Building and consuming housing assets in 4 EU countries Households - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

building and consuming housing assets in 4 eu countries
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Building and consuming housing assets in 4 EU countries Households - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Building and consuming housing assets in 4 EU countries Households perceptions in the good old days and expectations about the future Janneke Toussaint and Marja Elsinga Delft University of Technology Challenge the future


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Janneke Toussaint and Marja Elsinga

Challenge the future

Delft University of Technology

Building and consuming housing assets in 4 EU countries

Households’ perceptions in ‘the good old days’ and expectations about the future

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2 Building and consuming housing assets in 4 EU countries

| xx

Introduction

  • Financial insecurity
  • Growth of owner-occupation
  • More debts – more risks
  • More housing wealth – more security
  • Life cycle theories
  • Housing assets are different (Levin 1998)
  • Why do households build housing assets and

how do they plan to consume them in times of financial hardship?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3 Building and consuming housing assets in 4 EU countries

| xx 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% H u n g a r y U K N e t h e r l a n d s G e r m a n y Social rental Private rental Owner-occupation

Figure 2 Housing tenure structure

65 19 United Kingdom 50 11 The Netherlands 74 13 Hungary 64 12 Germany Everyone is at risk of poverty at some time in their life’s (% agrees) (Eurobarometer) At risk of poverty rate after social transfer (Eurostat) Financial insecurity

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4 Building and consuming housing assets in 4 EU countries

| xx

Germany (Tegeder & Helbrecht 2007)

  • Private rental sector attractive as long as unsettled
  • Buying once in a lifetime
  • Mortgage repayment as soon as possible
  • Insecurity labour market and welfare restructuring
  • Housing assets not taken in account for state benefits
  • Reduced housing expenses
  • ‘Pension in stone’

Building housing assets Conditions Owner-occupation and financial hardship

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5 Building and consuming housing assets in 4 EU countries

| xx

Hungary (Hegedüs & Teller 2007)

  • Buying necessary starting point for the young
  • Avoidance insecure and stigmatised rental sector
  • Housing assets part of family’s safety-net strategy
  • Insecurity about maintenance costs, house prices,

incomes and no reliance on state welfare provision

  • Pass on housing wealth to children
  • Support from heirs – ‘life annuity schemes’
  • Last resort: downsizing (not always good solution)

Building housing assets Conditions Owner-occupation and financial hardship

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6 Building and consuming housing assets in 4 EU countries

| xx

The Netherlands (Toussaint & Elsinga 2007)

  • Better to buy if you can afford
  • House price increases
  • Difficult access social rental sector
  • Reliance on welfare state and labour market
  • Housing assets are nest-egg for emergencies
  • Self-employed - pension

Building housing assets Conditions Owner-occupation and financial hardship

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7 Building and consuming housing assets in 4 EU countries

| xx

United Kingdom (Quilgars & Jones 2007)

  • One day the property will be theirs
  • Investment, gains from market
  • Rental sector no acceptable alternative
  • Vague notion of risks, but plenty of opportunities

labour market; no reliance on state welfare provision

  • Tenants: ‘Why build housing assets if I have to

consume them at old age’

  • Pass housing wealth on to children
  • Retirement
  • Downsizing

Building housing assets Conditions Owner-occupation and financial hardship

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8 Building and consuming housing assets in 4 EU countries

| xx

‘The good old days’

  • Avoid insecure rental sector (UK, Hung)
  • Part of private safety net planning (Hung)
  • House price increases (Neth, UK)
  • Profit from incentives government (Hung, Neth)
  • Not taken into account for benefits (UK, Germ)
  • State welfare provision (Neth, Germ)
  • Many other strategies with owner-occupation
  • Bequest motives
  • Illiquidity: selling- heart and soul in the ‘home’
  • MEW: prosperity; distrust reverse mortgages
  • Hold on to assets in times of financial hardship

Why build housing assets? Why not consume housing assets?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9 Building and consuming housing assets in 4 EU countries

| xx

Now: financial insecurity- unemployment, pensions under pressure

Owner-occupation, especially meaningful if no state welfare provision

1. Reduced housing expenses 2. Other strategies: sublet, or to get support from heirs 3. Last resort: selling

However, if many people want to sell, housing market stagnates - Then, mortgage equity withdrawal better option?! Different histories, norms and customs:

Germans: ‘pension in stone’ & aversion towards mortgage debts Hungarians: make their own contracts based on inheritance Dutch: borrow according fiscal arrangements British: did go through the ‘learning curve’ of MEW, but wish to have the cake and eat it

Will households consume their housing assets?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10 Building and consuming housing assets in 4 EU countries

| xx

References

M Elsinga, P De Decker, N Teller, J Toussaint (eds). Home ownership beyond asset and security. Perceptions of housing related security and insecurity in eight European countries., Amsterdam: IOS Press:

  • Hegedüs J, Teller N. Chapter 6. Hungary: Escape into home ownership.
  • Quilgars D, Jones A. Chapter 10. United Kingdom: Safe as houses?
  • Tegeder G, Helbrecht I. Chapter 5. Germany: Home ownership, a Janus-

faced advantage in time of welfare restructuring.

  • Toussaint J, Elsinga M. Chapter 7. The Netherlands: Positive prospects

and equity galore. Levin L. 1998. Are assets fungible? Testing the behavioral theory of life

  • savings. Journal of economic behavior and organization 36: 59-83