asymptotics of ehrhart series of lattice polytopes
play

Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck (SF State) math.sfsu.edu/beck Joint with Alan Stapledon (MSRI & UBC) arXiv:0804.3639 to appear in Math. Zeitschrift Warm-Up Trivia Lets say we add two random 100-digit


  1. Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck (SF State) math.sfsu.edu/beck Joint with Alan Stapledon (MSRI & UBC) arXiv:0804.3639 to appear in Math. Zeitschrift

  2. Warm-Up Trivia Let’s say we add two random 100-digit integers. How often should we ◮ expect to carry a digit? Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 2

  3. Warm-Up Trivia Let’s say we add two random 100-digit integers. How often should we ◮ expect to carry a digit? How about if we add three random 100-digit integers? ◮ Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 2

  4. Warm-Up Trivia Let’s say we add two random 100-digit integers. How often should we ◮ expect to carry a digit? How about if we add three random 100-digit integers? ◮ How about if we add four random 100-digit integers? ◮ Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 2

  5. Warm-Up Trivia Let’s say we add two random 100-digit integers. How often should we ◮ expect to carry a digit? How about if we add three random 100-digit integers? ◮ How about if we add four random 100-digit integers? ◮ A d ( t ) m d t m = � The Eulerian polynomial A d ( t ) is defined through (1 − t ) d +1 m ≥ 0 Persi Diaconis will tell you that the coefficients of A d ( t ) (the Eulerian numbers) play a role here. . . Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 2

  6. Ehrhart Polynomials P ⊂ R d – lattice polytope of dimension d (vertices in Z d ) Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 3

  7. Ehrhart Polynomials P ⊂ R d – lattice polytope of dimension d (vertices in Z d ) � m P ∩ Z d � L P ( m ) := # (discrete volume of P ) Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 3

  8. Ehrhart Polynomials P ⊂ R d – lattice polytope of dimension d (vertices in Z d ) � m P ∩ Z d � L P ( m ) := # (discrete volume of P ) � L P ( m ) t m Ehr P ( t ) := 1 + m ≥ 1 Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 3

  9. Ehrhart Polynomials P ⊂ R d – lattice polytope of dimension d (vertices in Z d ) � m P ∩ Z d � L P ( m ) := # (discrete volume of P ) � L P ( m ) t m Ehr P ( t ) := 1 + m ≥ 1 Theorem (Ehrhart 1962) L P ( m ) is a polynomial in m of degree d . Equivalently, h ( t ) Ehr P ( t ) = (1 − t ) d +1 where h ( t ) is a polynomial of degree at most d . Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 3

  10. Ehrhart Polynomials P ⊂ R d – lattice polytope of dimension d (vertices in Z d ) � m P ∩ Z d � L P ( m ) := # (discrete volume of P ) � L P ( m ) t m Ehr P ( t ) := 1 + m ≥ 1 Theorem (Ehrhart 1962) L P ( m ) is a polynomial in m of degree d . Equivalently, h ( t ) Ehr P ( t ) = (1 − t ) d +1 where h ( t ) is a polynomial of degree at most d . Write the Ehrhart h-vector of P as h ( t ) = h d t d + h d − 1 t d − 1 + · · · + h 0 , then d � m + d − j � � L P ( m ) = h j . d j =0 Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 3

  11. Ehrhart Polynomials P ⊂ R d – lattice polytope of dimension d (vertices in Z d ) � m P ∩ Z d � L P ( m ) := # (discrete volume of P ) h ( t ) L P ( m ) t m = � Ehr P ( t ) := 1 + (1 − t ) d +1 m ≥ 1 (Serious) Open Problem Classify Ehrhart h-vectors. Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 4

  12. Ehrhart Polynomials P ⊂ R d – lattice polytope of dimension d (vertices in Z d ) � m P ∩ Z d � L P ( m ) := # (discrete volume of P ) h ( t ) L P ( m ) t m = � Ehr P ( t ) := 1 + (1 − t ) d +1 m ≥ 1 (Serious) Open Problem Classify Ehrhart h-vectors. L P ( nm ) t m as n increases. � Easier Problem Study Ehr n P ( t ) = 1 + m ≥ 1 Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 4

  13. Why Should We Care? Linear systems are everywhere, and so polytopes are everywhere. ◮ Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 5

  14. Why Should We Care? Linear systems are everywhere, and so polytopes are everywhere. ◮ In applications, the volume of the polytope represented by a linear ◮ system measures some fundamental data of this system (“average”). Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 5

  15. Why Should We Care? Linear systems are everywhere, and so polytopes are everywhere. ◮ In applications, the volume of the polytope represented by a linear ◮ system measures some fundamental data of this system (“average”). Polytopes are basic geometric objects, yet even for these basic objects ◮ volume computation is hard and there remain many open problems. Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 5

  16. Why Should We Care? Linear systems are everywhere, and so polytopes are everywhere. ◮ In applications, the volume of the polytope represented by a linear ◮ system measures some fundamental data of this system (“average”). Polytopes are basic geometric objects, yet even for these basic objects ◮ volume computation is hard and there remain many open problems. Many discrete problems in various mathematical areas are linear ◮ problems, thus they ask for the discrete volume of a polytope in disguise. Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 5

  17. Why Should We Care? Linear systems are everywhere, and so polytopes are everywhere. ◮ In applications, the volume of the polytope represented by a linear ◮ system measures some fundamental data of this system (“average”). Polytopes are basic geometric objects, yet even for these basic objects ◮ volume computation is hard and there remain many open problems. Many discrete problems in various mathematical areas are linear ◮ problems, thus they ask for the discrete volume of a polytope in disguise. Polytopes are cool. ◮ Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 5

  18. General Properties of Ehrhart h-Vectors t m = h d t d + h d − 1 t d − 1 + · · · + h 0 � m P ∩ Z d � � Ehr P ( t ) = 1 + # (1 − t ) d +1 m ≥ 1 P ◦ ∩ Z d � � P ∩ Z d � � (Ehrhart) h 0 = 1 , h 1 = # − d − 1 , h d = # ◮ Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 6

  19. General Properties of Ehrhart h-Vectors t m = h d t d + h d − 1 t d − 1 + · · · + h 0 � m P ∩ Z d � � Ehr P ( t ) = 1 + # (1 − t ) d +1 m ≥ 1 P ◦ ∩ Z d � � P ∩ Z d � � (Ehrhart) h 0 = 1 , h 1 = # − d − 1 , h d = # ◮ (Ehrhart) vol P = 1 d ! ( h d + h d − 1 + · · · + h 1 + 1) ◮ Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 6

  20. General Properties of Ehrhart h-Vectors t m = h d t d + h d − 1 t d − 1 + · · · + h 0 � m P ∩ Z d � � Ehr P ( t ) = 1 + # (1 − t ) d +1 m ≥ 1 P ◦ ∩ Z d � � P ∩ Z d � � (Ehrhart) h 0 = 1 , h 1 = # − d − 1 , h d = # ◮ (Ehrhart) vol P = 1 d ! ( h d + h d − 1 + · · · + h 1 + 1) ◮ (Stanley 1980) h j ∈ Z ≥ 0 ◮ Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 6

  21. General Properties of Ehrhart h-Vectors t m = h d t d + h d − 1 t d − 1 + · · · + h 0 � m P ∩ Z d � � Ehr P ( t ) = 1 + # (1 − t ) d +1 m ≥ 1 P ◦ ∩ Z d � � P ∩ Z d � � (Ehrhart) h 0 = 1 , h 1 = # − d − 1 , h d = # ◮ (Ehrhart) vol P = 1 d ! ( h d + h d − 1 + · · · + h 1 + 1) ◮ (Stanley 1980) h j ∈ Z ≥ 0 ◮ (Stanley 1991) Whenever h s > 0 but h s +1 = · · · = h d = 0 , then ◮ h 0 + h 1 + · · · + h j ≤ h s + h s − 1 + · · · + h s − j for all 0 ≤ j ≤ s . Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 6

  22. General Properties of Ehrhart h-Vectors t m = h d t d + h d − 1 t d − 1 + · · · + h 0 � m P ∩ Z d � � Ehr P ( t ) = 1 + # (1 − t ) d +1 m ≥ 1 P ◦ ∩ Z d � � P ∩ Z d � � (Ehrhart) h 0 = 1 , h 1 = # − d − 1 , h d = # ◮ (Ehrhart) vol P = 1 d ! ( h d + h d − 1 + · · · + h 1 + 1) ◮ (Stanley 1980) h j ∈ Z ≥ 0 ◮ (Stanley 1991) Whenever h s > 0 but h s +1 = · · · = h d = 0 , then ◮ h 0 + h 1 + · · · + h j ≤ h s + h s − 1 + · · · + h s − j for all 0 ≤ j ≤ s . � d � (Hibi 1994) h 0 + · · · + h j +1 ≥ h d + · · · + h d − j for 0 ≤ j ≤ − 1 . ◮ 2 Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 6

  23. General Properties of Ehrhart h-Vectors t m = h d t d + h d − 1 t d − 1 + · · · + h 0 � m P ∩ Z d � � Ehr P ( t ) = 1 + # (1 − t ) d +1 m ≥ 1 P ◦ ∩ Z d � � P ∩ Z d � � (Ehrhart) h 0 = 1 , h 1 = # − d − 1 , h d = # ◮ (Ehrhart) vol P = 1 d ! ( h d + h d − 1 + · · · + h 1 + 1) ◮ (Stanley 1980) h j ∈ Z ≥ 0 ◮ (Stanley 1991) Whenever h s > 0 but h s +1 = · · · = h d = 0 , then ◮ h 0 + h 1 + · · · + h j ≤ h s + h s − 1 + · · · + h s − j for all 0 ≤ j ≤ s . � d � (Hibi 1994) h 0 + · · · + h j +1 ≥ h d + · · · + h d − j for 0 ≤ j ≤ − 1 . ◮ 2 (Hibi 1994) If h d > 0 then h 1 ≤ h j for 2 ≤ j < d . ◮ Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 6

  24. General Properties of Ehrhart h-Vectors t m = h d t d + h d − 1 t d − 1 + · · · + h 0 � m P ∩ Z d � � Ehr P ( t ) = 1 + # (1 − t ) d +1 m ≥ 1 (Stapledon 2009) Many more inequalities for the h j ’s arising from ◮ Kneser’s Theorem ( arXiv:0904.3035 ) Asymptotics of Ehrhart Series of Lattice Polytopes Matthias Beck 7

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend