Building the Online Enterprise: Lessons Learned from the Formation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

building the online enterprise
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Building the Online Enterprise: Lessons Learned from the Formation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Kennedy & Company Kennedy & Company Building the Online Enterprise: Lessons Learned from the Formation of USCs Palmetto College ACHE South Presentation April 19, 2016 2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC Starting


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Kennedy & Company Kennedy & Company

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC

ACHE South Presentation April 19, 2016

Building the Online Enterprise:

Lessons Learned from the Formation

  • f USC’s Palmetto College
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Starting Question: What should our online enterprise accomplish?

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 2

Better Question: What are the goals for our university and how does an online enterprise help us get there?

Marketing & Brand

Extend Reach of Delivery Boost Enrollments & Revenues Enhance Retention Lower Costs

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Outline for Today’s Presentation

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC

§ Goals for the Online Enterprise = The Goals for the University § Timeline for Development of USC Palmetto College § A Centralized Approach? or Every School for Itself? § Goals Dictate Architecture of Online Enterprise

  • But Should we Outsource?

§ Assumption: Let’s Build Something Together – What are the Issues?

  • Governance
  • Revenue Sharing – How Should we Split Revenues & Costs
  • Accreditation & Authorization
  • Other Programs, Integration with Traditional Education
  • Student Retention
  • Admissions, Financial Aid, Registrar, Bursar
  • Economies of Scale: Course Development & Marketing
  • Strategy & Market Research
  • Final Lessons Learned

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Timeline of Events: USC’s Online Enterprise

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 4

USC-Columbia and its four regional campuses begin

  • ffering online degree-

completion through Palmetto Programs; many of the courses are taught via synchronized classrooms USC President Harris Pastides begins planning process for Palmetto College, seeking to expand delivery of online education, increase enrollment, and deliver a low-cost degree to South Carolina residents. A consulting project creates the initial architecture for Palmetto College, for Board review and approval.

July, 2011 2007 February, 2012

USC’s Board approves Palmetto College and USC pushes for state funding to launch the enterprise

Summer, 2012

The SC legislature approves a $5M state appropriation to fund the creation of Palmetto College

Spring, 2013

  • Dr. Susan Elkins

appointed first Chancellor of Palmetto College Palmetto College formally launches with 7 programs, including 5 new programs in Criminal Justice, Education, Nursing, Human Behavior, and Business.

Fall, 2013 May, 2014

USC’s University Chancellors, Dr. Elkins, and the Provost agree to a final revenue sharing agreement that splits tuition revenue between the 8 participating institutions

June, 2014

Palmetto College finishes its first full year with 64 courses and over 1600 students enrolled

June, 2015

Palmetto College finishes its second full year with a 35%+ increase in students and a 35%+ increase course consumption, leading to a doubling of tuition revenues generated.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Designing an Online Enterprise? Start with Your Goals.

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 5

USC – Palmetto College started with a vision for what it wanted in 2011 and gained Board approval for both its vision and the corresponding architecture for Palmetto College in 2012.

The$Need$for$Palme.o$College$

By#establishing#Palme0o#College,#the#University#of#South#Carolina#achieves#its# fundamental#goals#and#plays#a#significant#role#in#improving#economic#stability#in#the# State.##

  • South#Carolina#ranks#40th#in#the#naCon#in#number#of#adults#holding#a#bachelor's#degree#at#
  • nly#approximately#25%.##The#level#of#educaConal#a0ainment#relates#directly#to#the#number#
  • f#new#employers#that#might#consider#relocaCng#to#South#Carolina.###
  • #An$increase$in$bachelor's$a.ainment$is$$determined$to$be$"cri:cal"$or$"most$cri:cal"##for#a#

majority#of#counCes#to#meet#projected#economic#demands.####

Low$Level$of$Bachelor’s$ Degree$A.ainment$in$ South$Carolina$$

  • Individuals#holding#a#bachelor's#degree#in#South#Carolina##earn$$1.2$million$more$over#a#

lifeCme#than#those#with#just#a#high#school#diploma.#

  • Research#conCnues#to#indicate#that#holding$a$college$degree$elevates$individuals$with#

increased#social#and#cultural#capital##that#is#passed#on#to#future#generaCons.##Educated# ciCzens#are#rewarded#with#higher#paying#jobs#and#higher#status#in#society.##

Quality$of$Life$ Improvements$for$ Bachelor’s$Degree$ Holders$$$$

  • By$2018,$630,000$new$jobs$and$job$vacancies$that$require$a$bachelor's$degree$will$exist$in#

South#Carolina#with#strong#growth#in#the#fields#of#health#sciences,#business#administraCon,# educaCon,#criminal#jusCce,#and#informaCon#technology.###

  • Based#on#projected#degree#compleCon#rates,#South#Carolina#must#increase#bachelor's#

degree#a0ainment#by#a#rate#of#7.3%#annually#to#meet#job#market#needs.#####

Expanding$Job$Market$ Demand$for$Bachelor’s$ Degree$Holders$

  • The#mission#of#Palme0o#College#will#include#increasing$access$to$more$students$who$may$

be$placeXbound#and#increasing$the$level$of$educa:onal$a.ainment$across$the$$State.$$$

  • Palme0o#College#will#build#on#the#missions#of#Palme0o#Programs#and#the#regional#

campuses#to#deliver#educaCon#to#underserved#populaCons#and#to#individuals#who#

  • therwise#might#not#have#access.####

Fulfills$Mission$of$the$ University$$

  • Palme0o#College#will#hit#on#the#core$principles$of$the$new$funding$model:#degree#

a0ainment,#job#placement#and#opportuniCes#for#low#income#and#minority#students.#

  • With#increased#bachelor's#degree#a0ainment#and#access$to$underserved$students$in#the#

State,#USC's#impact#on#economic$development$$will#be#vast#by#making#South#Carolina#more# a0racCve#to#potenCal#employers#and#providing#access#to#higher#paying#jobs#for#its#ciCzens.####

Accountability$Based$ Funding$$

Sources: Georgetown Center on Education and the Workforce & The Lumina Foundation Education Needs Index

4

Review&of&Palme-o&College&&

As#Palme)o#College#develops,#these#guiding#principles#will#shape#the#final#product.##&

Students# Courses & Programs & Structure &

  • Adult#students#who#

may#be# geographically=bound###

  • University#non=

completes#and# Associate’s#Degree# holders#

  • Both#in=state#and#out=
  • f=state#residents&
  • Upper#Division#

courses#only##

  • Vast#majority#of#

courses#on=line#via# asynchronous# delivery#methods!!

&

  • VocaEonally#oriented##
  • Fields#with#proven#job#

market#demand#

  • Accredited#through#

the#senior#campus# degree#programs###

  • PosiEoned#to#

compete#with#for= profit#insEtuEons##

  • Leverages#the#

regional#campuses##

  • Organized#as#one#

college#within#the# system##

  • Overseen#by#a#new#

Chancellor#with#a# direct#reporEng# relaEonship#to#the# President#

  • CentralizaEon#of#

many#services#&

Based&on&its&market&posi;on,&brand&integrity,&exis;ng&infrastructure,&and&strong& market&demand,&Palme-o&College&is&poised&for&success.&&&&

3

2012 USC Board Presentation

Stated Goals:

§ Extend USC’s reach beyond its physical campuses and aid degree completion, in South Carolina § Create affordable degrees § Increase net revenue – important, but secondary § Utilize existing infrastructure and programs to jump-start the launch of Palmetto College

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Goals Dictate the Architecture of Online

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 6

Based on USC’s experience, we believe that the ultimate goal for the University should dictate how the online enterprise is constructed.

Example University Goals Examples of Corresponding Architecture

Enhance University Brand Quick New Revenues, Low Investment Extend University Delivery, Increase Long-Run Revenues MOOC/Not-for-Credit Outsource to Online Program Management Build Internally on Top of Existing Structures

slide-7
SLIDE 7

For USC, Building on Something Established

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 7

An online extension wasn’t new for USC, which had 2 programs of study built on its four regional campuses that offered 2-year degrees. Palmetto College expanded programs and resources while creating a cohesive entity dedicated to growing enrollments and new programs.

!

Selec&ng!Programs!For!Palme0o!

Palme&o(College's(ini/al(programs(will(be(selected(on(the(mission,(goals,(market(demands,( and(capabili/es(of(the(University(of(South(Carolina(System.( (

Metrics! Degree! Programs!

Proven(forA profit( market?( Established(USC(catalog(of(distance( educa/on(classes(applicable(to(a(( bachelor(degree?( Projected(South(Carolina(Job( Opportuni/es(in(2018( Fit(with(USC( Mission/Strategic( Plan( Overall( Score(

Organiza/onal( Leadership*(

2 3 117,000( 4 3

Liberal(Studies*(

4 27,000( 4 3

Criminal(Jus/ce(

4 2 61,300( 4 3

Health(Sciences( and(Nursing(

3 3 192,000( 4 3

Business( Administra/on(

4 1 286,200( 4 3

Informa/on( Technology(

4 33,100( 4 2

Educa/on(

2 1 140,900( 4 2

Hospitality( Management(

1 N/A( 4 1 USC!is!in!a!unique!posi&on!to!immediately!add!online!degree!programs! by!capitalizing!on!previously!done!course!design. Legend 0 1 2 3 4 !

Programming!Goals! 1. Offer(classes(best(suited(to(build(enrollment( 2. Offer(enough(online(programs(at(once(to(create(economies(of(scale(in(adver/sing(and(administra/on(( 3. Serve(the(ci/zens(of(South(Carolina(((

Source: 1Georgetown Center on Education and the Workforce 2 USC Department of Distributed Learning

5 *Program Exists

USC’s “Palmetto Programs” had offered

  • nline programs for
  • years. Palmetto

College added additional offerings to create scale and promised additional support for marketing and recruiting.

2012 USC Board Presentation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Can a Decentralized Online Enterprise Work?

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 8

Perhaps, but only when your goals focus on speed and creativity. Eventually, scale matters. Erie Canal Example

Advantages of an Organic, Decentralized Approach

§ Faster start-up § Promotes creative approaches § Reduced bureaucracy in decision-making § Eliminates some issues of revenue sharing and governance § Less arm-twisting to find participants

Erie canal construction started (1807) as a decentralized process with canal construction divided into 3 segments.

§ Canal managers learned new techniques, not biased by a master plan of how to build canals § Eventually consolidated best practices to finish remaining parts of the canal building

School 1 School 6 School 2 School 3 School 5 School 4

Advantages: (Sometimes) faster, more creative solutions Disadvantages: Still requires “central” services such as bursar, registrar, admissions, financial aid; higher operational costs on per-student basis

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Palmetto College: Early Outsourcing; Later, In-House

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 9

USC Partnered with Academic Partnerships (AP) on a fee-for-service basis (no revenue sharing) for almost two years; the relationship was discontinued in 2014 for USC’s undergraduate offerings.

AP: Provided a Quick Start; Fee-for-Service

Model Not Sustainable for USC or AP

§ The fee-for-service structure was not a part

  • f AP’s typical model (typically receives

40% to 60% of revenues) § AP and USC could not reach an agreement

  • n future work for Palmetto College

§ USC now does all work formerly done by AP in-house for its undergrad programs AP built initial websites, developed many (but not all) of the courses, and staffed a call center for 1+ years

Based on current costs for USC versus AP’s desired contract terms, moving to a fully in-house model saved USC at least $1.5M in FY2015. Savings in 2016 are projected to exceed $2M.

Web Courses Calls

slide-10
SLIDE 10

A Checklist of Outsourcing Options

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 10

Every aspect of operating the online enterprise can be be outsourced, but some areas make more sense than others based on your current competencies and the cyclicality of the work in that area.

Service Is it a Current Core Competency? Is it a One-Time or Cyclical Event? Should we Outsource It? When to Outsource? Local/Regional Marketing 4

  • When regional recruiting is poor

Recruiting Online/Call Center 2 2

  • When faster start-up is needed or fewer
  • perational costs/risks

Course Development 2 2 2

  • When creation of digital classes will be

limited and sporadic

Website Development 2 2 2

  • When few university resources exist

Retention Services/Coaching 2 2

  • When speed is critical or when retention

services for online are separate from on- ground

Partnership Development with Business, Other Entities 4 1

  • When seeking business/partnership

development in geographically disparate areas

Marketing/Recruiting to Int’l Markets 1 4 2

  • When university has few/no resources

internationally

Marketing/Recruiting to National Markets 2 4

  • When university has few/no resources
  • utside of home region

Market Research & Strategy 1 2 2

  • When data is hard to get or politics gets

in the way of clear strategic planning Illustrative

4 = Yes 2 = Partial 0 = No

slide-11
SLIDE 11

When Does Outsourcing Make Financial Sense?

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 11

Outsourcing to an Online Program Management company can be a good way to get off the ground quickly using experienced recruiters, website developers, and course developers. But it comes with a potentially hefty long-term cost. The right contract terms are critical.

$1.5M $2.1M $5.3M $6.6M $8.3M $10.5M $13.3M $16.9M

$0.7M

$1.4M $2.0M $2.6M $3.2M $4.1M $5.2M $6.6M $8.4M

$0.6M $0.7M $0.7M $0.8M $0.9M $1.0M $1.1M

$0.3M $0.8M $1.4M $1.9M $2.5M $3.3M $4.3M $5.6M $7.3M

  • $1.0M

$0.0M $1.0M $2.0M $3.0M $4.0M $5.0M $6.0M $7.0M $8.0M $0.0M $5.0M $10.0M $15.0M $20.0M $25.0M $30.0M $35.0M $40.0M FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025

Revenues (000s) OPM Costs (50% Revenue Share) Projected In-House Approach Costs Difference - OPM and In-House Net Revenues

Example

At 2,500 total students and $300/ credit hour (projected 2025 levels), a “typical” OPM revenue sharing agreement would pin OPM-related costs at ~$8.4M/ year, plus include the institution's internal expenses, cutting net revenues by roughly $8M per year by 2025 Projected Net Revenues ($M) Total Revenues and Costs ($M)

*Model assumes that costs for admissions, financial aid, faculty, and course development are the same under both models and that these costs are borne by by the institution.

Comparison of Net Revenues: OPM vs. In-house Approach Sample Analysis, 2016-2025 In this example, an OPM would have to outperform the in-house/DIY recruiting output by roughly 75% to match the net revenue output for the sample institution under an in-house approach.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Building the In-House Enterprise: Major Decisions

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 12

With a DIY-approach to building the online enterprise, universities must decide how all of the related components will work together, be governed, and share the revenues and costs. Retention & Student Services

Does online use the University’s current advising/retention apparatus? How do admissions, financial aid, registrar, and bursar manage these students? How are those extra efforts paid for?

Governance

Who decides on new programs and program ownership? On other major changes?

Data & Decisions

Who provides research and analysis on which new programs to build and how to recruit (and where)?

Revenue Sharing

How are tuition revenues shared? How are direct costs paid for?

1 9 6

Accreditation & State Authorization

How will various degree offerings be accredited? Who will seek authorization for serving students in new states?

Course Development

How do we leverage current digital courses? Build new ones? How do we use course developers from multiple areas?

7 2

Operational Strategic Online Enterprise

Role in Brick-and-Mortar

How can/should the online enterprise be involved with the digital enhancement of on-ground courses?

Types of Programs

Should the online enterprise include continuing education, graduate programs, certificates, and any other online offerings?

Marketing & Recruiting

Who manages? How does the brand stay consistent? Who runs call centers, online chats, etc.?

4 5 8 3

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Governance – Who Decides?

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 13

The largest strategic issues—like how the online enterprise should be governed—need to be decided before the enterprise is launched, ideally.

Proposed(Administra/on/Governance((

Palme&o(College(will(require(a(unique(structure(within(the(University(system(to(achieve(its( many(goals.(((

Key(Considera/ons((

  • Palme&o(College(will(require(strong(leadership((

at(the(very(top(which(is(communicated(to(the( public(to(illustrate(its(overall(importance.(((

  • The(role(of(the(Palme&o(College(Chancellor(

must(be(empowered(to(make(important( decisions(and(have(direct(access(to(other( decision(makers.(((

  • Upon(the(comple?on(of(the(organiza?on(design,(

many(exis?ng(roles(may(be(redundant((

Preliminary(Recommenda/ons(((

  • Appoint(a(chancellor(with(a(direct(repor?ng(

rela?onship(to(the(President(to(oversee( Palme&o(College.(

  • Centralize(services(to(eliminate(redundancy.((

Many(services,(such(as(student(services(and( financial(aid(can(be(melded(together(under(one( role.(

  • Reducing(current(staff(levels(across(all(

ins?tu?ons(is(not(necessary(as(cost(reduc?ons( will(occur(over(?me(through(a&ri?on.((

  • Deans(should(take(on(increased(responsibility(at(

their(respec?ve(campuses(and(assist(across( mul?ple(departments.(

Across(years(one(and(two,(administra/ve(costs(are(expected( to(rise,(but(are(predicted(to(fall(a?er(year(two. (

16

DRAFT(

For(Discussion(Only (

  • 2012: Recommended that

USC create a Chancellor position, given that 8 different colleges/ universities would be involved with Palmetto College

  • High-level governance

well-established with USC President and new Chancellor

  • In retrospect, required

more detail about who makes decision on launching new programs, and other decisions between and among divided interests

1 3 2

2012 USC Board Presentation – Governance Proposal

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Revenue (and Cost) Sharing – How to Split?

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 14

Similarly, revenue and cost sharing in a multi-school (or college) system should be agreed upon up-front. A neutral party (like the President, Provost, Online Chancellor, etc.) can be arbiter.

1

The Plan: Pay the Costs, Split the Rest

USC’s original cost sharing model, blessed by the Board, called for direct costs of running the enterprise to be paid up-front, with some indirect (overhead costs paid) using proxies for effort. The remaining dollars would be split between the

  • nline enterprise (central) and the

schools.

2 Create Consistency, Right

Incentives

This model acknowledged the several pre-existing revenue sharing agreement between schools/campuses and sought to override them for the sake of consistency and so that some campuses would not have incentives to promote

  • ne program of study over another.

A"New"Revenue*Sharing"Model"

Source:

Present ' Future '

The'new'model'will'require'a'revamped'revenue'sharing'system.'

Inconsistent Models of Revenue Sharing Across the System

Consistent Cost-Based Model of Revenue Sharing for all Campuses

USC Salkehatchie (Allendale Campus) USC Sumter USC Salkehatchie (Walterboro Campus)

USC Columbia

USC Aiken USC Upstate USC Salkehatchie (Allendale Campus) USC Union (Laurens Campus) USC Union USC Lancaster USC Sumter USC Salkehatchie (Walterboro Campus)

USC Columbia

USC Aiken USC Upstate USC Beaufort

6/18/15 75% USC<Upstate'

25% USC<Sumter'

50% USC<Aiken'

50%'USC<Salkehatchie'

  • Consistent'set'of'revenue<sharing'arrangements'between'

senior'and'regional'campuses''based'on'direct'costs'and'a' new'approximaFon'of'indirect'costs.'

  • Pays'for'direct'costs'up'front.'
  • Compensates'campuses'for'overhead'contribuFons'from'

regional'and'senior'campuses.'

  • Equally'splits'remaining'revenue'dollars'50<50.'

Current Revenue Sharing Arrangement Examples

19

2012 USC Board Presentation

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Adapting Revenue Sharing to New Conditions

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 15

USC’s original plan for sharing revenue was a good start, but didn’t account for how to create incentives such that every school/campus recruited for every program.

What%Incen*ves%Does%the%Model%Create?%

3%

Interviews%with%Chancellors,%Deans,%and%other%stakeholders%indicated%that%the%2012=2014%model% created%incen*ves%for%campuses%to%recruit%only%for%those%programs%they%deliver.%%

Current%Model%

Lancaster,%Salkehatchie,%% Sumter,%Union% Aiken% Beaufort% Upstate%

Campus% Recrui*ng%Priori*es%

  • BOL%
  • BLS%

%

  • Business%

%

  • Human%Services%

%

  • Nursing%
  • Criminal%Jus*ce%

%

  • Educa*on%

2014=2015%Model%

Lancaster,%Salkehatchie,%% Sumter,%Union% Aiken% Beaufort% Upstate%

Campus% Recrui*ng%Priori*es%

  • BOL%
  • BLS%
  • Business%
  • Human%Services%
  • Nursing%
  • Criminal%Jus*ce%
  • Educa*on%
  • Future&Programs&

Columbia% Columbia%

USC implemented a tweak in 2014 to its

  • riginal plan to account for cross-campus

recruiting… …which grew cross-campus recruiting from practically nothing to a substantial amount in 2015

New$Data$Shows$Diffuse$Pa0ern$of$Program$Enrollment$(2$of$2)$

6$

County ED)Elementary)Educ PP)Liberal) Studies PP)Organiza:onal) Leadership Upstate)Criminal) Jus:ce Upstate)Nursing)@) R.N. USCA)Business) Admin USCB)Human) Services Headcoun t Georgetown 1 1 1 3 Greenville 4 2 6 31 4 4 51 Greenwood 1 3 1 2 7 Hampton 5 2 1 8 Horry 1 3 3 4 2 2 15 Jasper 1 1 1 3 Jefferson,$AL 1 1 Kershaw 1 2 1 1 5 Lancaster 5 54 42 2 1 104 Laurens 1 7 3 2 2 15 Lee 1 1 Lexington 2 7 5 5 6 13 5 43 Marlboro 1 1 Montgomery,$MD 1 1 Newberry 2 1 1 4 Oconee 4 4 Orangeburg 1 7 2 1 11 Pickens 1 6 1 8 Richland 4 12 6 6 7 15 9 59 Richmond,$GA 1 1 Saluda 1 1 San$Diego,$CA 1 1 Spartanburg 2 3 1 25 2 33 Sumter 2 25 4 2 5 2 1 41 Union 14 20 3 1 38 Williamsburg 1 1 York 1 9 9 2 6 8 5 40 Grand)Total 32 214 123 57 144 78 42 690

Design and implement a revenue-sharing model before you implement, but have the right governance in place to be able to change it as conditions change.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

But Still More Structural Start-Up Questions

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 16

Understanding governance can help define the vision for how new programs get accredited and authorized, how they blend with the University’s on-ground offerings, and how they include and/or share resources with continuing education and graduate programs.

Accreditation & Authorization Blend with On-Ground Teaching Share with Continuing Education & Grad School

  • Many programs can be

accredited underneath current accreditation, which USC did.

  • State-by-state

authorization can take time; prioritize states where your brand matters

  • Digital courses and

materials can be re- purposed for online/on- ground use, creating economies of scale

  • Requires coordination in

course development and

  • ne “keeper” of all digital

inventory

  • Depending on the offering,

sharing resources/costs with grad and CE programs can lower overall costs

  • May be large advantages in

marketing/ad spending to have a seamless catalog of classes, especially with non-traditional students

slide-17
SLIDE 17

How Can (And Should) Online Help Retention?

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 17

Online classes can be a boon to retention efforts, when digital assets are re-purposed for supplemental instruction or when courses help smooth curricular bottlenecks. But they can also hurt students that nay be challenged by an all-online environment. Classroom Environment Type of Student

  • Online classes can overcome course

bottlenecks, allow double-majors to finish on-time, etc.

  • Can keep students from taking

summer courses elsewhere and transferring them back-in

  • Few retention issues here, generally
  • Online assets can help students make

up for classes missed due to illness, athletic travel, etc.

  • Risk of too many incentives to skip

class

  • May require more intensive advising
  • r supplemental instruction;

additional coaching, even for students that thrived in on-ground

  • Example: USC has seen some of its

best on-ground two-year students struggle with completely asynchronous classes

  • Online assets can help provide

supplemental instruction at any time

  • f day
  • Can aid professors in seeing which

sections of material students find most challenging

Well-Prepared On-Ground, With Online Resources Under-Prepared Completely Online

Online courses provide a major

  • pportunity to

supplement the on- the-ground experience. However, a totally

  • nline experience

poses a retention risk for some students that require a more hands-

  • n learning

environment and/or a more connected advising experience.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Online’s Effect on Core Student Operations

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 18

Without major workarounds, outsourced, decentralized, or centralized online enterprises will all rely on some of the university’s core student services: admissions, financial aid, registrar, and bursar operations.

New/expanded

  • nline enterprises

impose real costs

  • n these functions,

which should be acknowledged (and preferably paid for) via the revenue/cost sharing model

Student Information System

Admissions Financial Aid Registrar Bursar

New Online Students

Functions & technology that cannot be

  • utsourced and shouldn’t be decentralized?
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Building (More) Scale: Marketing and Course Dev

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 19

Marketing and course development can both be done more quickly, initially, in a decentralized or

  • utsourced approach. However, getting the biggest bang for your buck in ad spending and course

development costs requires centralization of efforts. Scaling Course Development

  • May not need a full-time course developer for one academic

program, after initial catalog is built

  • However, combining several programs under one roof creates

enough need to keep design know-how, pedagogical principles in-house

Scaling Marketing & Advertising

  • Important to keep control of brand and message
  • Should consolidate advertising buys across all programs, if

possible (e.g., one banner ad, links to 20 programs)

  • In many cases, important to associate online brand with on-

ground offering for greater credibility

40 40 40 20 14 23 19

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Fall 2013 Spring 2014 Summer 2014 Fall 2014 Spring 2015 Summer 2015 Fall 2015

Organizational Leadership Liberal Studies Nursing Human Behavior Business Education Criminal Justice Course Building Capacity: 2 FTE
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Scale in Course Development Lowers Costs When Demand Varies

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 20

40 40 40 20 14 23 19

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Fall 2013 Spring 2014 Summer 2014 Fall 2014 Spring 2015 Summer 2015 Fall 2015

Organizational Leadership Liberal Studies Nursing Human Behavior Business Education Criminal Justice Course Building Capacity: 2 FTE

Illustrative Example: Expected Demand for Building Courses for 7 New Online Programs

  • If 2 FT course developers

develop 20 course per year, the university seems to have enough work with all programs combined.

  • However, if assigned only to

specific programs, no program needs a course developer in- house for more than one semester.

  • The university could outsource.

In the first 3 semesters,

  • utsourcing the development of

20 courses makes sense. In the long run, outsourcing all course development may prove more expensive and means the university lacks a vital core competency

Maintenance and new course additions start in Spring of 2015

New Course Building per Semester

1 3 2

slide-21
SLIDE 21

How to Launch the Right New Programs?

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 21

A combination of market research, resources, and good governance are necessary to build and deliver new programs so that your online enterprise can continue to grow.

Capabilities Students Competition

What programs already have online resources? Which programs are best- known in our region? Which schools are most willing to jump into the

  • nline enterprise?

Where are the prospective students? What is the demand for a four-year degree? Degree completion? Graduate programs? Continuing education? Where are the prospective students that will value our brand and reputation most? Where do our students take summer courses? Where are the pre-existing online programs? What do they offer? Can

  • ur offering be better? Where is

there a clear hole in the market?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Final Thoughts: Lessons Learned

2015 Kennedy & Company Education Strategies LLC 22

Start with all of the university’s goals in mind and then make the online enterprise an enabler of those goals. Construct several alternative scenarios in terms of

  • utsourcing and decentralization, and understand the

financial implications of each Draft a strategic plan that identifies governance and decision-making rights, splits revenues, and shares

  • costs. Ensure your governance works and can make

mid-course corrections quickly.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Appendix

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Enrollments (Seats Filled) in

Palmetto College Online Courses

______________________________________________________

Semester Courses

Total Enrollments

Enrolled

Average Enrollments

Per Course

Fall 2013 57 1649 29 Spring 2014 64 1668 26 Summer 2014 15 542 36 Fall 2014 73 2077 28 TOTAL 209 5936 28

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Es>mated Average Life>me Earnings by Educa>on Level (2008)

Source: 1Georgetown Center on Education and the Workforce

South Carolina ci>zens who earn bachelor’s degrees are much more likely to achieve a higher socioeconomic status.

$4,650,588 $4,029,948 $3,837,239 $3,380,060 $2,254,765 $2,239,548 $1,767,025 $1,198,447 $- $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000

Professional Degree PhD Master's Degree Bachelor's Degree Associate's Degree Some College High School Graduate High School Dropout

+ $1,125,295

Bachelor Degree holders earn 50% more than associate Degree Holders 25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Cri>cal Needs for Bachelor’s Degrees

The need for an increase in bachelor’s degrees to meet projected job market demands is considered “most criQcal” or “criQcal” across South Carolina.

Source: The Lumina Foundation Education Needs Index.

EducaQon Needs Index for South Carolina

Level of EducaQon Need

The EducaQon Needs Index is calculated by combining the educaQonal capacity of a region’s adult populaQon, the degree of economic challenges, and populaQon growth issues and potenQal need for increased human capital. Each factor is converted to a Z Score with scores above 0 indicaQng criQcal educaQon needs. Scores from 0 – 0.47 indicate criQcal need and above that indicate most criQcal. As a state, South Carolina scored 0.53 for an overall “most criQcal” raQng. 26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Marke>ng Principles

To effecQvely communicate in a way that appeals to potenQal students and differs with other available programs, a_enQon must be given to specific principles.

External Message: Mission & Access Control Brand & Message Quality Package as Unique

− Tying Palme_o College to the original missions of the regional campuses will bolster their purpose and strengthen their individual value to the system and State − The President’s ”three A’s” of Accessibility, Affordability and Accountability should be reinforced − Each of the “A’s” serves to disQnguish Palme_o College from for-profit insQtuQons − MarkeQng efforts must take into account the reflecQon on quality of Palme_o College and USC − Techniques should be used to differenQate USC from the for-profit insQtuQons that are heavily marketed − A disQnct focus on quality should play a central role − The markeQng of Palme_o College will ulQmately have an impact on the overall USC brand − Palme_o College may be used as an opportunity to launch and promote the USC brand to new markets − Care should be taken to avoid cheapening the brand − DisQnguish Palme_o College from other entry points to the University such as “Back to Carolina” − Micro-target efforts to specific potenQal Palme_o College students − Avoid communicaQons overlaps with other markeQng efforts 27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Five Year Projected Income Statement

5 Year Income Statement Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Headcount 250 300 350 400 450 500 Revenue $ 2,390,500 $ 2,881,155 $ 3,393,761 $ 3,809,126 $ 4,368,083 $ 4,891,495 Fixed Costs $ 1,466,385 $ 1,494,045 $ 1,522,396 $ 1,551,456 $ 1,491,242 $ 1,611,773 Variable Costs $ 772,292 $ 777,375 $ 949,958 $ 1,004,417 $ 1,030,125 $ 1,069,583 Total Costs $ 2,238,677 $ 2,271,420 $ 2,472,354 $ 2,555,872 $ 2,521,367 $ 2,681,356 Net Income $ 151,823 $ 609,735 $ 921,407 $ 1,253,254 $ 1,846,716 $ 2,210,139

Posi>ve Scenario: High Enrollment, high marke>ng and overhead costs

  • While costs per credit hour range from $155 to $570,

we recommend a price of $367/credit hour, equal to the current price for Palmebo Programs courses, which furthers the access mission of USC while sQll fostering a financially sustainable enterprise.

  • Pricing Palme_o College at $367/credit hour will make

the program a significant compeQtor to the for-profit insQtuQons that have recently become major players in the South Carolina higher educaQon marketplace.

Price/ Credit hour Student/Class Additional Overhead New Degree Program / Year Development Costs Credit hours / student / year

Assumptions

$367: 25: $500,000: 1: $360,000: 22: