Assessment Final Presentation Andrew Knudtsen, Managing Principal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

assessment
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Assessment Final Presentation Andrew Knudtsen, Managing Principal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment Final Presentation Andrew Knudtsen, Managing Principal Rachel Shindman, Associate Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. July 2018 Denver Los Angeles Oakland


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 1

Final Presentation

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment

July 2018

Denver Los Angeles Oakland Sacramento

Andrew Knudtsen, Managing Principal Rachel Shindman, Associate

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 2

About EPS

Firm Description

  • Full service economic consulting firm
  • Denver, Oakland, Sacramento, Los

Angeles

  • Expertise
  • Real estate economics
  • Economic development
  • Public finance
  • Fiscal and economic impact

analysis

  • Affordable housing

▪ National practice ▪ Colorado mountain community focus since 1990 Regional and Relevant Experience Clients

  • Chaffee County
  • Summit County
  • Eagle County
  • Pitkin County
  • Garfield County
  • Clear Creek County
  • Park County
  • Custer County
  • Fremont County
  • Town of Vail
  • City of Idaho Springs
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 3

Study Overview Data Summary Issues, Goals, and Action Plan Questions

Photo: coloradoguy.com

Agenda

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 4

Study Overview

  • 1. Market Demographics
  • Population characteristics
  • Employment and economy
  • 2. Housing Conditions
  • 3. Market Trends
  • For-sale housing
  • Rental housing
  • 4. Affordability Indicators
  • 5. Summary of Issues
  • Key issues
  • Housing goals
  • 6. Identification of Goals
  • 7. Delineation of Actions
  • Policy
  • Organizations
  • Assets

Photo: coloradoguy.com

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 5

Study Goals and Objectives

Community-wide understanding of the need Multi-faceted approach to the problem and solution Action plan that enables the community to align resources and direct them into achievable solutions

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 6

Key Questions

What are the housing needs facing Leadville and Lake County? Who is affected? What resources are available to address housing issues, and how do they match identified needs? What goals are realistic and attainable, and how can they be achieved?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 7

Data Analysis First Community Meeting Targeted Follow Up Research Second Community Meeting Resource and Strategy Evaluation Goals and Actions

Project Process

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 8

DEMOGRAPHIC CONTEXT

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 9

Population Growth

Population (Lake County, 2017) | 7,900 Households (Lake County, 2017) | 3,200

The region’s population decreased from 2000 to 2010  Mostly due to people moving out Since 2010, trends shifted and the area has recently recovered to 2000 population levels  From 2010 to 2017 Lake County grew by an average of 80 new residents per year

0.6% 1.1% Leadville Lake County

Annual Population Growth | 2010-2017

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 10

Population Growth

The most growth since 2000 has been in residents aged 60 to 74 Over this time, there has also been a decline in residents aged 34 and younger

16% 15% 27% 32% 8% 2% 13% 14% 21% 34% 14% 4% 0 to 9 10 to 19 20 to 34 35 to 59 60 to 74 75 and Over

2000 2016

An Aging Population| 2000-2016

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 11

Income

$

Household Income

Median household income in Lake County is approximately $47,000

28% lower than Colorado statewide

Almost 30% of households in Lake County earn less than $25,000 per year

12% 15% 9% 19% 20% 11% 11% 2% 1%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 12

Income

$

Income by Source

63% of income comes from employment – down from 72% in 2001 18% of income now comes from Transfer Receipts – up from 11% in 2001

63% 19% 18% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Employment Income Dividends, Interest, and Rent Transfer Receipts

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis; Economic & Planning Systems

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 13

EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC TRENDS

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 14

Employment

Total Employment (Lake County) | 3,500 Total Employed Residents (Lake County) | 4,000 Largest Employment Sectors

Education and Health Services, Leisure and Hospitality, Natural Resources and Mining, and Government

$

Wages The average wage in Lake County is $35,000 Proprietors

30% of employment in

Lake County is Proprietors (business owners)

22% 18% 17% 14%

Education and Health Services Leisure and Hospitality Natural Resources and Mining Government

Source: Colorado Department of Labor; Economic & Planning Systems

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 15

Commuting

Employed in Lake County, Live Outside Employed and Live in Lake County Live in Lake County, Employed Outside

Commuting Patterns

75% of residents commute out of the County for work

Most employees commuting in to Lake County come from Chaffee County Most Lake County residents commuting

  • ut are going to Summit County and

Eagle County

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 16

Economic Recovery and Growth

Compared to neighboring counties, Lake County experienced a slower and less drastic, but more prolonged decrease in employment Lake County saw economic recovery beginning in 2014

Total Employment| Indexed to 2006

90 100 110 120 130 140 150 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Employment Index

Lake County Summit County Eagle County Colorado

Source: BLS; Economic & Planning Systems

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 17

Challenges to Growth

Employers have indicated that housing challenges affect recruitment Newly hired employees have turned down jobs because of challenges finding local housing

Employment Vacancies| February – June 2018

Interviews with large and small employers indicate over 100 vacant positions in Lake County This represents 3% vacancy in local employment – a significant piece of the local economy

When appropriate and affordable housing is not available, local economic growth is “capped” based on the housing inventory

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 18

HOUSING INVENTORY

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 19

Housing Composition

Total Housing Units (2017) | 4,470 Vacancy Rate (2017) | 29%

72% of housing in the County is Single Family Detached homes A large percentage is also mobile homes

72% 5% 8% 16% 1 Unit (Detached) 1 Unit (Attached) to 4 Units 5 Units or More Mobile Home

Units in Structure

Photo: coloradoguy.com

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 20

Housing Age

38 588 252 341 373 399 333 192 271 80 54 92 138 83 211 16 1,062 2010-2013 2000-2009 1990-1999 1980-1989 1970-1979 1960-1969 1950-1959 1940-1949 1939 or Earlier

Leadville Lake County

Leadville has a much older housing stock than the County overall, with 61% of units built before 1940, and only 13% built since 1980

Housing by Year Built

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 21

Owners and Renters

Leadville has a higher proportion of renters than Lake County, with 44% of housing units in the City being rented

Lake County Leadville

Of the 3,200 occupied housing units in the County:

63% are owner-occupied 37% are rented

Of the 1,300 occupied housing units in the City:

56% are owner-occupied 44% are rented

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 22

New Development

Building Permits Planned Development

Since 2011, there have been 140 building permits for single family homes and 17 permits for mobile homes An average of 22 new units/year There are several developments in or planned for the approval process, which could add up to

650 new units.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 23

Second Homes

Many homes in Lake County are “second homes” – homes

  • wned by someone with a permanent address outside of the

County and not occupied year-round

Vacancy Owner Location

Overall housing vacancy in Lake County is 29% - an increase from 24% in 2000 Most of these are likely second

homes 28% of properties in Lake

County are registered to addresses with a different city from the home location

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 24

Local Purchasers

On average, 48% of home sales are to non-local buyers

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Local Buyer Out of Town Buyer

Source: Lake County Assessor; Economic & Planning Systems

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 25

MARKET TRENDS

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 26

Home Sales

There has been a dramatic shift in the housing market since 2014-2015

56 34 45 41 59 59 74 90 133 148

$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Number of Sales Average Sales Price

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 27

Home Sales

The average sales price in the first 2 months of 2018 was $311,271 There were only 15 active listings in the County at the time of analysis

2008 – 2014 2015 – Feb. 2018 Total Sales 368 378 Average Sales Price $173,700 $238,500 Annual Average Sales Price Increase Dollars

  • $5,016

$30,370 Percent

  • 2.6%

12.2%

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 28

Rental Vacancy

Data on rentals needs to be gathered from a variety of sources

Total Units Vacant Vacancy Percent Eagles Nest 162 1 0.6% Tabor Grand 37 1 2.7% Dispersed Rentals 66 1 1.5% Total 265 3 1.1%

Based on interviews with property managers in June and July 2018

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 29

Rental Rates

Data on rentals comes from a variety of sources

# of Units Average Rent Studio 6 $672 1 Bedroom 40 $881 2 Bedroom 154 $1,043 3 Bedroom 63 $1,249

Based on interviews with property managers in June and July 2018 and listings from Craigslist and the Leadville Herald over 3 months in 2017-18

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 30

HOUSING AFFORDABILITY

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 31

Affordability Indicators

$

Household income reflects all earnings for all members of the household

Income

Housing is “affordable” when a household spends no more than 30% of income on housing costs

Total Household Income

  • Avg. Income for 1.5

Earner HH

  • Avg. Income for 2.0

Earner HH Annual Hourly Annual Hourly 30% AMI $14,100 $9,400 $4.52 $7,050 $3.39 60% AMI $28,200 $18,800 $9.04 $14,100 $6.78 80% AMI $37,600 $25,067 $12.05 $18,800 $9.04 100% AMI $47,000 $31,333 $15.06 $23,500 $11.30 120% AMI $56,400 $37,600 $18.08 $28,200 $13.56

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 32

Ownership Affordability Indicators

$

A household earning the median income of $47,000 can afford a $194,000 home

Home Ownership

Housing is “affordable” when a household spends no more than 30% of income on housing costs

Household Income

  • Max. Affordable

Purchase Price % Affordable 2017 Sales 30% AMI $14,100 $32,500 0% 60% AMI $28,200 $103,600 4% 80% AMI $37,600 $148,800 5% 100% AMI $47,000 $194,000 19% 120% AMI $56,400 $241,500 19%

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 33

Ownership Affordability Indicators

$

A household earning the median income

  • f $47,000 can afford a $194,000 home

Home Ownership

Housing is “affordable” when a household spends no more than 30% of income on housing costs

36 18 32 33 38 44 50 47 65 42 20 16 13 8 21 15 24 43 68 105 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Affordable up to 100% AMI Affordable to over 100% AMI

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 34

Ownership Affordability Indicators

Housing is “affordable” when a household spends no more than 30% of income on housing costs

38% sales in 2017 were affordable to households earning 80 – 120% AMI

14 9 20 24 27 34 32 28 32 14 22 9 12 9 11 10 18 19 33 28 7 7 8 2 12 8 6 13 17 28 13 9 5 6 9 7 18 30 51 77

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Less than 80% AMI 80 - 100% AMI 100 - 120% AMI Over 120% AMI

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 35

Rental Affordability Indicators

Housing is “affordable” when a household spends no more than 30% of income on housing costs $

A household earning the median income of $47,000 can afford $1,175 in monthly rent

Rental Housing

Household Income

  • Max. Affordable

Rent % Inventoried Units 30% AMI $14,100 $353 0% 60% AMI $28,200 $705 8% 80% AMI $37,600 $940 18% 100% AMI $47,000 $1,175 52% 120% AMI $56,400 $1,410 19%

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 36

Rental Affordability Indicators

$

A household earning the median income of $47,000 can afford $1,175 in monthly rent

Rental Housing

Housing is “affordable” when a household spends no more than 30% of income on housing costs

Average Rent Required Income AMI Affordability Studio $672 $26,880 57% 1 Bedroom $881 $35,240 75% 2 Bedroom $1,043 $41,720 89% 3 Bedroom $1,249 $49,960 106%

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 37

ISSUES AND GOALS

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 38

Housing Issues

#1: Inadequate Housing Supply #2: Challenges Facing New Housing Development #3: Location and Regional Context of Lake County #4: Continuing Pressure on Pricing #5: Links to Employment and Economic Development

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 39

Goals

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 40

Housing Goals

#1: Define affordability and the mechanisms for policies and programs #2: Commit sites and establish process to build new affordable inventory #3: Identify options for funding resources and establish process to adopt them #4: Adopt new policies and regulations that address long term needs #5: Find effective partners and establish logistical framework for action #6: Identify local needs and continue to press for regional solutions

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 41

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTION PLAN

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 42

Action Plan Overview

#4 Policy Initiatives #5 Organization and Management #3 Funding Sources #6 Regional Partnerships #2 Land Strategy #1 Affordability Definitions and Framework

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 43

Definitions and Framework for Policies

Next Steps

  • Formalize the

attributes of an affordable housing program, developed as part of this process

  • Establish framework

for future policies, regulation, and

  • ccupancy of future

development Adopt standards for affordability and establish terminology for all future projects, programs, and policies. What it can achieve:

Clarity for all parties – including

governing entities, developers, future residents.

Consistency, which will lead to credibility.

Why it works for Lake County: The City and County are poised for action, both for development and policy adoption.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 44

Land Strategy

Next Steps

  • Formalize the

prioritization of available public land for housing development

  • Prioritize other

actions, such as the issuance of an RFP , for the identified site(s) Define a strategy to utilize publicly held land for rental and ownership affordable housing developments What it can achieve: Remove land from development costs, reduce overall cost of housing, and

bring new affordable units to

the community Why it works for Lake County: The City and County have available surplus land that is suitable for housing development

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 45

Policy Initiatives

Next Steps

  • Establish hierarchy for

the policy options identified

  • Move forward with
  • ne or two, such as

Short Term Rental Policy, Inclusionary Zoning, or Impact Fees Pass targeted policy initiatives to address key housing issues What it can achieve:

Increased inventory of

affordable housing and/or greater

financial resources to develop

County and City sponsored projects. Why it works for Lake County: Development pressure will only increase

  • ver time. Policies will enable the

community to keep pace with the anticipated growth.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 46

Organization and Management

Next Steps

  • Formalize discussions

with the Chaffee Housing Trust to include Lake County

  • Address needs for

staffing based in Leadville

  • Formalize work program
  • staff responsibilities

related to projects, policies, and agency

  • rganization

Partner with the Chaffee Housing Trust to govern and manage housing activities What it can achieve:

Dedicated organization can

lead the housing initiatives; land trust model can own land, manage development, qualify owners/renters, and manage affordability covenants Why it works for Lake County: Availability and willingness of the Chaffee Housing Trust to be a partner is a significant opportunity.

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 47

Funding Sources

Next Steps

  • Establish working

group to review potential programs, targeting use tax and impact fees

  • Define reasonable

targets for each, with corresponding time lines for adoption (for fees) and election (for use tax) Dedicate a local funding source for housing activities What it can achieve:

Consistent and sufficient funding is necessary to support

housing initiatives Why it works for Lake County: Revenue is needed to close gaps on future projects as well as manage the program.

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 48

Regional Partnerships

Next Steps

  • Continue to elevate

the needs of Lake County in the region

  • Quantify ways Lake

County serves the multi-county region and needs related to commuting employees - such as health care, day care, and social services Identify regional partnerships to address issues related to housing, including transportation and child care What it can achieve: Regional partnerships can focus on

community services, including

transportation, recreation, and child care Why it works for Lake County: Lake County is deeply integrated with its surrounding communities and their economies, and there is an opportunity for those communities to contribute to the needs created in Lake County from that integration

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 49

Final Thoughts

Issues are pressing, but resources are available to begin addressing them Cooperation and coordination will be key to success Local energy and motivation to take action is a key asset

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento

Lake County Housing Needs Assessment | 50

QUESTIONS