built-up areas of England and Wales 1999-2008 Marcus Young - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

built up areas of england and wales 1999 2008
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

built-up areas of England and Wales 1999-2008 Marcus Young - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A segment-based spatial analysis of non- motorised road traffic casualties occurring in non built-up areas of England and Wales 1999-2008 Marcus Young Background and Rationale Pedestrian casualties Pedestrian casualties Fatal, On built-up


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A segment-based spatial analysis of non- motorised road traffic casualties occurring in non built-up areas of England and Wales 1999-2008

Marcus Young

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background and Rationale

Fatal, 429, 1.6% Serious, 5738, 20.9% Slight, 21227, 77.5%

Pedestrian casualties On built-up roads

Fatal, 122, 12.2% Serious, 307, 30.6% Slight, 575, 57.3%

Pedestrian casualties

  • n non built-up roads

Built- up, 429, 77.9% non built- up, 122, 22.1%

Pedestrian fatalities

Built- up, 58, 50.4% non built- up, 57, 49.6%

Cyclist fatalities

> 40mph = non built-up <= 40mph = built-up

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Research Aims

Identify key findings that can inform road safety strategy for non built-up NMT casualty reduction. Develop a series of negative binomial regression models. Assign a range of relevant explanatory variables to each segment. Assign each NMT casualty that occurred outside a built-up area to a segment and generate counts. Create a segment-based dataset for the road network in England & Wales.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Segment Dataset

OS Meridian 2 vector dataset. ONS urban area and settlement boundary polygon layer – to erase roads in built-up areas. Target a nominal fixed segment length of 250m. 742,355 segments to use in regression models

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Casualty Data

STATS19 – form used by the police in GB to record every personal injury RTA on a public road. Data quality issues – accident NGR. Each casualty snapped to a road polyline. Casualty counts for each segment generated (total, by casualty type, by severity).

2.8 million total casualties 499,006 NMT 37,471 NMT non built-up

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Explanatory Variables

Road Characteristics

  • A-class
  • B-class
  • Minor road

(reference)

  • Sinuosity
  • Number of

intersections

  • Steep
  • Traffic flow

NMT user interactions

  • National Trail

present

  • Sustrans

route present

  • Dangerous

crossing present Demographic characteristics

  • Local

Population Spatial Factors

  • Distance from

built-up area

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Statistical Analysis

OLS regression unsuitable – can predict negatives values/assumptions violated. NB model common in road accident analysis literature and fits the data better than Poisson. Disaggregated approach with different segment casualty counts used as the dependent variable in a series of models.

Total casualties Total casualties (A roads) Total fatalities Total serious injuries Total slight injuries Pedestrian casualties Cyclist casualties Horse rider casualties

Spatial Autocorrelation - Global Moran’s I indicated clustering present. Separate model for East Anglian region to introduce spatial lag of the dependent variable.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Key Findings

Road Class

  • A-class and B-class

roads show strong positive association across most models.

  • Incidence rate for

fatal casualties 12x greater on A-roads than minor roads.

Sinuosity

  • Strong negative

association in fatalities, horse rider and A-class models.

  • For a one unit

increase in sinuosity, casualty rate decreases by 99.9% for fatal casualties and 47.6% for A-class road.

Intersections

  • Positive

association in all models.

  • Incidence rate for

total casualties increases by a factor of 1.8 (81%) for each additional intersection. Coefficient exponentiated and expressed as an Incidence Rate Ratio

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Key Findings

NMT road user interactions

  • Presence of a

National Trail doubles the pedestrian casualty rate.

  • A national or

regional cycle route increases cyclist casualty rate by a factor of 1.31.

Distance from built-up area

  • Negative

association.

  • For a one standard

deviation increase in mean distance (2.2km) the incidence rate for total casualties reduces by a factor

  • f -0.325 (-67.5%).

Impact of spatial autocorrelation

  • Spatially lagged

variable significant.

  • Sinuosity changes

from significant at 90% confidence level to non significant.

  • Other variables

that are significant remain so with coefficients slightly reduced.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Recommendations

Focus on A-class and B-class roads to have maximum impact on reducing NMT casualties. Effect of sinuosity in reducing casualties on A-class roads suggests speed reduction measures would be effective. Stepped reductions in posted speed limits at the edge of settlements. Protective speed limits on stretches between nearby built-up areas. Programme to establish alternative routes for on-road sections of flagship National Trails.