diabolical entropy
play

Diabolical Entropy Neil Dobbs Nicolae Mihalache June 2016 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Entropy Visible MME Uniformity Main proof Iceland 2 England 1 Diabolical Entropy Neil Dobbs Nicolae Mihalache June 2016 Parameter Problems in Analytic Dynamics Entropy Visible MME Uniformity Main proof Iceland 2 England 1


  1. Entropy Visible MME Uniformity Main proof Iceland 2 — England 1 Diabolical Entropy Neil Dobbs Nicolae Mihalache June 2016 Parameter Problems in Analytic Dynamics

  2. Entropy Visible MME Uniformity Main proof Iceland 2 — England 1 Topological Entropy and the Quadratic Family f a : x �→ x 2 + a , a ∈ A = [ − 2 , 1 / 4 ] • h ( a ) := lim n →∞ 1 n log # f − n a ( 0 ) . • h ( a ) exists, a �→ h ( a ) is continuous and monotone. [MS, DHS, MT, BvS] • λ ( a ) := lim n →∞ 1 n log | Df n a ( a ) | • If λ ( a 0 ) < 0 , a 0 is hyperbolic, there is a periodic attractor, a �→ h ( a ) is locally constant at a 0 . [LPS] • the hyperbolic set Hyp is open and dense. [G ´ S, Ly] • for almost every a ∈ A , λ ( a ) exists, λ ( a ) � = 0 . [AM,Ly] • for pos. measure set of parameters, λ ( a ) > 0 . [J, BC, AM]

  3. Entropy Visible MME Uniformity Main proof Iceland 2 — England 1 Topological Entropy and the Quadratic Family f a : x �→ x 2 + a , a ∈ A = [ − 2 , 1 / 4 ] • h ( a ) := lim n →∞ 1 n log # f − n a ( 0 ) . • h ( a ) exists, a �→ h ( a ) is continuous and monotone. [MS, DHS, MT, BvS] • λ ( a ) := lim n →∞ 1 n log | Df n a ( a ) | • If λ ( a 0 ) < 0 , a 0 is hyperbolic, there is a periodic attractor, a �→ h ( a ) is locally constant at a 0 . [LPS] • the hyperbolic set Hyp is open and dense. [G ´ S, Ly] • for almost every a ∈ A , λ ( a ) exists, λ ( a ) � = 0 . [AM,Ly] • for pos. measure set of parameters, λ ( a ) > 0 . [J, BC, AM]

  4. Entropy Visible MME Uniformity Main proof Iceland 2 — England 1 Regularity of Toplogical Entropy WR ( a ) : lim δ ց 0 lim inf 1 a ( a ) | <δ, j ≤ n log | f j ( a ) | = 0 n log � | f j • Tsujii’s weak regularity condition : "does not return too close, too soon, too often" • W := { a : λ ( a ) exists and λ ( a ) > 0 and WR ( a ) } • full measure in Hyp c [AM,Ly,L,T] • A NLC = { a : { a } = h − 1 ( h ( a )) } – positive measure set Theorem (D, Mihalache) Suppose a ∈ W and { a } = h − 1 ( h ( a )) . Then log | h ( a + t ) − h ( a ) | = h ( a ) lim λ ( a ) . log t t → 0

  5. Entropy Visible MME Uniformity Main proof Iceland 2 — England 1 Regularity of Toplogical Entropy WR ( a ) : lim δ ց 0 lim inf 1 a ( a ) | <δ, j ≤ n log | f j ( a ) | = 0 n log � | f j • Tsujii’s weak regularity condition : "does not return too close, too soon, too often" • W := { a : λ ( a ) exists and λ ( a ) > 0 and WR ( a ) } • full measure in Hyp c [AM,Ly,L,T] • A NLC = { a : { a } = h − 1 ( h ( a )) } – positive measure set Theorem (D, Mihalache) Suppose a ∈ W and { a } = h − 1 ( h ( a )) . Then log | h ( a + t ) − h ( a ) | = h ( a ) lim λ ( a ) . log t t → 0

  6. Entropy Visible MME Uniformity Main proof Iceland 2 — England 1 Visible measures of maximal entropy µ acip : absolutely continuous invariant probability measure µ max : measure of maximal entropy � Lyapunov exponent χ ( µ ) := log | Df | d µ. Theorem (D, Mihalache) Let g be a real-analytic unimodal map with non-degenerate critical point. Then µ max = µ acip if and only if g is analytically conjugate to x �→ x 2 − 2 . [Shub-Sullivan, Martens de Melo] Expanding maps : abs cns conjugacy upgrades to smooth/analytic conjugacy. [D] expanding induced map : upgrades to smooth conjugacy on an interval... implies pre-Chebyshev. Analytic conjugacy between renormalised map and x �→ x 2 − 2 , contradiction if renormalised (too many critical points).

  7. Entropy Visible MME Uniformity Main proof Iceland 2 — England 1 Visible measures of maximal entropy µ acip : absolutely continuous invariant probability measure µ max : measure of maximal entropy � Lyapunov exponent χ ( µ ) := log | Df | d µ. Theorem (D, Mihalache) Let g be a real-analytic unimodal map with non-degenerate critical point. Then µ max = µ acip if and only if g is analytically conjugate to x �→ x 2 − 2 . [Shub-Sullivan, Martens de Melo] Expanding maps : abs cns conjugacy upgrades to smooth/analytic conjugacy. [D] expanding induced map : upgrades to smooth conjugacy on an interval... implies pre-Chebyshev. Analytic conjugacy between renormalised map and x �→ x 2 − 2 , contradiction if renormalised (too many critical points).

  8. Entropy Visible MME Uniformity Main proof Iceland 2 — England 1 Escalier du diable Corollary a � = − 2 implies h ( a ) h ( a ) acip ) > 1 , max ) < 1 . χ ( µ a χ ( µ a For a � = − 2 χ ( µ acip ) = h ( µ a acip ) < h ( µ a max ) = h ( a ) < χ ( µ a max ) . Corollary Moreover, h ′ ( a ) = 0 almost everywhere. λ ( a ) = χ ( µ a acip ) = h ( µ a For almost every a ∈ W , acip ) [AM]. Thus, almost everywhere, Hölder exponent > 1 . Uniformity ?

  9. Entropy Visible MME Uniformity Main proof Iceland 2 — England 1 Escalier du diable Corollary a � = − 2 implies h ( a ) h ( a ) acip ) > 1 , max ) < 1 . χ ( µ a χ ( µ a For a � = − 2 χ ( µ acip ) = h ( µ a acip ) < h ( µ a max ) = h ( a ) < χ ( µ a max ) . Corollary Moreover, h ′ ( a ) = 0 almost everywhere. λ ( a ) = χ ( µ a acip ) = h ( µ a For almost every a ∈ W , acip ) [AM]. Thus, almost everywhere, Hölder exponent > 1 . Uniformity ?

  10. Entropy Visible MME Uniformity Main proof Iceland 2 — England 1 Uniformity Theorem (Misiurewicz Szlenk, Raith, D Todd, D Mihalache) s �→ g s continuous family of S-unimodal maps, each with positive topological entropy. Then s �→ µ g s s �→ χ ( µ g s s �→ h top ( g s ) , max , max ) are continuous. Pressure P s ( t ) = sup µ h ( µ ) − t � log | Dg s | d µ • pressure is analytic on a nbd of zero [based on DT] • pressure functions converge on a nbd of zero [DT] • slope of pressure at zero is − χ ( µ g s max ) • Therefore s �→ χ ( µ g s max ) is continuous.

  11. Entropy Visible MME Uniformity Main proof Iceland 2 — England 1 Uniformity II Lemma If g k → g 0 , S-unimodal, and h top ( g k ) /χ ( µ g k acip ) → 1 . Then µ g 0 max = µ g 0 acip . Lemma In a neighbourhood of a F (Feigenbaum), there exists ε > 0 with h ( a ) h ( a ) max ) < 1 − ε, acip ) > 1 + ε. χ ( µ a χ ( µ a . • Take a sequence a n converging to a F , f a n is ( m n + 1 ) times Feigenbaum renormalisable. • subsequence of (rescaled) m n -renormalised maps converge to some S-unimodal map g [Sullivan] • by 2nd Theorem, µ max � = µ acip .

  12. Entropy Visible MME Uniformity Main proof Iceland 2 — England 1 Uniformity III Summing up : Theorem Given ε > 0 , there exists δ > 0 for which • for all a ∈ ( − 2 + ε, a F ) , if µ a acip exists then h ( a ) /χ ( µ a acip ) > 1 + δ • for all a ∈ ( − 2 + ε, a F ) , h ( a ) /χ ( µ a max ) < 1 − δ. Recall first theorem : Suppose a ∈ W and { a } = h − 1 ( h ( a )) . Then log | h ( a + t ) − h ( a ) | = h ( a ) λ ( a ) . lim log t t → 0

  13. Entropy Visible MME Uniformity Main proof Iceland 2 — England 1 Uniformity and Dimension λ ( a ) = χ ( µ a X ε := { a ∈ A NLC ∩ W : a > − 2 + ε, acip ) } λ ( a ) = χ ( µ a Y ε := { a ∈ A NLC ∩ W : a > − 2 + ε, max ) } . log | h ( a + t ) − h ( a ) | = h ( a ) λ ( a ) . lim log t t → 0 Theorem dim H ( h ( X ε )) < 1 , dim H ( Y ε ) < 1 . • ∪ ε X ε has full measure in A NLC [Avila Moreira Lyubich Levin Tsujii...] • ∪ ε h ( Y ε ) has full measure in [ 0 , log 2 ] . [Bruin Sands]

  14. Entropy Visible MME Uniformity Main proof Iceland 2 — England 1 Proof of main theorem log | h ( a + t ) − h ( a ) | = h ( a ) λ ( a ) . lim log t t → 0 • h monotone, cns, suffices to prove for t n with log t n / log t n + 1 aribtrarily close to 1 . • Tent map T b : x �→ 1 − b | x | , turning point at 0 , entropy log b • ξ n ( a ) = f n φ n ( b ) = T n a ( a ) , b ( 1 ) 1 • n log | D ξ n ( a + t ) | ≈ λ ( a ) for a subsequence of n , for a neighbourhood which gets mapped to the large scale 1 • n log | D φ n ( b ) | ≈ log b 0 = h ( a ) on corresponding nbds • Use conjugacy with tent map to measure change of entropy • log | t | ≈ − n λ ( a ) , log | h ( a + t ) − h ( a ) | ≈ − nh ( a )

  15. Entropy Visible MME Uniformity Main proof Iceland 2 — England 1 Tsujii’s Lemma Lemma Suppose a 0 ∈ W . Let δ > 0 . There exist r 0 > 0 , m ≥ 1 , a sequence ( k n ) n ≥ 0 and decreasing neighbourhoods ω n ∋ a 0 for which k n + 1 • ≤ 1 + δ k n • ξ k n ( ω n ) ⊃ B ( ξ k n ( a 0 ) , r 0 ) • ξ j has bounded distortion on ω n for j = m , m + 1 , . . . , k n 1 • k n | D ξ k n ( a ) | ≈ λ ( a ) . Requires Weak Regularity, Transversality [L], Collet-Eckmann.

  16. Entropy Visible MME Uniformity Main proof Iceland 2 — England 1 HAPPY BIRTHDAY Sebastian

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend