Asymptotic enumeration of labelled planar graphs . Omer Gimnez, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

asymptotic enumeration of labelled planar graphs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Asymptotic enumeration of labelled planar graphs . Omer Gimnez, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Asymptotic enumeration of labelled planar graphs . Omer Gimnez, Marc Noy omer.gimenez@upc.edu , marc.noy@upc.edu Universitat Politcnica de Catalunya Departament de Matemtica Aplicada II - p. 1/63


slide-1
SLIDE 1
  • p. 1/63

Asymptotic enumeration of labelled planar graphs

.

Omer Giménez, Marc Noy

  • mer.gimenez@upc.edu, marc.noy@upc.edu

Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada II

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • p. 2/63

Definitions (I)

✂ ✄ ☎ ✆ ✝

is planar if we can embed it in the plane. Labelled graphs:

✄ ✁ ✞ ✟ ☎✠ ✠ ✠ ☎ ✡ ☛

isomorphic iff

✆ ✁ ✆ ☞

1 2 3 4 5 1 3 4 2 5

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • p. 3/63

Definitions (II)

All the graphs in this talk will be planar and labelled. A graph is connected if every two vertices are joined by a path. A graph is 2-connected if it is connected and by removing any vertex the graph is still connected.

✂✁ ✄ ☎ ✂ ✡ ✝

means that

✆ ✝ ✞ ✁ ✟ ✠
☎ ✂ ✡ ✝ ✁ ✟
slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • p. 4/63

Labelled planar graphs

Let

be the number of LPG on

vertices.

1 2 1 3 3 2 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 2 1 3 3 2 1 1 3 2 1 2 3

1 1 2 2 3 8 4 64 5 1023 6 32071 7 1823707 8 163947848 . . . . . .

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • p. 5/63

Labelled connected planar graphs

Let

be the number of LCPG on

vertices.

1 1 2 1 2 3 2 1 3 1 2 3 1 3 2 (12) (4) (12) (3) (6) (1)

1 1 2 1 3 4 4 38 5 727 6 26013 7 1597690 8 149248656 . . . . . .

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • p. 6/63

Labelled 2-connected planar graphs

Let

be the number of L2CPG on

vertices.

1 2 1 2 3 (3) (6) (1) (10) (12) (60) (30) (60) (30) (15) (10) (10)

1 2 1 3 1 4 10 5 237 6 10707 7 774924 8 78702536 . . . . . .

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • p. 7/63

Asymptotic enumeration

It is known that

✡ ✝ ✁ ✁ ✡ ✂

where

✡ ✝

is a subexponential function,

is the growth constant:

✆ ✝ ✞ ✁ ✟ ✠
✡ ✂ ✂ ✡ ✄ ✟ ✝ ✂
☎ ✆ ✁ ✁ ✆ ✝ ✞ ✁ ✟ ✠ ✝
✡ ✂ ✞ ✟ ✠ ✁ ✁

Questions: What is the growth constant

? What is the function

✡ ✝

? We will later show that

✄ ✡

where

☛ ☞ ✡ ☞ ✟

The asymptotics of LCPG and LPG are almost the same.

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • p. 8/63

Previous results

Bounds for

✁ ✁ ✂ ✄ ✠ ☎

(Demise, Vasconcellos, Welsh; 1996)

✁ ✁ ✆ ✂ ✠ ✆

(Osthus, Prömel, Taraz; 2002)

✁ ✁ ✆✝ ✠ ✝

(Bonichon, Gavoille, Hanusse; 2002)

✟ ✁ ✁

(Bender, Gao, Wormald; 2002)

✁ ✁ ✆ ☛ ✠ ✟

(B., G., H., Poulalhon, Schaeffer; 2004)

✝ ✂ ✠ ✝ ✁ ✁

(Prömel; 2003) [conference]

Asymptotic enumeration of labelled 2-connected planar graphs (Bender, Gao, Wormald; 2002)

✡ ☎ ✟ ✠ ✡ ✁ ✞ ✁ ✡ ✂

with explicit expressions for

☛ ☛ ✠ ✆ ✂✌☞ ✟ ☛ ☎ ✍

and

✁ ✞ ☛ ✝
✟ ☎ ✎

.

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • p. 9/63

Our results

We take the Work of [BGW] as a starting point. We show that

✄ ✁ ✡ ☎ ✟ ✠ ✡ ✁ ✁ ✡ ✂
✄ ✡ ✂ ✡ ☎ ✟ ✠ ✡ ✁ ✁ ✡ ✂

with explicit expressions for

  • ,
✡ ☛ ☛ ✠ ✄
  • and
✁ ☛ ✝ ✂ ✠ ✝ ✝

. Other consequences of our work We can give a precise asymptotic answer to:

■ How many edges a random planar graph has? ■ How many isolated vertices? ■ How many connected components?

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • p. 10/63

Structure of this talk

■ Generating functions and equations of LPG

We introduce the generating functions for our families of graphs and the equations relating them.

■ Brief description of the work of BGW

Solving the asymptotic enumeration of 2-connected labelled planar graphs.

■ How to obtain a good estimation for

Easy way to improve the best known bounds for

.

■ How to obtain an exact expression for

Solving the problem.

■ Applications

Distributions for the number of edges, components and isolated vertices.

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • p. 11/63

Generating Functions

■ Bivariate generating functions. ■ The variable

  • counts the vertices,

counts the edges.

■ The GFs are exponential on

  • and ordinary on

.

✁ ✝ ✁ ✁ ✂ ✄
✂ ✄
✡ ✂ ✁ ✄

(LPG)

☎ ✂
✁ ✝ ✁ ✁ ✂ ✄
✂ ✄
✡ ✂ ✁ ✄

(LCPG)

✆ ✂
✁ ✝ ✁ ✁ ✂ ✄
✂ ✄
✡ ✂ ✁ ✄

(L2CPG)

■ Univariate GFs are the corresponding bivariate GFs at

✁ ✁ ✟

.

■ If not specified, derivatives are taken on the variable

  • .
☎ ✂
  • ✝✞✝
✁ ☎ ✂
✟ ✝ ☎ ☞ ✂
✁ ✝ ✝ ✁ ✟ ☎ ✟
✁ ✝
slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • p. 12/63

Three Steps

(Flajolet, Sedgewick; Analytic Combinatorics) Combinatorial Description Generating Functions Singularity Analysis Constructive, unambiguous description of the objects we are counting.

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • p. 13/63

Three Steps

(Flajolet, Sedgewick; Analytic Combinatorics) Combinatorial Description Generating Functions Singularity Analysis Translate the previous description into equations

  • f generating functions.
slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • p. 14/63

Three Steps

(Flajolet, Sedgewick; Analytic Combinatorics) Combinatorial Description Generating Functions Singularity Analysis Study the singularities of the generating functions.

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • p. 15/63

Generating Functions

■ LPG, LCPG and L2CPG are related by several graph

decomposition theorems.

■ Combinatorial operations on graphs translate into operations

  • n the GFs.
✂✁ ✄
✆ ✂✞✝ ✝ ☎ ✆ ✂ ✝ ✝ ✠✟ ✄ ✁☛✡✌☞ ✍ ✎ ✁ ✡ ✏
☎ ✡ ✆ ✂✞✝ ✝ ✆ ✂ ✝ ✝
✝ ✆ ☞ ✂ ✝ ✝
✂ ✡ ☎ ✟ ✝
✓ ✆ ✆ ☞ ✂✞✝ ✝

powerset

✠ ✡✌☞ ✍ ✆ ✂ ✝ ✝ ✡ ✔ ✕ ✂ ✁ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ✆ ✂ ✝ ✝ ✝
✄ ✝ ✠ ✡✌☞ ✍
✆ ✂✞✝ ✝ ✡ ✁ ✆ ✂ ✆ ✂✞✝ ✝ ✝

■ We proceed to show the decompositions.

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • p. 16/63

Equations relating the GFs

Labelled Planar Graphs

2 8 1 6 9 7 3 4 12 5 10 13 11

A LPG is a powerset of LCPG (conveniently relabelled).

1 4 1 2 3 3 2 1 2 1 2 4 5

That is,

powerset

✂ ✁ ✝ ☎
✁ ✝ ✁ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ☎ ✂
✁ ✝ ✝
slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • p. 17/63

Equations relating the GFs

Planar graphs

☎ ✂
✁ ✝

connected

✁ ✝

all The arrow means that the generating functions are related by an easy (explicit) equation.

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • p. 18/63

Equations relating the GFs

Labelled Connected Planar Graphs. Non-obvious example. How can we describe a LCPG in terms

  • f L2CPGs?

2 8 1 6 9 7 3 4 12 5 10 13 11

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • p. 19/63

Equations relating the GFs

■ Point one vertex. ■ Look at the 2-connected components it belongs. ■ Replace vertexs of these components by connected graphs.

8 1 6 9 7 3 4 11 5 10 12 2 6 1 2 3 5 2 3 8 4 7 4 1

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • p. 20/63

Equations relating the GFs

Another example.

7 1 5 8 6 2 3 11 4 9 13 10

1 1 3 5 4 2 1 4 2 3 7 6

A pointed LCPG is a powerset of pointed L2CPG where each vertex is replaced by a pointed LCPG (everything conveniently relabelled).

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • p. 21/63

Equations relating the GFs

7 1 5 8 6 2 3 11 4 9 13 10

1 1 3 5 4 2 1 4 2 3 7 6

✁ ✒ ✁

multiset

✂ ✄ ✒ ✂ ✁ ✑ ✝ ✝ ☎ ☞ ✂
✁ ✝ ✁ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ✆ ☞ ✂
☞ ✂
☎ ✁ ✝ ✝
slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • p. 22/63

Equations relating the GFs

Vertex rooted Non-rooted

✟ ✆ ✟
✁ ✝

2-connected

✟ ☎ ✟
✁ ✝ ☎ ✂
✁ ✝

connected

✁ ✝

all The arrow means that the generating functions are related by a hard (implicit) equation.

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • p. 23/63

Equations relating the GFs

Labelled 2-Connected Planar Graphs. We need a characterization of 2-connected graphs in terms of 3-connected graphs. A network is a graph with two distinguished vertices (poles) such that the graph obtained by joining the poles if they were not joined is 2-connected. [Trakhtenbrot, 1958] Every network is either

■ A series composition of networks. ■ A parallel composition of networks. ■ A 3-connected graph (with two poles) where every edge has

been replaced by a network.

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • p. 24/63

Equations relating the GFs

Let

✁ ✝

be the GF of labelled planar networks with unlabelled poles. To obtain such a network we need to

■ Choose a 2-connected planar graph ■ Select an edge ■ Unlabel the two vertices of the edge (the poles) ■ Choose which pole is the first one ■ Remove or do not remove the selected edge

Hence planar networks are related to L2CPG by:

✁ ✝ ✁ ✂ ✟ ☎ ✁ ✝ ✝
✟ ✆ ✟ ✁ ✂
✁ ✝
slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • p. 25/63

Equations relating the GFs

Vertex rooted Non-rooted Edge rooted

✟ ✆ ✟
✁ ✝ ✟ ✆ ✟ ✁ ✂
✁ ✝
✁ ✝

2-connected

✟ ☎ ✟
✁ ✝ ☎ ✂
✁ ✝

connected

✁ ✝

all Planar networks counted by

✁ ✝

are closely related to edge-rooted 2-connected graphs.

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • p. 26/63

Equations relating the GFs

Let

✁ ✝

be the GF of labelled planar networks that are series compositions. To obtain such a series network we need to

■ Choose a network

■ Choose a non-series network

■ Join the second pole of

with the first pole of

.

■ Add a label to the joined poles.

Hence the GFs of all networks and series networks satisfy

✁ ✝ ✁
✁ ✝ ✂
✁ ✝ ✄
✁ ✝ ✝
✁ ✝ ✁
✁ ✝ ✡ ✟ ☎
✁ ✝
slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • p. 27/63

Equations relating the GFs

Let

✁ ✝

be the GF of networks with non-adjacent poles, and

✁ ✂
✁ ✝
  • f those that are non-parallel.

A network with non-adjacent poles is either

■ non-parallel ■ parallel, that is, a set of at least two non-parallel networks.

✁ ✝ ✁ ✟ ☎ ✁ ✂
✁ ✝ ✂ ✄☎ ✆

non-parallel

☎ ✁ ✡ ✝ ✂ ☎ ✁ ✝ ✆ ✂ ☎ ☞ ☞ ☞ ✂ ✄☎ ✆

parallel

exp

✂ ✁ ✂
✁ ✝ ✝

On the other hand

✁ ✝

and

✁ ✝

are easy to relate, so

✂ ✟ ☎ ✁ ✝
✁ ✝ ✄ ✟ ✁
✁ ✝
✁ ✝ ✁ ✟ ☎
✁ ✝ ✟ ☎ ✁ ✁ ✂
✁ ✝ ✁ ✆✟✞ ✠ ✟ ☎
✁ ✝ ✟ ☎ ✁
slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • p. 28/63

Equations relating the GFs

Let

✂ ✝ ✂
✁ ✝

be the GF of the rooted 3-connected planar maps. To obtain a network with non-adjacent poles that is neither parallel nor series:

■ Choose a rooted 3-connected planar map ■ Forget which face is the root face ■ Remove the root edge ■ Unlabel the two distinguished vertices (poles) ■ Susbtitute every edge by a network

So we have the equation

✂ ✝ ✂
✁ ✝ ✝ ✝
✁ ✝ ✂ ✄☎ ✆

non-parallel,non-series

✁ ✆ ✞ ✠ ✟ ☎
✁ ✝ ✟ ☎ ✁ ✂ ✄ ☎ ✆

non-parallel

✁ ✝ ✟ ☎
✁ ✝ ✂ ✄☎ ✆

series

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • p. 29/63

Equations relating the GFs

Vertex rooted Non-rooted Edge rooted

✂ ✝ ✂
✁ ✝

3-connected

✟ ✆ ✟
✁ ✝ ✟ ✆ ✟ ✁ ✂
✁ ✝
✁ ✝

2-connected

✟ ☎ ✟
✁ ✝ ☎ ✂
✁ ✝

connected

✁ ✝

all

✂ ✝ ✂
✁ ✝

and

✁ ✝

are related by an implicit equation.

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • p. 30/63

Equations relating the GFs

Mullin, Schellenberg (1968) gave the GF for rooted 3-connected planar maps.

✁ ✝ ✁
✂ ✟ ☎ ✁ ✂
✁ ✝ ✝ ✡ ✁ ✂
✁ ✝ ✁ ✁ ✂ ✟ ☎
✁ ✝ ✝ ✡ ✂ ✝ ✂
✁ ✝ ✁
✁ ✡ ✟ ✟ ☎
☎ ✟ ✟ ☎ ✁ ✄ ✟ ✄ ✂ ✟ ☎
✡ ✂ ✟ ☎ ✁ ✝ ✡ ✂ ✟ ☎
✁ ✝ ✝

Fusy, Schaeffer (2003) provided a combinatorial explanation for this formula.

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • p. 31/63

Equations relating the GFs

So these are all the equations:

  • ✁✂✁✄✁✆☎
✁✂✁✄✁✂✝
✝ ✝ ✁
✂ ✟ ☎ ✁ ✂
✝ ✝ ✝ ✡ ✁ ✂
✝ ✝ ✁ ✝ ✂ ✟ ☎
✝ ✝ ✝ ✡ ✂ ✝ ✂
✝ ✝ ✁
✝ ✡ ✟ ✟ ☎
☎ ✟ ✟ ☎ ✝ ✄ ✟ ✄ ✂ ✟ ☎
✡ ✂ ✟ ☎ ✁ ✝ ✡ ✂ ✟ ☎
✁ ✝ ✝
  • ✁✆✁✄✁✂☎
✁✆✁✂✁✄✝ ✂ ✝ ✂
✆ ✞ ✠ ✟ ☎
☎ ✁ ☎
✟ ☎
☛ ✟ ✆ ✟ ✁ ✂
✁ ✝ ✁
✝ ✟ ☎
✁ ✝ ✟ ☎ ✁
✝ ☎ ☞ ✂
✁ ✝ ✁ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ✆ ☞ ✂
☞ ✂
✁ ✝ ☎ ✁ ✝ ✝
✁ ✝ ✁ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ☎ ✂
✁ ✝ ✝
slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • p. 32/63

Equations relating the GFs

Vertex rooted Non-rooted Edge rooted

✂ ✝ ✂
✁ ✝

3-connected

✟ ✆ ✟
✁ ✝ ✆ ✂
✁ ✝ ✟ ✆ ✟ ✁ ✂
✁ ✝
✁ ✝

2-connected

✟ ☎ ✟
✁ ✝ ☎ ✂
✁ ✝

connected

✁ ✝

all The arrow means that the generating functions are related by a partial derivation.

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • p. 33/63

Equations relating the GFs

Vertex rooted Non-rooted Edge rooted

✂ ✝ ✂
✁ ✝

3-connected

✟ ✆ ✟
✁ ✝ ✆ ✂
✁ ✝ ✟ ✆ ✟ ✁ ✂
✁ ✝
✁ ✝

2-connected

✟ ☎ ✟
✁ ✝ ☎ ✂
✁ ✝

connected

✁ ✝

all We follow the path to obtain

✁ ✝

.

slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • p. 34/63

2-connected graphs [BGW]

[BGW] proved that: The singularities of

✁ ✝

are given by those of

✂ ✝ ✂
✝ ✝

.

✂ ✝ ✂
✆ ✞ ✠ ✟ ☎
☎ ✁ ☎
✟ ☎

A parametrization

✂✁ ✝ ☎ ✁ ✍ ✂

for the singularities of

✁ ✝

. The expansion of

✁ ✍ ✝

at a singular point

✂✁ ✝ ☎ ✁ ✍ ✂

:

✁ ✍ ✝ ✄
✂✁ ✝ ☎
✂ ✟ ✄
✝ ☎
✂✁ ✝ ✂ ✟ ✄
✝ ✝ ✠ ✡

If

  • is such that
✁ ✍ ✂✁ ✝ ✁ ✟

, then

✟ ✝ ✁
☎ ✂ ✄ ✆ ✔ ✝ ✝ ✡ ☎ ✍ ✠ ✡
☎ ✁
slide-35
SLIDE 35
  • p. 35/63

2-connected graphs [BGW]

Because of

✟ ✆ ✟ ✁ ✂
✁ ✝ ✁
✝ ✟ ☎
✁ ✝ ✟ ☎ ✁

they can obtain the asymptotics for

✄ ✟ ✆ ✟ ✁ ✂
✟ ✝ ✁ ✄
✂ ✄

They also prove that

■ The expected number of edged is

✁ ✡

, with

✁ ☛ ✝ ✠ ✝
  • .

■ The variance is

✂ ✡ ✡

, with

✂ ✡ ☛ ☛ ✠ ✎

. So almost all

  • vertex 2-connected planar graphs (for large

) have

✁ ✡

edges,

✄ ✄
✂ ✄ ✁ ✡ ✄
✎ ✁ ☎ ✂ ✄ ✆ ✔ ✝ ✝ ✡ ☎ ✟ ✠ ✡
✁ ✍
slide-36
SLIDE 36
  • p. 36/63

2-connected graphs [BGW]

Summary:

■ We know about

✟ ✆ ✟ ✁ ✂
✁ ✝

.

■ We know about the coefficients of

and

✟ ✆ ✟ ✁

.

■ But

✆ ✂
✁ ✝

is hidden behing an integral.

✆ ✂
✁ ✝ ✁
✟ ☎
✁ ✝ ✟ ☎ ✁

d

Just understanding

✁ ✝

at the singularity point is not enough for evaluating

✆ ✂
✁ ✝

.

slide-37
SLIDE 37
  • p. 37/63

Estimating

  • The growth constant

is the inverse of the radius of converge

  • f
☎ ✂

.

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.03

☎ ✂
✁✂☎✄ ✆ ✝ ✞ ✟ ✠ ✄ ✆ ✝ ✞

Question: Where does

☎ ✂

stop being defined?

slide-38
SLIDE 38
  • p. 38/63

Lower bound:

✂ ✄ ✁ ✁☎ ✆✝

We use the equation

☎ ☞ ✂
✁ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✟ ✆ ✟
☞ ✂
☎ ✟ ✝ ✠

Define

✞ ☎ ✂
  • ✝✞✝
☞ ✂
☎ ✟ ✂
✝ ✁
✗ ✘ ✄ ✟ ✆ ✟
✟ ✝ ✠

then

✁ ✡

, and

✞ ☎ ✂
✗ ✘ ✟ ✆ ✟
✞ ☎ ✂
☎ ✟ ✝ ✞ ☎ ✂
✖ ✗ ✘ ✄ ✟ ✆ ✟
✞ ☎ ✂
☎ ✟ ✝ ✁
✂ ✞ ☎ ✂
✝ ✁
  • That is,
✟ ✂

is the inverse of

✞ ☎ ✂

.

slide-39
SLIDE 39
  • p. 39/63

Lower bound:

✂ ✄ ✁ ✁☎ ✆✝ ✟ ✂
✗ ✘ ✄ ✟ ✆ ✟
✟ ✝ ✟ ✂

stops being defined at the radius of convergence of

✆ ✂
✟ ✝

:

✁ ☎ ✆ ✞ ☛ ☛ ✠ ☛ ✆ ☎ ✆

. Hence

✞ ☎ ✂

is bounded by

✁ ☎ ✆ ✞

.

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.03

✞ ☎ ✂
✟ ✂
✞ ✁ ✂ ✟ ✠ ✄ ✆ ✝ ✞
slide-40
SLIDE 40
  • p. 40/63

Lower bound:

✂ ✄ ✁ ✁☎ ✆✝

Consider the truncations of

✞ ☎ ✂

and

✆ ✂
✟ ✝

. That is, if

✞ ☎ ✂
✁ ✠ ✡✌☞ ✍ ✞

, then let

✞ ☎ ✁ ✂
✝ ✁ ✁ ✡ ☞ ✍ ✞
✠ ✞ ☎ ✁ ✂

is a lower bound of

✞ ☎ ✂

. Similarly, if

✆ ✂
✟ ✝ ✁ ✠ ✡✌☞ ✍

, then let

✆ ✁ ✂
✝ ✁ ✁ ✡✌☞ ✍
✠ ✟ ✁ ✂
✝ ✁
✗ ✘ ✄ ✟ ✆ ✁ ✟

Since

✆ ✁ ✂

is a lower bound of

✆ ✂
✟ ✝

,

✟ ✁ ✂

is an upper bound of

✟ ✂

.

slide-41
SLIDE 41
  • p. 41/63

Lower bound:

✂ ✄ ✁ ✁☎ ✆✝

We can use

✞ ☎ ✁ ✂
  • r
✟ ✁ ✂

to bound the region where

✞ ☎ ✂

can be.

✂✁☎✄ ✆✞✝ ✟ ✂ ✝ ✠ ✝ ✡ ✠ ✟ ✝ ✄
✆ ✝ ✟

can not be here 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.03

✞ ☎ ✂
✟ ✂
✞ ✁ ✂ ✟ ✠ ✄ ✆ ✝ ✞
slide-42
SLIDE 42
  • p. 42/63

Lower bound:

✂ ✄ ✁ ✁☎ ✆✝

This gives us

■ a lower bound on the region where

✞ ☎ ✂

is defined,

■ an upper bound on the radius of convergence

✁ ☎ ✆

,

■ a lower bound on the growth constant

. By considering

✞ ☎ ✁ ✂

and

✟ ✁ ✂

for greater

we can improve the previous bounds.

✂ ✄ ✝ ☎ ✂✁✝✆ ✆✞✝ ✟✟✞
✞ ✁ ✠ ✝ ✞

(bound from

✡☞☛ ✆ ✌✎✍ ✏

)

✂ ✄ ✑ ✆ ✆✓✒ ✟ ☎ ✒ ✔ ✆ ✂✖✕
✞ ✁ ✟ ✠ ✝ ✞

(bound from

✗ ✆ ✌✎✘ ✏

)

✄ ✝ ✂ ✠ ✝ ✝
✎ ✂ ✝ ✂ ✠ ✝ ✝
✄ ✄ ✟ ☛ ✝ ✂ ✠ ✝ ✝
✂ ✄ ✝ ✂ ✠ ✝ ✝
✄ ☛ ✟ ✄ ✝ ✂ ✠ ✝ ✝
✆ ✆ ✝ ✂ ✠ ✝ ✝
✆ ✂ ✝ ☛ ✝ ✂ ✠ ✝ ✝
✄ ✟ ✝ ✂ ✠ ✝ ✝
✄ ✆
slide-43
SLIDE 43
  • p. 43/63

Upper bound:

✂ ✄ ✁ ✁☎ ✆ ✆

To prove

✁ ☞ ✝ ✂ ✠ ✝ ✝

we need the opposite:

■ An upper bound on the region where

✞ ☎ ✂

is defined,

■ a lower bound on the radius of convergence

✁ ☎ ✆

,

■ an upper bound on the growth constant

.

✟ ✂
✝ ✂ ✄ ☎ ✆ ✁ ✁ ☎ ✆✄✂
✁ ☞

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.03

✞ ☎ ✂
✟ ✂
✒ ☎
slide-44
SLIDE 44
  • p. 44/63

Upper bound:

✂ ✄ ✁ ✁☎ ✆ ✆

We want

to be as close to

✁ ☎ ✆ ✞

as possible.

✟ ✂
✝ ✂ ✄ ☎ ✆ ✁ ✁ ☎ ✆✄✂
✁ ☞

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.03

✞ ☎ ✂
✟ ✂
✒ ☎
slide-45
SLIDE 45
  • p. 45/63

Upper bound:

✂ ✄ ✁ ✁☎ ✆ ✆

Truncations

✞ ☎ ✁

and

✟ ✁

bound in the wrong direction. We try to evaluate

✟ ✂

using the equations:

✑ ✆✓✒ ✟ ✂ ✒
✁ ✂ ✄ ☎ ✆ ☎ ✝ ✆✓✒ ✕ ✆ ✟ ✝ ☎ ✆ ☎ ✝ ✆ ✒ ✕ ✆ ✟ ✂ ☎ ☎ ✝ ✞ ☎ ☎ ✆ ☎✟✞ ✆✓✒ ✕ ✠ ✟ ✡ ✠ ☎ ✆ ☎✟✞ ✆ ✝ ✕ ✞ ✟ ✂ ✝ ✡ ✟ ✂ ✆ ✠ ☛ ✆✞✝ ✕ ✞ ✟ ✆ ✠ ✞ ✄ ✆ ✝ ☞ ✄ ✆ ✝ ✕ ☛ ✟ ✟ ✝ ✡ ☛ ✄ ✌✎✍ ✏ ✂ ✆ ✠ ☛ ✆ ✠ ✞ ✝ ✠ ✝ ☛ ✡ ✆ ✠ ✝ ☛ ✂ ✂ ☞ ✄ ✆ ✝ ✕ ✞ ✟ ✂ ✝ ✡ ✞ ✡ ✂ ✆ ✆ ✠ ✝ ✞ ✠ ✆ ✆ ✠ ✞ ✄ ✆ ✄ ✆ ✆ ✠ ✒ ✟ ✡ ✆ ✆ ✠✒✑ ✟ ✡ ✆ ✆ ✠ ✒ ✠ ✑ ✟ ✄ ✝ ✒ ✂ ✝ ✞ ✆ ✆ ✠✒✑ ✟ ✡ ✑ ✂ ✞ ✆ ✆ ✠ ✒ ✟ ✡
slide-46
SLIDE 46
  • p. 46/63

Upper bound:

✂ ✄ ✁ ✁☎ ✆ ✆

Things to take care of:

✟ ✆ ✟
✟ ✝ ✁ ✟ ✟✁ ✆ ✍ ✟ ✆ ✟ ✁ ✂
  • ■ We have to bound
✟ ✆ ✟
☎ ✟ ✝

.

■ We use that

✟ ✡ ✆ ✟
✁ ✝

is positive.

✆ ☞ ✂
✝ ✁ ✆ ✂
☎☎✄ ✝ ✄ ✆ ✂
✝ ✄

■ We need to evaluate

✆ ✟ ✆ ✔ ✟ ✁

at

and at

☎ ✄

.

slide-47
SLIDE 47
  • p. 47/63

Upper bound:

✂ ✄ ✁ ✁☎ ✆ ✆

Things to take care of:

✟ ✆ ✟
✟ ✝ ✁ ✟ ✟
✟ ✆ ✟ ✁ ✂
  • ■ Numerical methods to estimate the integral.

■ Errors in Newton-Cotes integration methods (Simpson rule,

midpoint rule, etc.) are evaluations of a derivative of the integrand.

■ Integrand

✟ ✆ ✔ ✟ ✁

has positive derivatives.

■ We know the sign of the derivative, so we know the sign of

the error.

■ We are obtaining bounds, not just approximations.

slide-48
SLIDE 48
  • p. 48/63

Upper bound:

✂ ✄ ✁ ✁☎ ✆ ✆

Things to take care of:

✂ ✝ ✂
✆ ✞ ✠ ✟ ☎
☎ ✁ ☎
✟ ☎

✁ ✝

is singular in

✂ ✁ ☎ ✆ ✞ ☎ ✟ ✝

.

■ We need to be carefull when solving for

✁ ✝

if

✁ ✝

is close to

✂ ✁ ☎ ✆ ✞ ☎ ✟ ✝

.

✁ ✝

does not go to infinity at the singularity.

slide-49
SLIDE 49
  • p. 49/63

Upper bound:

✂ ✄ ✁ ✁☎ ✆ ✆

■ Maple 9 ■ 25 precission digits. ■

✁ ☛ ✠ ☛ ✆ ☎ ✟ ✄ ✟ ☛ ✄
  • (
✁ ☎ ✆ ✞ ✄
☛ ✟ ☛ ☎
  • ).

✄ ✁ ✟ ✠
✟ ☛ ☎ ✁

.

■ Integration methods: repeated midpoint rule, trapezoid rule. ■ 30000 equispaced evaluations.

Computational results:

✁ ☎ ✆ ✂ ✟ ✂
✝ ✂ ☛ ✠ ☛ ✆
✝ ☎ ✎ ✟ ☛ ✎ ✆✝ ✁ ☞ ✝ ✂ ✠ ✝ ✝
✂ ✄ ✂
slide-50
SLIDE 50
  • p. 50/63

Singularity type

Transfer theorems (Flajotet, Odlyzko): The singularity type of

☎ ✂

determines the subexponential behaviour of its coefficients

. Question: How does

☎ ✂

stop being defined? Since its inverse

✟ ✂

is defined in

✂ ☛ ☎ ✁ ☎ ✆ ✞ ✝

, there are two different possibilities:

☎ ✔ ✆ ✂ ✕
✞ ✁ ✟ ✑ ✁ ✆ ✒ ☎ ✟ ✂ ✂ ✂ ✒ ✔ ✆ ✂ ✕
✞ ✁ ✟ ✑ ✁ ✆✓✒ ✟ ✄ ✂

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.03

☎ ✆ ✝✟✞ ✠ ✡ ✝✟☛ ✠

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.03

☎ ✆ ✝ ✞ ✠ ✡ ✝✟☛ ✠

(case A) (case B)

slide-51
SLIDE 51
  • p. 51/63

Singularity type

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.03

✂☎✄ ✆ ✝ ✂☎✞ ✆

(case A):

✞ ☎

has a square root-type singularity (

✟ ✆ ✠ ✡

):

✟ ✂
✁ ✟ ✂
✝ ☎ ✆ ✂
✝ ✡ ☎ ✠ ✎ ✂
✝ ✝ ✏ ✞ ☎ ✂
✄ ✆ ✟ ✄
✟ ✂
✝ ☎ ✠ ✝ ✂
✟ ✂
✝ ✝ ✡ ✞

By the Transfer theorems,

☎ ✡ ✠ ☛ ✁ ✁ ✡ ✂
☎ ☞ ✠ ☛ ✁ ✁ ✡ ✂
slide-52
SLIDE 52
  • p. 52/63

Singularity type

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.03

✂☎✄ ✆ ✝ ✂☎✞ ✆

(case B):

✞ ☎

has the same singularity type than

. The singularity type of

is

✟ ✍ ✠ ✡

(BGW; 2002). Thus the singularity type of

✆ ☞

is

✟ ✝ ✠ ✡

.

✟ ✂
✗ ✘ ✂ ✄ ✆ ☞ ✂
✟ ✝ ✝

has the same singularity type that

✆ ☞

.

☎ ☞ ✠ ☛ ✁ ✁ ✡ ✂
☛ ✁ ✁ ✡ ✂
slide-53
SLIDE 53
  • p. 53/63

How to obtain exact results

✁ ✂ ☛ ☎ ✁ ☎ ✆ ✞ ✝ ✟ ☞ ✂
✝ ✁ ☛

?

✟ ☞ ✂
✁ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ✄ ✆ ☞ ✂
✝ ✂ ✟ ✄
☞ ☞ ✂

If

✟ ✄ ✂ ✞ ✆ ☞ ☞ ✂ ✂ ✞ ✝ ✂ ☛

it follows that

✟ ☞ ✂
✂ ☛

for all

  • . So:

■ Evaluate

✆ ☞ ☞ ✂ ✂ ✞ ☎ ✁ ✝

to obtain the singularity type of

.

■ If

✟ ✄ ✂ ✞ ✆ ☞ ☞ ✂ ✂ ✞ ✝ ✂ ☛

, then

◆ the singularity type would be

✟ ✍ ✠ ✡

,

◆ and

✁ ☎ ✆

would be

✂ ✞ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ✄ ✆ ☞ ✂ ✂ ✞ ☎ ✁ ✝ ✝

. Problem: We know about

✟ ✆ ✔ ✟ ✁

, but not about

.

✟ ✆ ✟ ✁ ✂
✁ ✝ ✁
✝ ✟ ☎
✁ ✝ ✟ ☎ ✁ ✆ ✂
✁ ✝ ✁
✟ ☎
✁ ✝ ✟ ☎ ✁

d

slide-54
SLIDE 54
  • p. 54/63

How to obtain exact results

Three lemmas about integrating functions through its inverses. Let

  • ✂✞✝

be an invertible function such that

☛ ✝ ✁ ☛

, and let

✆ ✂

be its inverse. Then

✁ ✍
✝ ✝

d

✝ ✁ ✟
✟ ✝ ✄ ✂ ✄ ✁ ☎ ✍
✆ ✂

d

✝ ✝
✂ ✝ ✝

d

✝ ✁
✟ ✝
✟ ✝ ✄ ✂ ✄ ✁ ☎ ✍
✆ ✂

d

✍ ✆ ✂ ✝ ☎
✝ ✝ ✝

d

✝ ✁ ✂ ✄ ✁ ☎ ✍ ✆ ✂
✆ ✂
✆ ✂
  • d
slide-55
SLIDE 55
  • p. 55/63

How to obtain exact results

✂ ✝ ✂
✆ ✞ ✠ ✟ ☎
☎ ✁ ☎
✟ ☎

The inverse of

✁ ✝

with respect to

is explicit:

✁ ✁ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✄ ✂ ✝ ✂
✆✟✞ ✠ ✂ ✟ ☎
✟ ☎

So we can integrate

✁ ✝

through its inverse:

✟ ☎
✁ ✝ ✟ ☎ ✁

d

✁ ✁
✁ ✝ ✆✟✞ ✠ ✂ ✟ ☎ ✁ ✝ ✄
  • ✄✂✁
✍ ✆✟✞ ✠ ✂ ✟ ☎
✆ ✂

d

✁ ✝ ✆ ✞ ✠ ✂ ✟ ☎ ✁ ✝ ☎
✁ ✂
✍ ✂ ✝ ✂
✆ ✞ ✠ ✂ ✟ ☎
✟ ☎
  • d
  • ✄✂✁
✍ ✂ ✝ ✂
✆✟✞ ✠ ✂ ✟ ☎
☎ ✆ ✞ ✠ ✂ ✟ ☎ ✁ ✝ ☎
✟ ☎
  • d
slide-56
SLIDE 56
  • p. 56/63

How to obtain exact results

  • ✄✂✁
✍ ✂ ✝ ✂
✆✟✞ ✠ ✂ ✟ ☎
☎ ✆ ✞ ✠ ✂ ✟ ☎ ✁ ✝ ☎
✟ ☎
  • d
  • But
✂ ✝ ✂
  • d
  • is not easy, because
✂ ✝

depends on algebraic functions

  • and

:

✝ ✝ ✁
✂ ✟ ☎ ✁ ✂
✝ ✝ ✝ ✡ ✁ ✂
✝ ✝ ✁ ✝ ✂ ✟ ☎
✝ ✝ ✝ ✡
✝ ✝ ✁
✎ ✟ ☎ ✝ ✂ ✟ ☎
✝ ✝ ✝ ✡ ✏ ✡

To obtain the inverses of

✝ ✝

with respect to

we need to solve a cubic equation.

slide-57
SLIDE 57
  • p. 57/63

How to obtain exact results

But if we consider

✝ ✝ ✁ ✝ ✂ ✟ ☎
✝ ✝ ✝

it will be easier, because

✝ ✝ ✁ ✝ ✂ ✟ ☎
✝ ✝ ✝ ✁ ✝ ✂ ✟ ☎
✎ ✟ ☎ ✝ ✂ ✟ ☎
✝ ✝ ✝ ✡ ✏ ✡ ✝ ✁ ✝ ☎
✡ ✂ ✟ ☎
✝ ✝ ✡ ✝ ✝ ✡ ✁ ✝ ☎
  • ✂✞✝
✝ ✝ ✡ ✝ ✡

so to obtain inverse of

✝ ✝

we only need to solve a quadratic equation.

■ We express

✂ ✝ ✂
✝ ✝

in terms of

✝ ✝

.

■ We integrate through the inverse of

  • .

■ We replace every resulting

✝ ✝

by

✝ ✂ ✟ ☎
✝ ✝ ✝

.

■ So we obtain a long but explicit expression for

✆ ✂
✁ ✝

:

✆ ✂
✁ ✝ ✁ ✆ ✂
✁ ☎
✁ ✝ ☎
✁ ✝ ✝

From here we can obtain

✆ ☞ ✂
✁ ✝

,

✆ ☞ ☞ ✂
✁ ✝

, etc.

slide-58
SLIDE 58
  • p. 58/63

How to obtain exact results

One last application of the integrating-through-inverse lemmas:

✞ ☎ ✂
✁ ✝ ✁
☞ ✂
✁ ✝ ✞ ☎

and

are inverses

☎ ✂
✁ ✝ ✁ ✁ ✍ ☎ ☞ ✂ ✁ ☎ ✁ ✝

d

✁ ✁ ✁ ✍ ✞ ☎ ✂ ✁ ☎

d

✁ ✁ ✆✟✞ ✠ ✂
✞ ☎ ✂
✁ ✝ ✄
✄✂✁ ✂
✍ ✆ ✞ ✠ ✂ ✟ ✂✁ ☎ ✁ ✝ ✝

d

✆ ✞ ✠ ✂
✞ ☎ ✂
✁ ✝ ✄
✄ ✁ ✂
✍ ✆✟✞ ✠ ✂
✗ ✘ ✂ ✄ ✆ ☞ ✂
✁ ✝ ✝ ✝

d

✆ ✞ ✠ ✂
✞ ☎ ✂
✁ ✝ ✄
✄✂✁ ✂
✍ ✆✟✞ ✠ ✂

d

✄✂✁ ✂
✍ ✆ ☞ ✂✁ ☎ ✁ ✝

d

✆ ✞ ✠ ✂
✞ ☎ ✂
✁ ✝ ✄ ✞ ☎ ✂
✁ ✝ ✆ ✞ ✠ ✂ ✞ ☎ ✂
✁ ✝ ✝ ☎ ✞ ☎ ✂
✁ ✝ ✆ ✂ ✞ ☎ ✂
✁ ✝ ☎ ✁ ✝
slide-59
SLIDE 59
  • p. 59/63

Applications

How many isolated vertices has a random planar graph? Consider the following GF , where

  • counts the number of

isolated vertices

✁ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ☎ ✂

The probability that a

  • vertex graf has

isolated vertices is

✄ ✂
✁ ✂
✄ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ☎ ✂
✖ ✗ ✘ ✂
✄ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ☎ ✂
✝ ✄ ✂
✄ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ☎ ✂
✝ ✁ ✂ ✡ ✂ ✂
✄ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ☎ ✂
✝ ✁ ✂
✂ ✡ ✂

Answer: Poisson distribution of parameter

✂ ✁ ✁ ☎ ✆

.

slide-60
SLIDE 60
  • p. 60/63

Applications

We generalize the previous result. Let

  • be a not too large family of planar graphs, and
✆ ✂

its GF . How many

  • components has a random planar graph?
✄ ✂
✟ ✝ ✁ ✂
✄ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ☎ ✂
✄ ✆ ✂
✝ ✂
✖ ✗ ✘ ✂
✝ ✂
✄ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ☎ ✂
✝ ✄ ✆ ✂ ✂ ✝
✄ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ☎ ✂
✝ ✁
✂ ☎ ✡ ✂ ✂
✄ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ☎ ✂
✝ ✁ ✆ ✂ ✂ ✝
✂ ☎ ✡ ✂

Answer: Poisson distribution of parameter

✆ ✂ ✂ ✝

.

slide-61
SLIDE 61
  • p. 61/63

Applications

What is the probability of being connected? Consider the GF

✁ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂

, where

  • counts the

number of connected components. The probability of having

components is given by

✄ ✂
✁ ✂
✄ ✂
✖ ✗ ✘ ✂
✝ ✂
✄ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂
✝ ✄ ✂
✄ ☎ ✂
✗ ✘ ✂ ☎ ✂ ✂ ✝ ✝ ✡ ✂ ✂
✄ ☎ ✂

If we set

✡ ✁ ✟

we obtain the probability of being connected:

✄ ☎ ✂
✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ☎ ✂ ✂ ✝ ✝ ✂
✄ ☎ ✂
✁ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ✄ ☎ ✂ ✂ ✝ ✝
slide-62
SLIDE 62
  • p. 62/63

Applications

How many components has a random planar graph?

✄ ✂
✄ ✂
✄ ☎ ✂
✗ ✘ ✂ ☎ ✂ ✂ ✝ ✝ ✡ ✂ ✂
✄ ☎ ✂

The important terms of the expansion of

☎ ✂

close to the singularity are

☎ ✂ ✂ ✝ ☎
✟ ✄ ✁ ✂ ✝ ✍ ✠ ✡

, so

✄ ☎ ✂
✄ ✂ ✟ ✄
✝ ✍ ✠ ✡ ✂
✄ ☎ ✂
✡ ☎ ✂ ✂ ✝
✄ ✂ ✟ ✄
✝ ✍ ✠ ✡ ✂
✄ ☎ ✂
✗ ✘ ✂ ☎ ✂ ✂ ✝ ✝ ✡ ✂ ✂
✄ ☎ ✂
✄ ☎ ✂ ✂ ✝
✆ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ☎ ✂ ✂ ✝ ✝ ✂ ✡ ✄ ✟ ✝ ✂

Answer: (1+#components) follows a Poisson distribution of parameter

☎ ✂ ✂ ✝

.

slide-63
SLIDE 63
  • p. 63/63

Applications

How many edges has a random planar graph?

☎ ✂
✁ ✝ ✄ ✂ ✟ ✄ ✁ ✂ ✄
✝ ✟ ✠ ✡

around the singularity in a neighbourhood of

✁ ✁ ✟

.

■ We apply the quasi powers theorem. ■ It follows that ◆ The distribution of the number of edges follows a Normal

law.

◆ The expected number of edges is

✁ ✡

.

◆ The variation is

✂ ✡ ✡

.

◆ Concentration: almost all planar graphs has

✁ ✡

edges.

is given by

✂ ☞ ✂ ✟ ✝ ✔ ✂ ✂ ✟ ✝

, and can be computed using that

✂ ☞ ✂ ✁ ✝ ✁ ✟ ✟ ✁ ✂ ✂ ✞ ✂ ✁ ✝ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✂ ✆ ☞ ✂ ✂ ✞ ✂ ✁ ✝ ☎ ✁ ✝ ✝ ✝

.