Bike Fitting as a Diagnostic Tool: Lower Extremity Movement - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

bike fitting as a diagnostic tool lower extremity
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Bike Fitting as a Diagnostic Tool: Lower Extremity Movement - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bike Fitting as a Diagnostic Tool: Lower Extremity Movement Impairments and Solutions Andrea Myers, PT, DPT 11/1/2020 Disclosure Class Cycles Independent Contractor (bike fitting) Course Objectives At the end of this workshop, the learner


slide-1
SLIDE 1

11/1/2020 Andrea Myers, PT, DPT

Bike Fitting as a Diagnostic Tool: Lower Extremity Movement Impairments and Solutions

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosure

Class Cycles Independent Contractor (bike fitting)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Course Objectives

At the end of this workshop, the learner will be able to: 1) Describe normal road cycling posture and biomechanics 2) Identify common bike fit related lower extremity movement impairments 3) Explain potential solutions for bike fit related lower extremity movement impairments 4) Describe fit solutions for cyclists with lower extremity hypertonicity

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Bio

  • Doctor of Physical Therapy
  • Board Certified Orthopedic

Specialist

  • BikePT certified bike fitter
  • Former professional road racer
  • Physical Therapist at Carlson

Therapy Network in Bethel, CT

  • Bike fitter at Class Cycles in

Southbury, CT

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Bike Fitting Basics

  • A complete bike fit improves a

rider’s comfort, efficiency, and aerodynamics on the bike

  • When done by a medical

practitioner, bike fitting can be a valuable tool to diagnose and prevent injury

  • Bike fit can be considered a

specialized form of gait and postural analysis

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Cycling and the General Population

  • 2018 People for Bikes survey of 14,467 Americans found that

32% of Americans age 3 and older rode a bicycle in the past year

  • Improvements in cycling technology are making cycling more

accessible to people with medical diagnoses

  • E-bikes
  • Cycling-specific prosthetics
  • The prevalence of non-traumatic bicycle injuries may be as high

as 85%

  • Injured cyclists need medical practitioners with a deep

understanding of cycling medicine

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Know Your Anatomy and Have a Purpose

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Cycling Gait Analysis: Muscle Activity

  • Two phases: propulsion and recovery
  • Propulsion occurs from 12:00-6:00
  • Recovery 6:00-12:00
  • 12:00=Top Dead Center (TDC)
  • 6:00=Bottom Dead Center (BDC)
  • Greatest muscle activity in propulsion phase
  • Gluteus maximus, quads, hamstrings, gastrocnemius
  • Recovery phase involves unweighting the pedal so the
  • pposite leg may perform its propulsion phase
  • Hamstrings, gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, rectus femoris
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Cycling Gait Analysis: Joint Mechanics

  • At TDC, hip and knee are at maximum flexion
  • Exact amount of hip and knee flexion at TDC depends on crank

length, saddle height, and individual rider physiology

  • Ankle moves from DF to PF, achieving peak DF at 50°– 70°

crank angle

  • At BDC, the hip and knee are at minimum flexion and ankle is at

max PF

  • In recovery phase, the hip and knee flex, and the ankle moves

from plantarflexion to dorsiflexion

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Normal Cycling Posture

  • Cervical spine should be in

mid-range extension, thoracic spine in mild flexion, lumbar spine in flexion, and pelvis in anterior rotation

  • Majority of forward bending

should come from the pelvis and L-spine, resulting in a “flat back” appearance

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Normal Road Cycling Posture

  • Shoulders should be at

approximately 90° of flexion and in neutral horizontal abduction/adduction, elbows in mid-range flexion and mild pronation, and wrists in slight flexion

  • In general, joints should not

be at end range to promote dynamic stability

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Planes of Cycling Motion

  • Cycling is primarily a sagittal plane activity
  • Some transverse and frontal plane motion is considered normal
  • Tibial IR and pronation occur in propulsion phase
  • Tibial ER and supination occur in the recovery phase
  • Slight medial knee movement is seen at TDC and peaks at 90°

crank angle

  • Frontal plane trunk movement should be minimal
  • Excessive trunk SF could indicate non-ideal saddle height,

saddle too narrow, or compensation for quad and glute fatigue

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Cycling Cleat Positioning

  • Many types of clipless pedals
  • Most cleats are adjustable in 3 planes
  • Proper cleat positioning is essential to proper LE alignment and

should match the patient’s off-bike alignment and biomechanics

  • Genu varum or valgum
  • Femoral or tibial ER or IR
  • Stance width
  • Forefoot and rearfoot positioning can be modified through
  • rthotics, forefoot canting under the cleat, or heat moldable shoes
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Common Fit-Related Postural Deviations

  • Static postural deviations

common in the upper extremities and spine

  • Excessive cervical extension
  • r thoracic flexion
  • Shoulder flex > or < 90°
  • Shoulder IR or ER
  • Full elbow extension
  • Wrist extension
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Common Fit-Related Gait Deviations

  • Shirley Sahrman, PT, PhD, developed the concept of Movement

System Impairment Syndromes

  • These concepts can be expanded and applied to cycling
  • Faulty movement patterns that may lead to injury
  • Several common faulty LE movement patterns found in cyclists
  • Important to consider the entire kinetic chain (including spine and

UEs) to determine root cause of problem

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Common Fit-Related Gait Deviations

  • Rider with hip abd/ER, genu

varum, and supination

  • Common pain complaints
  • Lumbosacral
  • Anterior or lateral hip
  • Knee
  • Lateral foot
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Common Fit-Related Gait Deviations

  • Common correction needed
  • Increase stance width by

moving cleat medially on shoe

  • May also need pedal with

longer spindle or pedal spindle extenders

  • Consider shorter cranks if hip
  • r knee flex ROM is limited
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Common Fit-Related Gait Deviations

  • Hip add/IR, genu valgum,

pronation

  • Common pain complaints
  • Anterior or lateral hip
  • Knee
  • Medial foot
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Common Fit-Related Gait Deviations

  • Common correction needed
  • Decrease stance width by

moving cleat laterally on shoe

  • Ensure sufficient medial

longitudinal arch support

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Common Fit-Related Gait Deviations

  • Thoracolumbar SF on propulsion

phase side, hip adduction, knee flex angle at DBC too small, and excessive PF at DBC

  • Common pain complaints:
  • lower back pain
  • posterior knee pain
  • neural tissue tension symptoms in

sciatic n. or its branches

  • cramping in hip adductors and/or

plantarflexors

  • perineal pain or saddle sores
  • “hot spots” MTPs (usually medial)
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Common Fit-Related Gait Deviations

  • Common correction needed
  • Lower saddle height
  • Saddle height should be based on

rider flexibility, neural tissue tension, spine and LE joint mechanics

  • Remember – lowering the saddle

also moves it forward (potentially causing patellofemoral pain)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Common Fit-Related Gait Deviations

  • Thoracolumbar SF on

propulsion phase side, excessive hip and knee flex at TDC and excessive knee flex and/or DF at DBC

  • Common pain complaints:
  • Lower back pain
  • Anterior or lateral hip pain
  • Anterior knee pain
  • Foot pain or paresthesia
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Common Fit-Related Gait Deviations

  • Common correction needed:
  • Raise saddle height
  • Consider shorter cranks if hip
  • r knee flex ROM limited
  • Check cleat fore-aft and

handlebar position

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Common Fit-Related Gait Deviations

  • Rider demonstrates excessive trunk, hip, and knee movement

in the frontal and transverse planes that doesn’t fit any of the above patterns

  • Common pain complaints:
  • Lower back pain
  • Knee pain
  • Foot pain and paresthesia
  • Saddle pain and saddle sores
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Common Fit-Related Gait Deviations

  • Common correction needed:
  • Saddle may be too narrow with poor ischial tuberosity support
  • Excessive LE movement due to unstable pelvis
  • Best way to size a saddle is through trial and error. Saddle

widths are measured at the widest (rearward) point of the saddle, which is not where riders actually sit

  • Various measuring devices for ischial tuberosity width, but they

do not account for degree of anterior pelvic tilt when riding (what part of ischial tuberosities will actually contact the saddle and where)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Bike Fitting as a Diagnostic Tool: Assessment and Diagnosis

  • Majority of cycling injuries are

repetitive

  • Pedaling at 90 rpm for 1 hour =

5400 pedal revolutions

  • Use the data gathered in the on

and off the bike assessments to make a diagnosis

  • Abnormal biomechanics
  • bserved on the bike help

support findings from off the bike evaluation

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Bike Fit Considerations for Riders with Hypertonicity

  • Consider principles of tone management for all patients with

hypertonicity

  • Hypertonicity vs. spasticity: spasticity is velocity dependent
  • Lower extremity extensor pattern: hip add/knee ext/PF/inv
  • Cleat positioning and forefoot canting considerations
  • Allow the LE to do what it wants to do – attempting to position the LE
  • utside of the extensor pattern may result in increased tone
  • If postural stability does not allow patient to ride road bike, a

recumbent bike or handcycle may be safer options

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Non-Traumatic Cycling Injuries

  • Lumbar or cervical radiculopathy
  • Discogenic pain
  • Sciatic nerve compression

(piriformis or ischial tuberosity)

  • SIJ pain
  • Iliac artery endofibrosis
  • ITB syndrome
  • Patellofemoral pain
  • Trochanteric bursitis
  • Pes anserinus bursitis
  • Metatarsalgia
  • Morton’s neuroma
  • Achilles tendinopathies
  • Plantar fascitis
  • Saddle sores
  • Ulnar or median nerve

compression at wrist

  • CMC joint pain
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Comprehensive Bike Fits = Happy Cyclists

  • Questions?
  • Thank You
  • BiciVitaLLC@gmail.com
slide-30
SLIDE 30

References

  • 1. Lefever-Button S. Cycling. In: Shamus E and Shamus J, eds. Sports Injury Prevention and
  • Rehabilitation. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001: 459-483.
  • 2. Broker, J. The Biomechanics of Cycling. In: Hughes, C, ed. Orthopedic Management of the Cyclist,

Runner, and Swimmer. Lacrosse, WI: Orthopaedic Section, APTA, Inc.; 2013.

  • 3. Kotler, D; Babu, A; Robidoux, G. Prevention, Evaluation, and Rehabilitation of Cycling-Related Injury,

Current Sports Medicine Reports: 2016; 15(3): 199-206.doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000262

  • 4. Barratt, PR; Martin, JC; Elmer, SJ; Korff, T. Effects of Pedal Speed and Crank Length on Pedaling

Mechanics during Submaximal Cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(4):705‐713. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000817

  • 5. Dettori, NJ; Norvell, DC. Non-Traumatic Bicycle Injuries. Sports Med 36, 7–18 (2006).

doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200636010-00002

  • 6. Martin, J; Spirduso, W. Determinants of maximal cycling power: crank length, pedaling rate and

pedal speed. Eur J Appl Physiol 84, 413–418 (2001). doi:10.1007/s004210100400

  • 7. Sahrmann, S; Azevedo, DC; Dillen, LV. Diagnosis and treatment of movement system impairment
  • syndromes. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017;21(6):391‐399. doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.08.001
  • 8. People for Bikes. (2018). U.S. Bicycle Participation Report. People for Bikes.

https://peopleforbikes.org/resources/u-s-bicycling-participation-report/