Bifurcations and chaos in high-speed milling an 2 and S. John Hogan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

bifurcations and chaos in high speed milling
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Bifurcations and chaos in high-speed milling an 2 and S. John Hogan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bifurcations and chaos in high-speed milling an 2 and S. John Hogan 3 obert Szalai 1 , G R abor St ep 1 szalai@mm.bme.hu, 2 stepan@mm.bme.hu, 3 s.j.hogan@bristol.ac.uk MIT, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, University


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Bifurcations and chaos in high-speed milling

  • bert Szalai1, G´

abor St´ ep´ an2 and S. John Hogan3

1szalai@mm.bme.hu, 2stepan@mm.bme.hu, 3s.j.hogan@bristol.ac.uk

MIT, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, University of Bristol

– p.1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Contents

Introduction Discrete-time model Local bifurcations Chaos Delay-differential equation model

– p.2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

High-speed milling (standard model)

Calculation of the cutting force: F t

c = Ktwh3/4(t)

and F n

c = Knwh3/4(t),

[Tlusty, 2000], [Burns and Davies, 2002].

– p.3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

History

Mostly stability results and simulation. Averaging and harmonic balance techniques [Minis, Y. Altintas] Semi-discretization [T. Insperger and G. Stepan] Time finite element analysis [B. Mann and P . Bayly] Heuristic assumptions for period-doubling boundaries [W. Corpus and W. Endres] Discrete time model [Davies and T. Burns] Analytical stability chart [R. Szalai and G. Stepan]

– p.4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Mechanical model

c k m τ τ1 τ2 x(t − τ) x(t) h(t) x

h h0 Fx ∆x k1∆x

Equation of motion: ¨ x(t) + 2ζωn ˙ x(t) + ω2

nx(t) = g(t) K w m (h0 + x(t − τ) − x(t))3/4,

where g(t) = 0, 1, if kτ ≤ t < kτ + τ1 if kτ + τ1 ≤ t < (k + 1)τ, k ∈ Z.

– p.5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Discrete-time model

c k m ˜ τ ˜ τ2 x(˜ t − ˜ τ) x(˜ t) h(˜ t)

h h0 Fx ∆x k1∆x

m ¨ x(˜ t) + k ˙ x(˜ t) + s x(˜ t) = 0, ˜ t ∈ [˜ t0, ˜ t0 + ˜ τ1] m

  • ˙

x(˜ t) − ˙ x(˜ t − ˜ τ2)

  • = ˜

τ2Fc(h(˜ t)), ˜ t ∈ [˜ t0 + ˜ τ1, ˜ t0 + ˜ τ], where h(˜ t) = h0 + x(˜ t − ˜ τ) − x(˜ t), h0 = v0˜ τ, and Fc(h(t)) = Kw h3/4(t) is the cutting force.

– p.6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Mathematical model

Natural eigenfrequency: ωn =

  • s/m

Relative damping: ζ = k/(2√s m) Dimensionless time: t = ωn ˜ t Dimensionless eigenfrequency: ˆ ωd =

  • 1 − ζ2.

State transition between tj = t0 + jτ and tj+1 is described by   xj+1 vj+1   = A   xj vj   +  

Kwτ2 mω2

n (h0 + (1 − A11)xj − A12vj)3/4

  . where xj = x(tj), vj = ˙ x(tj) and A = exp   0 1 −1 ζ   τ1

– p.7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Stability

The linearized equation around the fixed point  xj+1 vj+1   =   A11 A12 A21 + ˆ w (1 − A11) A22 − ˆ w A12  

  • B

 xj vj   . Stability boundaries: ˆ wf

cr = det A + trA + 1

2A12 = ˆ ωd cos(ˆ ωdτ) + cosh(ζτ) sin(ˆ ωdτ) ˆ wns

cr = det A − 1

A12 = −2ˆ ωd sinh(ζτ) sin(ˆ ωdτ), where ˆ w = 3 4h1/4 Kτ2 mω2

n

w

– p.8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Stability chart

– p.9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Flip Bifurcation

Consider the following perturbation of the linear system around the fixed point in the basis of the eigenvectors

@ξn+1 ηn+1 1 A = @−1 + af ∆ ˆ w λ2 1 A @ξn ηn 1 A + B B @ X

i+j=2,3

cijξi

nηj n

X

i+j=2,3

dijξi

nηj n

1 C C A ,

Using center manifold and normal form reduction we find that there is a period two orbit on the center manifold ξ1,2 =

  • −∆ ˆ

waf δ , where δ = − 5 12h2 cosh(ζτ) + cos(ˆ ωdτ) cosh(ζτ) + 2 sinh(ζτ) + cos(ˆ ωdτ) < 0. Hence, the bifurcation is subcritical!

– p.10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Simulation

– p.11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Neimark-Sacker bifurcation

Similarly, the Taylor expansion of the system in the eigenbasis

  • ξn+1

ηn+1

  • = (1 + |ah|∆ ˆ

w)

  • eiϕ

e−iϕ ξn ηn

  • +

   

  • i+j=2,3

cijξi

nηj n

  • i+j=2,3

dijξi

nηj n

    . The radius of the invariant circle (in the eigenbasis)

R = s − 2|ah| ∆ ˆ w + |ah|2 ∆ ˆ w2 2(1 + |ah| ∆ ˆ w)δ ≈ s − |ah| ∆ ˆ w δ ,

where δ = e−5ζτ1(4e4ζτ1 − 3e2ζτ1 − 1)(cosh(ζτ1) − cos(ωdτ1)) 32h2 , This is subcritical, too!

– p.12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Simulation

– p.13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Period-2 motion with ‘fly-overs’

The motion exists if: ˆ w > 3ˆ

ωd 27/4 cos(ˆ ωdτ)+cosh(ζτ) sin(ˆ ωdτ)

It is stable when ˆ w < 21/4ωd cos(2ωdτ1) + cosh(2ζτ1) sin(2ωdτ1)

  • r

ˆ w < −27/4ωd sinh(2ζτ1) sin(2ωdτ1).

– p.14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Stability chart

– p.15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Bifurcation diagram 1

  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 x fixed point s t a b l e p e r i

  • d
  • 2

p

  • i

n t (a) w

^

– p.16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Bifurcation diagram 2

  • 0.5

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 x fixed point stable period-2 point chaos unstable period-2 point (b) w

^

– p.17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Bifurcation diagram 3

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 x fixed point unstable period-2

  • rbits

chaos (c) w ^

– p.18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Smale horseshoe

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4

x/h h0 h F

c

P

2 P

1

W

s P

1

W

u P

2

W

u P

2

W

s

P

1

switchingline

1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 P

2

W

s P

2

W

u P

1

W

s P

1

W

u

P

1

P

2

switchingline

x/h (a) (b)

A B C D E H1 H0 V

1

V H0 H1 V

1

horseshoe V

v/h0

– p.19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Chaos

The transition matrix of the symbolic dynamics: T =

  • 1

1 1

  • ,

T 2 =

  • 1

1 1 2

  • =

⇒ T irreducible

– p.20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Delay differential equation model

– p.21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Mechanical model

s k m τ τ1 τ2 x(t − τ) x(t) h(t) x

h h0 Fx ∆x k1∆x

– p.22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Mechanical model

s k m τ τ1 τ2 x(t − τ) x(t) h(t) x

h h0 Fx ∆x k1∆x

Equation of motion: ¨ x(t) + 2ζωn ˙ x(t) + ω2

nx(t) = g(t) K w m (h0 + x(t − τ) − x(t))3/4,

where g(t) = 0, 1, if kτ ≤ t < kτ + τ1 if kτ + τ1 ≤ t < (k + 1)τ, k ∈ Z.

– p.22

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Variational system

Linearized equation with dimensionless time (ˆ t = ωnt): ¨ x(ˆ t) + 2ζ ˙ x(ˆ t) + x(ˆ t) = g(ˆ t) ˆ w

  • x(ˆ

t − ˆ τ) − x(ˆ t)

  • ,

where ˆ w = 3Kw/(4h1/4

0 mω2 n) is the dimenzionless chip width.

– p.23

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Variational system

Linearized equation with dimensionless time (ˆ t = ωnt): ¨ x(ˆ t) + 2ζ ˙ x(ˆ t) + x(ˆ t) = g(ˆ t) ˆ w

  • x(ˆ

t − ˆ τ) − x(ˆ t)

  • ,

where ˆ w = 3Kw/(4h1/4

0 mω2 n) is the dimenzionless chip width.

Rewritten into 1st order form (x(ˆ t) = (x(ˆ t), ˙ x(ˆ t))T ): ˙ x(ˆ τ) = A(ˆ t)x(ˆ t) + B(ˆ t)x(ˆ t − ˆ τ), where A(t) =

  • 1

−1 − g(t) ˆ w −2ζ

  • ,

B(t) =

  • g(t) ˆ

w

  • .

– p.23

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Stability analysis

eλˆ

τ characteristic multiplier

  • x(t) = eλtv(t) satisfies the equation such that v(t) = v(t + ˆ

τ)

– p.24

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Stability analysis

eλˆ

τ characteristic multiplier

  • x(t) = eλtv(t) satisfies the equation such that v(t) = v(t + ˆ

τ) The periodic solution is assimptotically stable if for each characteristic multiplier |eλˆ

τ| < 1.

– p.24

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Stability analysis

eλˆ

τ characteristic multiplier

  • x(t) = eλtv(t) satisfies the equation such that v(t) = v(t + ˆ

τ) The periodic solution is assimptotically stable if for each characteristic multiplier |eλˆ

τ| < 1.

Exploiting the first condition we are left with the BVP ˙ v(t) =

  • A(t) + e−λˆ

τB(t) − λI

  • v(t)

v(0) = v(ˆ τ).

– p.24

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Stability analysis

The BVP is solvable iff 0 = f(µ) := det (Φ(ˆ τ) − I) , where Φ(ˆ τ) = µe(A2+µB2)ˆ

τ2e(A1+µB1)ˆ τ1,

µ = e−λˆ

τ,

A1 =

  • 1

−1 −2ζ

  • ,

B1 =

  • ,

A2 =

  • 1

−1 − ˆ w −2ζ

  • ,

B2 =

  • ˆ

w

  • .

– p.25

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Argument principle

Roots for which µ = (eλˆ

τ)−1 f |µ| < 1 cause instability. They can

be easily counted N = 1 2πi

  • γ

f ′(z) f(z) dz = 1 2π

  • γ

d arg f = 1 2π

n

  • j=1

arg f(exp(j 2π

n i))

f(exp((j − 1) 2π

n i)

– p.26

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Stability chart

– p.27

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Machining with ‘fly-over’ effect

¨ x(t) + 2ζ ˙ x(t) + x(t) = g(ϕ) ˆ w (cos ϕ + 0.3 sin ϕ) × × [H ((h0 + x(t − 2τ) − x(t − τ))) Fc ((h0 + x(t − τ) − x(t)) sin ϕ) +H ((h0 + x(t − τ) − x(t − 2τ))) Fc ((2h0 + x(t − 2τ) − x(t)) sin ϕ)]

– p.28

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Numerical method

Orthogonal collocation ˜ ϕ(θ) =

m

  • j=0

ϕ(θi+ j

m )Pi,j(θ)

Pi,j(θ) =

m

  • r=0,r=j

θ − θi+ r

m

θi+ j

m − θi+ r m

The equation is satisfied at ci,j ˙ ˜ ϕ(ci,j) = f(ci,j, ˜ ϕ(ci,j), ˜ ϕ(ci,j − τ mod T)) [Engelborghs and Doedel, 2001]

– p.29

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Continuation

Consider F(X, λ) = 0. The tangent comes from FX(X0, λ0)X′ + Fλ(X0, λ0)λ′ = 0 The Newton iteration

@ FX(X(ν)

1

, λ(ν)

1

) Fλ(X(ν)

1

, λ(ν)

1

) X′∗ λ′ 1 A @ ∆X ∆λ 1 A = @ −F(X, λ) ds − X′∗(X(ν)

1

− X0) − λ′

0(λ(ν) 1

− λ0) 1 A

– p.30

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Continuation

– p.31

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Continuation

– p.32

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Experimental setup

One tooth tool with diameter of 19.05mm (3/4”); Workpiece width: 6.35mm Natural frequency: 146.8Hz; Spindle speed: 3000 - 4000 rpm Feed h0 = 0.1082mm/period ˆ w = 2.9 × 10−4w, where w is the depth of cut (z direction).

– p.33

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Stability chart

– p.34

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Tool trajectories

– p.35

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Tool trajectories

– p.36

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Subcriticality

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 T [s] x

– p.37

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Conclusions

High amplitude periodic, quasi-periodic and chaotic vibrations were found. These unwanted vibrations can occur at linearly stable parameters. This parameter region can be large due to the fold of period-2 orbits Side-product: PDDE-CONT a continuation software for periodic and autonomous DDEs

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 −0.4 −0.2 0.2 0.4 −0.4 −0.3 −0.2 −0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 – p.38

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Questions?

Thank you for your attention!

– p.39