Quality Improvement Basics
Michelle S. Gabriel, RN, MS, ACHPN Palliative Care Clinical Nurse Specialist VA Palo Alto Health Care System July 16, 2015
Basics Michelle S. Gabriel, RN, MS, ACHPN Palliative Care Clinical - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Quality Improvement Basics Michelle S. Gabriel, RN, MS, ACHPN Palliative Care Clinical Nurse Specialist VA Palo Alto Health Care System July 16, 2015 Integrating Palliative Care and Intensive Care IPAL-ICU: 2 IPAL-ICU is designed to provide
Michelle S. Gabriel, RN, MS, ACHPN Palliative Care Clinical Nurse Specialist VA Palo Alto Health Care System July 16, 2015
Integrating Palliative Care and Intensive Care
2
➔Expertise ➔Evidence ➔Tools
3
➔ IPAL-ICU Portfolio ➔ Improvement Tools (ICU) ➔ Patient & Family Resources (ICU) ➔ Reference Library (IPAL-ICU) ➔ Professional Education (IPAL-ICU) ➔ Premier Programs ➔ Research Resources (ICU) ➔ Professional Organizations & Awards ➔ Journals (ICU) ➔ Leadership & Advisory Board (IPAL-ICU)
4
5
➔What is your discipline?
6
➔What is your area of specialty?
7
➔How much experience have you had with
– Novice – Have participated as a team member – Have led a team – Have coached other teams
8
➔By the end of this webinar, participants will
9
➔One of the sites where med errors are most
➔ICU patients vulnerable to experiencing
➔Known risk for burnout among ICU providers
(http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Burnout+in+critical+care+nurses%3a+a+literature+review.- a0312827884)
10
11
➔ A 55 yo man with a history of polycythemia vera was admitted
to the ICU for recovery post splenectomy for an enlarged
ICU medical team confirmed with the family that the patient was a DNR/DNI even in the context of the surgery. The nurse, not having been part of the conversation, questioned the family as to the accuracy of the DNR/DNI order. The family expressed frustration at feeling like they had to justify their wishes.
12
➔ Purpose:
– Understand the current process – Understand the current problem (fact-based)
➔ Things to Consider:
– Quantify the current situation – Focus on a problem that you can impact – Validate with data
13
➔What is the process? ➔What problems specifically are occurring?
➔Who is involved? ➔Who is affected? ➔Where is it happening? ➔When is it happening?
14
Desired Performance Current Performance
1.
Standard (desired) level of performance
2.
Current level of performance
3.
Performance gap
4.
The extent of the impact (pain) resulting from the perceived problem
15
➔ Problem:
– Family meetings that occur without the bedside nurse cause inconsistent messages to the patient and family resulting in frustration for families and nurses and other clinicians.
➔ How do you know?
– 50% of families queried over the last month reported a lack
were on the same page one day following a family meeting.
16
➔Developing a SMART aim ➔Identify root causes ➔Propose interventions that will address
17
➔ Measurable ➔ Achievable ➔ Relevant ➔ Time-bound
Example: Decrease by 25% the proportion of families reporting a lack of confidence that the bedside nurse and medical team are on the same page one day post a family meeting by Dec 1.
18
➔Purpose:
➔Things to consider:
19
➔ Purpose:
– Help identify the root cause of a problem
➔ How to:
1. Write down the specific problem. 2. Ask “Why the problem happens” and write the answer down below the problem. 3. Validate the response. 4. Continue asking “why” and validating until you have identified the root cause of the problem identified in Step
20
➔ Aim: Reduce family’s perception of a disconnect
between bedside nurse and medical team.
➔ Why is there a disconnect?
– Because the nurse is not consistently at the family meeting
➔ Why is the nurse not consistently at the family
meeting?
– Because nurses are unable to find coverage during the meeting
➔ Proposed Countermeasure: Establish a mechanism
to provide coverage
21
➔ Why are nurses unable to find coverage?
– Because meetings are happening at change of shift.
➔ Why are meetings happening at change of shift?
– Because that is when the team has completed their patient rounds and education.
➔ Proposed Countermeasure: Suggest that a
different time be set aside for family meetings –
22
➔ Run experiments - test your ideas ➔ Start small
– Test change on one unit, with one provider, with one patient – Test over a short time period – Test change with a few volunteers
➔ Collect data during the test
– Allows prediction of how much improvement will result from change – Qualitative data can be informative
23
➔What happened? ➔Was it expected? ➔What would you do differently?
24
➔Adopt the changes
– What needs to be done to hardwire the improvement
➔Adapt the changes
– What should be done differently? – Run another test of change
➔Abandon the changes
25
➔ A 55 yo man with a history of polycythemia vera was admitted
to the ICU for recovery post splenectomy for an enlarged
ICU medical team, including the nurse, confirmed with the family that the patient was a DNR/DNI even in the context of the surgery. Ahead of the family meeting, the team reviewed the patient’s previously expressed wishes with the surgeon so that they understood the rationale. The family expressed feeling supported during this uncertain time, and confidence in the team’s ability to support their loved one’s wishes.
26
➔ How well did this webinar achieve the stated
– By the end of this webinar, participants will be able to:
– Not at all – Minimally – Moderately – Completely
27
➔How likely are you to apply some of the
28
➔Do you have questions for the presenter? ➔Click the hand-raise icon on your control
29
➔ For a calendar of CAPC events, including upcoming
webinars and office hours, visit
– https://www.capc.org/providers/webinars-and-virtual-office- hours/
➔ Today’s webinar recording can be found in CAPC
Central under ‘Webinars: 2015 Community-Based Palliative Care’ – https://central.capc.org/eco_player.php?id=290
30