Can informal assessments be used in FASD diagnosis?
Graphomotor examples from the Lililwan Project
Dr Robyn Doney Occupational Therapist
be used in FASD diagnosis? Graphomotor examples from the Lililwan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Can informal assessments be used in FASD diagnosis? Graphomotor examples from the Lililwan Project Dr Robyn Doney Occupational Therapist The Lililwan Project Aims Methods Findings Significance Background The Lililwan Project Stage 2
Graphomotor examples from the Lililwan Project
Dr Robyn Doney Occupational Therapist
Background
Aims Methods Findings Significance
4
Stage 2
assessment ➢ Paediatrician ➢ Speech pathologist ➢ Psychologist ➢ Occupational therapist ➢ Physiotherapist ➢ Audiologist ➢ Opthalmologist
May - October 2011 n = 108
Background
Aims Methods Findings Significance
a) Fine motor skills b) Gross motor skills c) Visual-motor integration d) Visual perception e) Sensory function f) Articulation g) Phonology h) Motor speech
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance
Informal assessments
Formal assessments
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance
Fine Motor Composite Fine Motor Precision Fine Motor Integration Manual Dexterity Upper-Limb Coordination Fine Manual Control Manual Coordination
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance
Bruininks-OseretskyT est of Motor Proficiency: Fine Motor Skills
30 40 50 60
Fine Motor Composite Fine Manual Control Manual Coordination No PAE PAE, no FASD FASD
FASD < No PAE p < .05 Standard score FASD < No PAE p < .05 Robyn Doney
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance
Beery-Buktenica Developmental T est of Visual-Motor Integration
70 75 80 85 90 95 100
Visual-Motor Integration Visual Perception Motor Coordination No PAE PAE, no FASD FASD
FASD < No PAE p < .05
Robyn Doney
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance
Pencil grasp Vision Core strength Tremor Sensory issues Sitting posture Concentration Handedness Following instructions Writing pressure
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance
Evaluation T
(ETCH) Miller Function and Participation Scales (M-Fun)
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
Name: Letter legibility Sentence: Letter legibility Sentence: Word legibility
No PAE PAE, no FASD FASD
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance
4 6 8 10 12 14
Body awareness Motor accuracy Total score
No PAE PAE, no FASD FASD
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance
No prenatal alcohol exposure (No-PAE) Prenatal Alcohol Exposure (PAE)
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance
No PAE PAE
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance
No PAE PAE
No PAE PAE
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance
No PAE PAE
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance
No PAE PAE
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance
No PAE PAE
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance
No PAE PAE
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance
Background Aims Methods Findings Significance