BACKGROUND JULY 23 rd WORK SESSION GMP BIDS AT $25,000,000 OVER - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

background
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

BACKGROUND JULY 23 rd WORK SESSION GMP BIDS AT $25,000,000 OVER - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BACKGROUND JULY 23 rd WORK SESSION GMP BIDS AT $25,000,000 OVER TOTAL PROJECT COST. REDESIGN AND VE TO $15,000,000 OVER TPC. ON BUDGET BY SHELLING 100% OF LABS AND OFFICES. JULY 30 th EXECUTIVE MEETING PROJECT BUDGET


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

BACKGROUND

JULY 23rd WORK SESSION

  • GMP BIDS AT $25,000,000 OVER TOTAL PROJECT COST.
  • REDESIGN AND VE TO $15,000,000 OVER TPC.
  • ON BUDGET BY SHELLING 100% OF LABS AND OFFICES.

JULY 30th EXECUTIVE MEETING

  • PROJECT BUDGET INCREASED TO $110,000,000.
  • RETAIN FULL PROGRAM (AT 50% LAB SHELL).
  • MAINTAIN CHARACTER OF BOARD APPROVED DESIGN.

AUGUST 7th WORK SESSION

  • LOWERED BUILDING “TO GRADE”.
  • IDENTIFIED REDUCTIONS ACROSS THE BOARD.
  • “AT GRADE” DESIGN ON BUDGET.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

OBJECTIVES

DESIGN TO ACHIEVE BUDGET

  • ESTABLISH $/SF TARGET FOR REDESIGN.
  • IDENTIFY EFFICIENCIES FOR EACH PROJECT COMPONENT.
  • SIMPLIFY SYSTEMS (STRUCTURE, MEP, LAB SUPPORT)

RETAIN BOARD APPROVED DESIGN

  • MAINTAIN CURRENT LAB PROGRAM AND LAYOUT.
  • CURVED GEOMETRY DERIVED FROM FLOYD CURL DRIVE.
  • “GATEWAY” STATEMENT AT CAMPUS DRIVE ENTRY.

MINIMIZE SCHEDULE IMPACT

  • SIMPLIFY BUILDING TO REDUCE RE-DESIGN TIME.
  • FACILITATE CONSTRUCTABILITY.
  • DOCUMENT DELIVERY TAILORED TO CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

“AT GRADE” DESIGN

  • MORE EFFICIENT LAB LAYOUTS--REDUCE MODULE BY 6”.
  • NUMBER OF P.I.’S REMAINS THE SAME (42).
  • “GENERIC” APPROACH TO LABS--MAXIMUM FLEXIBILITY.
  • DEVELOP FIT-OUT OF LAB SPACES FROM WEST END.
  • SIMPLIFIED STRUCTURE--NO CANTILEVERS.
  • REDUCE VIBRATION CRITERIA FROM 4,000 MIPS AT MODERATE

DOWN TO SLOW PACE (TYPICAL FOR LAB SPACES).

  • MINIMIZE COST OF EXTERIOR ENVELOPE.
  • LESS GLASS AREA, DECREASES ENERGY LOAD.
  • REDUCTION IN MECHANICAL SYSTEMS.
  • FEWER ELEVATOR/STAIR CORES (LOWER BUILDING).
slide-5
SLIDE 5

ADDITIONAL SAVINGS

  • REDUCE CENTRAL PLANT SIZE BY 10-15%.
  • REDUCE CHILLER SIZES.
  • DOWNSIZE CHILLED WATER LINES.
  • ALTERNATE PRICING FOR COOLING TOWER, PUMP & CHILLER.
  • REVIEW BACK FEED OF ELECTRICAL SERVICE.
  • RELOCATE VIVARIUM MECHANICAL UNITS TO MAIN BUILDING.
slide-6
SLIDE 6

“AT GRADE” DESIGN IMAGES

slide-7
SLIDE 7

“AT GRADE” DESIGN--AERIAL VIEW

slide-8
SLIDE 8

VIEW TOWARDS CAMPUS DRIVE

slide-9
SLIDE 9

VIEW TOWARDS ENTRY

slide-10
SLIDE 10

VIEW FROM FLOYD CURL DRIVE

slide-11
SLIDE 11

GROUND FLOOR SECOND FLOOR THIRD FLOOR

MECHANICAL LOBBY LOADING MECHANICAL OFFICES LABORATORIES

slide-12
SLIDE 12

TYPICAL LAB BAY

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CROSS SECTION

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

RECENT LABORATORY EXPERIENCE

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Van Andel Institute Princeton University, Carl Icahn Lab UCLA California NanoSystems Institute UCSF Helen Diller Family Cancer Research Building Bard College, Center for Science & Computation Howard Hughes Medical Institute

slide-17
SLIDE 17

BARD COLLEGE

slide-18
SLIDE 18

BARD COLLEGE

slide-19
SLIDE 19

PENN STATE

slide-20
SLIDE 20

UCLA NANOSYSTEMS

slide-21
SLIDE 21

UCLA NANOSYSTEMS

slide-22
SLIDE 22

UCSF DILLER CANCER CENTER

slide-23
SLIDE 23

HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE JANELIA FARMS

slide-24
SLIDE 24

HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE JANELIA FARMS

slide-25
SLIDE 25

RAFAEL VIÑOLY ARCHITECTS / KIRKSEY