backward stochastic partial differential equations driven
play

Backward stochastic partial differential equations driven by - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aims Notations Spaces of solutions Definitions Assumptions Existence & Uniqueness Theorem Proof Some advantages An application Backward stochastic partial differential equations driven by infinite dimensional martingales and


  1. Aims Notations Spaces of solutions Definitions Assumptions Existence & Uniqueness Theorem Proof Some advantages An application Backward stochastic partial differential equations driven by infinite dimensional martingales and applications AbdulRahman Al-Hussein Department of Mathematics, College of Science, Qassim University, P . O. Box 6644, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia E-mail: alhusseinqu@hotmail.com Workshop on Stochastic Control and Finance Roscoff, France March 18-23, 2010

  2. Aims Notations Spaces of solutions Definitions Assumptions Existence & Uniqueness Theorem Proof Some advantages An application Outline Aims 1 Notations 2 Example 1 Spaces of solutions 3 Definitions 4 Assumptions 5 Existence & Uniqueness Theorem 6 7 Proof Some advantages 8 An application 9 Maximum principle for controlled stochastic evolution equations An example

  3. Aims Notations Spaces of solutions Definitions Assumptions Existence & Uniqueness Theorem Proof Some advantages An application Aims To derive the existence and uniqueness of the solutions to:  − dY ( t ) = ( A ( t ) Y ( t ) + F ( t , Y ( t ) , Z ( t ) Q 1 / 2 ( t )) ) dt  ( BSPDE ) − Z ( t ) dM ( t ) − dN ( t ) , Y ( T ) = ξ.  to provide some applications to the maximum principle for a controlled stochastic evolution system.

  4. Aims Notations Spaces of solutions Definitions Assumptions Existence & Uniqueness Theorem Proof Some advantages An application Outline Aims 1 Notations 2 Example 1 Spaces of solutions 3 Definitions 4 Assumptions 5 Existence & Uniqueness Theorem 6 7 Proof Some advantages 8 An application 9 Maximum principle for controlled stochastic evolution equations An example

  5. Aims Notations Spaces of solutions Definitions Assumptions Existence & Uniqueness Theorem Proof Some advantages An application H is a separable Hilbert space. (Ω , F , P ) is a complete probability space equipped with a right continuous filtration {F t } t ≥ 0 . M ∈ M 2 , c [ 0 , T ] ( H ) , i.e M is a continuous square integrable martingale in H . < M > is the predictable quadratic variation of M . ˜ Q M is the predictable process taking values in the space L 1 ( H ) , which is associated with the Dol´ eans measure of M ⊗ M . � t 0 ˜ << M >> t = Q M ( s ) d < M > s . Assume: ∃ a predictable process Q satisfying Q ( t , ω ) is symmetric, positive definite nuclear operator on H and � t << M >> t = Q ( s ) ds . 0 ξ ( ξ ( ω ) ∈ H ) is the terminal value.

  6. Aims Notations Spaces of solutions Definitions Assumptions Existence & Uniqueness Theorem Proof Some advantages An application F : [ 0 , T ] × Ω × H × L 2 ( H ) → H is P ⊗ B ( H ) ⊗ B ( L 2 ( H )) / B ( H ) - measurable. L 2 ( H ) is the space of Hilbert-Schmidt operators on H , inner � � product · , · 2 , norm || · || 2 . A ( t , ω ) is a predictable unbounded linear operator on H . � · The stochastic integral 0 Φ( s ) dM ( s ) is defined for Φ s.t. for Q 1 / 2 Q 1 / 2 (Φ ◦ ˜ M )( t , ω )( H ) ∈ L 2 ( H ) , for every h ∈ H : Φ ◦ ˜ M ( h ) is predictable and � T Q 1 / 2 || Φ ◦ ˜ E [ M || 2 2 d < M > t ] < ∞ . 0 The space of integrands ��� Λ 2 ( H ; P , M ) .

  7. Aims Notations Spaces of solutions Definitions Assumptions Existence & Uniqueness Theorem Proof Some advantages An application Example 1 Let m be a 1-dimensional, continuous, square integrable martingale � t with respect to {F t } t s.t. < m > t = 0 h ( s ) ds ∀ 0 ≤ t ≤ T , some cts h : [ 0 , T ] → ( 0 , ∞ ) . � t M ( t ) = β m ( t )(= 0 β dm ( s )) , a fixed element β � = 0 of H . ⇓ ◦ M ∈ M 2 , c ( H ) � t ◦ << M >> t = � 0 h ( s ) ds , where � β ⊗ β β ⊗ β is the identification of β ⊗ β in L 1 ( H ) : ( � � � β ⊗ β )( k ) = β, k β, k ∈ H . ◦ < M > t = | β | 2 � t 0 h ( s ) ds . � ◦ ˜ β ⊗ β Q M = | β | 2 . � t ◦ Let Q ( t ) = � β ⊗ β h ( t ) ⇒ << M >> t = 0 Q ( s ) ds . ◦ Q ( · ) is bounded since Q ( t ) ≤ Q := � β ⊗ β max 0 ≤ t ≤ T h ( t ) . � � β, k β ◦ Q 1 / 2 ( t )( k ) = h 1 / 2 ( t ) . In particular β ∈ Q 1 / 2 ( t )( H ) . | β |

  8. Aims Notations Spaces of solutions Definitions Assumptions Existence & Uniqueness Theorem Proof Some advantages An application Outline Aims 1 Notations 2 Example 1 Spaces of solutions 3 Definitions 4 Assumptions 5 Existence & Uniqueness Theorem 6 7 Proof Some advantages 8 An application 9 Maximum principle for controlled stochastic evolution equations An example

  9. Aims Notations Spaces of solutions Definitions Assumptions Existence & Uniqueness Theorem Proof Some advantages An application L 2 F ( 0 , T ; H ) := { φ : [ 0 , T ] × Ω → H , predictable, � T E [ 0 | φ ( t ) | 2 H dt ] < ∞ } . B 2 ( H ) := L 2 F ( 0 , T ; H ) × Λ 2 ( H ; P , M ) . This is a separable Hilbert space, the norm: � � T � � E | φ 1 ( t ) | 2 || ( φ 1 , φ 2 ) || B 2 ( H ) = H dt 0 � � T �� 1 / 2 || φ 2 ( t ) ˜ Q 1 / 2 + E M ( t ) || 2 2 d < M > t . 0 ( V , H , V ′ ) is a rigged Hilbert space: ⊲ V is a separable Hilbert space embedded continuously and densely in H . ⊲ By identifying H with its dual ⇒ get continuous and dense two inclusions: V ⊆ H ⊆ V ′ , V ′ is the dual space of V .

  10. Aims Notations Spaces of solutions Definitions Assumptions Existence & Uniqueness Theorem Proof Some advantages An application Outline Aims 1 Notations 2 Example 1 Spaces of solutions 3 Definitions 4 Assumptions 5 Existence & Uniqueness Theorem 6 7 Proof Some advantages 8 An application 9 Maximum principle for controlled stochastic evolution equations An example

  11. Aims Notations Spaces of solutions Definitions Assumptions Existence & Uniqueness Theorem Proof Some advantages An application Definition 1 Two elements M and N of M 2 , c [ 0 , T ] ( H ) are very strongly orthogonal (VSO) if E [ M ( u ) ⊗ N ( u )] = E [ M ( 0 ) ⊗ N ( 0 )] , for all [ 0 , T ] - valued stopping times u . In fact: M and N are VSO ⇔ << M , N >> = 0 .

  12. Aims Notations Spaces of solutions Definitions Assumptions Existence & Uniqueness Theorem Proof Some advantages An application Definition 2 A solution of the:  − dY ( t ) = ( A ( t ) Y ( t ) + F ( t , Y ( t ) , Z ( t ) Q 1 / 2 ( t )) ) dt  ( BSPDE ) − Z ( t ) dM ( t ) − dN ( t ) , 0 ≤ t ≤ T , Y ( T ) = ξ,  F ( 0 , T ; V ) × Λ 2 ( H ; P , M ) × M 2 , c is a triple ( Y , Z , N ) ∈ L 2 [ 0 , T ] ( H ) s.t. ∀ t ∈ [ 0 , T ] : � T ( A ( s ) Y ( s ) + F ( s , Y ( s ) , Z ( s ) Q 1 / 2 ( s )) ) ds Y ( t ) = ξ + t � T � T − Z ( s ) dM ( s ) − dN ( s ) , t t N ( 0 ) = 0 and N is VSO to M .

  13. Aims Notations Spaces of solutions Definitions Assumptions Existence & Uniqueness Theorem Proof Some advantages An application Outline Aims 1 Notations 2 Example 1 Spaces of solutions 3 Definitions 4 Assumptions 5 Existence & Uniqueness Theorem 6 7 Proof Some advantages 8 An application 9 Maximum principle for controlled stochastic evolution equations An example

  14. Aims Notations Spaces of solutions Definitions Assumptions Existence & Uniqueness Theorem Proof Some advantages An application (A1) F : [ 0 , T ] × Ω × H × L 2 ( H ) → H is a mapping such that the following properties are verified. (i) F is P ⊗ B ( H ) ⊗ B ( L 2 ( H )) / B ( H ) - measurable. � T 0 | F ( t , 0 , 0 ) | 2 dt ] < ∞ , where F ( t , 0 , 0 ) = F ( t , ω, 0 , 0 ) . (ii) E [ (iii) ∃ k 1 > 0 such that ∀ y , y ′ ∈ H , ∀ z , z ′ ∈ L 2 ( H ) | F ( t , ω, y , z ) − F ( t , ω, y ′ , z ′ ) | 2 ≤ k 1 ( | y − y ′ | 2 + || z − z ′ || 2 2 ) , uniformly in ( t , ω ) . (A2) ξ ∈ L 2 (Ω , F T , P ; H ) . (A3) There exists a predictable process Q satisfying Q ( t , ω ) is symmetric, positive definite nuclear operator on H and � t << M >> t = Q ( s ) ds . 0

  15. Aims Notations Spaces of solutions Definitions Assumptions Existence & Uniqueness Theorem Proof Some advantages An application (A4) Every square integrable H -valued martingale with respect {F t , 0 ≤ t ≤ T } has a continuous version. (A5) A ( t , ω ) is a linear operator on H , P - measurable, belongs to L ( V ; V ′ ) uniformly in ( t , ω ) and satisfies the following conditions: (i) A ( t , ω ) satisfies the coercivity condition in the sense that 2 [ A ( t , ω ) y , y ] + α | y | 2 V ≤ λ | y | 2 a . e . t ∈ [ 0 , T ] , a . s . ∀ y ∈ V , H for some α, λ > 0 . (ii) A ( t , ω ) is uniformly continuous, i.e. ∃ k 3 ≥ 0 such that for all ( t , ω ) | A ( t , ω ) y | V ′ ≤ k 3 | y | V , for every y ∈ V .

  16. Aims Notations Spaces of solutions Definitions Assumptions Existence & Uniqueness Theorem Proof Some advantages An application Outline Aims 1 Notations 2 Example 1 Spaces of solutions 3 Definitions 4 Assumptions 5 Existence & Uniqueness Theorem 6 7 Proof Some advantages 8 An application 9 Maximum principle for controlled stochastic evolution equations An example

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend