temperatures: 165 MeV and 156 MeV .

Yu.S. , Shapoval, arXiv:1809.07400 for Phys.Rev. C (2019)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Space-time picture of the pion and kaon emission

From Yu.S., Shapoval, Naboka, Nucl. Phys. A 946 (2016) 247 ( arXiv:1508.01812)

w/o transv. expansion where 2015 1987 1995

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Extraction of emission time from fit R long

T Indication: τ < τ . Possible explanations ( arxiv:1508.01812 ): HKM includes re-

π K

scatterings (UrQMD cascade): e.g. Kπ→K*(892)→Kπ, KN→K*(892)X; (K*(892) lifetime 4-5 fm/c) [πN→N*(Δ)X, N*(Δ)→πX (N*s(Δs)- short lifetime)] The new formula for extraction of the maximal emission time for the case of strong transverse flow was used ( Yu. S., Shapoval, Naboka, Nucl. Phys. A 946 (2016) 227 ) The parameters of freeze-out: T and “intensity of transverse flow” α were fixed by fitting π and K spectra ( arxiv:1508.01812 ) T

  • estimate the systematic errors: T = 0.144 was varied
  • n ± 0.03 GeV & free α , α , were used; systematic errors ~ 1 fm/c

π K

L.V . Malinina

ALI CE Coll. Phys. Rev. C 96 … (2017) Quark Matter, Japan

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

  • M. Adzhimambetov, V

. Shapoval, Yu.S., Nucl.Phys. A 987 (2019) 321–336.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

K* probes

K* (892) life time is 4.2 fm/c

slide-38
SLIDE 38

radiation picture in iHKM. V.Shapoval, P.Braun-Munzinger, Yu.S. Sudden vs continuous thermal freeze-out at the LHC. Nuclear Physics A 968 (2017) 391

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

radiation picture in iHKM. Sudden vs continuous thermal freeze-out at the LHC.

39

Less than 30% of direct K* can be seen till 15 fm/c

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Suppression of due to continuous thermal freeze-out (LHC)

40

70% - 20% = 50% Therefore at least 50% of direct K* 0 are recreated in reactions:

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Spectra of (LHC)

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Summary for space-time structure of ultrarelativistic A+ A collisions

It seems that we understood in detail the femtoscopic picture of ultrarelativistic A+ A collisions at the top RHIC and available LHC energies.

The dependence of the interferometry volume on both main parameters, namely, multiplicity and initial size of the system formed, is obviously demonstrated.

As for the complete space-time picture of collision process , the femoscopy analysis altogether with probes demonstrate that even at the first 4-5 fm/c (proper time!) after hadronization at least 70% of decay products are re-scattered. The intensive re-generation

  • f K* takes place. At least 50% of direct are re-combine.
  • Quite intensive “afterburner life” at the last hadron evolution stage, leads not only to violation
  • f kaon-pion femtoscopy mT – scaling, but also to continuous “chemical freeze-out”

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Space-time picture of the particle production

43

Thermal and evolutionary approaches

Yu.S., V . Shapoval,

  • Phys. Rev. C 97 064901 (2018)
slide-44
SLIDE 44
  • Thermal models of particle production vs dynamic/evolutionary approaches

44

Continuous freeze-out vs sudden freeze-out

Kinetic/ thermal freeze-out

Sudden freeze-out

Cooper-Frye prescription

Continuous freeze-out

The is peace of hypersurface where the particles with momentum near has a maximal emission rate. Yu.S.

Chemical freeze-out

The is typically isotherm. The numbers of quasi-stable particles is defined from Ni with taking into account the resonance decays but not inelastic re- scattering. The is the minimal temperature when the expanding system is still (near) in local thermal and chemical equilibrium. Below the hadronic cascade takes place: . The inelastic reactions, annihilation processes in hadron-resonance gas change the quasi-particle yields in comparison with sudden chem. freeze-out.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Equation of State - 1

45

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Equation of state -2

46

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

Thermal models vs evolutionary approach

Evolutionary models

Basic matter properties: thermodynamic EoS High dense matter formation time

  • Max. energy

density

Thermal models

Chemical freeze-out at Particle number ratios At the particlization temperature hydrodynamic evolution transforms (suddenly or continuously) into interact. hadron gas evolution L.-S. Karsch (lattice QCD) 0.15 fm/c fm/c GeV/fm3 495 GeV/fm3

EoS: iHKM Kinetic freeze-out

«Blast-wave” parametrization of freeze-out hypersurface and transverse flows on it. Spectra Kinetic freeze-out is continuous, lasts more than 5 fm/c. “Effective temperature” of maximal emission: .

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Multiplicity dependence of all charged particles on centrality

and spectra for LHC energy

48

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

Particle number ratios at the LHC 2.76 TeV/n.p., Lattice QCD EoS

Yu.S. , Shapoval,

  • Phys. Rev. C 97 064901 (2018)
slide-50
SLIDE 50

Particle number ratios at the LHC, 2.76 TeV, L-S EoS

50

Yu.S. , Shapoval, Phys.Rev. C (2018)

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Particle number ratios at the LHC, 5.02 TeV/n.p.

51

Yu.S. , Shapoval, arXiv:1809.07400 (will be published in

Phys.Rev. C (2019)].

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Particle yields at LHC, 5.02 TeV/n.p.

52

Yu.S. , Shapoval, arXiv:1809.07400 (will be published in

Phys.Rev. C (2019)].

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Particle ratios at LHC, 5.02 TeV/n.p.

53

Yu.S. , Shapoval, arXiv:1809.07400 (will be

published in Phys.Rev. C (2019)].

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Spectra at LHC 5.02 TeV/n.p

54

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Elliptic flow LHC 5.02 TeV/n.p.

55

Yu.S. , Shapoval, arXiv:1809.07400 (will be

published in Phys.Rev. C (2019)].

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Asymmetric n-flow LHC 5.02 TeV/n.p.

56

slide-57
SLIDE 57

57

  • M. Adzhimambetov, V

. Shapoval, Yu.S., Nucl.Phys. A 987 (2019) 321–336.

slide-58
SLIDE 58

58

Au+ Au, top RHIC energy

slide-59
SLIDE 59

59

Au+ Au, top RHIC energy

slide-60
SLIDE 60

60

Au+ Au, top RHIC energy

slide-61
SLIDE 61

61

Au+ Au, top RHIC energy

slide-62
SLIDE 62

62

Au+ Au, top RHIC energy

slide-63
SLIDE 63

63

Au+ Au, top RHIC energy

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Spectra of strange baryons, , on centrality

64

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Summary on the particle production

 Neither thermal nor chemical freeze-out cannot be considered as sudden at some corresponding temperatures.

 Particle yield probe as well as absolute values !) demonstrate that even at the

minimal hadronization temperature MeV, the annihilation and other non-elastic scattering reactions play role in formation particle number ratios, especially.

  • It happens that the results for small and relatively large are quite similar. It seems

that inelastic processes (other than the resonance decays), that happen at the matter evolution below , , play a role of the compensatory mechanism in formation of . . Chemical freeze-out is continuous.

  • The iHKM works perfectly not only at LHC but also at RHIC energies and describes well spectra
  • f pion, kaon, proton, antiprotons, Lambdas, Omega, Cascade, different particle number

ration? Elliptic flow and femtoscopy scales. For this aim non-sero baryon chemical potential is introduced as well as . The latter depends on the proper life-time of QGP, which is calculated in the iHKM.

65

slide-66
SLIDE 66

iHKM

DI RECT PHOTONS

slide-67
SLIDE 67

67

slide-68
SLIDE 68

68

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Blow up text

69

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Photon radiation in iHKM

70

HYDRO HADRONOZATI ON HADRON CASCADE (UrQMD) Pre-thermal stage

Tp ~ 156 - 165 MeV

r t

¿th = 1 fm

¿0 = 0:1 fm

¿p

  • generation of the initial states: (MC Glaub & CGC)

PROMPT PHOTONS

  • thermalization of initially non-thermal

matter; PRE-THERMAL PHOTONS

  • viscous chemically equilibrated

hydrodynamic expansion; THERMAL PHOTONS FROM QGP

  • hadronization of expanding medium

HADRONI ZATI ON EMI SSI ON

  • hadron matter expansion

THERMAL PHOTONS FROM HADRONI C STAGE The initial (non-equilibrium) state

slide-71
SLIDE 71

71

Direct photons. Transverse Spectra

We claim that a description

  • f photon spectra and its

anisotropy could be significantly improved if an additional photon radiation, that accompanies the presence of deconfined environment, is included.

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Photon puzzle: Anisotropy of spectra, large v2 coefficients.

72

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Photons at RHIC

73

European Physical Journal A - Manuscript ID EPJA-104987.R1 arXiv:1812.02763

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Spectra: Photons at RHIC, c. 10-20 %

74

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Contributions to photon spectra, c. 0-20%

75

slide-76
SLIDE 76

76

Spectra: Photons at RHIC, c. 20-40 %

slide-77
SLIDE 77

77

Spectra: Photons at RHIC, c. 40-60 %

slide-78
SLIDE 78

78

Photons at RHIC, v2 , c. 10 – 20 %

slide-79
SLIDE 79

79

Photons at RHIC, v2 , c. 20 – 40 %

slide-80
SLIDE 80

80

Photons at RHIC, v2 , c. 40 – 60 %

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Triangular flow, v_3 coefficients, c. 0-20%

81

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Triangular flow, v_3 coefficients, c. 20-40%

82

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Triangular flow, v_3 coefficients, c. 40-60%

83

slide-84
SLIDE 84

Summary for photons

84

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Acknowledgement

85

Thank you for your attention