be st ma na g e me nt pra c tic e s fo r sto rmwa te r
play

Be st Ma na g e me nt Pra c tic e s fo r Sto rmwa te r Qua lity T - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Be st Ma na g e me nt Pra c tic e s fo r Sto rmwa te r Qua lity T re a tme nt in Urb a n Se tting s Lower Mississippi River WMO September 2017 Sto rmwa te r 101 Impervious surfaces (pavement, parking lots, etc.): quickly produce large


  1. Be st Ma na g e me nt Pra c tic e s fo r Sto rmwa te r Qua lity T re a tme nt in Urb a n Se tting s Lower Mississippi River WMO – September 2017

  2. Sto rmwa te r 101 – Impervious surfaces (pavement, parking lots, etc.): quickly produce large volumes of runoff, causing erosion and flooding – Runoff carries pollutants (e.g., sediment, phosphorus) to surface waters – “First flush” runoff contains higher concentrations of pollutants

  3. Co mmo n sto rmwa te r runo ff-re la te d wa te r q ua lity impa irme nts • Nutrients (phosphorus, nitrogen) ‒ Can cause excess algae growth • Total suspended solids (particulate material such as sediment) ‒ Impacts water clarity • Chloride (salt) ‒ Can affect aquatic life

  4. Stormwater BMP fa mily tre e BMPs Green Traditional Engineering Infrastructure Not all best Wet Infiltration Tree management Rain Gardens Ponds Basins Trenches practices (BMPs) Stormwater Bioinfiltration Permeable Swales work for every Basins Pavement Wetland site; not all BMPs Stormwater Green Roofs Planters created equal Structural Good BMPs Housekeeping Filtration/ Underground Infiltration Sedimentation In-Catch-Basin Vaults Media Beds Devices Iron-Enhanced Chambers Sedimentation Sand Perforated Spent Lime Filtration Pipes Systems

  5. Go o d ho use ke e ping (po llutio n pre ve ntio n) • Non-structural programs/action • Street sweeping • Salt/chemical storage practices • Training and education • Maintenance/operation procedures

  6. T ra ditio na l e ng ine e ring • Proven design techniques that Traditional provide effective water quality Engineering treatment • Often requires significant footprint Wet Ponds Infiltration Basins • Easy to implement at time of Stormwater Swales development Wetlands • Difficult to retrofit

  7. T ra ditio na l e ng ine e ring : we t po nds • Popular in early 1990s • Proven design techniques (NURP) • ~50% total phosphorus reduction • ~85% total suspended solids reduction • Easy to implement at time of construction • Provide water quantity benefits Image: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • Large footprint

  8. T ra ditio na l e ng ine e ring : sto rmwa te r we tla nds • Constructed BMP (not discharge to existing wetland) • Treatment concept/performance similar to wet ponds • Education and habitat value • Pretreatment is recommended • Water quantity benefits Image: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • Large footprint

  9. Sto rmwa te r pre -tre a tme nt • Reduce maintenance and preserve long-term functionality • Remove trash, debris, and coarse sediments, organic materials • Various pretreatment types: Sediment Sump Vegetated Screens Forebays Manholes Filter Strips Images: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

  10. T ra ditio na l e ng ine e ring : infiltra tio n b a sin a nd swa le s • Various types • Dry pond • Trench • Swale • Pretreatment is recommended • Requires permeable soils • Limited water quantity benefits Image: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

  11. Gre e n infra struc ture Green Infrastructure • Mimics natural hydrology Rain Gardens Tree Trenches • Science is still developing Bioinfiltration Permeable • Retrofit opportunities Basins Pavement • Lower impact/more sustainable Stormwater Green Roofs Planters

  12. Gre e n infra struc ture : ra ing a rde ns a nd b io infiltra tio n • Variety of applications ‒ Small scale ‒ Retrofit potential • Visually appealing • Treat small volumes • Requires permeable soils Image: Living Streets project, Maplewood • Maintenance often delegated

  13. Gre e n infra struc ture : ra ing a rde ns a nd b io infiltra tio n Images: Burnsville and Minneapolis

  14. Gre e n infra struc ture : g re e n ro o fs • Layered substrate supporting plant growth • Volume reduction through evapotranspiration • Filtration through substrate • Retrofit opportunities • Maintains usable space Image: Minneapolis College of Art and Design

  15. Gre e n infra struc ture : tre e tre nc he s a nd tre e b o xe s • Often use engineered substrate or structural cells • Filtration through substrate with underdrain • Pretreatment recommended • Maintains usable space • Aesthetically pleasing Image: Green Line tree trenches, St. Paul

  16. Gre e n infra struc ture : pe rme a b le pa ve me nt • Many types • Pervious concrete • Porous asphalt • Permeable pavers • Reduces runoff by replacing impervious surface • Maintains usable space Image: Minnetonka Civic Center • Requires frequent maintenance

  17. Struc tura l BMPs: unde rg ro und infiltra tio n Structural BMPs Underground Infiltration Vaults Chambers Image: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Perforated Pipes

  18. Unde rg ro und infiltra tio n syste ms • Variety of shapes and sizes ‒ Vaults ‒ Chambers ‒ Perforated pipe networks • Can store/infiltrate large volumes • Requires permeable soils Image: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • Relatively expensive • Allows for land use above

  19. Unde rg ro und infiltra tio n: va ults • Large pre-cast concrete vaults • Customizable sizes, modular design • Used for infiltration, storage, reuse • Requires pretreatment chambers Images: StormTrap Stormwater Management; 37 th Avenue, Minneapolis

  20. Unde rg ro und infiltra tio n: c ha mb e rs Triton Stormwater Chamber • Plastic dome chambers of various sizes –Grid pattern with multiple layers possible to accommodate large storms –Requires “header row” for sedimentation and clean-out Images: Triton Stormwater Solutions

  21. Struc tura l BMPs: filtra tio n/ se dime nta tio n In-catch-basin device Structural BMPs • Inserted into or replaces stormwater catch basin Filtration/ • Uses a variety of treatment mechanisms Sedimentation ‒ Filtration (screens/cartridges filter suspended pollutants) In-Catch-Basin ‒ Settling (water movement/detention used to Devices settle/capture pollutants) Sedimentation • Best used for retrofit/where space is limited Requires regular inspection and maintenance to remain effective! Filtration

  22. Se dime nta tio n: Hydro dyna mic se pa ra to rs • Several proprietary technologies • Stormceptor • Downstream Defender • Used as pretreatment for downstream infiltration BMPs • Alternative to sump catch basins Image: Hydro International

  23. Se dime nta tio n: Hydro dyna mic se pa ra to rs • Effective at removing large particles • Ineffective at removing dissolved nutrients/very fine particulates • Requires yearly inspection and regular maintenance • Relatively expensive Images: Hydro International

  24. Se dime nta tio n: Hydro dyna mic se pa ra to rs • Several proprietary technologies • Stormceptor • Downstream Defender • Effective at removing large particles • Ineffective at removing dissolved nutrients/very fine particulates Images: Hydro International • Requires yearly inspection

  25. F iltra tio n: E c o Sto rm Plus b y Wa te rte c to nic s • Large pre-cast concrete chamber with multiple removal mechanisms • Uses gravity, hydrodynamic separation, adsorptive filtration • Filtration accomplished via porous concrete elements that last approximately 5 years • Proven effective for TSS, heavy metals, and dissolved nutrients Image Credit: Watertectonics

  26. F iltra tio n: E c o Sto rm Plus b y Wa te rte c to nic s • Effective, but relatively expensive • Requires a small footprint, but can be scaled to treat a larger watershed Removal Efficiency Total suspended solids (TSS) >80% Zinc (Zn) >90% Lead (Pb) >95% Copper (Cu) >80% Phosphorus >60% Image: Watertectonics

  27. F iltra tio n: SAF L Ba ffle b y Upstre a m T e c hno lo g ie s • Perforated screen inserted in to catch basin • Prevents resuspension and wash out of sediments previously captured by sump catch basin • Allows for the retrofitting of most existing sump catch basins • Designed to be maintained twice per year Image: Upstream Technologies

  28. F iltra tio n: Me dia b e ds Iron-Enhanced Sand Filter Structural BMPs Filtration/ Sedimentation Image: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Media Beds Spent-Lime Filter Iron-Enhanced Sand Filter Spent-Lime Filter Image: Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District

  29. F iltra tio n: I ro n-e nha nc e d sa nd • Filtration basin similar to rain garden or modified wet pond • Employs underdrains embedded in sand mixed with iron (filings or granular) Overflow outlet structure to storm sewer Perimeter underdrain to outlet structure Iron-enhanced (to prevent ground Filter media drain tile sand filter media water intrusion) to outlet structure Image: MPCA

  30. F iltra tio n: I ro n-e nha nc e d sa nd • Numerous local examples in several configurations • Dissolved phosphorus bonds to iron as it passes through the filter • Research shows up to 90% removal of dissolved phosphorus • Critical that water level draws down within 48 hours to prevent conditions that can release bound phosphorus (filter needs to dry out) Iron enhanced sand filter, Maplewood Image: Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District

  31. F iltra tio n: Spe nt-lime • New technology using available waste material—granular lime previously used to treat drinking water • Highly effective at removing dissolved phosphorus – up to 95% • Effective lifespan being researched Wakefield Lake Spent Lime Filter, Maplewood Image: Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend